Commit eda96b24 authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: use refcount_inc_not_zero in kill_all_nodes

commit baf320b9 upstream.

We hit the following warning while running down a different problem

[ 6197.175850] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 6197.185082] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[ 6197.194704] WARNING: CPU: 47 PID: 966 at lib/refcount.c:190 refcount_sub_and_test_checked+0x53/0x60
[ 6197.521792] Call Trace:
[ 6197.526687]  __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x76/0x1c0
[ 6197.536615]  btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes+0xec/0x130
[ 6197.546532]  ? __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.556482]  btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x71/0xd0
[ 6197.566910]  cleaner_kthread+0xfa/0x120
[ 6197.574573]  kthread+0x111/0x130
[ 6197.581022]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[ 6197.590086]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 6197.597228] ---[ end trace 424bb7ae00509f56 ]---

This is because the free side drops the ref without the lock, and then
takes the lock if our refcount is 0.  So you can have nodes on the tree
that have a refcount of 0.  Fix this by zero'ing out that element in our
temporary array so we don't try to kill it again.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 6e3b9068
......@@ -1939,12 +1939,19 @@ void btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(struct btrfs_root *root)
}
inode_id = delayed_nodes[n - 1]->inode_id + 1;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
refcount_inc(&delayed_nodes[i]->refs);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
/*
* Don't increase refs in case the node is dead and
* about to be removed from the tree in the loop below
*/
if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&delayed_nodes[i]->refs))
delayed_nodes[i] = NULL;
}
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (!delayed_nodes[i])
continue;
__btrfs_kill_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment