Commit e9cc807f authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König

pwm: Move contents of sysfs.c into core.c

With the upcoming restructuring having all in a single file simplifies
things a bit. The relevant and somewhat visible changes are:

 - Some dropped prototypes from include/linux/pwm.h that were only
   necessary that core.c has a declaration of the symbols defined in
   sysfs.c. The respective functions are static now.

 - The pwm class now also exists if CONFIG_SYSFS isn't enabled. Having
   CONFIG_SYSFS is not very relevant today, but even without it the
   class and device stuff still provides lifetime tracking.

 - Both files had an initcall, these are merged into a single one now.
   Instead of a big #ifdef block for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, a single
   if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)) is used now. This increases compile
   coverage a bit and is a tad nicer on the eyes.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9e2d39a5280d7dda5bfc6682a8aef510148635b2.1710670958.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
parent b40ac0e1
......@@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ menuconfig PWM
if PWM
config PWM_SYSFS
bool
default y if SYSFS
config PWM_DEBUG
bool "PWM lowlevel drivers additional checks and debug messages"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
......
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM) += core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SYSFS) += sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_AB8500) += pwm-ab8500.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_APPLE) += pwm-apple.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ATMEL) += pwm-atmel.o
......
This diff is collapsed.
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -630,17 +630,4 @@ static inline void pwm_remove_table(struct pwm_lookup *table, size_t num)
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PWM_SYSFS
void pwmchip_sysfs_export(struct pwm_chip *chip);
void pwmchip_sysfs_unexport(struct pwm_chip *chip);
#else
static inline void pwmchip_sysfs_export(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
}
static inline void pwmchip_sysfs_unexport(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PWM_SYSFS */
#endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment