Commit f5115e88 authored by Marc Zyngier's avatar Marc Zyngier Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap

When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b88 ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: default avatarArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 20e8175d
...@@ -62,7 +62,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) ...@@ -62,7 +62,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{ {
/*
* "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
* trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
* Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
*
* We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
* otherwise return to the same address...
*/
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
return 1; return 1;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment