Commit f5959dec authored by Xu Yu's avatar Xu Yu Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: do not restore dst_reg when cur_state is freed

commit 0803278b upstream.

Syzkaller hit 'KASAN: use-after-free Write in sanitize_ptr_alu' bug.

Call trace:

  dump_stack+0xbf/0x12e
  print_address_description+0x6a/0x280
  kasan_report+0x237/0x360
  sanitize_ptr_alu+0x85a/0x8d0
  adjust_ptr_min_max_vals+0x8f2/0x1ca0
  adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x8ed/0x22e0
  do_check+0x1ca6/0x5d00
  bpf_check+0x9ca/0x2570
  bpf_prog_load+0xc91/0x1030
  __se_sys_bpf+0x61e/0x1f00
  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x550
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Fault injection trace:

  kfree+0xea/0x290
  free_func_state+0x4a/0x60
  free_verifier_state+0x61/0xe0
  push_stack+0x216/0x2f0	          <- inject failslab
  sanitize_ptr_alu+0x2b1/0x8d0
  adjust_ptr_min_max_vals+0x8f2/0x1ca0
  adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x8ed/0x22e0
  do_check+0x1ca6/0x5d00
  bpf_check+0x9ca/0x2570
  bpf_prog_load+0xc91/0x1030
  __se_sys_bpf+0x61e/0x1f00
  do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x550
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

When kzalloc() fails in push_stack(), free_verifier_state() will free
current verifier state. As push_stack() returns, dst_reg was restored
if ptr_is_dst_reg is false. However, as member of the cur_state,
dst_reg is also freed, and error occurs when dereferencing dst_reg.
Simply fix it by testing ret of push_stack() before restoring dst_reg.

Fixes: 979d63d5 ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic")
Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 738dda85
......@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*dst_reg = *ptr_reg;
}
ret = push_stack(env, env->insn_idx + 1, env->insn_idx, true);
if (!ptr_is_dst_reg)
if (!ptr_is_dst_reg && ret)
*dst_reg = tmp;
return !ret ? -EFAULT : 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment