Commit f301a29f authored by Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar Janusz Krzysztofik Committed by Tvrtko Ursulin

drm/i915: Never return 0 if not all requests retired

Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on
success.  However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially
returned by a call to dma_fence_wait_timeout() when it succedes right
after its timeout has expired.

Replace 0 with -ETIME before potentially using the timeout value as return
code, so -ETIME is returned if there are still some requests not retired
after timeout, 0 otherwise.

v3: Use conditional expression, more compact but also better reflecting
    intention standing behind the change.

v2: Move the added lines down so flush_submission() is not affected.

Fixes: f33a8a51 ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
parent f235dbd5
......@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ out_active: spin_lock(&timelines->lock);
if (remaining_timeout)
*remaining_timeout = timeout;
return active_count ? timeout : 0;
return active_count ? timeout ?: -ETIME : 0;
}
static void retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment