- 25 Nov, 2016 16 commits
-
-
Nicolai Stange authored
The struct file_operations instance serving the f2fs/status debugfs file lacks an initialization of its ->owner. This means that although that file might have been opened, the f2fs module can still get removed. Any further operation on that opened file, releasing included, will cause accesses to unmapped memory. Indeed, Mike Marshall reported the following: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0307430 IP: [<ffffffff8132a224>] full_proxy_release+0x24/0x90 <...> Call Trace: [] __fput+0xdf/0x1d0 [] ____fput+0xe/0x10 [] task_work_run+0x8e/0xc0 [] do_exit+0x2ae/0xae0 [] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xae/0x100 [] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1ca/0x310 [] do_group_exit+0x44/0xc0 [] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20 [] do_syscall_64+0x61/0x150 [] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 <...> ---[ end trace f22ae883fa3ea6b8 ]--- Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed! Fix this by initializing the f2fs/status file_operations' ->owner with THIS_MODULE. This will allow debugfs to grab a reference to the f2fs module upon any open on that file, thus preventing it from getting removed. Fixes: 902829aa ("f2fs: move proc files to debugfs") Reported-by: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> Reported-by: Martin Brandenburg <martin@omnibond.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
While calculating inode count that we can create at most in the left space, we should consider space which data/node blocks occupied, since we create data/node mixly in main area. So fix the wrong calculation in ->statfs. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Geliang Tang authored
Drop duplicate header timer.h from segment.c. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If i_size is not aligned to the f2fs's block size, we should not skip inode update during fsync. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If i_size is already valid during roll_forward recovery, we should not update it according to the block alignment. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
For below two cases, we can't guarantee data consistence: a) 1. xfs_io "pwrite 0 4195328" "fsync" 2. xfs_io "pwrite 4195328 1024" "fdatasync" 3. godown 4. umount & mount --> isize we updated before fdatasync won't be recovered b) 1. xfs_io "pwrite -S 0xcc 0 4202496" "fsync" 2. xfs_io "fpunch 4194304 4096" "fdatasync" 3. godown 4. umount & mount --> dnode we punched before fdatasync won't be recovered The reason is that normally fdatasync won't be aware of modification of metadata in file, e.g. isize changing, dnode updating, so in ->fsync we will skip flushing node pages for above cases, result in making fdatasynced file being lost during recovery. Currently we have introduced DIRTY_META global list in sbi for tracking dirty inode selectively, so in fdatasync we can choose to flush nodes depend on dirty state of current inode in the list. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
Thread A Thread B Thread C - f2fs_create - f2fs_new_inode - f2fs_lock_op - alloc_nid alloc last nid - f2fs_unlock_op - f2fs_create - f2fs_new_inode - f2fs_lock_op - alloc_nid as node count still not be increased, we will loop in alloc_nid - f2fs_write_node_pages - f2fs_balance_fs_bg - f2fs_sync_fs - write_checkpoint - block_operations - f2fs_lock_all - f2fs_lock_op While creating new inode, we do not allocate and account nid atomically, so that when there is almost no free nids left, we may encounter deadloop like above stack. In order to avoid that, reuse nm_i::available_nids for accounting free nids and make nid allocation and counting being atomical during node creation. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Yunlei He authored
Thread A Thread B - write_checkpoint - block_operations -blk_start_plug -sync_node_pages - f2fs_do_sync_file - fsync_node_pages - f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback Thread A wait for global F2FS_DIRTY_NODES decreased to zero, it start a plug list, some requests have been added to this list. Thread B lock one dirty node page, and wait this page write back. But this page has been in plug list of thread A with PG_writeback flag. Thread A keep on running and its plug list has no chance to finish, so it seems a deadlock between cp and fsync path. This patch add a wait on page write back before set node page dirty to avoid this problem. Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Pengyang Hou <houpengyang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
Normally, while committing checkpoint, we will wait on all pages to be writebacked no matter the page is data or metadata, so in scenario where there are lots of data IO being submitted with metadata, we may suffer long latency for waiting writeback during checkpoint. Indeed, we only care about persistence for pages with metadata, but not pages with data, as file system consistent are only related to metadate, so in order to avoid encountering long latency in above scenario, let's recognize and reference metadata in submitted IOs, wait writeback only for metadatas. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Previously, written_valid_blocks was got by ckpt->valid_block_count. But if the last checkpoint has some NEW_ADDR due to power-cut, we can get wrong value. Fix it to get the number from actual written block count from sit entries. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If many threads hit has_not_enough_free_secs() in f2fs_balance_fs() at the same time, all the threads would do FG_GC or BG_GC. In this critical path, we totally don't need to do BG_GC at all. Let's avoid that. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
In direct_IO path of f2fs_file_write_iter(), 1. f2fs_preallocate_blocks(F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRE_DIO) -> allocate LBA X 2. f2fs_direct_IO() -> return 0; Then, f2fs_write_data_page() will allocate another LBA X+1. This makes EIO triggered by HM-SMR. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch has no functional change. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch implements multiple devices support for f2fs. Given multiple devices by mkfs.f2fs, f2fs shows them entirely as one big volume under one f2fs instance. Internal block management is very simple, but we will modify block allocation and background GC policy to boost IO speed by exploiting them accoording to each device speed. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We can allow dio reads for LFS mode, while doing buffered writes for dio writes. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Now we don't need to be too much careful about storage alignment for dio, since its speed becomes quite fast and we'd better avoid any misalignment first. Revert: 38aa0889 (f2fs: align direct_io'ed data to section) Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
- 23 Nov, 2016 24 commits
-
-
Yunlei He authored
If one block has been to written to a new place, just return in move data process. This patch check it again with holding page lock. Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
i_times of inode will be set with current system time which can be configured through 'date', so it's not safe to judge dnode block as garbage data or unchanged inode depend on i_times. Now, we have used enhanced 'cp_ver + cp' crc method to verify valid dnode block, so I expect recoverying invalid dnode is almost not possible. This reverts commit 807b1e1c. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
The generic freeze_super() calls sync_filesystems() before f2fs_freeze(). So, basically we don't need to do checkpoint in f2fs_freeze(). But, in xfs/068, it triggers circular locking problem below due to gc_mutex for checkpoint. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.9.0-rc1+ #132 Tainted: G OE ------------------------------------------------------- 1. wait for __sb_start_write() by [<ffffffff9845f353>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 [<ffffffff980e80bf>] print_circular_bug+0x1cf/0x230 [<ffffffff980eb4d0>] __lock_acquire+0x19e0/0x1bc0 [<ffffffff980ebdcb>] lock_acquire+0x11b/0x220 [<ffffffffc08c7c3b>] ? f2fs_drop_inode+0x9b/0x160 [f2fs] [<ffffffff9826bdd0>] __sb_start_write+0x130/0x200 [<ffffffffc08c7c3b>] ? f2fs_drop_inode+0x9b/0x160 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc08c7c3b>] f2fs_drop_inode+0x9b/0x160 [f2fs] [<ffffffff98289991>] iput+0x171/0x2c0 [<ffffffffc08cfccf>] f2fs_sync_inode_meta+0x3f/0xf0 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc08cfe04>] block_operations+0x84/0x110 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc08cff78>] write_checkpoint+0xe8/0xf20 [f2fs] [<ffffffff980e979d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffffc08c6de9>] ? f2fs_sync_fs+0x79/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffff9803e9d9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 [<ffffffffc08c6de9>] ? f2fs_sync_fs+0x79/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc08c6df5>] f2fs_sync_fs+0x85/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffff982a4f90>] ? do_fsync+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff982a4f90>] ? do_fsync+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff982a4fb0>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff9826ca3e>] iterate_supers+0xae/0x100 [<ffffffff982a50b5>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90 [<ffffffff9890b345>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 2. wait for sbi->gc_mutex by [<ffffffff980ebdcb>] lock_acquire+0x11b/0x220 [<ffffffff989063d6>] mutex_lock_nested+0x76/0x3f0 [<ffffffffc08c6de9>] f2fs_sync_fs+0x79/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc08c7a6c>] f2fs_freeze+0x1c/0x20 [f2fs] [<ffffffff9826b6ef>] freeze_super+0xcf/0x190 [<ffffffff9827eebc>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x53c/0x6a0 [<ffffffff9827f099>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 [<ffffffff9890b345>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Previously, we assigned CURSEG_WARM_DATA for direct_io, but if we have two or four logs, we do not use that type at all. Let's fix it. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
Shouldn't update in-memory i_atime with on-disk i_mtime of inode when recovering inode. Shuoran found this bug which is hidden for a long time, honour is belong to him. Signed-off-by: Shuoran Liu <liushuoran@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
We should record updating status of inode only for living inode, for those unlinked inode it needs to clear its ino cache, otherwise after the ino was been reused, it will cause unneeded node page writing during ->fsync. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
Similarly to the regular discard, trace zone reset events. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
When a zoned block device is mounted, discarding sections contained in sequential zones must reset the zone write pointer. For sections contained in conventional zones, the regular discard is used if the drive supports it. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
With the zoned block device feature enabled, section discard need to do a zone reset for sections contained in sequential zones, and a regular discard (if supported) for sections stored in conventional zones. Avoid the need for a costly report zones to obtain a section zone type when discarding it by caching the types of the device zones in the super block information. This cache is initialized at mount time for mounts with the zoned block device feature enabled. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
The LFS mode is mandatory for host-managed zoned block devices as update in place optimizations are not possible for segments in sequential zones. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
Zone write pointer reset acts as discard for zoned block devices. So if the zoned block device feature is enabled, always declare that discard is enabled, even if the device does not actually support the command. For the same reason, prevent the use the "nodicard" mount option. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
For zoned block devices, discard is replaced by zone reset. So do not warn if the device does not supports discard. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
The F2FS_FEATURE_BLKZONED feature indicates that the drive was formatted with zone alignment optimization. This is optional for host-aware devices, but mandatory for host-managed zoned block devices. So check that the feature is set in this latter case. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
SMR stands for "Shingled Magnetic Recording" which makes sense only for hard disk drives (spinning rust). The ZBC/ZAC standards enable management of SMR disks, but solid state drives may also support those standards. So rename the HMSMR feature to BLKZONED to avoid a HDD centric terminology. For the same reason, rename f2fs_sb_mounted_hmsmr to f2fs_sb_mounted_blkzoned. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Damien Le Moal authored
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch should fix an infinite loop case below. F2FS-fs : inject IO error in f2fs_read_end_io+0xf3/0x120 [f2fs] F2FS-fs (nvme0n1p1): recover_orphan_inode: orphan failed (ino=39ac1a), run fsck to fix. ... [<ffffffffc0b11ede>] sync_meta_pages+0xae/0x270 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b288dd>] ? flush_sit_entries+0x8d/0x960 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b13801>] write_checkpoint+0x361/0xf20 [f2fs] [<ffffffffb40e979d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffffc0b0a199>] ? f2fs_sync_fs+0x79/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b0a1a5>] f2fs_sync_fs+0x85/0x190 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b2560e>] f2fs_balance_fs_bg+0x7e/0x1c0 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b216c4>] f2fs_write_node_pages+0x34/0x320 [f2fs] [<ffffffffb41dff21>] do_writepages+0x21/0x30 [<ffffffffb429edb1>] __writeback_single_inode+0x61/0x760 [<ffffffffb490a937>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [<ffffffffb42a0805>] writeback_single_inode+0xd5/0x190 [<ffffffffb42a0959>] write_inode_now+0x99/0xc0 [<ffffffffb4289a16>] iput+0x1f6/0x2c0 [<ffffffffc0b0e3be>] f2fs_fill_super+0xe0e/0x1300 [f2fs] [<ffffffffb426c394>] ? sget_userns+0x4f4/0x530 [<ffffffffb426c692>] mount_bdev+0x182/0x1b0 [<ffffffffc0b0d5b0>] ? f2fs_commit_super+0x100/0x100 [f2fs] [<ffffffffc0b0a375>] f2fs_mount+0x15/0x20 [f2fs] [<ffffffffb426d038>] mount_fs+0x38/0x170 [<ffffffffb428ec9b>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6b/0x160 [<ffffffffb4291d9e>] do_mount+0x1be/0xd60 [<ffffffffb4291a57>] ? copy_mount_options+0xb7/0x220 [<ffffffffb4292c54>] SyS_mount+0x94/0xd0 [<ffffffffb490b345>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
Report error of f2fs_fill_dentries to ->iterate_shared, otherwise when error ocurrs, user may just list part of dirents in target directory without any hints. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen without a prior initialization: fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’: fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) { As pointed out by Chao Yu, the code is actually correct as 'prealloc' is only set if the last_ofs_in_node has been set, the two always get updated together. This initializes last_ofs_in_node to dn.ofs_in_node for each new dnode at the start of the 'next_block' loop, which at that point is a correct initialization as well. I assume that compilers that correctly track the contents of the variables and do not warn about the condition also figure out that they can eliminate the extra assignment here. Fixes: 46008c6d ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch removes percpu_count usage due to performance regression in iozone. Fixes: 523be8a6 ("f2fs: use percpu_counter for page counters") Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch tries to make more clean inodes when flushing dirty inodes in checkpoint. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This is to avoid no free segment bug during checkpoint caused by a number of dirty inodes. The case was reported by Chao like this. 1. mount with lazytime option 2. fill 4k file until disk is full 3. sync filesystem 4. read all files in the image 5. umount In this case, we actually don't need to flush dirty inode to inode page during checkpoint. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We don't need to allocate bio partially in order to maximize sequential writes. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch avoids build warning. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If inode becomes dirty, we need to check the # of dirty inodes whether or not further checkpoint would be required. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-