Commit ff474a78 authored by Jiri Olsa's avatar Jiri Olsa Committed by Masami Hiramatsu (Google)

uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe

Adding uretprobe syscall instead of trap to speed up return probe.

At the moment the uretprobe setup/path is:

  - install entry uprobe

  - when the uprobe is hit, it overwrites probed function's return address
    on stack with address of the trampoline that contains breakpoint
    instruction

  - the breakpoint trap code handles the uretprobe consumers execution and
    jumps back to original return address

This patch replaces the above trampoline's breakpoint instruction with new
ureprobe syscall call. This syscall does exactly the same job as the trap
with some more extra work:

  - syscall trampoline must save original value for rax/r11/rcx registers
    on stack - rax is set to syscall number and r11/rcx are changed and
    used by syscall instruction

  - the syscall code reads the original values of those registers and
    restore those values in task's pt_regs area

  - only caller from trampoline exposed in '[uprobes]' is allowed,
    the process will receive SIGILL signal otherwise

Even with some extra work, using the uretprobes syscall shows speed
improvement (compared to using standard breakpoint):

  On Intel (11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz)

  current:
    uretprobe-nop  :    1.498 ± 0.000M/s
    uretprobe-push :    1.448 ± 0.001M/s
    uretprobe-ret  :    0.816 ± 0.001M/s

  with the fix:
    uretprobe-nop  :    1.969 ± 0.002M/s  < 31% speed up
    uretprobe-push :    1.910 ± 0.000M/s  < 31% speed up
    uretprobe-ret  :    0.934 ± 0.000M/s  < 14% speed up

  On Amd (AMD Ryzen 7 5700U)

  current:
    uretprobe-nop  :    0.778 ± 0.001M/s
    uretprobe-push :    0.744 ± 0.001M/s
    uretprobe-ret  :    0.540 ± 0.001M/s

  with the fix:
    uretprobe-nop  :    0.860 ± 0.001M/s  < 10% speed up
    uretprobe-push :    0.818 ± 0.001M/s  < 10% speed up
    uretprobe-ret  :    0.578 ± 0.000M/s  <  7% speed up

The performance test spawns a thread that runs loop which triggers
uprobe with attached bpf program that increments the counter that
gets printed in results above.

The uprobe (and uretprobe) kind is determined by which instruction
is being patched with breakpoint instruction. That's also important
for uretprobes, because uprobe is installed for each uretprobe.

The performance test is part of bpf selftests:
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/run_bench_uprobes.sh

Note at the moment uretprobe syscall is supported only for native
64-bit process, compat process still uses standard breakpoint.

Note that when shadow stack is enabled the uretprobe syscall returns
via iret, which is slower than return via sysret, but won't cause the
shadow stack violation.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-4-jolsa@kernel.org/Suggested-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMasami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
parent 190fec72
......@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p);
int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig);
int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void);
int shstk_update_last_frame(unsigned long val);
bool shstk_is_enabled(void);
#else
static inline long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option,
unsigned long arg2) { return -EINVAL; }
......@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ static inline void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
static inline int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig) { return 0; }
static inline int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void) { return 0; }
static inline int shstk_update_last_frame(unsigned long val) { return 0; }
static inline bool shstk_is_enabled(void) { return false; }
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
......
......@@ -588,3 +588,8 @@ int shstk_update_last_frame(unsigned long val)
ssp = get_user_shstk_addr();
return write_user_shstk_64((u64 __user *)ssp, (u64)val);
}
bool shstk_is_enabled(void)
{
return features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
}
......@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/uprobes.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
......@@ -308,6 +309,122 @@ static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
asm (
".pushsection .rodata\n"
".global uretprobe_trampoline_entry\n"
"uretprobe_trampoline_entry:\n"
"pushq %rax\n"
"pushq %rcx\n"
"pushq %r11\n"
"movq $" __stringify(__NR_uretprobe) ", %rax\n"
"syscall\n"
".global uretprobe_syscall_check\n"
"uretprobe_syscall_check:\n"
"popq %r11\n"
"popq %rcx\n"
/* The uretprobe syscall replaces stored %rax value with final
* return address, so we don't restore %rax in here and just
* call ret.
*/
"retq\n"
".global uretprobe_trampoline_end\n"
"uretprobe_trampoline_end:\n"
".popsection\n"
);
extern u8 uretprobe_trampoline_entry[];
extern u8 uretprobe_trampoline_end[];
extern u8 uretprobe_syscall_check[];
void *arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
{
static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
/*
* At the moment the uretprobe syscall trampoline is supported
* only for native 64-bit process, the compat process still uses
* standard breakpoint.
*/
if (user_64bit_mode(regs)) {
*psize = uretprobe_trampoline_end - uretprobe_trampoline_entry;
return uretprobe_trampoline_entry;
}
*psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE;
return &insn;
}
static unsigned long trampoline_check_ip(void)
{
unsigned long tramp = uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr();
return tramp + (uretprobe_syscall_check - uretprobe_trampoline_entry);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uretprobe)
{
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
unsigned long err, ip, sp, r11_cx_ax[3];
if (regs->ip != trampoline_check_ip())
goto sigill;
err = copy_from_user(r11_cx_ax, (void __user *)regs->sp, sizeof(r11_cx_ax));
if (err)
goto sigill;
/* expose the "right" values of r11/cx/ax/sp to uprobe_consumer/s */
regs->r11 = r11_cx_ax[0];
regs->cx = r11_cx_ax[1];
regs->ax = r11_cx_ax[2];
regs->sp += sizeof(r11_cx_ax);
regs->orig_ax = -1;
ip = regs->ip;
sp = regs->sp;
uprobe_handle_trampoline(regs);
/*
* Some of the uprobe consumers has changed sp, we can do nothing,
* just return via iret.
* .. or shadow stack is enabled, in which case we need to skip
* return through the user space stack address.
*/
if (regs->sp != sp || shstk_is_enabled())
return regs->ax;
regs->sp -= sizeof(r11_cx_ax);
/* for the case uprobe_consumer has changed r11/cx */
r11_cx_ax[0] = regs->r11;
r11_cx_ax[1] = regs->cx;
/*
* ax register is passed through as return value, so we can use
* its space on stack for ip value and jump to it through the
* trampoline's ret instruction
*/
r11_cx_ax[2] = regs->ip;
regs->ip = ip;
err = copy_to_user((void __user *)regs->sp, r11_cx_ax, sizeof(r11_cx_ax));
if (err)
goto sigill;
/* ensure sysret, see do_syscall_64() */
regs->r11 = regs->flags;
regs->cx = regs->ip;
return regs->ax;
sigill:
force_sig(SIGILL);
return -1;
}
/*
* If arch_uprobe->insn doesn't use rip-relative addressing, return
* immediately. Otherwise, rewrite the instruction so that it accesses
......
......@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check c
extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
void *src, unsigned long len);
extern void uprobe_handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void *arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize);
extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void);
#else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
struct uprobes_state {
};
......
......@@ -1474,11 +1474,20 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
return ret;
}
void * __weak arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
{
static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
*psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE;
return &insn;
}
static struct xol_area *__create_xol_area(unsigned long vaddr)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
unsigned long insns_size;
struct xol_area *area;
void *insns;
area = kmalloc(sizeof(*area), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!area))
......@@ -1502,7 +1511,8 @@ static struct xol_area *__create_xol_area(unsigned long vaddr)
/* Reserve the 1st slot for get_trampoline_vaddr() */
set_bit(0, area->bitmap);
atomic_set(&area->slot_count, 1);
arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(area->pages[0], 0, &insn, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
insns = arch_uprobe_trampoline(&insns_size);
arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(area->pages[0], 0, insns, insns_size);
if (!xol_add_vma(mm, area))
return area;
......@@ -1827,7 +1837,7 @@ void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
*
* Returns -1 in case the xol_area is not allocated.
*/
static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
{
struct xol_area *area;
unsigned long trampoline_vaddr = -1;
......@@ -1878,7 +1888,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!ri)
return;
trampoline_vaddr = get_trampoline_vaddr();
trampoline_vaddr = uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr();
orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, regs);
if (orig_ret_vaddr == -1)
goto fail;
......@@ -2123,7 +2133,7 @@ static struct return_instance *find_next_ret_chain(struct return_instance *ri)
return ri;
}
static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
void uprobe_handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask;
struct return_instance *ri, *next;
......@@ -2187,8 +2197,8 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
int is_swbp;
bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr())
return handle_trampoline(regs);
if (bp_vaddr == uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr())
return uprobe_handle_trampoline(regs);
uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
if (!uprobe) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment