Commit eef0532e authored by Geliang Tang's avatar Geliang Tang Committed by Martin KaFai Lau

selftests/bpf: Null checks for links in bpf_tcp_ca

Run bpf_tcp_ca selftests (./test_progs -t bpf_tcp_ca) on a Loongarch
platform, some "Segmentation fault" errors occur:

'''
 test_dctcp:PASS:bpf_dctcp__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/1    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:FAIL
 test_cubic:PASS:bpf_cubic__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_cubic:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/2    bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:FAIL
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:dctcp_skel 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:bpf_dctcp__load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:FAIL:dctcp link unexpected error: -524
 #29/4    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:FAIL
 test_write_sk_pacing:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_write_sk_pacing:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/6    bpf_tcp_ca/write_sk_pacing:FAIL
 test_update_ca:PASS:open 0 nsec
 test_update_ca:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 settcpca:FAIL:setsockopt unexpected setsockopt: \
					actual -1 == expected -1
 (network_helpers.c:99: errno: No such file or directory) \
					Failed to call post_socket_cb
 start_test:FAIL:start_server_str unexpected start_server_str: \
					actual -1 == expected -1
 test_update_ca:FAIL:ca1_ca1_cnt unexpected ca1_ca1_cnt: \
					actual 0 <= expected 0
 #29/9    bpf_tcp_ca/update_ca:FAIL
 #29      bpf_tcp_ca:FAIL
 Caught signal #11!
 Stack trace:
 ./test_progs(crash_handler+0x28)[0x5555567ed91c]
 linux-vdso.so.1(__vdso_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0x7ffffee408b0]
 ./test_progs(bpf_link__update_map+0x80)[0x555556824a78]
 ./test_progs(+0x94d68)[0x5555564c4d68]
 ./test_progs(test_bpf_tcp_ca+0xe8)[0x5555564c6a88]
 ./test_progs(+0x3bde54)[0x5555567ede54]
 ./test_progs(main+0x61c)[0x5555567efd54]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x22208)[0x7ffff2aaa208]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xac)[0x7ffff2aaa30c]
 ./test_progs(_start+0x48)[0x55555646bca8]
 Segmentation fault
'''

This is because BPF trampoline is not implemented on Loongarch yet,
"link" returned by bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is NULL. test_progs
crashs when this NULL link passes to bpf_link__update_map(). This
patch adds NULL checks for all links in bpf_tcp_ca to fix these errors.
If "link" is NULL, goto the newly added label "out" to destroy the skel.

v2:
 - use "goto out" instead of "return" as Eduard suggested.

Fixes: 06da9f3b ("selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms.")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGeliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b4c841492bd4ed97964e4e61e92827ce51bf1dc9.1720615848.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cnSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
parent ec5b8c76
......@@ -411,7 +411,8 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
return;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
goto out;
do_test(&opts);
saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
......@@ -425,6 +426,7 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
bpf_link__destroy(link);
out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
......@@ -447,7 +449,8 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
return;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
goto out;
do_test(&opts);
saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
......@@ -460,6 +463,7 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
bpf_link__destroy(link);
out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
......@@ -481,7 +485,8 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
return;
link_nl = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_no_link);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl");
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl"))
goto out;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
......@@ -494,6 +499,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
......@@ -536,7 +542,8 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_2);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd");
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd"))
goto out;
/* BPF_F_REPLACE with a wrong old map Fd. It should fail!
*
......@@ -559,6 +566,7 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment