- 05 Jul, 2024 23 commits
-
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Patch series "mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-specific memcg data under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1". This patchset puts all cgroup v1's members of struct mem_cgroup, struct mem_cgroup_per_node and struct task_struct under the CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option. If cgroup v1 support is not required (and it's true for many cgroup users these days), it allows to save a bit of memory and compile out some code, some of which is on relatively hot paths. It also structures the code a bit better by grouping cgroup v1-specific stuff in one place. This patch (of 9): memcg_account_kmem() consists of a trivial statistics change via mod_memcg_state() call and a relatively large memcg1-specific part. Let's factor out the mod_memcg_state() call and move the rest into the mm/memcontrol-v1.c file. Also rename memcg_account_kmem() into memcg1_account_kmem() for consistency. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240628210317.272856-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240628210317.272856-2-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Acked-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Dan Schatzberg authored
Allow proactive reclaimers to submit an additional swappiness=<val> argument to memory.reclaim. This overrides the global or per-memcg swappiness setting for that reclaim attempt. For example: echo "2M swappiness=0" > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.reclaim will perform reclaim on the rootcg with a swappiness setting of 0 (no swap) regardless of the vm.swappiness sysctl setting. Userspace proactive reclaimers use the memory.reclaim interface to trigger reclaim. The memory.reclaim interface does not allow for any way to effect the balance of file vs anon during proactive reclaim. The only approach is to adjust the vm.swappiness setting. However, there are a few reasons we look to control the balance of file vs anon during proactive reclaim, separately from reactive reclaim: * Swapout should be limited to manage SSD write endurance. In near-OOM situations we are fine with lots of swap-out to avoid OOMs. As these are typically rare events, they have relatively little impact on write endurance. However, proactive reclaim runs continuously and so its impact on SSD write endurance is more significant. Therefore it is desireable to control swap-out for proactive reclaim separately from reactive reclaim * Some userspace OOM killers like systemd-oomd[1] support OOM killing on swap exhaustion. This makes sense if the swap exhaustion is triggered due to reactive reclaim but less so if it is triggered due to proactive reclaim (e.g. one could see OOMs when free memory is ample but anon is just particularly cold). Therefore, it's desireable to have proactive reclaim reduce or stop swap-out before the threshold at which OOM killing occurs. In the case of Meta's Senpai proactive reclaimer, we adjust vm.swappiness before writes to memory.reclaim[2]. This has been in production for nearly two years and has addressed our needs to control proactive vs reactive reclaim behavior but is still not ideal for a number of reasons: * vm.swappiness is a global setting, adjusting it can race/interfere with other system administration that wishes to control vm.swappiness. In our case, we need to disable Senpai before adjusting vm.swappiness. * vm.swappiness is stateful - so a crash or restart of Senpai can leave a misconfigured setting. This requires some additional management to record the "desired" setting and ensure Senpai always adjusts to it. With this patch, we avoid these downsides of adjusting vm.swappiness globally. [1]https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/systemd-oomd.service.html [2]https://github.com/facebookincubator/oomd/blob/main/src/oomd/plugins/Senpai.cpp#L585-L598 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240103164841.2800183-3-schatzberg.dan@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> Suggested-by:
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by:
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dan Schatzberg authored
Patch series "Add swappiness argument to memory.reclaim", v6. This patch proposes augmenting the memory.reclaim interface with a swappiness=<val> argument that overrides the swappiness value for that instance of proactive reclaim. Userspace proactive reclaimers use the memory.reclaim interface to trigger reclaim. The memory.reclaim interface does not allow for any way to effect the balance of file vs anon during proactive reclaim. The only approach is to adjust the vm.swappiness setting. However, there are a few reasons we look to control the balance of file vs anon during proactive reclaim, separately from reactive reclaim: * Swapout should be limited to manage SSD write endurance. In near-OOM situations we are fine with lots of swap-out to avoid OOMs. As these are typically rare events, they have relatively little impact on write endurance. However, proactive reclaim runs continuously and so its impact on SSD write endurance is more significant. Therefore it is desireable to control swap-out for proactive reclaim separately from reactive reclaim * Some userspace OOM killers like systemd-oomd[1] support OOM killing on swap exhaustion. This makes sense if the swap exhaustion is triggered due to reactive reclaim but less so if it is triggered due to proactive reclaim (e.g. one could see OOMs when free memory is ample but anon is just particularly cold). Therefore, it's desireable to have proactive reclaim reduce or stop swap-out before the threshold at which OOM killing occurs. In the case of Meta's Senpai proactive reclaimer, we adjust vm.swappiness before writes to memory.reclaim[2]. This has been in production for nearly two years and has addressed our needs to control proactive vs reactive reclaim behavior but is still not ideal for a number of reasons: * vm.swappiness is a global setting, adjusting it can race/interfere with other system administration that wishes to control vm.swappiness. In our case, we need to disable Senpai before adjusting vm.swappiness. * vm.swappiness is stateful - so a crash or restart of Senpai can leave a misconfigured setting. This requires some additional management to record the "desired" setting and ensure Senpai always adjusts to it. With this patch, we avoid these downsides of adjusting vm.swappiness globally. Previously, this exact interface addition was proposed by Yosry[3]. In response, Roman proposed instead an interface to specify precise file/anon/slab reclaim amounts[4]. More recently Huan also proposed this as well[5] and others similarly questioned if this was the proper interface. Previous proposals sought to use this to allow proactive reclaimers to effectively perform a custom reclaim algorithm by issuing proactive reclaim with different settings to control file vs anon reclaim (e.g. to only reclaim anon from some applications). Responses argued that adjusting swappiness is a poor interface for custom reclaim. In contrast, I argue in favor of a swappiness setting not as a way to implement custom reclaim algorithms but rather to bias the balance of anon vs file due to differences of proactive vs reactive reclaim. In this context, swappiness is the existing interface for controlling this balance and this patch simply allows for it to be configured differently for proactive vs reactive reclaim. Specifying explicit amounts of anon vs file pages to reclaim feels inappropriate for this prupose. Proactive reclaimers are un-aware of the relative age of file vs anon for a cgroup which makes it difficult to manage proactive reclaim of different memory pools. A proactive reclaimer would need some amount of anon reclaim attempts separate from the amount of file reclaim attempts which seems brittle given that it's difficult to observe the impact. [1]https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/systemd-oomd.service.html [2]https://github.com/facebookincubator/oomd/blob/main/src/oomd/plugins/Senpai.cpp#L585-L598 [3]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAJD7tkbDpyoODveCsnaqBBMZEkDvshXJmNdbk51yKSNgD7aGdg@mail.gmail.com/ [4]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YoPHtHXzpK51F%2F1Z@carbon/ [5]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231108065818.19932-1-link@vivo.com/ This patch (of 2): We use the constants 0 and 200 in a few places in the mm code when referring to the min and max swappiness. This patch adds MIN_SWAPPINESS and MAX_SWAPPINESS #defines to improve clarity. There are no functional changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240103164841.2800183-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240103164841.2800183-2-schatzberg.dan@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Cc: Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-15-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Put legacy cgroup v1 memory controller code under a new CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option. The option is turned off by default. Nobody except those who are still using cgroup v1 should turn it on. If the option is not set, memory controller can still be mounted under cgroup v1, but none of memcg-specific control files are present. Please note, that not all cgroup v1's memory controller code is guarded yet (but most of it), it's a subject for some follow-up work. Thanks to Michal Hocko for providing a better Kconfig option description. [roman.gushchin@linux.dev: better config option description provided by Michal] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZnxXNtvqllc9CDoo@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-14-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Group all cgroup v1-related declarations at the end of memcontrol.h and mm/memcontrol-v1.h with an intention to put them all together under a config option later on. It should make things easier to follow and maintain too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-13-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
memcg1_update_tree() is not used outside of mm/memcontrol-v1.c anymore, define it as static and remove the declaration from the header file. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-12-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Move legacy cgroup v1 memory controller interfaces and corresponding code into memcontrol-v1.c. [roman.gushchin@linux.dev: move two functions] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240704002712.2077812-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-11-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Rename memcg_oom_recover() into memcg1_oom_recover() for consistency with other memory cgroup v1-related functions. Move the declaration in mm/memcontrol-v1.h to be nearby other memcg v1 oom handling functions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-10-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Cgroup v1 supports a complicated OOM handling in userspace mechanism, which is not supported by cgroup v2. Let's move the corresponding code into memcontrol-v1.c. Aside from mechanical code movement this patch introduces two new functions: memcg1_oom_prepare() and memcg1_oom_finish(). Those are implementing cgroup v1-specific parts of the common memcg OOM handling path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-9-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Rename memcg_check_events() into memcg1_check_events() for consistency with other cgroup v1-specific functions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-8-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Cgroup v1's memory controller contains a pretty complicated event notifications mechanism which is not used on cgroup v2. Let's move the corresponding code into memcontrol-v1.c. Please, note, that mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit() remains in memcontrol.c, otherwise it would require exporting too many details on memcg stats outside of memcontrol.c. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-7-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Rename exported function related to the charge move to have the memcg1_ prefix. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-6-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Unlike the legacy cgroup v1 memory controller, cgroup v2 memory controller doesn't support moving charged pages between cgroups. It's a fairly large and complicated code which created a number of problems in the past. Let's move this code into memcontrol-v1.c. It shaves off 1k lines from memcontrol.c. It's also another step towards making the legacy memory controller code optionally compiled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-5-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Rename exported function related to the softlimit reclaim to have memcg1_ prefix. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-4-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Soft limits are cgroup v1-specific and are not supported by cgroup v2, so let's move the corresponding code into memcontrol-v1.c. Aside from simple moving the code, this commits introduces a trivial memcg1_soft_limit_reset() function to reset soft limits and also moves the global soft limit tree initialization code into a new memcg1_init() function. It also moves corresponding declarations shared between memcontrol.c and memcontrol-v1.c into mm/memcontrol-v1.h. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-3-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Patch series "mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option", v2. Cgroups v2 have been around for a while and many users have fully adopted them, so they never use cgroups v1 features and functionality. Yet they have to "pay" for the cgroup v1 support anyway: 1) the kernel binary contains an unused cgroup v1 code, 2) some code paths have additional checks which are not needed, 3) some common structures like task_struct and mem_cgroup contain unused cgroup v1-specific members. Cgroup v1's memory controller has a number of features that are not supported by cgroup v2 and their implementation is pretty much self contained. Most notably, these features are: soft limit reclaim, oom handling in userspace, complicated event notification system, charge migration. Cgroup v1-specific code in memcontrol.c is close to 4k lines in size and it's intervened with generic and cgroup v2-specific code. It's a burden on developers and maintainers. This patchset aims to solve these problems by: 1) moving cgroup v1-specific memcg code to the new mm/memcontrol-v1.c file, 2) putting definitions shared by memcontrol.c and memcontrol-v1.c into the mm/memcontrol-v1.h header, 3) introducing the CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option, turned off by default, 4) making memcontrol-v1.c to compile only if CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is set. If CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is not set, cgroup v1 memory controller is still available for mounting, however no memory-specific control knobs are present. This patch (of 14): This patch introduces the mm/memcontrol-v1.c source file which will be used for all legacy (cgroup v1) memory cgroup code. It also introduces mm/memcontrol-v1.h to keep declarations shared between mm/memcontrol.c and mm/memcontrol-v1.c. As of now, let's compile it if CONFIG_MEMCG is set, similar to mm/memcontrol.c. Later on it can be switched to use a separate config option, so that the legacy code won't be compiled if not required. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625005906.106920-2-roman.gushchin@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Chengming Zhou authored
Now the implementation of stable_node_dup() causes chain()/chain_prune() interfaces and usages are overcomplicated. Why? stable_node_dup() only find and return a candidate stable_node for sharing, so the users have to recheck using stable_node_dup_any() if any non-candidate stable_node exist. And try to ksm_get_folio() from it again. Actually, stable_node_dup() can just return a best stable_node as it can, then the users can check if it's a candidate for sharing or not. The code is simplified too and fewer corner cases: such as stable_node and stable_node_dup can't be NULL if returned tree_folio is not NULL. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621-b4-ksm-scan-optimize-v2-3-1c328aa9e30b@linux.devSigned-off-by:
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io> Signed-off-by:
-
Chengming Zhou authored
The code flow in cmp_and_merge_page() is suboptimal for handling the ksm page and non-ksm page at the same time. For example: - ksm page 1. Mostly just return if this ksm page is not migrated and this rmap_item has been on the rmap hlist. Or we have to fix this rmap_item mapping. 2. But we absolutely don't need to checksum for this ksm page, since it can't change. - non-ksm page 1. First don't need to waste time searching stable tree if fast changing. 2. Should try to merge with zero page before search the stable tree. 3. Then search stable tree to find mergeable ksm page. This patch optimizes the code flow so the handling differences between ksm page and non-ksm page become clearer and more efficient too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621-b4-ksm-scan-optimize-v2-2-1c328aa9e30b@linux.devSigned-off-by: -
Chengming Zhou authored
Patch series "mm/ksm: cmp_and_merge_page() optimizations and cleanup", v2. This series mainly optimizes cmp_and_merge_page() to have more efficient separate code flow for ksm page and non-ksm anon page. - ksm page: don't need to calculate the checksum obviously. - anon page: don't need to search stable tree if changing fast and try to merge with zero page before searching ksm page on stable tree. Please see the patch-2 for details. Patch-3 is cleanup also a little optimization for the chain()/chain_prune interfaces, which made the stable_tree_search()/stable_tree_insert() over complex. I have done simple testing using "hackbench -g 1 -l 300000" (maybe I need to use a better workload) on my machine, have seen a little CPU usage decrease of ksmd and some improvements of cmp_and_merge_page() latency: We can see the latency of cmp_and_merge_page() when handling non-ksm anon pages has been improved. This patch (of 3): In preparation for later changes, refactor out a new function called try_to_merge_with_zero_page(), which tries to merge with zero page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621-b4-ksm-scan-optimize-v2-0-1c328aa9e30b@linux.dev Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621-b4-ksm-scan-optimize-v2-1-1c328aa9e30b@linux.devSigned-off-by:
-
Aristeu Rozanski authored
When trying to allocate a hugepage with no reserved ones free, it may be allowed in case a number of overcommit hugepages was configured (using /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages) and that number wasn't reached. This allows for a behavior of having extra hugepages allocated dynamically, if there're resources for it. Some sysadmins even prefer not reserving any hugepages and setting a big number of overcommit hugepages. But while attempting to allocate overcommit hugepages in a multi node system (either NUMA or mempolicy/cpuset) said allocations might randomly fail even when there're resources available for the allocation. This happens due to allowed_mems_nr() only accounting for the number of free hugepages in the nodes the current process belongs to and the surplus hugepage allocation is done so it can be allocated in any node. In case one or more of the requested surplus hugepages are allocated in a different node, the whole allocation will fail due allowed_mems_nr() returning a lower value. So allocate surplus hugepages in one of the nodes the current process belongs to. Easy way to reproduce this issue is to use a 2+ NUMA nodes system: # echo 0 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages # echo 1 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages # numactl -m0 ./tools/testing/selftests/mm/map_hugetlb 2 Repeating the execution of map_hugetlb test application will eventually fail when the hugepage ends up allocated in a different node. [aris@ruivo.org: v2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240701212343.GG844599@cathedrallabs.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621190050.mhxwb65zn37doegp@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@ruivo.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
The variable is supposed to be set via later migrate_pages() call. However, the function does not do that when CONFIG_MIGRATION is unset. Initialize the variable to zero. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240701165332.47495-1-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 5311c0a2eee3 ("mm/damon/paddr: introduce DAMOS_MIGRATE_COLD action for demotion") Signed-off-by:
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Reported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202406251102.GE07hqfQ-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com> Cc: Hyeongtak Ji <hyeongtak.ji@sk.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Folios of order <= 1 are not in deferred list, the check of order is added into folio_undo_large_rmappable() from commit 8897277a ("mm: support order-1 folios in the page cache"), but there is a repeated check for small folio (order 0) during each call of the folio_undo_large_rmappable(), so only keep folio_order() check inside the function. In addition, move all the checks into header file to save a function call for non-large-rmappable or empty deferred_list folio. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240521130315.46072-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Signed-off-by:
-
- 04 Jul, 2024 17 commits
-
-
SeongJae Park authored
User could update max_nr_regions parameter while DAMON is running to a value that smaller than the current number of regions that DAMON is seeing. Such update could be done for reducing the monitoring overhead. In the case, DAMON should merge regions aggressively more than normal situation to ensure the new limit is successfully applied. Implement a kselftest to ensure that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-9-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Users can update DAMON parameters while it is running, using 'commit' DAMON sysfs interface command. For testing the feature in future tests, implement a function for doing that on the test-purpose DAMON sysfs interface wrapper Python module. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-8-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Implement a kselftest for DAMON's {min,max}_nr_regions' parameters. The test ensures both the minimum and the maximum number of regions limit is respected even if the workload's real number of regions is less than the minimum or larger than the maximum limits. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-7-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: -
SeongJae Park authored
Implement DAMON stop function on the test-purpose DAMON sysfs interface wrapper Python module, _damon_sysfs.py. This feature will be used by future DAMON tests that need to start/stop DAMON multiple times. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-6-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Implement a test for DAMOS tried regions command of DAMON sysfs interface. It ensures the expected number of monitoring regions are created using an artificial memory access pattern generator program. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-5-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
To test schemes_tried_regions feature, we need to have a program having specific number of regions that having different access pattern. Existing artificial access pattern generator, 'access_memory', cannot be used for the purpose, since it accesses only one region at a given time. Extending it could be an option, but since the purpose and the implementation are pretty simple, implementing another one from the scratch is better. Implement such another artificial memory access program that allocates user-defined number/size regions and accesses even-numbered regions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-4-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Implement schemes_update_tried_regions DAMON sysfs command on _damon_sysfs.py, to use on implementations of future tests for the feature. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-3-sj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Patch series "selftests/damon: test DAMOS tried regions and {min,max}_nr_regions". This patch series fix a minor issue in a program for DAMON selftest, and implement new functionality selftests for DAMOS tried regions and {min,max}_nr_regions. The test for max_nr_regions also test the recovery from online tuning-caused limit violation, which was fixed by a previous patch [1] titled "mm/damon/core: merge regions aggressively when max_nr_regions is unmet". The first patch fixes a minor problem in the articial memory access pattern generator for tests. Following 3 patches (2-4) implement schemes tried regions test. Then a couple of patches (5-6) implementing static setup based {min,max}_nr_regions functionality test follows. Final two patches (7-8) implement dynamic max_nr_regions update test. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20240624210650.53960C2BBFC@smtp.kernel.org This patch (of 8): 'access_memory' is an artificial memory access pattern generator for DAMON tests. It creates and accesses memory regions that the user specified the number and size via the command line. However, real access part of the program ignores the user-specified size of each region. Instead, it uses a hard-coded value, 10 MiB. Fix it to use user-defined size. Note that all existing 'access_memory' users are setting the region size as 10 MiB. Hence no real problem has happened so far. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-1-sj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625180538.73134-2-sj@kernel.org Fixes: b5906f5f ("selftests/damon: add a test for update_schemes_tried_regions sysfs command") Signed-off-by: -
Jan Kara authored
Unify all conditions for initial readahead to simplify goto logic in page_cache_sync_ra(). No functional changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-10-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by:
Zhang Peng <zhangpengpeng0808@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
try_context_readahead() has a single caller page_cache_sync_ra(). Fold the function there to make ra state modifications more obvious. No functional changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-9-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Both async and sync readahead are handled by ondemand_readahead() function. However there isn't actually much in common. Just move async related parts into page_cache_ra_async() and sync related parts to page_cache_ra_sync(). No functional changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-8-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
ondemand_readahead() scales up the readahead window if the current read would hit the readahead mark placed by itself. However the condition is mostly dead code because: a) In case of async readahead we always increase ra->start so ra->start == index is never true. b) In case of sync readahead we either go through try_context_readahead() in which case ra->async_size == 1 < ra->size or we go through initial_readahead where ra->async_size == ra->size iff ra->size == max_pages. So the only practical effect is reducing async_size for large initial reads. Make the code more obvious. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-7-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
page_cache_ra_order() scales folio order down so that is fully fits within readahead window. Thus the code handling the case where we walked past the readahead window is a dead code. Remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-6-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
The index argument of page_cache_async_readahead() is just folio->index so there's no point in passing is separately. Drop it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-5-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Current index to readahead is tracked in readahead_control and properly updated by page_cache_ra_unbounded() (read_pages() in fact). So there's no need to track the index separately in force_page_cache_ra(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-4-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
When we succeed in creating some folios in page_cache_ra_order() but then need to fallback to single page folios, we don't shorten the amount to read passed to do_page_cache_ra() by the amount we've already read. This then results in reading more and also in placing another readahead mark in the middle of the readahead window which confuses readahead code. Fix the problem by properly reducing number of pages to read. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-3-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
page_cache_next_miss() should return value outside of the specified range when no hole is found. However currently it will return the last index *in* the specified range confusing ondemand_readahead() to think there's a hole in the searched range and upsetting readahead logic. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240625101909.12234-2-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
-
