- 23 Nov, 2023 10 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Add encoder vfuncs for audio enable/disable. This will allow audio to be enabled/disabled during fastsets. An encoder hook is necessary as on pre-hsw platforms different encoder types implement audio in different ways. Reviewed-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231121054324.9988-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Follow the hsw+ approach toggle the audio presence detect when we set up the ELD, instead of doing it when turning the port on/off. This will facilitate audio enable/disable to happen during fastsets instead of requiring a full modeset. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Follow the hsw+ approach toggle the audio presence detect when we set up the ELD, instead of doing it when turning the port on/off. This will facilitate audio enable/disable to happen during fastsets instead of requiring a full modeset. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Put a wrapper around the intel_audio_codec_{enable,disable}() calls in the g4x+ DP/HDMI code. We shall move the presence detect enable/disable into the wrappers later. Reviewed-by: -
Ville Syrjälä authored
Push the audio enable/disable to be the last/first thing respectively that is done in the encoder enable/disable hooks. The goal is to move it further out of these encoder hooks entirely. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Doing the if-else around RMWs is kinda silly. Just set/clear the apporiate bits with a single RMW. Also unify the coding style a bit icl_wa_cursorclkgating() while at it. Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We used to call intel_pre_plane_updates() for any pipe going through a modeset whether the pipe was previously enabled or not. This in fact needed to apply all the necessary clock gating workarounds/etc. Restore the correct behaviour. Fixes: 39919997 ("drm/i915: Disable all planes before modesetting any pipes") Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
{planes,vrr}_{enabling,disabling}() are supposed to indicate whether the specific hardware feature is supposed to be enabling or disabling. That can only makes sense if the pipe is active overall. So check for that before we go poking at the hardware. I think we're semi-safe currently on due to: - intel_pre_plane_update() doesn't get called when the pipe was not-active prior to the commit, but this is actually a bug. This saves vrr_disabling(), and vrr_enabling() is called from deeper down where we have already checked hw.active. - active_planes mirrors the crtc's hw.active Reviewed-by: -
Jouni Högander authored
Do not continue to psr2 checks if psr or panel replay is not supported. Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Fixes: b8cf5b5d ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9670Signed-off-by:
Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231120130214.3332726-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
-
Mika Kahola authored
entry_setup_frames variable is defined as u8. However, the function call intel_psr_entry_setup_frames() can return negative error code. There is a type mismatch here, so let's switch to use int here as well. Fixes: 2b981d57 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier") Signed-off-by:
Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231116090512.480373-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
-
- 22 Nov, 2023 16 commits
-
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Drop unused vlv_iosf_sb_read() and vlv_iosf_sb_write(). Signed-off-by:
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
For a couple of cases the branches call the same bxt_gpio_set_value(). As Ville suggested they can be combined by dropping the DISPLAY_VER() check from Gen 11 to Gen 9. Do it that way. Suggested-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
It's a dirty hack in the driver that pokes GPIO registers behind the driver's back. Moreoever it might be problematic as simultaneous I/O may hang the system, see the commit 0bd50d71 ("pinctrl: cherryview: prevent concurrent access to GPIO controllers") for the details. Taking all this into consideration replace the hack with proper GPIO APIs being used. Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Currently soc_gpio_set_value() supports only a single indexing for GPIO pin. For CHV case, for example, we will need to distinguish community based index from the one that VBT is using. Introduce an additional parameter to soc_gpio_set_value() and its callers. Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
It's a dirty hack in the driver that pokes GPIO registers behind the driver's back. Moreoever it might be problematic as simultaneous I/O may hang the system, see the commit 40ecab55 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Really serialize all register accesses") for the details. Taking all this into consideration replace the hack with proper GPIO APIs being used. Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Extract a common soc_gpio_set_value() helper that may be used by a few SoCs. Signed-off-by:
-
Hans de Goede authored
Fix wrong initial value for GPIOs in bxt_gpio_set_value(). Signed-off-by:
-
Hans de Goede authored
To properly deal with GPIOs used in MIPI panel sequences a temporary GPIO lookup will be used. Since there can only be 1 GPIO lookup table for the "0000:00:02.0" device this will not work if the GPIO lookup table used by intel_dsi_vbt_gpio_init() is still registered. After getting the "backlight" and "panel" GPIOs the lookup table registered by intel_dsi_vbt_gpio_init() is no longer necessary, remove it so that another temporary lookup-table for the "0000:00:02.0" device can be added. Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Names of the MIPI sequence steps are sequential and defined, no need to check for the gaps. However in seq_name the MIPI_SEQ_END is missing. Add it there, and drop unneeded NULL check in sequence_name(). Reviewed-by:
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
In the snippets like the following if (...) return / goto / break / continue ...; else ... the 'else' is redundant. Get rid of it. Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Move existing condition to while(), so it will be clear on what circumstances the loop is successfully finishing. Reviewed-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
Drop the unused parameter. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The lowest level functions are about setting GPIO values, not about executing any sequences anymore. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
With the various sequence versions and pointer increments interleaved, it's a bit hard to decipher what's going on. Add separate paths for different sequence versions. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
Follow the contemporary conventions. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
Purely a guess. Drop the nop function. Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Nov, 2023 11 commits
-
-
Imre Deak authored
Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate() and intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in intel_link_compute_m_n(), instead of open-coding the equivalent. Note the kbit/sec -> kByte/sec unit change in the M/N values, but this not reducing the precision, as the link rate value is based anyway on a less precise 10 kbit/sec value. Suggested-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231116131841.1588781-12-imre.deak@intel.com
-
Imre Deak authored
Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate() using drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency() to calculate the max data rate for both DP1.4 and UHBR link rates. This trades a redundant multiply/divide for readability. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Callers of intel_dp_max_data_rate() use the return value as an upper bound for the BW a given mode requires. As such the rounding shouldn't result in a bigger value than the actual upper bound. Use round-down instead of -closest accordingly. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Atm the allocated MST PBN value is calculated from the TU size (number of allocated MTP slots) as PBN = TU * pbn_div pbn_div being the link BW for each MTP slot. For DP 1.4 link rates this worked, as pbn_div there is guraranteed to be an integer number, however on UHBR this isn't the case. To get a PBN, TU pair where TU is a properly rounded-up value covering all the BW corresponding to PBN, calculate first PBN and from PBN the TU value. Calculate PBN directly from the effective pixel data rate, instead of calculating it indirectly from the corresponding TU and pbn_div values (which are in turn derived from the pixel data rate and BW overhead). Add a helper function to calculate the effective data rate, also adding a note that callers of intel_dp_link_required() may also need to check the effective data rate (vs. the data rate w/o the BW overhead). While at it add a note to check if WA#14013163432 is applicable. v2: - Fix PBN calculation, deriving it from the effective data rate directly instead of using the indirect TU and pbn_div values for this. - Add a note about WA#14013163432. (Arun) v3: - Fix rounding up quotient while calculating remote_tu. (Ville) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
The next patch will calculate the PBN value directly from the pixel data rate and the BW allocation overhead, not requiring the data, link M/N and TU values for this. To prepare for that move the calculation of BW overheads from intel_dp_mst_compute_m_n() to intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(). While at it store link_bpp in a .4 fixed point format. Reviewed-by:
Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
The link M/N ratio is the data rate / link symbol clock rate, fix things up accordingly. On DP 1.4 this ratio was correct as the link symbol clock rate in that case matched the link data rate (in bytes/sec units, the symbol size being 8 bits), however it wasn't correct for UHBR rates where the symbol size is 32 bits. Kudos to Arun noticing in Bspec the incorrect use of link data rate in the ratio's N value. Reviewed-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Apply the correct BW allocation overhead and channel coding efficiency on UHBR link rates, similarly to DP1.4 link rates. Reviewed-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with the recently added drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(). Reviewed-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Add kunit test cases for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw() with all the DP1.4 and UHBR link configurations. v2: - List test cases in decreasing rate,lane count order matching the corresponding DP Standard tables. (Ville) - Add references to the DP Standard tables. v3: - Sort the testcases properly. v4: - Avoid 'stack frame size x exceeds limit y in drm_test_dp_mst_calc_pbn_div()' compiler warn. (LKP) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Acked-by:
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v3) Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
The current way of calculating the pbn_div value, the link BW per each MTP slot, worked only for DP 1.4 link rates. Fix things up for UHBR rates calculating with the correct channel coding efficiency based on the link rate. v2: - Return the fractional pbn_div value from drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(). v3: - Fix rounding up quotient while calculating req_slots. (Ville) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Reviewed-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
On UHBR links the PBN divider is a fractional number, accordingly store it in fixed point format. For now drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw() always returns a whole number and all callers will use only the integer part of it which should preserve the current behavior. The next patch will fix drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw() for UHBR rates returning a fractional number for those (also accounting for the channel coding efficiency correctly). Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Reviewed-by:
-
- 20 Nov, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
IVB Bspec says: "Frame Buffer Compression is only supported with memory surfaces of 4096 lines or less and pipe source sizes of 4096 pixels by 2048 lines or less. " so seems like we should be able to bump the offset+size limit to at least 4kx4k. Make it so. Signed-off-by:
Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
FBC on icl+ should supposedly be fine with surface sizes up to 8kx4k. Bump up the limit. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Do separate checks for the visible plane size vs. the surface size (which I take to mean offset+size). For now both use the same max w/h, but we can relax the surface size limits as a followup. Signed-off-by:
-
