- 23 Oct, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe musb with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data with the following changes: 1. Swap the old ti,am33xx-usb compatible wrapper to generic ti-sysc driver. This means later on we can also remove the old wrapper driver drivers/usb/musb/musb_am335x.c 2. Update the child nodes to use the ranges provided by ti-sysc 3. Drop unneeded status = "enabled" tinkering for SoC internal devices. This allows us to remove some useless board specific boilerplate code in the following patches Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 21 Oct, 2019 30 commits
-
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it dynamically, which is no longer needed. Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods dts property. As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch. Cc: Ankur Tyagi <ankur.tyagi@gallagher.com> Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
Also on am335x we need the swsup quirks for musb. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tony Lindgren authored
We need swsup quirks for sidle and mstandby for musb to work properly. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 18 Oct, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Tony Lindgren authored
-
Tony Lindgren authored
I noticed that when probed with ti-sysc, watchdog can trigger on am3, am4 and dra7 causing a device reset. Turns out I made several mistakes implementing the watchdog quirk handling: 1. We must do both writes to spr register 2. We must also call the reset quirk on disable 3. On am3 and am4 we need to also set swsup quirk flag I probably only tested this earlier with watchdog service running when the watchdog never gets disabled. Fixes: 4e23be47 ("bus: ti-sysc: Add support for module specific reset quirks") Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 08 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Tero Kristo authored
Current implementation for ti-sysc powers down the module once module init is complete. However, right after power is disabled, it is enabled via runtime PM. This is unnecessary so avoid it by re-ordering the events a bit; move powering down of the module post runtime PM enable which makes sure the use counts are maintained properly and there is no extra power down/up sequence for the module. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tero Kristo authored
There seems to be unnecessary extra hardreset line toggling applied during module init. This is unnecessary, as the reset lines are already asserted during boot, and it can cause certain modules to hang (iommus, remoteprocs.) Remove the extra hardreset toggle, and remove the now redundant function to handle this also. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
Tero Kristo authored
The main clocks and reset controls have a hardware level dependency, where one can't transition state without the other one transitioning. Because we don't have the dependency implemented in software, we must ensure the ordering of these two is done properly; they way this is handled is that clocks transition on software level without delay, and the status is only polled on reset side. Because of this, we must re-order the main clock and reset handling on the ti-sysc driver. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 30 Sep, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-