Fix following warning:
arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c:41:6: warning: symbol 'pmc_swift_idle'
was not declared. Should it be static?

It was not used outside this file - make it static
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use sparc64 version of prom/printf.c.

The only differences for sparc32 is that prom_printf is no longer
exported for modules which should be OK.
Signed-off-by: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Noticed by Robert Reif and Sam Ravnborg.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o in sparc32 variant removed prom_halt in warning situations
o ifdef out sparc32 specific code
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o Use C99 initializer for struct members
o fix code style issues
o Add KERN_WARNING to all printk
o Update prints to match sparc64
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This broke sparc64 in various ways.

Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o use cpu_32.c as base
o move all sparc64 definitions to the common cpu.c
o use ifdef for the parts that differs and use cpu_32 as base
o spitfire.h required a CONFIG_SPARC64 guard to fix build on 32 bit
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Prepare cputable to include sparc64 versions
Declare it __initconst so it can be dropped after init
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o declare variables from cpu_*.c
o declare function from cpu_32.c

To do this introduce a new header "kernel.h" which is local to kernel/
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Without fancy makefile rules it's not straightforward
to prevent both arch/sparc/kernel/audit.o and lib/audit.o
from both being used on sparc32.

Since arch/sparc/kernel/audit.c is identical to lib/audit.c
except some CONFIG_COMPAT protected sections of code, just
use it on sparc32 too as that's the simplest way to fix
this.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If we cannot determine the CPU or FPU report
"Unknown CPU" or "Unknown FPU" like sparc64 does.

And report with KERN_ERR that we cannot determine the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fixed style issues
Use C99 struct assignments
Use KERN_DEBUG for printk
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

To make this work we provide a dummy nop implementation
of of_fill_in_cpu_data() for sparc32.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Sparc64 uses a non-recursive sibling traversal algorithm
that never got propagated into the sparc32 copy of this
code.

Sync them up.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This makes it match what sparc64's version does.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add final len assignment in sparc64's get_one_property() (it's necessary
to avoid unchecked return value warnings on the sparc32 side),
and mark name argument const on sparc32's copy.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.

This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This will be used in a subsequent changeset.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

All sparc64 specific, so only build this file on sparc64.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A subsequent changeset will use this.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This is where common code implementations will go as we unify
32-bit and 64-bit OF device tree code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This brings things in line with sparc64.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This is where common declarations will go as we unify
these files as much as possible into common code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A closer inspection revealed that these two files had identical
functionality - but the implementation of it differed slightly.

Base it on the sparc version as it was the best.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It is always equals y so no need to test for it
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

of_node_put is needed before discarding a value received from
of_find_node_by_name, eg in error handling code or when the device
node is no longer used.

The semantic match that catches the bug is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@r exists@
local idexpression struct device_node *n;
position p1, p2;
struct device_node *n1;
statement S;
identifier f;
expression E;
expression *ptr != NULL;
@@

n@p1 = of_find_node_by_name(...)
...
if (!n) S
... when != of_node_put(n)
    when != n1 = f(n,...)
    when != E = n
    when any
    when strict
(
  return \(0\|<+...n...+>\|ptr\);
|
return@p2 ...;
|
  of_node_put(n);
|
  n1 = f(n,...)
|
  E = n
)

@script:python@
p1 << r.p1;
p2 << r.p2;
@@

print "* file: %s of_find_node_by_name %s return %s" % (p1[0].file,p1[0].line,p2[0].line)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Simple unification:
o renamed piggyback to *_32.c/*_64.c
o copied content of Makefile from sparc64 to sparc and guard it
o updated sparc/boot/.gitignore
o deleted remaining files in sparc64/boot
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o Move all files from sparc64/kernel/ to sparc/kernel
  - rename as appropriate
o Update sparc/Makefile to the changes
o Update sparc/kernel/Makefile to include the sparc64 files

NOTE: This commit changes link order on sparc64!

Link order had to change for either of sparc32 and sparc64.
And assuming sparc64 see more testing than sparc32 change link
order on sparc64 where issues will be caught faster.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o sparc32 files with identical names to sparc64 renamed to <name>_32.S
o introduced a few Kconfig helpers to simplify Makefile logic
o refactored Makefile to prepare for unification
  - use obj-$(CONFIG_SPARC32) for sparc32 specific files
  - use <name>_$(BITS) for files where sparc64 has a _64 variant
  - sparc64 directly include a few files where sparc32 builds them,
    refer to these files directly (no BITS)
  - sneaked in -Werror as used by sparc64
o modified sparc/Makefile to use the new names for head/init_task
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o Renamed files in sparc64 to <name>_64.S when identical
  to sparc32 files.
o iomap.c were equal for sparc32 and sparc64
o adjusted sparc/Makefile now we have only one lib/
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Identical named files renamed to <name>_32.S
Refactored Makefile to prepare for unification.

Linking order was altered slightly - but this is a lib.a file so
it should not matter.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

- all files with identical names copied and renamed to *_64.c
- the remaning files copied as is
- added sparc64 specific files to sparc/prom/Makefile
- teach sparc64 Makefile to look into sparc/prom/
- delete unused Makefile from sparc64/prom/

linking order was not kept for sparc64 with this change.
It was not possible to keep linking order for both sparc and sparc64
and as sparc64 see more testing than sparc it was natural to
break linking order on sparc64. Should it have any effect it
would be detected sooner this way.

printf_32.c and printf_64.c are obvious candidates to be merged
but they are not 100% equal so that was left for later
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

- rename files where sparc64 uses identical names to *_32.c
- refactor Makefile (but keep linking order)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

To unify Makefile for sparc and sparc64 a few other steps was needed:
1) separate defconfig files for sparc and sparc64 is required,
   so locate these in arch/sparc/configs
2) removoval of hack in toplevel Makefile to deal with that
   headers was in a separate directory compared to the rest

The unification of the Makefile required usage of several

    foo-$(CONFIG_SPARCnn) +=

due to a few directories pending unification.
This will be cleaned up when we unify the remaining directories.

Included in this patch are the deletion of a few files in
sparc64 as they are no longer needed: Makefile + Kconfig.
arch/sparc64/ will after this patch is applied only
have four directories (prom, lib, kernel, boot)
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

With this 'git status' no longer reports any new files
At least not for a sparc allnoconfig build
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Leave all cleaning to boot/Makefile
and delete zImage too when we do a 'make clean'
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The btfixup step needs knowledge of all the .o files,
but there is no need to pass them in independent variables.
Simplify it to use only two variables.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>