Commit ed738ba7 authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: check worker before need_preemptive_reclaim

need_preemptive_reclaim() does some calculations, which aren't heavy,
but if we're already running preemptive reclaim there's no reason to do
them at all, so re-order the checks so that we don't do the calculation
if we're already doing reclaim.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 94358c35
......@@ -1588,8 +1588,8 @@ static int __reserve_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
* the async reclaim as we will panic.
*/
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags) &&
need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info) &&
!work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work)) {
!work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work) &&
need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info)) {
trace_btrfs_trigger_flush(fs_info, space_info->flags,
orig_bytes, flush, "preempt");
queue_work(system_unbound_wq,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment