Commit f127bab4 authored by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Committed by David S. Miller

net: e100: Remove in_interrupt() usage and pointless GFP_ATOMIC allocation

e100_hw_init() invokes e100_self_test() only if in_interrupt() returns
false as e100_self_test() uses msleep() which requires sleepable task
context. The in_interrupt() check is incomplete because in_interrupt()
cannot catch callers from contexts which have just preemption or interrupts
disabled.

e100_hw_init() is invoked from:

  - e100_loopback_test() which clearly is sleepable task context as the
    function uses msleep() itself.

  - e100_up() which clearly is sleepable task context as well because it
    invokes e100_alloc_cbs() abd request_irq() which both require sleepable
    task context due to GFP_KERNEL allocations and mutex_lock() operations.

Remove the pointless in_interrupt() check.

As a side effect of this analysis it turned out that e100_rx_alloc_list()
which is only invoked from e100_loopback_test() and e100_up() pointlessly
uses a GFP_ATOMIC allocation. The next invoked function e100_alloc_cbs() is
using GFP_KERNEL already.

Change the allocation mode in e100_rx_alloc_list() to GFP_KERNEL as well.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8aed9064
......@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static int e100_hw_init(struct nic *nic)
e100_hw_reset(nic);
netif_err(nic, hw, nic->netdev, "e100_hw_init\n");
if (!in_interrupt() && (err = e100_self_test(nic)))
if ((err = e100_self_test(nic)))
return err;
if ((err = e100_phy_init(nic)))
......@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ static int e100_rx_alloc_list(struct nic *nic)
nic->rx_to_use = nic->rx_to_clean = NULL;
nic->ru_running = RU_UNINITIALIZED;
if (!(nic->rxs = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct rx), GFP_ATOMIC)))
if (!(nic->rxs = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct rx), GFP_KERNEL)))
return -ENOMEM;
for (rx = nic->rxs, i = 0; i < count; rx++, i++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment