- 12 Jan, 2023 5 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When syncing a log, if we fail to update a log root in the log root tree, we are aborting the transaction if the failure was not -ENOSPC. This is excessive because there is a chance that a transaction commit can succeed, and therefore avoid to turn the filesystem into RO mode. All we need to be careful about is to mark the log for a full commit, which we already do, to make sure no one commits a super block pointing to an outdated log root tree. So don't abort the transaction if we fail to update a log root in the log root tree, and log an error if the failure is not -ENOSPC, so that it does not go completely unnoticed. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
When syncing the log, if we fail to write log tree extent buffers, we mark the log for a full commit and abort the transaction. However we don't need to abort the transaction, all we really need to do is to make sure no one can commit a superblock pointing to new log tree roots. Just because we got a failure writing extent buffers for a log tree, it does not mean we will also fail to do a transaction commit. One particular case is if due to a bug somewhere, when writing log tree extent buffers, the tree checker detects some corruption and the writeout fails because of that. Aborting the transaction can be very disruptive for a user, specially if the issue happened on a root filesystem. One example is the scenario in the Link tag below, where an isolated corruption on log tree leaves was causing transaction aborts when syncing the log. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
When logging conflicting inodes, if we reach the maximum limit of inodes, we return BTRFS_LOG_FORCE_COMMIT to force a transaction commit. However we don't mark the log for full commit (with btrfs_set_log_full_commit()), which means that once we leave the log transaction and before we commit the transaction, some other task may sync the log, which is incomplete as we have not logged all conflicting inodes, leading to some inconsistent in case that log ends up being replayed. So also call btrfs_set_log_full_commit() at add_conflicting_inode(). Fixes: e09d94c9 ("btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
Sometimes we log a directory without holding its VFS lock, so while we logging it, dir index entries may be added or removed. This typically happens when logging a dentry from a parent directory that points to a new directory, through log_new_dir_dentries(), or when while logging some other inode we also need to log its parent directories (through btrfs_log_all_parents()). This means that while we are at log_dir_items(), we may not find a dir index key we found before, because it was deleted in the meanwhile, so a call to btrfs_search_slot() may return 1 (key not found). In that case we return from log_dir_items() with a success value (the variable 'err' has a value of 0). This can lead to a few problems, specially in the case where the variable 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1 (and it's initialized to that when it was declared): 1) By returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and a value of (u64)-1 for '*last_offset_ret', we end up not logging any other dir index keys that follow the missing, just deleted, index key. The (u64)-1 value makes log_directory_changes() not call log_dir_items() again; 2) Before returning with success (0), log_dir_items(), will log a dir index range item covering a range from the last old dentry index (stored in the variable 'last_old_dentry_offset') to the value of 'last_offset'. If 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1, then it means if the log is persisted and replayed after a power failure, it will cause deletion of all the directory entries that have an index number between last_old_dentry_offset + 1 and (u64)-1; 3) We can end up returning from log_dir_items() with ctx->last_dir_item_offset having a lower value than inode->last_dir_index_offset, because the former is set to the current key we are processing at process_dir_items_leaf(), and at the end of log_directory_changes() we set inode->last_dir_index_offset to the current value of ctx->last_dir_item_offset. So if for example a deletion of a lower dir index key happened, we set ctx->last_dir_item_offset to that index value, then if we return from log_dir_items() because btrfs_search_slot() returned 1, we end up returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and then log_directory_changes() sets inode->last_dir_index_offset to a lower value than it had before. This can result in unpredictable and unexpected behaviour when we need to log again the directory in the same transaction, and can result in ending up with a log tree leaf that has duplicated keys, as we do batch insertions of dir index keys into a log tree. So fix this by making log_dir_items() move on to the next dir index key if it does not find the one it was looking for. Reported-by: David Arendt <admin@prnet.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
When logging a directory, at log_dir_items(), if we get an error when attempting to search the subvolume tree for a dir index item, we end up returning 0 (success) from log_dir_items() because 'err' is left with a value of 0. This can lead to a few problems, specially in the case the variable 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1 (and it's initialized to that when it was declared): 1) By returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and a value of (u64)-1 for '*last_offset_ret', we end up not logging any other dir index keys that follow the missing, just deleted, index key. The (u64)-1 value makes log_directory_changes() not call log_dir_items() again; 2) Before returning with success (0), log_dir_items(), will log a dir index range item covering a range from the last old dentry index (stored in the variable 'last_old_dentry_offset') to the value of 'last_offset'. If 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1, then it means if the log is persisted and replayed after a power failure, it will cause deletion of all the directory entries that have an index number between last_old_dentry_offset + 1 and (u64)-1; 3) We can end up returning from log_dir_items() with ctx->last_dir_item_offset having a lower value than inode->last_dir_index_offset, because the former is set to the current key we are processing at process_dir_items_leaf(), and at the end of log_directory_changes() we set inode->last_dir_index_offset to the current value of ctx->last_dir_item_offset. So if for example a deletion of a lower dir index key happened, we set ctx->last_dir_item_offset to that index value, then if we return from log_dir_items() because btrfs_search_slot() returned an error, we end up returning without any error from log_dir_items() and then log_directory_changes() sets inode->last_dir_index_offset to a lower value than it had before. This can result in unpredictable and unexpected behaviour when we need to log again the directory in the same transaction, and can result in ending up with a log tree leaf that has duplicated keys, as we do batch insertions of dir index keys into a log tree. Fix this by setting 'err' to the value of 'ret' in case btrfs_search_slot() or btrfs_previous_item() returned an error. That will result in falling back to a full transaction commit. Reported-by: David Arendt <admin@prnet.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/ Fixes: e02119d5 ("Btrfs: Add a write ahead tree log to optimize synchronous operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 Jan, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Naohiro Aota authored
The commit 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned") disabled the metadata over-commit to track active zones properly. However, it also introduced a heavy overhead by allocating new metadata block groups and/or flushing dirty buffers to release the space reservations. Specifically, a workload (write only without any sync operations) worsen its performance from 343.77 MB/sec (v5.19) to 182.89 MB/sec (v6.0). The performance is still bad on current misc-next which is 187.95 MB/sec. And, with this patch applied, it improves back to 326.70 MB/sec (+73.82%). This patch introduces a new fs_info->flag BTRFS_FS_NO_OVERCOMMIT to indicate it needs to disable the metadata over-commit. The flag is enabled when a device with max active zones limit is loaded into a file-system. Fixes: 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There are some reports from the mailing list that since v6.1 kernel, the WARN_ON() inside btrfs_qgroup_account_extent() gets triggered during rescan: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6424 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:2756 btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs] CPU: 3 PID: 6424 Comm: snapperd Tainted: P OE 6.1.2-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 05c7a1b1b61d5627475528f71f50444637b5aad7 RIP: 0010:btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs] Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_commit_transaction+0x30c/0xb40 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6] ? start_transaction+0xc3/0x5b0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6] btrfs_qgroup_rescan+0x42/0xc0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6] btrfs_ioctl+0x1ab9/0x25c0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa9/0x4a0 ? mntput_no_expire+0x4a/0x240 ? __seccomp_filter+0x319/0x4d0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40 ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fd9b790d9bf </TASK> [CAUSE] Since commit e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), if our qgroup is already in inconsistent state, we will no longer do the time-consuming backref walk. This can leave some qgroup records without a valid old_roots ulist. Normally this is fine, as btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() would also skip those records if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set. But there is a small window, if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set, and inserted some qgroup_record without a old_roots ulist, but then the user triggered a qgroup rescan. During btrfs_qgroup_rescan(), we firstly clear NO_ACCOUNTING flag, then commit current transaction. And since we have a qgroup_record with old_roots = NULL, we trigger the WARN_ON() during btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(). [FIX] Unfortunately due to the introduction of NO_ACCOUNTING flag, the assumption that every qgroup_record would have its old_roots populated is no longer correct. Fix the false alerts and drop the WARN_ON(). Reported-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de> Reported-by: HanatoK <summersnow9403@gmail.com> Fixes: e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2403c697-ddaf-58ad-3829-0335fc89df09@gmail.com/Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When test case btrfs/219 (aka, mount a registered device but with a lower generation) failed, there is not any useful information for the end user to find out what's going wrong. The mount failure just looks like this: # mount -o loop /tmp/219.img2 /mnt/btrfs/ mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount(2) system call failed: File exists. dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call. While the dmesg contains nothing but the loop device change: loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 524288 [CAUSE] In device_list_add() we have a lot of extra checks to reject invalid cases. That function also contains the regular device scan result like the following prompt: BTRFS: device fsid 6222333e-f9f1-47e6-b306-55ddd4dcaef4 devid 1 transid 8 /dev/loop0 scanned by systemd-udevd (3027) But unfortunately not all errors have their own error messages, thus if we hit something wrong in device_add_list(), there may be no error messages at all. [FIX] Add errors message for all non-ENOMEM errors. For ENOMEM, I'd say we're in a much worse situation, and there should be some OOM messages way before our call sites. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 03 Jan, 2023 7 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] Even with commit 81d5d614 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling"), btrfs can still mount a fs with unsupported compat_ro flags read-only, then remount it RW: # btrfs ins dump-super /dev/loop0 | grep compat_ro_flags -A 3 compat_ro_flags 0x403 ( FREE_SPACE_TREE | FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID | unknown flag: 0x400 ) # mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs mount: /mnt/btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call. ^^^ RW mount failed as expected ^^^ # dmesg -t | tail -n5 loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1048576 BTRFS: device fsid cb5b82f5-0fdd-4d81-9b4b-78533c324afa devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0 scanned by mount (1146) BTRFS info (device loop0): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree BTRFS error (device loop0): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403) BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed # mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs ^^^ RW remount succeeded unexpectedly ^^^ [CAUSE] Currently we use btrfs_check_features() to check compat_ro flags against our current mount flags. That function get reused between open_ctree() and btrfs_remount(). But for btrfs_remount(), the super block we passed in still has the old mount flags, thus btrfs_check_features() still believes we're mounting read-only. [FIX] Replace the existing @sb argument with @is_rw_mount. As originally we only use @sb to determine if the mount is RW. Now it's callers' responsibility to determine if the mount is RW, and since there are only two callers, the check is pretty simple: - caller in open_ctree() Just pass !sb_rdonly(). - caller in btrfs_remount() Pass !(*flags & SB_RDONLY), as our check should be against the new flags. Now we can correctly reject the RW remount: # mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount point not mounted or bad option. dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call. # dmesg -t | tail -n 1 BTRFS error (device loop0: state M): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403) Reported-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <shepjeng@gmail.com> Fixes: 81d5d614 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently we have a btrfs_debug() for run_one_delayed_ref() failure, but if end users hit such problem, there will be no chance that btrfs_debug() is enabled. This can lead to very little useful info for debugging. This patch will: - Add extra info for error reporting Including: * logical bytenr * num_bytes * type * action * ref_mod - Replace the btrfs_debug() with btrfs_err() - Move the error reporting into run_one_delayed_ref() This is to avoid use-after-free, the @node can be freed in the caller. This error should only be triggered at most once. As if run_one_delayed_ref() failed, we trigger the error message, then causing the call chain to error out: btrfs_run_delayed_refs() `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs() `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head() `- run_one_delayed_ref() And we will abort the current transaction in btrfs_run_delayed_refs(). If we have to run delayed refs for the abort transaction, run_one_delayed_ref() will just cleanup the refs and do nothing, thus no new error messages would be output. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There is a bug report that a BUG_ON() in btrfs_repair_io_failure() (originally repair_io_failure() in v6.0 kernel) got triggered when replacing a unreliable disk: BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed root 257 ino 2397453 off 39624704 csum 0xb0d18c75 expected csum 0x4dae9c5e mirror 3 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2380! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 PID: 3614331 Comm: kworker/u257:2 Tainted: G OE 6.0.0-5-amd64 #1 Debian 6.0.10-2 Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7C60/TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60), BIOS 2.70 07/01/2021 Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs] RIP: 0010:repair_io_failure+0x24a/0x260 [btrfs] Call Trace: <TASK> clean_io_failure+0x14d/0x180 [btrfs] end_bio_extent_readpage+0x412/0x6e0 [btrfs] ? __switch_to+0x106/0x420 process_one_work+0x1c7/0x380 worker_thread+0x4d/0x380 ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0 kthread+0xe9/0x110 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [CAUSE] Before the BUG_ON(), we got some read errors from the replace target first, note the mirror number (3, which is beyond RAID1 duplication, thus it's read from the replace target device). Then at the BUG_ON() location, we are trying to writeback the repaired sectors back the failed device. The check looks like this: ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_WRITE, logical, &map_length, &bioc, mirror_num); if (ret) goto out_counter_dec; BUG_ON(mirror_num != bioc->mirror_num); But inside btrfs_map_block(), we can modify bioc->mirror_num especially for dev-replace: if (dev_replace_is_ongoing && mirror_num == map->num_stripes + 1 && !need_full_stripe(op) && dev_replace->tgtdev != NULL) { ret = get_extra_mirror_from_replace(fs_info, logical, *length, dev_replace->srcdev->devid, &mirror_num, &physical_to_patch_in_first_stripe); patch_the_first_stripe_for_dev_replace = 1; } Thus if we're repairing the replace target device, we're going to trigger that BUG_ON(). But in reality, the read failure from the replace target device may be that, our replace hasn't reached the range we're reading, thus we're reading garbage, but with replace running, the range would be properly filled later. Thus in that case, we don't need to do anything but let the replace routine to handle it. [FIX] Instead of a BUG_ON(), just skip the repair if we're repairing the device replace target device. Reported-by: 小太 <nospam@kota.moe> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACsxjPYyJGQZ+yvjzxA1Nn2LuqkYqTCcUH43S=+wXhyf8S00Ag@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
During lseek, when searching for delalloc in a range that represents a hole and that range has a length of 1 byte, we end up not doing the actual delalloc search in the inode's io tree, resulting in not correctly reporting the offset with data or a hole. This actually only happens when the start offset is 0 because with any other start offset we round it down by sector size. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -q 0 1" /mnt/sdc/foo $ xfs_io -c "seek -d 0" /mnt/sdc/foo Whence Result DATA EOF It should have reported an offset of 0 instead of EOF. Fix this by updating btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range() and count_range_bits() to deal with inclusive ranges properly. These functions are already supposed to work with inclusive end offsets, they just got it wrong in a couple places due to off-by-one mistakes. A test case for fstests will be added later. Reported-by: Joan Bruguera Micó <joanbrugueram@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20221223020509.457113-1-joanbrugueram@gmail.com/ Fixes: b6e83356 ("btrfs: make hole and data seeking a lot more efficient") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1 Tested-by: Joan Bruguera Micó <joanbrugueram@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There is a bug report that on a RAID0 NVMe btrfs system, under heavy write load the filesystem can flip RO randomly. With extra debugging, it shows some tree blocks failed to pass their level checks, and if that happens at critical path of a transaction, we abort the transaction: BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3): level verify failed on logical 5446121209856 mirror 1 wanted 0 found 1 BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3: state A): Transaction aborted (error -5) BTRFS: error (device nvme0n1p3: state A) in btrfs_finish_ordered_io:3343: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p3: state EA): forced readonly [CAUSE] The reporter has already bisected to commit 947a6299 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into validate_extent_buffer()"). And with extra debugging, it shows we can have btrfs_tree_parent_check filled with all zeros in the following call trace: submit_one_bio+0xd4/0xe0 submit_extent_page+0x142/0x550 read_extent_buffer_pages+0x584/0x9c0 ? __pfx_end_bio_extent_readpage+0x10/0x10 ? folio_unlock+0x1d/0x50 btrfs_read_extent_buffer+0x98/0x150 read_tree_block+0x43/0xa0 read_block_for_search+0x266/0x370 btrfs_search_slot+0x351/0xd30 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 btrfs_lookup_csum+0x63/0x150 btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x197/0x6c0 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x9f/0xc0 ? lock_release+0x14b/0x440 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x29/0x50 btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x441/0x860 btrfs_work_helper+0xfe/0x400 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 process_one_work+0x294/0x5b0 worker_thread+0x4f/0x3a0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xf5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 Currently we only copy the btrfs_tree_parent_check structure into bbio at read_extent_buffer_pages() after we have assembled the bbio. But as shown above, submit_extent_page() itself can already submit the bbio, leaving the bbio->parent_check uninitialized, and cause the false alert. [FIX] Instead of copying @check into bbio after bbio is assembled, we pass @check in btrfs_bio_ctrl::parent_check, and copy the content of parent_check in submit_one_bio() for metadata read. By this we should be able to pass the needed info for metadata endio verification, and fix the false alert. Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CABXGCsNzVxo4iq-tJSGm_kO1UggHXgq6CdcHDL=z5FL4njYXSQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 947a6299 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into validate_extent_buffer()") Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
From a recent regression report, we found that after commit 947a6299 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into validate_extent_buffer()") if we have a level mismatch (false alert though), there is no error message at all. This makes later debugging harder. This patch will add the proper error message for such case. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CABXGCsNzVxo4iq-tJSGm_kO1UggHXgq6CdcHDL=z5FL4njYXSQ@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Tanmay Bhushan authored
The em->len value is supposed to be verified in the assertion condition though we expect it to be same as the sectorsize. Fixes: a196a894 ("btrfs: do not reset extent map members for inline extents read") Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 20 Dec, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When logging a new name, we don't expect to fail joining a log transaction since we know at least one of the inodes was logged before in the current transaction. However if we fail for some unexpected reason, we end up not freeing the fscrypt name we previously allocated. So fix that by freeing the name in case we failed to join a log transaction. Fixes: ab3c5c18 ("btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper") Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
Commit 75b47033 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery path to use error_bitmap") introduced an uninitialized return variable. This can be caught by gcc 12.1 by -Wmaybe-uninitialized: CC [M] fs/btrfs/raid56.o fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function ‘scrub_rbio’: fs/btrfs/raid56.c:2801:15: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 2801 | ret = recover_scrub_rbio(rbio); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/raid56.c:2649:13: note: ‘ret’ was declared here 2649 | int ret; The warning is disabled by default so we haven't caught that. Due to the bug the raid56 scrub fstests have been failing since the patch was merged, so initialize that. Fixes: 75b47033 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery path to use error_bitmap") Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
If a file consists of an inline extent followed by a regular or prealloc extent, then a legitimate attempt to resolve a logical address in the non-inline region will result in add_all_parents reading the invalid offset field of the inline extent. If the inline extent item is placed in the leaf eb s.t. it is the first item, attempting to access the offset field will not only be meaningless, it will go past the end of the eb and cause this panic: [17.626048] BTRFS warning (device dm-2): bad eb member end: ptr 0x3fd4 start 30834688 member offset 16377 size 8 [17.631693] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5088000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [17.635041] CPU: 2 PID: 1267 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.0-07246-g75175d5adc74-dirty #199 [17.637969] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [17.641995] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_64+0xe7/0x110 [17.649890] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f73a08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [17.651652] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88810c42d000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [17.653921] RDX: 0005088000000000 RSI: ffffc90001f73a0f RDI: 0000000000000001 [17.656174] RBP: 0000000000000ff9 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: c0000000fffeffff [17.658441] R10: ffffc90001f73790 R11: ffffc90001f73788 R12: ffff888106afe918 [17.661070] R13: 0000000000003fd4 R14: 0000000000003f6f R15: cdcdcdcdcdcdcdcd [17.663617] FS: 00007f64e7627d80(0000) GS:ffff888237c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [17.666525] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [17.668664] CR2: 000055d4a39152e8 CR3: 000000010c596002 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [17.671253] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [17.673634] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [17.676034] PKRU: 55555554 [17.677004] Call Trace: [17.677877] add_all_parents+0x276/0x480 [17.679325] find_parent_nodes+0xfae/0x1590 [17.680771] btrfs_find_all_leafs+0x5e/0xa0 [17.682217] iterate_extent_inodes+0xce/0x260 [17.683809] ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50 [17.685597] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0 [17.687404] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0 [17.689121] ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50 [17.691010] btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x131/0x190 [17.692946] btrfs_ioctl+0x104a/0x2f60 [17.694384] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x182/0x220 [17.695995] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [17.697394] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [17.698697] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [17.700017] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [17.701753] RIP: 0033:0x7f64e72761b7 [17.709355] RSP: 002b:00007ffefb067f58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [17.712088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f64e72761b7 [17.714667] RDX: 00007ffefb067fb0 RSI: 00000000c0389424 RDI: 0000000000000003 [17.717386] RBP: 00007ffefb06d188 R08: 000055d4a390d2b0 R09: 00007f64e7340a60 [17.719938] R10: 0000000000000231 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [17.722383] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000c0389424 R15: 000055d4a38fd2a0 [17.724839] Modules linked in: Fix the bug by detecting the inline extent item in add_all_parents and skipping to the next extent item. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 Dec, 2022 5 commits
-
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Fix a typo of printing FLUSH_DELAYED_REFS event in flush_space() as FLUSH_ELAYED_REFS. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
In the patch a2c8d27e ("btrfs: use a structure to pass arguments to backref walking functions") Filipe converted everybody to using a new context struct to use for backref lookups, but accidentally dropped the BTRFS_SEQ_LAST usage that exists for qgroups. Add this back so we have the previous behavior. Fixes: a2c8d27e ("btrfs: use a structure to pass arguments to backref walking functions") Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
When removing the btrfs module we are not calling btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids() which results in leaking btrfs_fs_devices structures and other resources. This is a regression recently introduced by a refactoring of the module initialization and exit sequence, which simply removed the call to btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids() in the exit path, resulting in the leaks. So fix this by calling btrfs_cleanup_fs_uuids() at exit_btrfs_fs(). Fixes: 5565b8e0 ("btrfs: make module init/exit match their sequence") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
All error handling paths end to 'out', except this memory allocation failure. This is spurious. So branch to the error handling path also in this case. It will add a call to: memset(&root->defrag_progress, 0, sizeof(root->defrag_progress)); Fixes: 6702ed49 ("Btrfs: Add run time btree defrag, and an ioctl to force btree defrag") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
If new_whiteout_inode() fails, some resources need to be freed. Add the missing goto to the error handling path. Fixes: ab3c5c18 ("btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper") Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 05 Dec, 2022 17 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
Currently we print the transaction aborted message with a debug level, but a transaction abort is an exceptional event that indicates something went wrong and it's useful to have it printed with an error level as it helps analysing problems in a production environment, where debug level messages are typically not logged. For example reports from syzbot never include the transaction aborted message, since the log level on the test machines is above the debug level. So change the log level from debug to error. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
When syncing this code into btrfs-progs Dave noticed there's some things we were losing in the sync that are needed. This syncs those changes into the kernel, which include a few comments that weren't in the kernel, some whitespace changes, an attribute, and the cplusplus bit. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we get -ENOMEM while dropping file extent items in a given range, at btrfs_drop_extents(), due to failure to allocate memory when attempting to increment the reference count for an extent or drop the reference count, we handle it with a BUG_ON(). This is excessive, instead we can simply abort the transaction and return the error to the caller. In fact most callers of btrfs_drop_extents(), directly or indirectly, already abort the transaction if btrfs_drop_extents() returns any error. Also, we already have error paths at btrfs_drop_extents() that may return -ENOMEM and in those cases we abort the transaction, like for example anything that changes the b+tree may return -ENOMEM due to a failure to allocate a new extent buffer when COWing an existing extent buffer, such as a call to btrfs_duplicate_item() for example. So replace the BUG_ON() calls with proper logic to abort the transaction and return the error. Reported-by: syzbot+0b1fb6b0108c27419f9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000089773e05ee4b9cb4@google.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
void0red authored
Store the error code before freeing the extent_map. Though it's reference counted structure, in that function it's the first and last allocation so this would lead to a potential use-after-free. The error can happen eg. when chunk is stored on a missing device and the degraded mount option is missing. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216721Reported-by: eriri <1527030098@qq.com> Fixes: adfb69af ("btrfs: add_missing_dev() should return the actual error") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: void0red <void0red@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
As of commit 193df624 ("btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode"), the overwrite_item() function is always called for a root that is from a fs/subvolume tree. In other words, now it's only used during log replay to modify a fs/subvolume tree. Therefore we can remove the logic that checks if we are dealing with a log tree at overwrite_item(). So remove that logic, replacing it with an assertion and document that if we ever need to support a log root there, we will need to clone the leaf from the fs/subvolume tree and then release it before modifying the log tree, which is needed to avoid a potential deadlock, similar to the one recently fixed by a patch with the subject: "btrfs: do not modify log tree while holding a leaf from fs tree locked" Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
After commit 193df624 ("btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode"), there are no more callers of do_overwrite_item(), except overwrite_item(). Originally both used to be the same function, but were split in commit 086dcbfa ("btrfs: insert items in batches when logging a directory when possible"), as there was the need to execute all logic of overwrite_item() but skip the tree search, since in the context of directory logging we already had a path with a leaf to copy data from. So unify them again as there is no more need to have them split. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Artem Chernyshev authored
Using strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings are deprecated. To avoid possible forming of non-terminated string strscpy() should be used. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@red-soft.ru> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This was caught when syncing extent-io-tree.c into btrfs-progs. This however isn't really a problem, the only way next would be uninitialized is if we found the range we were looking for, and in this case we don't care about next. However it's a compile error, so fix it up. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
I don't know how this isn't caught when we build this in the kernel, but while syncing extent-io-tree.c into btrfs-progs I got an error because parent could potentially be uninitialized when we link in a new node, specifically when the extent_io_tree is empty. This means we could have garbage in the parent color. I don't know what the ramifications are of that, but it's probably not great, so fix this by initializing parent to NULL. I spot checked all of our other usages in btrfs and we appear to be doing the correct thing everywhere else. Fixes: c7e118cf ("btrfs: open code rbtree search in insert_state") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
ChenXiaoSong authored
Add annotations to functions that might sleep due to allocations or IO and could be called from various contexts. In case of btrfs_search_slot it's not obvious why it would sleep: btrfs_search_slot setup_nodes_for_search reada_for_balance btrfs_readahead_node_child btrfs_readahead_tree_block btrfs_find_create_tree_block alloc_extent_buffer kmem_cache_zalloc /* allocate memory non-atomically, might sleep */ kmem_cache_alloc(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL|__GFP_ZERO) read_extent_buffer_pages submit_extent_page /* disk IO, might sleep */ submit_one_bio Other examples where the sleeping could happen is in 3 places might sleep in update_qgroup_limit_item(), as shown below: update_qgroup_limit_item btrfs_alloc_path /* allocate memory non-atomically, might sleep */ kmem_cache_zalloc(btrfs_path_cachep, GFP_NOFS) Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We don't have these defined in the kernel because we don't have any users of these helpers. However we do use them in btrfs-progs, so define them to make keeping accessors.h in sync between progs and the kernel easier. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We already have this defined in btrfs-progs, add it to the kernel to make it easier to sync these files into btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is simply the same thing as btrfs_item_nr_offset(leaf, 0), so remove this helper and replace it's usage with the above statement. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have some gnarly memmove and copy_extent_buffer calls for leaf manipulation. This is because our item offsets aren't absolute, they're based on 0 being where the items start in the leaf, which is after the btrfs_header. This means any manipulation of the data requires adding sizeof(struct btrfs_header) to the offsets we pull from the items. Moving the items themselves is easier as the helpers are absolute offsets, however we of course have to call the helpers to get the offsets for the item numbers. This makes for copy_extent_buffer/memmove_extent_buffer calls that are kind of hard to reason about what's happening. Fix this by pushing this logic into helpers. For data we'll only use the item provided offsets, and the helpers will use the BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_OFFSET addition for the offsets. Additionally for the item manipulation simply pass in the item numbers, and then the helpers will call the offset helper to get the actual offset into the leaf. The diffstat makes this look like more code, but that's simply because I added comments for the helpers, it's net negative for the amount of code, and is easier to reason. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is a change needed for extent tree v2, as we will be growing the header size. This exists in btrfs-progs currently, and not having it makes syncing accessors.[ch] more problematic. So make this change to set us up for extent tree v2 and match what btrfs-progs does to make syncing easier. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is actually a change for extent tree v2, but it exists in btrfs-progs but not in the kernel. This makes it annoying to sync accessors.h with btrfs-progs, and since this is the way I need it for extent-tree v2 simply update these helpers to take the extent buffer in order to make syncing possible now, and make the extent tree v2 stuff easier moving forward. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
These got moved because of copy+paste, but this code exists in ctree.c, so move the declarations back into ctree.h. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-