- 09 Dec, 2019 18 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
On glk+ the hardware gets confused if we disable FBC while it's recompressing and we perform a plane update during the same frame. The result is that top of the screen gets corrupted. We can avoid that by giving the hardware enough time to finish the FBC disable before we touch the plane registers. Ie. we need an extra vblank wait after FBC disable. v2: Don't do the vblank wait if we never activated FBC in hw Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128150338.12490-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by:
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
The hardware automagically nukes the cfb on flip. We can use that whenever the plane/crtc configuration doesn't change too much. Let's hook that up. We'll need this for glk+ since we need to introduce an extra vblank wait after FBC disable. As we're currently disabling FBC around all plane updates we'd slow them down by an extra frame. Not a great user experience when your fps is always capped at vrefres/2. With flip nuke we don't need the extra vblank wait. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
fbc.enabled == (fbc.crtc != NULL), so let's just nuke fbc.enabled. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Replace the 'gen9 && !glk' with the slightly more obvious 'gen9_bc || bxt'. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
i965gm no longer needs the fence for scanout so we should be do what we do for ctg+ and only configure a fence for FBC when we have one. In theory this should do nothing atm on account of intel_fbc_can_activate() requiring the fence, but since we do this for g4x+ let's do it for i965gm as well. We may want to relax the requirements at some point and allow FBC without a fence. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Rather than playing around with vma+flags let's just grab the fence id from within and stash that directly in the fbc cache/params. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Currently the code (ab)uses cache->vma to indicate the plane visibility. I want to nuke that so let's add a dedicated boolean for this. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Precompute the override cfb stride value so that we can check it when determining if flip nuke can be used or not. The hardware has 13 bits for this, so we can shrink the storage to u16 while at it. v2: Don't explode when crtc_state->enable_fbc lies to us Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We don't want to use the FBC hardware render tracking so let's not enable it. To use the hw tracking properly we'd anyway need to integrate this into the command submissing path as the register is context saved, and if rendering happens via the ppgtt we'd have to configure it with the ppgtt address instead of the ggtt address. Easier to use software tracking instead. Note that on pre-ilk we can't actually disable render tracking. However we can't rely on it because it requires that DSPSURF to match the render target address, and since we play tricks with DSPSURF that may not be the case. Hence we shall rely on software render tracking on all platforms. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Move intel_crtc_active() next to its only remaining user (pre-g4x wm code). Reviewed-by:
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Not sure where the single pipe only restriction came for fbc1. Nothing I can see that would prevent this. v2: Nuke no_fbc_on_multiple_pipes() too Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We're missing a workaround in the fbc code for all glk+ platforms which can cause corruption around the top of the screen. So enabling fbc by default is a bad idea. I'm not keen to backport the w/a so let's start by disabling fbc by default on all glk+. We'll lift the restriction once the w/a is in place. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa authored
Gen12 supports saving/restoring render counters per context. Apply OAR configuration only for the context that is passed in to perf. v2: - Fix OACTXCONTROL value to only stop/resume counters. - Remove gen12_update_reg_state_unlocked as power state is already applied by the caller. v3: (Lionel) - Move register initialization into the array - Assume a valid oa_config in enable_metric_set Signed-off-by:
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Fixes: 00a7f0d7 ("drm/i915/tgl: Add perf support on TGL") Reviewed-by:
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa authored
SAMPLE_OA_REPORT enables sampling of OA reports from the OA buffer. Since reports from OA buffer had system wide visibility, collecting samples from the OA buffer was a privileged operation on previous platforms. Prior to TGL, it was also necessary to sample the OA buffer to normalize reports from MI REPORT PERF COUNT. TGL has a dedicated OAR unit to sample perf reports for a specific render context. This removes the necessity to sample OA buffer. - If not sampling the OA buffer, allow non-privileged access. An earlier patch allows the non-privilege access: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/337716/?series=68582&rev=1 - Clear up the path for non-privileged access in this patch Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
If someone else acquires the i915_vma before we complete our wait and unbind it, we currently error out with -EBUSY. Use -EAGAIN instead so that if necessary the caller is prepared to try again. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/683Signed-off-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191208161252.3015727-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
As i915_gem_object_unbind() waits on an rcu_barrier() to flush vm releases (and destruction of their bound vma), we have to be careful not to invoke that barrier from beneath the shrinker: <4> [430.222671] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [430.222673] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7508+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [430.222675] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [430.222677] gem_pwrite/2317 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [430.222678] ffffffff82248218 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}, at: rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.222685] but task is already holding lock: <4> [430.222687] ffffffff82263a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x0/0x30 <4> [430.222691] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [430.222693] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [430.222695] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [430.222698] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x24/0x30 <4> [430.222702] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x2c0 <4> [430.222705] intel_cpuc_prepare+0x37/0x1a0 <4> [430.222709] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0 <4> [430.222712] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140 <4> [430.222714] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0 <4> [430.222718] smp_init+0x57/0x96 <4> [430.222722] kernel_init_freeable+0xac/0x1c7 <4> [430.222725] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [430.222728] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [430.222729] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: <4> [430.222733] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0 <4> [430.222734] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190 <4> [430.222736] kernel_init+0x21/0x100 <4> [430.222737] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [430.222739] -> #0 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [430.222742] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [430.222743] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [430.222746] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [430.222747] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.222850] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x264/0x3d0 [i915] <4> [430.222882] i915_gem_shrink+0x297/0x5f0 [i915] <4> [430.222912] i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915] <4> [430.222934] i915_drop_caches_set+0x1f0/0x240 [i915] <4> [430.222938] simple_attr_write+0xb0/0xd0 <4> [430.222941] full_proxy_write+0x51/0x80 <4> [430.222943] vfs_write+0xb9/0x1d0 <4> [430.222944] ksys_write+0x9f/0xe0 <4> [430.222946] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4> [430.222948] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [430.222950] other info that might help us debug this: <4> [430.222952] Chain exists of: rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> fs_reclaim <4> [430.222955] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [430.222957] CPU0 CPU1 <4> [430.222958] ---- ---- <4> [430.222960] lock(fs_reclaim); <4> [430.222961] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); <4> [430.222963] lock(fs_reclaim); <4> [430.222964] lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex); <4> [430.222966] *** DEADLOCK *** <4> [430.222968] 3 locks held by gem_pwrite/2317: <4> [430.222969] #0: ffff88849e2d9408 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x1a4/0x1d0 <4> [430.222973] #1: ffff888496976db0 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}, at: simple_attr_write+0x36/0xd0 <4> [430.222976] #2: ffffffff82263a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x0/0x30 <4> [430.222980] stack backtrace: <4> [430.222982] CPU: 1 PID: 2317 Comm: gem_pwrite Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7508+ #1 <4> [430.222985] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWI1.R00.2321.A08.1909162051 09/16/2019 <4> [430.222989] Call Trace: <4> [430.222992] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b <4> [430.222995] check_noncircular+0x19b/0x1c0 <4> [430.222998] ? __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [430.222999] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [430.223001] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 <4> [430.223003] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [430.223005] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.223008] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [430.223009] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.223011] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.223013] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 <4> [430.223045] ? i915_gem_object_unbind+0x24a/0x3d0 [i915] <4> [430.223048] ? rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.223049] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [430.223081] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x264/0x3d0 [i915] <4> [430.223119] i915_gem_shrink+0x297/0x5f0 [i915] Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/743Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
Include all the number fields for describing the GT, as well as the current boolean flags, primarily for inclusion in error states. Signed-off-by:
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207182937.2583002-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
Since we didn't check and insist that args.pad must be zero for MMAP_GTT historically, we cannot insert a check now as old userspace may be feeding in garbage. As such the lack of check is enshrined into the ABI, so add a comment to remind us we cannot add the check later. Signed-off-by:
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207222644.2830129-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 08 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
"Have you tried switching it off and on again?" Set the size of the mm to 0 to disable all PD cachelines, before enabling the whole mm again. Let's see if that tricks the TLB into reloading. Signed-off-by:
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191208143648.2986669-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 07 Dec, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Our asserts allow for the PDEs to be allocated concurrently, but we did not account for the aliasing-ppgtt to be preallocated on top. Testcase: igt/gem_ppgtt #bsw Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In the extreme case, we may wish to wait on an rcu-barrier to reap stale vm to purge the last of the object bindings. However, we are not allowed to use rcu_barrier() beneath the dma_resv (i.e. object) lock and do not take lightly the prospect of unlocking a mutex deep in the bowels of the routine. i915_gem_object_unbind() itself does not need the object lock, and it turns out the callers do not need to the unbind as part of a locked sequence around set-cache-level, so rearrange the code to avoid taking the object lock in the callers. <4> [186.816311] ====================================================== <4> [186.816313] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [186.816316] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7486+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [186.816318] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [186.816320] perf_pmu/1321 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [186.816322] ffff88849487c4d8 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}, at: __might_fault+0x39/0x90 <4> [186.816331] but task is already holding lock: <4> [186.816333] ffffe8ffffa05008 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0xa9/0x1b0 <4> [186.816339] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [186.816341] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [186.816343] -> #6 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [186.816349] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [186.816352] perf_event_init_cpu+0xa4/0x140 <4> [186.816357] perf_event_init+0x19d/0x1cd <4> [186.816362] start_kernel+0x372/0x4f4 <4> [186.816365] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4> [186.816381] -> #5 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: <4> [186.816385] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [186.816387] perf_event_init_cpu+0x6b/0x140 <4> [186.816404] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0 <4> [186.816406] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140 <4> [186.816409] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0 <4> [186.816411] smp_init+0x57/0x96 <4> [186.816413] kernel_init_freeable+0xac/0x1c7 <4> [186.816416] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [186.816419] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [186.816421] -> #4 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: <4> [186.816424] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0 <4> [186.816427] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190 <4> [186.816429] kernel_init+0x21/0x100 <4> [186.816431] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [186.816433] -> #3 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [186.816436] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [186.816438] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [186.816502] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x3a6/0x400 [i915] <4> [186.816537] i915_gem_object_set_cache_level+0x32/0x90 [i915] <4> [186.816571] i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x5d/0x160 [i915] <4> [186.816612] intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj+0x9e/0x200 [i915] <4> [186.816679] intel_plane_pin_fb+0x3f/0xd0 [i915] <4> [186.816717] intel_prepare_plane_fb+0x130/0x520 [i915] <4> [186.816722] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes+0x85/0x110 <4> [186.816761] intel_atomic_commit+0xc6/0x350 [i915] <4> [186.816764] drm_atomic_helper_update_plane+0xed/0x110 <4> [186.816768] setplane_internal+0x97/0x190 <4> [186.816770] drm_mode_setplane+0xcd/0x190 <4> [186.816773] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [186.816775] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [186.816778] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0 <4> [186.816780] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60 <4> [186.816782] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4> [186.816785] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4> [186.816787] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [186.816789] -> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [186.816793] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.15+0xc3/0x1090 <4> [186.816795] ww_mutex_lock+0x39/0x70 <4> [186.816798] dma_resv_lockdep+0x10e/0x1f7 <4> [186.816800] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4> [186.816802] kernel_init_freeable+0x137/0x1c7 <4> [186.816804] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [186.816806] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [186.816808] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}: <4> [186.816811] dma_resv_lockdep+0xec/0x1f7 <4> [186.816813] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4> [186.816815] kernel_init_freeable+0x137/0x1c7 <4> [186.816817] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [186.816819] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [186.816820] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}: <4> [186.816824] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [186.816826] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [186.816828] __might_fault+0x63/0x90 <4> [186.816831] _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 <4> [186.816834] perf_read+0x200/0x2b0 <4> [186.816836] vfs_read+0x96/0x160 <4> [186.816838] ksys_read+0x9f/0xe0 <4> [186.816839] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4> [186.816841] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [186.816843] other info that might help us debug this: <4> [186.816846] Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_sem#2 --> pmus_lock --> &cpuctx_mutex <4> [186.816849] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [186.816851] CPU0 CPU1 <4> [186.816853] ---- ---- <4> [186.816854] lock(&cpuctx_mutex); <4> [186.816856] lock(pmus_lock); <4> [186.816858] lock(&cpuctx_mutex); <4> [186.816860] lock(&mm->mmap_sem#2); <4> [186.816861] *** DEADLOCK *** Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/728Signed-off-by: -
Matthew Brost authored
The preferred way to access the uncore is through the GT structure. Update the GuC function, flush_ggtt_writes, to use this path. Signed-off-by:
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 06 Dec, 2019 14 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
All pinning must be done prior to i915_request_create, to avoid timeline->mutex inversions. Here we slightly abuse the context_barrier_task stages to utilise the 'skip' decision as an opportunity to acquire the pin on the new ppgtt. Consider it s/skip/prepare/. At the moment, we only have on user of context_barrier_task, so it might be worth breaking it down for the specific task of set-vm and refactor it later if we find a second purpose. <4> [402.377487] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [402.377493] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7491+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [402.377497] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [402.377502] gem_exec_parall/2506 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [402.377507] ffff888403cdac70 (&kernel#2){+.+.}, at: i915_request_create+0x16/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [402.377593] but task is already holding lock: <4> [402.377597] ffff88835efad550 (&ppgtt->pin_mutex){+.+.}, at: gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x4d/0x110 [i915] <4> [402.377660] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [402.377664] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [402.377668] -> #1 (&ppgtt->pin_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [402.377674] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [402.377713] gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x4d/0x110 [i915] <4> [402.377756] emit_ppgtt_update+0x1dc/0x370 [i915] <4> [402.377801] context_barrier_task+0x176/0x310 [i915] <4> [402.377844] ctx_setparam+0x400/0xb10 [i915] <4> [402.377886] i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl+0xc8/0x160 [i915] <4> [402.377891] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [402.377895] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [402.377899] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0 <4> [402.377903] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60 <4> [402.377906] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4> [402.377910] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4> [402.377914] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [402.377917] -> #0 (&kernel#2){+.+.}: <4> [402.377923] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [402.377926] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [402.377930] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0 <4> [402.377977] i915_request_create+0x16/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [402.378013] intel_engine_flush_barriers+0x4c/0x100 [i915] <4> [402.378062] i915_ggtt_pin+0x7d/0x130 [i915] <4> [402.378108] gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x9c/0x110 [i915] <4> [402.378148] ring_context_pin+0x2e/0xc0 [i915] <4> [402.378183] __intel_context_do_pin+0x6b/0x190 [i915] <4> [402.378226] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x180c/0x26b0 [i915] <4> [402.378268] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11b/0x460 [i915] <4> [402.378272] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [402.378275] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [402.378279] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0 <4> [402.378282] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60 <4> [402.378286] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4> [402.378289] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4> [402.378292] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [402.378295] other info that might help us debug this: <4> [402.378299] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [402.378302] CPU0 CPU1 <4> [402.378305] ---- ---- <4> [402.378307] lock(&ppgtt->pin_mutex); <4> [402.378310] lock(&kernel#2); <4> [402.378314] lock(&ppgtt->pin_mutex); <4> [402.378317] lock(&kernel#2); <4> [402.378320] Signed-off-by: -
Andi Shyti authored
Get rid of the last remaining I915_WRITEs and replace them with intel_uncore_write(). Signed-off-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Commit 9c722e17 ("drm/i915: Disable pipes in reverse order") reverted the order that pipes gets disabled because of TGL master/slave relationship between transcoders in MST mode. But as stated in a comment in skl_commit_modeset_enables() the enabling order is not always crescent, possibly causing previously selected slave transcoder being enabled before master so another approach will be needed to select a transcoder to master in MST mode. It will be similar to the approach taken in port sync. But instead of implement something like intel_trans_port_sync_modeset_disables() to MST lets simply it and iterate over all pipes 2 times, the first one disabling any slave and then disabling everything else. The MST bits will be added in another patch. v2: Not using crtc->active as it is deprecated v3: Removing is_trans_port_sync_mode() check, just check for is_trans_port_sync_master() is enough v4: Adding and using is_trans_port_sync_slave(), otherwise non-port sync pipes will be disabled in the first loop, what is not wrong but is not what patch description promises Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v2) Signed-off-by:
José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205210350.96795-3-jose.souza@intel.com
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
For TGL the step to turn off the transcoder clock was moved to after the complete shutdown of DDI. Only the MST slave transcoders should disable the clock before that. v2: - Adding last_mst_stream to intel_mst_post_disable_dp, make code more easy to read and is similar to first_mst_stream in intel_mst_pre_enable_dp()(Ville's idea) - Calling intel_ddi_disable_pipe_clock() for GEN12+ right intel_disable_ddi_buf() as stated in BSpec(Ville) BSpec: 49190 Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
It should not care about DDB allocations of pipes going through a fullmodeset, as at this point those pipes are disabled. The comment in the code also points to that but that was not what was being executed. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Adding the recently added EHL/JSL PCI ids. BSpec: 29153 Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
If we see an already signaled dma-fence that we want to await on, we skip adding to the i915_sw_fence. However, we should pay attention to whether there was an error on that fence and if so propagate it for our future request. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
If we see an already signaled fence that we want to await on, we skip adding to the i915_sw_fence. However, we should pay attention to whether there was an error on that fence and if so propagate it for our future request. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Only do the locked compare of the existing fence->error if we actually need to set an error. As we tend to call i915_sw_fence_set_error_once() unconditionally, it saves on typing to put the common has-error check into the inline. Signed-off-by:
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
We used to report the minimum possible frequency as both requested and active while GPU was in sleep state. This was a consequence of sampling the value from the "current frequency" field in our software tracking. This was strictly speaking wrong, but given that until recently the current frequency in sleeping state used to be equal to minimum, it did not stand out sufficiently to be noticed as such. After some recent changes have made the current frequency be reported as last active before GPU went to sleep, meaning both requested and active frequencies could end up being reported at their maximum values for the duration of the GPU idle state, it became much more obvious that this does not make sense. To fix this we will now sample the frequency counters only when the GPU is awake. As a consequence reported frequencies could be reported as below the GPU reported minimum but that should be much less confusing that the current situation. v2: * Split out early exit conditions for readability. (Chris) Signed-off-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Before we signal the fence to indicate completion, ensure the pwrite through the indirect GGTT is coherent (as best as we know) in memory. Any listeners to the fence may start immediately and sample from the backing store prior to the writes being posted, thus seeing stale data. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Take a wakeref on the intel_gt specifically for the enabled breadcrumb interrupt so that we can safely process the mmio. If the intel_gt is already asleep by the time we try and setup the breadcrumb interrupt, by a process of elimination we know the request must have been completed and we can skip its enablement! <4> [1518.350005] Unclaimed write to register 0x220a8 <4> [1518.350323] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3685 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1163 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915] <4> [1518.350393] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi x86_pkg_temp_thermal i915 coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core btusb cdc_ether btrtl usbnet btbcm btintel r8152 snd_pcm mii bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc i2c_hid pinctrl_sunrisepoint pinctrl_intel intel_lpss_pci prime_numbers [last unloaded: vgem] <4> [1518.350646] CPU: 2 PID: 3685 Comm: gem_exec_parse_ Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7490+ #1 <4> [1518.350708] Hardware name: Google Caroline/Caroline, BIOS MrChromebox 08/27/2018 <4> [1518.350946] RIP: 0010:__unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915] <4> [1518.350992] Code: 74 05 5b 5d 41 5c c3 45 84 e4 48 c7 c0 95 8d 47 a0 48 c7 c6 8b 8d 47 a0 48 0f 44 f0 89 ea 48 c7 c7 9e 8d 47 a0 e8 40 45 e3 e0 <0f> 0b 83 2d 27 4f 2a 00 01 5b 5d 41 5c c3 66 90 41 55 41 54 55 53 <4> [1518.351100] RSP: 0018:ffffc900007f39c8 EFLAGS: 00010086 <4> [1518.351140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4> [1518.351202] RDX: 0000000080000006 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff <4> [1518.351249] RBP: 00000000000220a8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 <4> [1518.351296] R10: ffffc900007f3990 R11: ffffc900007f3868 R12: 0000000000000000 <4> [1518.351342] R13: 00000000fefeffff R14: 0000000000000092 R15: ffff888155fea000 <4> [1518.351391] FS: 00007fc255abfe40(0000) GS:ffff88817ab00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [1518.351445] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [1518.351485] CR2: 00007fc2554882d0 CR3: 0000000168ca2005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 <4> [1518.351529] Call Trace: <4> [1518.351746] fwtable_write32+0x114/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [1518.351795] ? sync_file_alloc+0x80/0x80 <4> [1518.352039] gen8_logical_ring_enable_irq+0x30/0x50 [i915] <4> [1518.352295] irq_enable.part.10+0x23/0x40 [i915] <4> [1518.352523] i915_request_enable_breadcrumb+0xb5/0x330 [i915] <4> [1518.352575] ? sync_file_alloc+0x80/0x80 <4> [1518.352612] __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x60/0x160 <4> [1518.352653] ? sync_file_alloc+0x80/0x80 <4> [1518.352685] dma_fence_add_callback+0x44/0xd0 <4> [1518.352726] sync_file_poll+0x95/0xc0 <4> [1518.352767] do_sys_poll+0x24d/0x570 Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Remove the vma we wish to destroy from the gt->closed_list to avoid having two i915_vma_parked() try and free it. Fixes: aa5e4453 ("drm/i915/gem: Try to flush pending unbind events") References: 2850748e ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
It appears now that we have the ring TLB invalidation in place, we need only update the page directory cachelines that we have altered. A great reduction from rewriting the whole 2MiB ppgtt on every update. Signed-off-by:
-
- 05 Dec, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
As __active_retire() does it's final atomic_dec() under the ref->tree_lock spinlock, in order to prevent ourselves from reusing the ref->cache and ref->tree as they are being destroyed, we need to serialise with the retirement during i915_active_acquire(). [ +0.000005] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:157! [ +0.000011] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ +0.000004] CPU: 7 PID: 188 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc8-03070-gac5e57322614 #89 [ +0.000002] Hardware name: Razer Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019/LY320, BIOS 1.02 09/10/2019 [ +0.000082] Workqueue: events_unbound active_work [i915] [ +0.000059] RIP: 0010:__active_retire+0x115/0x120 [i915] [ +0.000003] Code: 75 28 48 8b 3d 8c 6e 1a 00 48 89 ee e8 e4 5f a5 c0 48 8b 44 24 10 65 48 33 04 25 28 00 00 00 75 0f 48 83 c4 18 5b 5d 41 5c c3 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b e8 a0 90 87 c0 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 3d 54 6e 1a [ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffb833003f7e48 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ +0.000003] RAX: ffff8d6e8d726d00 RBX: ffff8d6f9db4e840 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000001] RDX: ffffffff82605930 RSI: ffff8d6f9adc4908 RDI: ffff8d6e96cefe28 [ +0.000002] RBP: ffff8d6e96cefe00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8d6f9ffe9a50 [ +0.000002] R10: 0000000000000048 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: ffff8d6f9adc4930 [ +0.000001] R13: ffff8d6f9e04fb00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8d6f9adc4988 [ +0.000002] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d6f9ffc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000002] CR2: 000055eb5a34cf10 CR3: 000000018d609002 CR4: 0000000000760ee0 [ +0.000002] PKRU: 55555554 [ +0.000001] Call Trace: [ +0.000010] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x350 [ +0.000004] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0 [ +0.000004] kthread+0xfb/0x130 [ +0.000004] ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350 [ +0.000003] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ +0.000005] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 Reported-by:
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> Fixes: c9ad602f ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree") Signed-off-by:
-
Andi Shyti authored
Get rid of the last remaining I915_READ in gt/ and make gt-land the first I915_READ-free happy island. Suggested-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As virtual_context_destroy() may be called from a request signal, it may be called from inside an irq-off section, and so we need to do a full save/restore of the irq state rather than blindly re-enable irqs upon unlocking. <4> [110.024262] WARNING: inconsistent lock state <4> [110.024277] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7489+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [110.024292] -------------------------------- <4> [110.024305] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. <4> [110.024323] kworker/0:0/5 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: <4> [110.024338] ffff88826a0c7a18 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock){?.-.}, at: i915_request_retire+0x221/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.024592] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: <4> [110.024612] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [110.024627] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50 <4> [110.024788] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x38c/0x600 [i915] <4> [110.024808] irq_work_run_list+0x49/0x70 <4> [110.024824] irq_work_run+0x26/0x50 <4> [110.024839] smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x44/0x1e0 <4> [110.024855] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 <4> [110.024871] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x47f <4> [110.024885] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0 <4> [110.024898] do_IRQ+0x83/0x160 <4> [110.024910] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4> [110.024922] irq event stamp: 172864 <4> [110.024938] hardirqs last enabled at (172863): [<ffffffff819ea214>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.024963] hardirqs last disabled at (172864): [<ffffffff819e9fba>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40 <4> [110.024988] softirqs last enabled at (172812): [<ffffffff81c00385>] __do_softirq+0x385/0x47f <4> [110.025012] softirqs last disabled at (172797): [<ffffffff810b829a>] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0 <4> [110.025031] other info that might help us debug this: <4> [110.025049] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [110.025065] CPU0 <4> [110.025075] ---- <4> [110.025084] lock(&(&rq->lock)->rlock); <4> [110.025099] <Interrupt> <4> [110.025109] lock(&(&rq->lock)->rlock); <4> [110.025124] *** DEADLOCK *** <4> [110.025144] 4 locks held by kworker/0:0/5: <4> [110.025156] #0: ffff88827588f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1de/0x620 <4> [110.025187] #1: ffffc9000006fe78 ((work_completion)(&engine->retire_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1de/0x620 <4> [110.025219] #2: ffff88825605e270 (&kernel#2){+.+.}, at: engine_retire+0x57/0xe0 [i915] <4> [110.025405] #3: ffff88826a0c7a18 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock){?.-.}, at: i915_request_retire+0x221/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.025634] stack backtrace: <4> [110.025653] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7489+ #1 <4> [110.025675] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [110.025856] Workqueue: events engine_retire [i915] <4> [110.025872] Call Trace: <4> [110.025891] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b <4> [110.025907] mark_lock+0x49a/0x500 <4> [110.025926] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x200/0x200 <4> [110.025946] mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 <4> [110.025962] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.025978] lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xa2/0x1c0 <4> [110.025995] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.026171] virtual_context_destroy+0xc5/0x2e0 [i915] <4> [110.026376] __active_retire+0xb4/0x290 [i915] <4> [110.026396] dma_fence_signal_locked+0x9e/0x1b0 <4> [110.026613] i915_request_retire+0x451/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.026766] retire_requests+0x4d/0x60 [i915] <4> [110.026919] engine_retire+0x63/0xe0 [i915] Fixes: b1e3177b ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex") Fixes: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine") Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
As we may start the loop again, we require our local list of i915_vma we've processed to be reinitialised. Fixes: aa5e4453 ("drm/i915/gem: Try to flush pending unbind events") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/731Signed-off-by:
-
