- 11 Nov, 2022 11 commits
-
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Martin KaFai Lau says: ==================== From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> The bpf-tc prog has already been able to access the skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp. This set extends the same hwtstamp access to the sockops prog. v2: - Fixed the btf_dump selftest which depends on the last member of 'struct bpf_sock_ops'. ==================== Signed-off-by:Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
This patch tests reading the skops->skb_hwtstamp field. A local test was also done such that the shinfo hwtstamp was temporary set to a non zero value in the kernel bpf_skops_parse_hdr() and the same value can be read by the skops test. An adjustment is needed to the btf_dump selftest because the changes in the 'struct bpf_sock_ops'. Signed-off-by:
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221107230420.4192307-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
This patch fixes the incorrect ASSERT test in tcp_hdr_options during the CHECK to ASSERT macro cleanup. Fixes: 3082f8cd ("selftests/bpf: Convert tcp_hdr_options test to ASSERT_* macros") Signed-off-by:
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> Acked-by:
-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
The bpf-tc prog has already been able to access the skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp. This patch extends the same hwtstamp access to the sockops prog. In sockops, the skb is also available to the bpf prog during the BPF_SOCK_OPS_PARSE_HDR_OPT_CB event. There is a use case that the hwtstamp will be useful to the sockops prog to better measure the one-way-delay when the sender has put the tx timestamp in the tcp header option. Signed-off-by:
-
Yang Jihong authored
xdp_synproxy fails to be compiled in the 32-bit arch, log is as follows: xdp_synproxy.c: In function 'parse_options': xdp_synproxy.c:175:36: error: left shift count >= width of type [-Werror=shift-count-overflow] 175 | *tcpipopts = (mss6 << 32) | (ttl << 24) | (wscale << 16) | mss4; | ^~ xdp_synproxy.c: In function 'syncookie_open_bpf_maps': xdp_synproxy.c:289:28: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast] 289 | .map_ids = (__u64)map_ids, | ^ Fix it. Fixes: fb5cd0ce ("selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers") Signed-off-by:Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Tucker authored
Add documentation for the BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY including kernel version introduced, usage and examples. Also document BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY which is similar. Co-developed-by:
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Tucker <dave@dtucker.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109174604.31673-2-donald.hunter@gmail.com
-
Donald Hunter authored
Add documentation for BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE and BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK, including usage and examples. Signed-off-by:
-
Donald Hunter authored
Add documentation for the ARRAY_OF_MAPS and HASH_OF_MAPS map types, including usage and examples. Reported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Maryam Tahhan authored
Add documentation for BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP including kernel version introduced, usage and examples. Co-developed-by:
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Donald Hunter authored
Add documentation for BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE including kernel BPF helper usage, userspace usage and examples. Signed-off-by:
-
Eduard Zingerman authored
A fix for the LLVM compilation error while building bpftool. Replaces the expression: _Static_assert((p) == NULL || ...) by expression: _Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) || ...) When "p" is not a constant the former is not considered to be a constant expression by LLVM 14. The error was introduced in the following patch-set: [1]. The error was reported here: [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202211110355.BcGcbZxP-lkp@intel.com/Reported-by:
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221110223240.1350810-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
-
- 10 Nov, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
John Fastabend says: ==================== Not sure if folks want to take this through BPF tree or networking tree. I took a quick look and didn't see any pending fixes so seems no one has noticed the panic yet. It reproducible and easy to repro. I put bpf in the title thinking it woudl be great to run through the BPF selftests given its XDP triggering the panic. Sorry maintainers resent with CC'ing actual lists. Had a scripting issue. Also dropped henqqi has they are bouncing. Thanks! ==================== Signed-off-by: -
John Fastabend authored
The following panic is observed when bringing up (veth_open) a veth device that has an XDP program attached. [ 61.519185] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6442! [ 61.519456] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 61.519752] CPU: 0 PID: 408 Comm: ip Tainted: G W 6.1.0-rc2-185930-gd9095f92-dirty #26 [ 61.520288] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 61.520806] RIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x3d/0x40 [ 61.521077] Code: f6 f6 80 61 08 00 00 02 74 0d 48 83 bf 88 01 00 00 00 74 03 80 cd 01 48 89 d0 f0 48 0f b1 4f 10 48 39 c2 75 c8 c3 cc cc cc cc <0f> 0b 90 48 8b 87 b0 00 00 00 48 81 c7 b0 00 00 00 45 31 c0 48 39 [ 61.522226] RSP: 0018:ffffbc9800cc36f8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 61.522557] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000300 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 61.523004] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffffff8b0de852 RDI: ffff9f03848e5000 [ 61.523452] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000800 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 61.523899] R10: ffff9f0384a96800 R11: ffffffffffa48061 R12: ffff9f03849c3000 [ 61.524345] R13: 0000000000000300 R14: ffff9f03848e5000 R15: 0000001000000100 [ 61.524792] FS: 00007f58cb64d2c0(0000) GS:ffff9f03bbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 61.525301] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 61.525673] CR2: 00007f6cc629b498 CR3: 000000010498c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 61.526121] Call Trace: [ 61.526284] <TASK> [ 61.526425] __veth_napi_enable_range+0xd6/0x230 [ 61.526723] veth_enable_xdp+0xd0/0x160 [ 61.526969] veth_open+0x2e/0xc0 [ 61.527180] __dev_open+0xe2/0x1b0 [ 61.527405] __dev_change_flags+0x1a1/0x210 [ 61.527673] dev_change_flags+0x1c/0x60 This happens because we are calling veth_napi_enable() on already enabled queues. The root cause is in commit 2e0de636 changed the control logic dropping this case, if (priv->_xdp_prog) { err = veth_enable_xdp(dev); if (err) return err; - } else if (veth_gro_requested(dev)) { + /* refer to the logic in veth_xdp_set() */ + if (!rtnl_dereference(peer_rq->napi)) { + err = veth_napi_enable(peer); + if (err) + return err; + } so that now veth_napi_enable is called if the peer has not yet initialiazed its peer_rq->napi. The issue is this will happen even if the NIC is not up. Then in veth_enable_xdp just above we have similar path, veth_enable_xdp napi_already_on = (dev->flags & IFF_UP) && rcu_access_pointer(rq->napi) err = veth_enable_xdp_range(dev, 0, dev->real_num_rx_queues, napi_already_on); The trouble is an xdp prog is assigned before bringing the device up each of the veth_open path will enable the peers xdp napi structs. But then when we bring the peer up it will similar try to enable again because from veth_open the IFF_UP flag is not set until after the op in __dev_open so we believe napi_alread_on = false. To fix this just drop the IFF_UP test and rely on checking if the napi struct is enabled. This also matches the peer check in veth_xdp for disabling. To reproduce run ./test_xdp_meta.sh I found adding Cilium/Tetragon tests for XDP. Fixes: 2e0de636 ("veth: Avoid drop packets when xdp_redirect performs") Signed-off-by:
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108221650.808950-2-john.fastabend@gmail.comAcked-by:
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Domenico Cerasuolo authored
When showing the result of a test group, if one of the subtests was skipped, while still having passing subtests, the group result was marked as SKIP. E.g.: 223/1 usdt/basic:SKIP 223/2 usdt/multispec:OK 223/3 usdt/urand_auto_attach:OK 223/4 usdt/urand_pid_attach:OK 223 usdt:SKIP The test result of usdt in the example above should be OK instead of SKIP, because the test group did have passing tests and it would be considered in "normal" state. With this change, only if all of the subtests were skipped, the group test is marked as SKIP. When only some of the subtests are skipped, a more detailed result is given, stating how many of the subtests were skipped. E.g: 223/1 usdt/basic:SKIP 223/2 usdt/multispec:OK 223/3 usdt/urand_auto_attach:OK 223/4 usdt/urand_pid_attach:OK 223 usdt:OK (SKIP: 1/4) Signed-off-by:
Domenico Cerasuolo <dceras@meta.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Eduard Zingerman says: ==================== The patch-set is consists of the following parts: - An update for libbpf's hashmap interface from void* -> void* to a polymorphic one, allowing to use both long and void* keys and values w/o additional casts. Interface functions are hidden behind auxiliary macro that add casts as necessary. This simplifies many use cases in libbpf as hashmaps there are mostly integer to integer and required awkward looking incantations like `(void *)(long)off` previously. Also includes updates for perf as it copies map implementation from libbpf. - A change to `lib/bpf/btf.c:btf__dedup` that adds a new pass named "Resolve unambiguous forward declaration". This pass builds a hashmap `name_off -> uniquely named struct or union` and uses it to replace FWD types by structs or unions. This is necessary for corner cases when FWD is not used as a part of some struct or union definition de-duplicated by `btf_dedup_struct_types`. The goal of the patch-set is to resolve forward declarations that don't take part in type graphs comparisons if declaration name is unambiguous. Example: CU #1: struct foo; // standalone forward declaration struct foo *some_global; CU #2: struct foo { int x; }; struct foo *another_global; Currently the de-duplicated BTF for this example looks as follows: [1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 ... [2] INT 'int' size=4 ... [3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 [4] FWD 'foo' fwd_kind=struct [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=4 The goal of this patch-set is to simplify it as follows: [1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 'x' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 [2] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED [3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 For defconfig kernel with BTF enabled this removes 63 forward declarations. For allmodconfig kernel with BTF enabled this removes ~5K out of ~21K forward declarations in ko objects. This unlocks some additional de-duplication in ko objects, but impact is tiny: ~13K less BTF ids out of ~2M. Changelog: v3 -> v4 Changes suggested by Andrii: - hashmap interface rework to allow use of integer and pointer keys an values w/o casts as suggested in [1]. v2 -> v3 Changes suggested by Andrii: - perf's util/hashtable.{c,h} are synchronized with libbpf implementation, perf's source code updated accordingly; - changes to libbpf, bpf selftests and perf are combined in a single patch to simplify bisecting; - hashtable interface updated to be long -> long instead of uintptr_t -> uintptr_t; - btf_dedup_resolve_fwds updated to correctly use IS_ERR / PTR_ERR macro; - test cases for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds are updated for better clarity. v1 -> v2 - Style fixes in btf_dedup_resolve_fwd and btf_dedup_resolve_fwds as suggested by Alan. [v1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221102110905.2433622-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/ [v2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103033430.2611623-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/ [v3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221106202910.4193104-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ8KFneEJxFAaNCCFPGqp20hSpS2aCj76uRk3-qZUH5xg@mail.gmail.com/ ==================== Signed-off-by: -
Eduard Zingerman authored
Tests to verify the following behavior of `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`: - remapping for struct forward declarations; - remapping for union forward declarations; - no remapping if forward declaration kind does not match similarly named struct or union declaration; - no remapping if forward declaration name is ambiguous; - base ids are considered for fwd resolution in split btf scenario. Signed-off-by:
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
-
Eduard Zingerman authored
Resolve forward declarations that don't take part in type graphs comparisons if declaration name is unambiguous. Example: CU #1: struct foo; // standalone forward declaration struct foo *some_global; CU #2: struct foo { int x; }; struct foo *another_global; The `struct foo` from CU #1 is not a part of any definition that is compared against another definition while `btf_dedup_struct_types` processes structural types. The the BTF after `btf_dedup_struct_types` the BTF looks as follows: [1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 ... [2] INT 'int' size=4 ... [3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 [4] FWD 'foo' fwd_kind=struct [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=4 This commit adds a new pass `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`, that maps such forward declarations to structs or unions with identical name in case if the name is not ambiguous. The pass is positioned before `btf_dedup_ref_types` so that types [3] and [5] could be merged as a same type after [1] and [4] are merged. The final result for the example above looks as follows: [1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 'x' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 [2] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED [3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 For defconfig kernel with BTF enabled this removes 63 forward declarations. Examples of removed declarations: `pt_regs`, `in6_addr`. The running time of `btf__dedup` function is increased by about 3%. Signed-off-by: -
Eduard Zingerman authored
An update for libbpf's hashmap interface from void* -> void* to a polymorphic one, allowing both long and void* keys and values. This simplifies many use cases in libbpf as hashmaps there are mostly integer to integer. Perf copies hashmap implementation from libbpf and has to be updated as well. Changes to libbpf, selftests/bpf and perf are packed as a single commit to avoid compilation issues with any future bisect. Polymorphic interface is acheived by hiding hashmap interface functions behind auxiliary macros that take care of necessary type casts, for example: #define hashmap_cast_ptr(p) \ ({ \ _Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),\ #p " pointee should be a long-sized integer or a pointer"); \ (long *)(p); \ }) bool hashmap_find(const struct hashmap *map, long key, long *value); #define hashmap__find(map, key, value) \ hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value)) - hashmap__find macro casts key and value parameters to long and long* respectively - hashmap_cast_ptr ensures that value pointer points to a memory of appropriate size. This hack was suggested by Andrii Nakryiko in [1]. This is a follow up for [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ8KFneEJxFAaNCCFPGqp20hSpS2aCj76uRk3-qZUH5xg@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/af1facf9-7bc8-8a3d-0db4-7b3f333589a2@meta.com/T/#m65b28f1d6d969fcd318b556db6a3ad499a42607dSigned-off-by:
-
- 08 Nov, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Rong Tao authored
since commit 450b167f("libbpf: clean up SEC() handling"), sec_def_matches() does not recognize "socket/xxx" as "socket", therefore, the BPF program type is not recognized. Instead of sockex3_user.c parsing section names to get the BPF program fd. We use the program array map to assign a static index to each BPF program (get inspired by selftests/bpf progs/test_prog_array_init.c). Therefore, use SEC("socket") as section name instead of SEC("socket/xxx"), so that the BPF program is parsed to SOCKET_FILTER type. The "missing BPF prog type" problem is solved. How to reproduce this error: $ cd samples/bpf $ sudo ./sockex3 libbpf: prog 'bpf_func_PARSE_IP': missing BPF prog type, check ELF section name 'socket/3' libbpf: prog 'bpf_func_PARSE_IP': failed to load: -22 libbpf: failed to load object './sockex3_kern.o' ERROR: loading BPF object file failed Signed-off-by:
Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn> Signed-off-by:
-
Kang Minchul authored
Variable ret is compared with less than zero even though it was set as u32. So u32 to int conversion is needed. Signed-off-by:
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Acked-by:
Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221105183656.86077-1-tegongkang@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 04 Nov, 2022 20 commits
-
-
Bagas Sanjaya authored
Sphinx reported unknown target warning: Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst:329: WARNING: Unknown target name: "bpf". The warning is caused by BPF type name prefix ("bpf_") which is written without escaping the trailing underscore. Escape the underscore to fix the warning. While at it, wrap the containing paragraph in less than 80 characters. Fixes: 9805af8d ("bpf: Document UAPI details for special BPF types") Signed-off-by:KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Acked-by:
David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221104123913.50610-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com
-
Artem Savkov authored
lld produces "fast" style build-ids by default, which is inconsistent with ld's "sha1" style. Explicitly specify build-id style to be "sha1" when linking liburandom_read.so the same way it is already done for urandom_read. Signed-off-by:
Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Rong Tao authored
Copy libbpf_strlcpy() from libbpf_internal.h to bpf_util.h, and rename it to bpf_strlcpy(), then replace selftests strncpy()/libbpf_strlcpy() with bpf_strlcpy(), fix compile warning. The libbpf_internal.h header cannot be used directly here, because references to cgroup_helpers.c in samples/bpf will generate compilation errors. We also can't add libbpf_strlcpy() directly to bpf_util.h, because the definition of libbpf_strlcpy() in libbpf_internal.h is duplicated. In order not to modify the libbpf code, add a new function bpf_strlcpy() to selftests bpf_util.h. How to reproduce this compilation warning: $ make -C samples/bpf cgroup_helpers.c: In function ‘__enable_controllers’: cgroup_helpers.c:80:17: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 4097 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation] 80 | strncpy(enable, controllers, sizeof(enable)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: -
Rong Tao authored
since commit c504e5c2("net: skb: introduce kfree_skb_reason()") kfree_skb() is replaced by kfree_skb_reason() and kfree_skb() is set to the inline function. So, we replace kprobe/kfree_skb with kprobe/kfree_skb_reason to solve the tracex2 error. $ cd samples/bpf $ sudo ./tracex2 libbpf: prog 'bpf_prog2': failed to create kprobe 'kfree_skb+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory ERROR: bpf_program__attach failed Signed-off-by:
-
Eduard Zingerman authored
A set of test cases to verify enum fwd resolution logic: - verify that enum fwd can be resolved as full enum64; - verify that enum64 fwd can be resolved as full enum; - verify that enum size is considered when enums are compared for equivalence. Signed-off-by:
-
Eduard Zingerman authored
Changes de-duplication logic for enums in the following way: - update btf_hash_enum to ignore size and kind fields to get ENUM and ENUM64 types in a same hash bucket; - update btf_compat_enum to consider enum fwd to be compatible with full enum64 (and vice versa); This allows BTF de-duplication in the following case: // CU #1 enum foo; struct s { enum foo *a; } *x; // CU #2 enum foo { x = 0xfffffffff // big enough to force enum64 }; struct s { enum foo *a; } *y; De-duplicated BTF prior to this commit: [1] ENUM64 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=8 vlen=1 'x' val=68719476735ULL [2] INT 'long unsigned int' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none) [3] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1 'a' type_id=4 bits_offset=0 [4] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=3 [6] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1 'a' type_id=8 bits_offset=0 [7] ENUM 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=0 [8] PTR '(anon)' type_id=7 [9] PTR '(anon)' type_id=6 De-duplicated BTF after this commit: [1] ENUM64 'foo' encoding=UNSIGNED size=8 vlen=1 'x' val=68719476735ULL [2] INT 'long unsigned int' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none) [3] STRUCT 's' size=8 vlen=1 'a' type_id=4 bits_offset=0 [4] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1 [5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=3 Enum forward declarations in C do not provide information about enumeration values range. Thus the `btf_type->size` field is meaningless for forward enum declarations. In fact, GCC does not encode size in DWARF for forward enum declarations (but dwarves sets enumeration size to a default value of `sizeof(int) * 8` when size is not specified see dwarf_loader.c:die__create_new_enumeration). Signed-off-by: -
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== This patch set fixes and improves BPF verifier's precision tracking logic for SCALAR registers. Patches #1 and #2 are bug fixes discovered while working on these changes. Patch #3 enables precision tracking for BPF programs that contain subprograms. This was disabled before and prevent any modern BPF programs that use subprograms from enjoying the benefits of SCALAR (im)precise logic. Patch #4 is few lines of code changes and many lines of explaining why those changes are correct. We establish why ignoring precise markings in current state is OK. Patch #5 build on explanation in patch #4 and pushes it to the limit by forcefully forgetting inherited precise markins. Patch #4 by itself doesn't prevent current state from having precise=true SCALARs, so patch #5 is necessary to prevent such stray precise=true registers from creeping in. Patch #6 adjusts test_align selftests to work around BPF verifier log's limitations when it comes to interactions between state output and precision backtracking output. Overall, the goal of this patch set is to make BPF verifier's state tracking a bit more efficient by trying to preserve as much generality in checkpointed states as possible. v1->v2: - adjusted patch #1 commit message to make it clear we are fixing forward step, not precision backtracking (Alexei); - moved last_idx/first_idx verbose logging up to make it clear when global func reaches the first empty state (Alexei). ==================== Signed-off-by:Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
test_align selftest relies on BPF verifier log emitting register states for specific instructions in expected format. Unfortunately, BPF verifier precision backtracking log interferes with such expectations. And instruction on which precision propagation happens sometimes don't output full expected register states. This does indeed look like something to be improved in BPF verifier, but is beyond the scope of this patch set. So to make test_align a bit more robust, inject few dummy R4 = R5 instructions which capture desired state of R5 and won't have precision tracking logs on them. This fixes tests until we can improve BPF verifier output in the presence of precision tracking. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Exploit the property of about-to-be-checkpointed state to be able to forget all precise markings up to that point even more aggressively. We now clear all potentially inherited precise markings right before checkpointing and branching off into child state. If any of children states require precise knowledge of any SCALAR register, those will be propagated backwards later on before this state is finalized, preserving correctness. There is a single selftests BPF program change, but tremendous one: 25x reduction in number of verified instructions and states in trace_virtqueue_add_sgs. Cilium results are more modest, but happen across wider range of programs. SELFTESTS RESULTS ================= $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/imprecise-early-results.csv ~/imprecise-aggressive-results.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ------------------- ----------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- loop6.bpf.linked1.o trace_virtqueue_add_sgs 398057 15114 -382943 (-96.20%) 8717 336 -8381 (-96.15%) ------------------- ----------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- CILIUM RESULTS ============== $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/imprecise-early-results-cilium.csv ~/imprecise-aggressive-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ------------- -------------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 23426 23221 -205 (-0.88%) 1537 1515 -22 (-1.43%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 13009 12904 -105 (-0.81%) 719 708 -11 (-1.53%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5261 5196 -65 (-1.24%) 247 243 -4 (-1.62%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3446 3406 -40 (-1.16%) 203 198 -5 (-2.46%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 23426 23221 -205 (-0.88%) 1537 1515 -22 (-1.43%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 13009 12904 -105 (-0.81%) 719 708 -11 (-1.53%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_egress 5074 4897 -177 (-3.49%) 255 248 -7 (-2.75%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress 5100 4923 -177 (-3.47%) 255 248 -7 (-2.75%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress_policy_only 5100 4923 -177 (-3.47%) 255 248 -7 (-2.75%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_egress 4558 4536 -22 (-0.48%) 188 187 -1 (-0.53%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress 4578 4556 -22 (-0.48%) 188 187 -1 (-0.53%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress_policy_only 4578 4556 -22 (-0.48%) 188 187 -1 (-0.53%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5261 5196 -65 (-1.24%) 247 243 -4 (-1.62%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5261 5196 -65 (-1.24%) 247 243 -4 (-1.62%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3482 3442 -40 (-1.15%) 204 201 -3 (-1.47%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 17200 15619 -1581 (-9.19%) 1111 1010 -101 (-9.09%) ------------- -------------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Setting reg->precise to true in current state is not necessary from correctness standpoint, but it does pessimise the whole precision (or rather "imprecision", because that's what we want to keep as much as possible) tracking. Why is somewhat subtle and my best attempt to explain this is recorded in an extensive comment for __mark_chain_precise() function. Some more careful thinking and code reading is probably required still to grok this completely, unfortunately. Whiteboarding and a bunch of extra handwaiving in person would be even more helpful, but is deemed impractical in Git commit. Next patch pushes this imprecision property even further, building on top of the insights described in this patch. End results are pretty nice, we get reduction in number of total instructions and states verified due to a better states reuse, as some of the states are now more generic and permissive due to less unnecessary precise=true requirements. SELFTESTS RESULTS ================= $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/subprog-precise-results.csv ~/imprecise-early-results.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) --------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_iter_ksym.bpf.linked1.o dump_ksym 347 285 -62 (-17.87%) 20 19 -1 (-5.00%) pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.linked1.o on_event 3678 3736 +58 (+1.58%) 276 285 +9 (+3.26%) setget_sockopt.bpf.linked1.o skops_sockopt 4038 3947 -91 (-2.25%) 347 343 -4 (-1.15%) test_l4lb.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress 4559 2611 -1948 (-42.73%) 118 105 -13 (-11.02%) test_l4lb_noinline.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress 6279 6268 -11 (-0.18%) 237 236 -1 (-0.42%) test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked1.o misc_estab 1307 1303 -4 (-0.31%) 100 99 -1 (-1.00%) test_sk_lookup.bpf.linked1.o ctx_narrow_access 456 447 -9 (-1.97%) 39 38 -1 (-2.56%) test_sysctl_loop1.bpf.linked1.o sysctl_tcp_mem 1389 1384 -5 (-0.36%) 26 25 -1 (-3.85%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o egress_fwdns_prio101 518 485 -33 (-6.37%) 51 46 -5 (-9.80%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o egress_host 519 468 -51 (-9.83%) 50 44 -6 (-12.00%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o ingress_fwdns_prio101 842 1000 +158 (+18.76%) 73 88 +15 (+20.55%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked1.o syncookie_tc 405757 373173 -32584 (-8.03%) 25735 22882 -2853 (-11.09%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked1.o syncookie_xdp 479055 371590 -107465 (-22.43%) 29145 22207 -6938 (-23.81%) --------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- Slight regression in test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o/ingress_fwdns_prio101 is left for a follow up, there might be some more precision-related bugs in existing BPF verifier logic. CILIUM RESULTS ============== $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/subprog-precise-results-cilium.csv ~/imprecise-early-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_host.o cil_from_host 762 556 -206 (-27.03%) 43 37 -6 (-13.95%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 23541 23426 -115 (-0.49%) 1538 1537 -1 (-0.07%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 33592 33566 -26 (-0.08%) 2163 2161 -2 (-0.09%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 23541 23426 -115 (-0.49%) 1538 1537 -1 (-0.07%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 33581 33543 -38 (-0.11%) 2160 2157 -3 (-0.14%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 21659 20920 -739 (-3.41%) 1440 1376 -64 (-4.44%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 17084 17039 -45 (-0.26%) 907 905 -2 (-0.22%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 73442 73430 -12 (-0.02%) 4370 4369 -1 (-0.02%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv6 152114 151895 -219 (-0.14%) 6493 6479 -14 (-0.22%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 17377 17200 -177 (-1.02%) 1125 1111 -14 (-1.24%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 6405 6397 -8 (-0.12%) 309 308 -1 (-0.32%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 7126 6934 -192 (-2.69%) 414 402 -12 (-2.90%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb6 18059 17905 -154 (-0.85%) 1105 1096 -9 (-0.81%) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Stop forcing precise=true for SCALAR registers when BPF program has any subprograms. Current restriction means that any BPF program, as soon as it uses subprograms, will end up not getting any of the precision tracking benefits in reduction of number of verified states. This patch keeps the fallback mark_all_scalars_precise() behavior if precise marking has to cross function frames. E.g., if subprogram requires R1 (first input arg) to be marked precise, ideally we'd need to backtrack to the parent function and keep marking R1 and its dependencies as precise. But right now we give up and force all the SCALARs in any of the current and parent states to be forced to precise=true. We can lift that restriction in the future. But this patch fixes two issues identified when trying to enable precision tracking for subprogs. First, prevent "escaping" from top-most state in a global subprog. While with entry-level BPF program we never end up requesting precision for R1-R5 registers, because R2-R5 are not initialized (and so not readable in correct BPF program), and R1 is PTR_TO_CTX, not SCALAR, and so is implicitly precise. With global subprogs, though, it's different, as global subprog a) can have up to 5 SCALAR input arguments, which might get marked as precise=true and b) it is validated in isolation from its main entry BPF program. b) means that we can end up exhausting parent state chain and still not mark all registers in reg_mask as precise, which would lead to verifier bug warning. To handle that, we need to consider two cases. First, if the very first state is not immediately "checkpointed" (i.e., stored in state lookup hashtable), it will get correct first_insn_idx and last_insn_idx instruction set during state checkpointing. As such, this case is already handled and __mark_chain_precision() already handles that by just doing nothing when we reach to the very first parent state. st->parent will be NULL and we'll just stop. Perhaps some extra check for reg_mask and stack_mask is due here, but this patch doesn't address that issue. More problematic second case is when global function's initial state is immediately checkpointed before we manage to process the very first instruction. This is happening because when there is a call to global subprog from the main program the very first subprog's instruction is marked as pruning point, so before we manage to process first instruction we have to check and checkpoint state. This patch adds a special handling for such "empty" state, which is identified by having st->last_insn_idx set to -1. In such case, we check that we are indeed validating global subprog, and with some sanity checking we mark input args as precise if requested. Note that we also initialize state->first_insn_idx with correct start insn_idx offset. For main program zero is correct value, but for any subprog it's quite confusing to not have first_insn_idx set. This doesn't have any functional impact, but helps with debugging and state printing. We also explicitly initialize state->last_insns_idx instead of relying on is_state_visited() to do this with env->prev_insns_idx, which will be -1 on the very first instruction. This concludes necessary changes to handle specifically global subprog's precision tracking. Second identified problem was missed handling of BPF helper functions that call into subprogs (e.g., bpf_loop and few others). From precision tracking and backtracking logic's standpoint those are effectively calls into subprogs and should be called as BPF_PSEUDO_CALL calls. This patch takes the least intrusive way and just checks against a short list of current BPF helpers that do call subprogs, encapsulated in is_callback_calling_function() function. But to prevent accidentally forgetting to add new BPF helpers to this "list", we also do a sanity check in __check_func_call, which has to be called for each such special BPF helper, to validate that BPF helper is indeed recognized as callback-calling one. This should catch any missed checks in the future. Adding some special flags to be added in function proto definitions seemed like an overkill in this case. With the above changes, it's possible to remove forceful setting of reg->precise to true in __mark_reg_unknown, which turns on precision tracking both inside subprogs and entry progs that have subprogs. No warnings or errors were detected across all the selftests, but also when validating with veristat against internal Meta BPF objects and Cilium objects. Further, in some BPF programs there are noticeable reduction in number of states and instructions validated due to more effective precision tracking, especially benefiting syncookie test. $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/baseline-results.csv ~/subprog-precise-results.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.linked1.o on_event 3966 3678 -288 (-7.26%) 306 276 -30 (-9.80%) pyperf_global.bpf.linked1.o on_event 7563 7530 -33 (-0.44%) 520 517 -3 (-0.58%) pyperf_subprogs.bpf.linked1.o on_event 36358 36934 +576 (+1.58%) 2499 2531 +32 (+1.28%) setget_sockopt.bpf.linked1.o skops_sockopt 3965 4038 +73 (+1.84%) 343 347 +4 (+1.17%) test_cls_redirect_subprogs.bpf.linked1.o cls_redirect 64965 64901 -64 (-0.10%) 4619 4612 -7 (-0.15%) test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked1.o misc_estab 1491 1307 -184 (-12.34%) 110 100 -10 (-9.09%) test_pkt_access.bpf.linked1.o test_pkt_access 354 349 -5 (-1.41%) 25 24 -1 (-4.00%) test_sock_fields.bpf.linked1.o egress_read_sock_fields 435 375 -60 (-13.79%) 22 20 -2 (-9.09%) test_sysctl_loop2.bpf.linked1.o sysctl_tcp_mem 1508 1501 -7 (-0.46%) 29 28 -1 (-3.45%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o egress_fwdns_prio100 468 435 -33 (-7.05%) 45 41 -4 (-8.89%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o ingress_fwdns_prio100 398 408 +10 (+2.51%) 42 39 -3 (-7.14%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked1.o ingress_fwdns_prio101 1096 842 -254 (-23.18%) 97 73 -24 (-24.74%) test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked1.o estab 2758 2408 -350 (-12.69%) 208 181 -27 (-12.98%) test_urandom_usdt.bpf.linked1.o urand_read_with_sema 466 448 -18 (-3.86%) 31 28 -3 (-9.68%) test_urandom_usdt.bpf.linked1.o urand_read_without_sema 466 448 -18 (-3.86%) 31 28 -3 (-9.68%) test_urandom_usdt.bpf.linked1.o urandlib_read_with_sema 466 448 -18 (-3.86%) 31 28 -3 (-9.68%) test_urandom_usdt.bpf.linked1.o urandlib_read_without_sema 466 448 -18 (-3.86%) 31 28 -3 (-9.68%) test_xdp_noinline.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress_v6 4302 4294 -8 (-0.19%) 257 256 -1 (-0.39%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked1.o syncookie_tc 583722 405757 -177965 (-30.49%) 35846 25735 -10111 (-28.21%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked1.o syncookie_xdp 609123 479055 -130068 (-21.35%) 35452 29145 -6307 (-17.79%) ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
When equivalent completed state is found and it has additional precision restrictions, BPF verifier propagates precision to currently-being-verified state chain (i.e., including parent states) so that if some of the states in the chain are not yet completed, necessary precision restrictions are enforced. Unfortunately, right now this happens only for the last frame (deepest active subprogram's frame), not all the frames. This can lead to incorrect matching of states due to missing precision marker. Currently this doesn't seem possible as BPF verifier forces everything to precise when validated BPF program has any subprograms. But with the next patch lifting this restriction, this becomes problematic. In fact, without this fix, we'll start getting failure in one of the existing test_verifier test cases: #906/p precise: cross frame pruning FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 48 usec stack depth 0+0 processed 26 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 3 total_states 17 peak_states 17 mark_read 8 This patch adds precision propagation across all frames. Fixes: a3ce685d ("bpf: fix precision tracking") Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
When processing ALU/ALU64 operations (apart from BPF_MOV, which is handled correctly already; and BPF_NEG and BPF_END are special and don't have source register), if destination register is already marked precise, this causes problem with potentially missing precision tracking for the source register. E.g., when we have r1 >>= r5 and r1 is marked precise, but r5 isn't, this will lead to r5 staying as imprecise. This is due to the precision backtracking logic stopping early when it sees r1 is already marked precise. If r1 wasn't precise, we'd keep backtracking and would add r5 to the set of registers that need to be marked precise. So there is a discrepancy here which can lead to invalid and incompatible states matched due to lack of precision marking on r5. If r1 wasn't precise, precision backtracking would correctly mark both r1 and r5 as precise. This is simple to fix, though. During the forward instruction simulation pass, for arithmetic operations of `scalar <op>= scalar` form (where <op> is ALU or ALU64 operations), if destination register is already precise, mark source register as precise. This applies only when both involved registers are SCALARs. `ptr += scalar` and `scalar += ptr` cases are already handled correctly. This does have (negative) effect on some selftest programs and few Cilium programs. ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv are veristat results with this patch, while ~/baseline-results.csv is without it. See post scriptum for instructions on how to make Cilium programs testable with veristat. Correctness has a price. $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/baseline-results.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_cubic.bpf.linked1.o bpf_cubic_cong_avoid 997 1700 +703 (+70.51%) 62 90 +28 (+45.16%) test_l4lb.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress 4559 5469 +910 (+19.96%) 118 126 +8 (+6.78%) ----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- $ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,verdict,insns,states ~/baseline-results-cilium.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0' File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3396 3446 +50 (+1.47%) 201 203 +2 (+1.00%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 71736 73442 +1706 (+2.38%) 4295 4370 +75 (+1.75%) ------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- P.S. To make Cilium ([0]) programs libbpf-compatible and thus veristat-loadable, apply changes from topmost commit in [1], which does minimal changes to Cilium source code, mostly around SEC() annotations and BPF map definitions. [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/ [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium/commits/libbpf-friendliness Fixes: b5dc0163 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking") Signed-off-by:
-
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi authored
Refactor map->off_arr handling into generic functions that can work on their own without hardcoding map specific code. The btf_fields_offs structure is now returned from btf_parse_field_offs, which can be reused later for types in program BTF. All functions like copy_map_value, zero_map_value call generic underlying functions so that they can also be reused later for copying to values allocated in programs which encode specific fields. Later, some helper functions will also require access to this btf_field_offs structure to be able to skip over special fields at runtime. Signed-off-by:
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-9-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi authored
Now that kptr_off_tab has been refactored into btf_record, and can hold more than one specific field type, accomodate bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer as well. While they don't require any more metadata than offset, having all special fields in one place allows us to share the same code for allocated user defined types and handle both map values and these allocated objects in a similar fashion. As an optimization, we still keep spin_lock_off and timer_off offsets in the btf_record structure, just to avoid having to find the btf_field struct each time their offset is needed. This is mostly needed to manipulate such objects in a map value at runtime. It's ok to hardcode just one offset as more than one field is disallowed. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== This patch set adds a bunch of new featurs and improvements that were sorely missing during recent active use of veristat to develop BPF verifier precision changes. Individual patches provide justification, explanation and often examples showing how new capabilities can be used. ==================== Signed-off-by: -
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Finally add support for filtering stats values, similar to non-comparison mode filtering. For comparison mode 4 variants of stats are important for filtering, as they allow to filter either A or B side, but even more importantly they allow to filter based on value difference, and for verdict stat value difference is MATCH/MISMATCH classification. So with these changes it's finally possible to easily check if there were any mismatches between failure/success outcomes on two separate data sets. Like in an example below: $ ./veristat -e file,prog,verdict,insns -C ~/baseline-results.csv ~/shortest-results.csv -f verdict_diff=mismatch File Program Verdict (A) Verdict (B) Verdict (DIFF) Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ------------------------------------- --------------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- ------------------- dynptr_success.bpf.linked1.o test_data_slice success failure MISMATCH 85 0 -85 (-100.00%) dynptr_success.bpf.linked1.o test_read_write success failure MISMATCH 1992 0 -1992 (-100.00%) dynptr_success.bpf.linked1.o test_ringbuf success failure MISMATCH 74 0 -74 (-100.00%) kprobe_multi.bpf.linked1.o test_kprobe failure success MISMATCH 0 246 +246 (+100.00%) kprobe_multi.bpf.linked1.o test_kprobe_manual failure success MISMATCH 0 246 +246 (+100.00%) kprobe_multi.bpf.linked1.o test_kretprobe failure success MISMATCH 0 248 +248 (+100.00%) kprobe_multi.bpf.linked1.o test_kretprobe_manual failure success MISMATCH 0 248 +248 (+100.00%) kprobe_multi.bpf.linked1.o trigger failure success MISMATCH 0 2 +2 (+100.00%) netcnt_prog.bpf.linked1.o bpf_nextcnt failure success MISMATCH 0 56 +56 (+100.00%) pyperf600_nounroll.bpf.linked1.o on_event success failure MISMATCH 568128 1000001 +431873 (+76.02%) ringbuf_bench.bpf.linked1.o bench_ringbuf success failure MISMATCH 8 0 -8 (-100.00%) strobemeta.bpf.linked1.o on_event success failure MISMATCH 557149 1000001 +442852 (+79.49%) strobemeta_nounroll1.bpf.linked1.o on_event success failure MISMATCH 57240 1000001 +942761 (+1647.03%) strobemeta_nounroll2.bpf.linked1.o on_event success failure MISMATCH 501725 1000001 +498276 (+99.31%) strobemeta_subprogs.bpf.linked1.o on_event success failure MISMATCH 65420 1000001 +934581 (+1428.59%) test_map_in_map_invalid.bpf.linked1.o xdp_noop0 success failure MISMATCH 2 0 -2 (-100.00%) test_mmap.bpf.linked1.o test_mmap success failure MISMATCH 46 0 -46 (-100.00%) test_verif_scale3.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress success failure MISMATCH 845499 1000001 +154502 (+18.27%) ------------------------------------- --------------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- ------------------- Note that by filtering on verdict_diff=mismatch, it's now extremely easy and fast to see any changes in verdict. Example above showcases both failure -> success transitions (which are generally surprising) and success -> failure transitions (which are expected if bugs are present). Given veristat allows to query relative percent difference values, internal logic for comparison mode is based on floating point numbers, so requires a bit of epsilon precision logic, deviating from typical integer simple handling rules. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Introduce the concept of "stat variant", by which it's possible to specify whether to use the value from A (baseline) side, B (comparison or control) side, the absolute difference value or relative (percentage) difference value. To support specifying this, veristat recognizes `_a`, `_b`, `_diff`, `_pct` suffixes, which can be appended to stat name(s). In non-comparison mode variants are ignored (there is only `_a` variant effectively), if no variant suffix is provided, `_b` is assumed, as control group is of primary interest in comparison mode. These stat variants can be flexibly combined with asc/desc orders. Here's an example of ordering results first by verdict match/mismatch (or n/a if one of the sides is missing; n/a is always considered to be the lowest value), and within each match/mismatch/n/a group further sort by number of instructions in B side. In this case we don't have MISMATCH cases, but N/A are split from MATCH, demonstrating this custom ordering. $ ./veristat -e file,prog,verdict,insns -s verdict_diff,insns_b_ -C ~/base.csv ~/comp.csv File Program Verdict (A) Verdict (B) Verdict (DIFF) Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ------------------ ------------------------------ ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- -------------- bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv6 N/A success N/A N/A 151895 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 N/A success N/A N/A 15619 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_ipv6_dsr N/A success N/A N/A 1206 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_ipv4_dsr N/A success N/A N/A 1162 N/A bpf_alignchecker.o tail_icmp6_send_echo_reply N/A failure N/A N/A 74 N/A bpf_alignchecker.o __send_drop_notify success N/A N/A 53 N/A N/A bpf_host.o __send_drop_notify success N/A N/A 53 N/A N/A bpf_host.o cil_from_host success N/A N/A 762 N/A N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 success success MATCH 71736 73430 +1694 (+2.36%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 success success MATCH 21547 20920 -627 (-2.91%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb6 success success MATCH 17954 17905 -49 (-0.27%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 success success MATCH 16974 17039 +65 (+0.38%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 success success MATCH 7658 7713 +55 (+0.72%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 success success MATCH 7126 6934 -192 (-2.69%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 success success MATCH 6405 6397 -8 (-0.12%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress failure failure MATCH 752 752 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_xdp.o cil_xdp_entry success success MATCH 423 423 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_xdp.o __send_drop_notify success success MATCH 151 151 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_alignchecker.o tail_icmp6_handle_ns failure failure MATCH 33 33 +0 (+0.00%) ------------------ ------------------------------ ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- -------------- Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
When comparing two datasets, if either side is missing corresponding record with the same file and prog name, currently veristat emits misleading zeros/failures, and even tried to calculate a difference, even though there is no data to compare against. This patch improves internal logic of handling such situations. Now we'll emit "N/A" in places where data is missing and comparison is non-sensical. As an example, in an artificially truncated and mismatched Cilium results, the output looks like below: $ ./veristat -e file,prog,verdict,insns -C ~/base.csv ~/comp.csv File Program Verdict (A) Verdict (B) Verdict (DIFF) Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ------------------ ------------------------------ ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- -------------- bpf_alignchecker.o __send_drop_notify success N/A N/A 53 N/A N/A bpf_alignchecker.o tail_icmp6_handle_ns failure failure MATCH 33 33 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_alignchecker.o tail_icmp6_send_echo_reply N/A failure N/A N/A 74 N/A bpf_host.o __send_drop_notify success N/A N/A 53 N/A N/A bpf_host.o cil_from_host success N/A N/A 762 N/A N/A bpf_xdp.o __send_drop_notify success success MATCH 151 151 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_xdp.o cil_xdp_entry success success MATCH 423 423 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 success success MATCH 21547 20920 -627 (-2.91%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 success success MATCH 16974 17039 +65 (+0.38%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 success success MATCH 71736 73430 +1694 (+2.36%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv6 N/A success N/A N/A 151895 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_ipv4_dsr N/A success N/A N/A 1162 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_ipv6_dsr N/A success N/A N/A 1206 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 N/A success N/A N/A 15619 N/A bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 success success MATCH 7658 7713 +55 (+0.72%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 success success MATCH 6405 6397 -8 (-0.12%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress failure failure MATCH 752 752 +0 (+0.00%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 success success MATCH 7126 6934 -192 (-2.69%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb6 success success MATCH 17954 17905 -49 (-0.27%) ------------------ ------------------------------ ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- --------- -------------- Internally veristat now separates joining two datasets and remembering the join, and actually emitting a comparison view. This will come handy when we add support for filtering and custom ordering in comparison mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Make veristat distinguish between table and CSV output formats and use different default set of stats (columns) that are emitted. While for human-readable table output it doesn't make sense to output all known stats, it is very useful for CSV mode to record all possible data, so that it can later be queried and filtered in replay or comparison mode. Signed-off-by:
-
