drm/amdgpu: Fix type of second parameter in trans_msg() callback
With clang's kernel control flow integrity (kCFI, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG), indirect call targets are validated against the expected function pointer prototype to make sure the call target is valid to help mitigate ROP attacks. If they are not identical, there is a failure at run time, which manifests as either a kernel panic or thread getting killed. A proposed warning in clang aims to catch these at compile time, which reveals: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mxgpu_ai.c:412:15: error: incompatible function pointer types initializing 'void (*)(struct amdgpu_device *, u32, u32, u32, u32)' (aka 'void (*)(struct amdgpu_device *, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') with an expression of type 'void (struct amdgpu_device *, enum idh_request, u32, u32, u32)' (aka 'void (struct amdgpu_device *, enum idh_request, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict] .trans_msg = xgpu_ai_mailbox_trans_msg, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mxgpu_nv.c:435:15: error: incompatible function pointer types initializing 'void (*)(struct amdgpu_device *, u32, u32, u32, u32)' (aka 'void (*)(struct amdgpu_device *, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') with an expression of type 'void (struct amdgpu_device *, enum idh_request, u32, u32, u32)' (aka 'void (struct amdgpu_device *, enum idh_request, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict] .trans_msg = xgpu_nv_mailbox_trans_msg, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. The type of the second parameter in the prototype should be 'enum idh_request' instead of 'u32'. Update it to clear up the warnings. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1750Reported-by:Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment