Commit f5faa077 authored by Lai Jiangshan's avatar Lai Jiangshan Committed by Tejun Heo

workqueue: use %current instead of worker->task in worker_maybe_bind_and_lock()

worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() uses both @worker->task and @current at
the same time.  As worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() can only be called by
the current worker task, they are always the same.

Update worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() to use %current consistently.

This doesn't introduce any functional change.

tj: Massaged the description.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent 45d9550a
......@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* flushed from cpu callbacks while cpu is going down, they are
* guaranteed to execute on the cpu.
*
* This function is to be used by rogue workers and rescuers to bind
* This function is to be used by unbound workers and rescuers to bind
* themselves to the target cpu and may race with cpu going down or
* coming online. kthread_bind() can't be used because it may put the
* worker to already dead cpu and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() can't be used
......@@ -1537,7 +1537,6 @@ static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker *worker)
__acquires(&pool->lock)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
while (true) {
/*
......@@ -1547,12 +1546,12 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
* against POOL_DISASSOCIATED.
*/
if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED))
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu));
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
return false;
if (task_cpu(task) == pool->cpu &&
if (task_cpu(current) == pool->cpu &&
cpumask_equal(&current->cpus_allowed,
get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu)))
return true;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment