Commit f4303d8f authored by Andreea-Cristina Bernat's avatar Andreea-Cristina Bernat Committed by Christoph Hellwig

libfc: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()

The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@

- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
  (..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarVasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
parent b8d23dc6
......@@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ void fc_fc4_deregister_provider(enum fc_fh_type type, struct fc4_prov *prov)
BUG_ON(type >= FC_FC4_PROV_SIZE);
mutex_lock(&fc_prov_mutex);
if (prov->recv)
rcu_assign_pointer(fc_passive_prov[type], NULL);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(fc_passive_prov[type], NULL);
else
rcu_assign_pointer(fc_active_prov[type], NULL);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(fc_active_prov[type], NULL);
mutex_unlock(&fc_prov_mutex);
synchronize_rcu();
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment