Commit febc88c5 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

semaphore: Add DEFINE_SEMAPHORE

The full cleanup of init_MUTEX[_LOCKED] and DECLARE_MUTEX has not been
done. Some of the users are real semaphores and we should name them as
such instead of confusing everyone with "MUTEX".

Provide the infrastructure to get finally rid of init_MUTEX[_LOCKED]
and DECLARE_MUTEX.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20100907125054.795929962@linutronix.de>
parent d56557af
...@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct semaphore { ...@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct semaphore {
.wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \ .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \
} }
#define DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(name) \
struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, 1)
#define DECLARE_MUTEX(name) \ #define DECLARE_MUTEX(name) \
struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, 1) struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, 1)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment