Commit febeca6d authored by Chao Yu's avatar Chao Yu Committed by Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: don't track newly allocated nat entry in list

We will never persist newly allocated nat entries during checkpoint(), so
we don't need to track such nat entries in nat dirty list in order to
avoid:
- more latency during traversing dirty list;
- sorting nat sets incorrectly due to recording wrong entry_cnt in nat
entry set.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
parent d9703d90
......@@ -158,9 +158,6 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
nid_t set = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(ne->ni.nid);
struct nat_entry_set *head;
if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
return;
head = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set);
if (!head) {
head = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_set_slab, GFP_NOFS);
......@@ -171,10 +168,18 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
head->entry_cnt = 0;
f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head);
}
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
goto refresh_list;
nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++;
head->entry_cnt++;
set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, true);
refresh_list:
if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR)
list_del_init(&ne->list);
else
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
}
static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
......@@ -2423,8 +2428,7 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
nid_t nid = nat_get_nid(ne);
int offset;
if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR)
continue;
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR);
if (to_journal) {
offset = lookup_journal_in_cursum(journal,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment