- 07 Mar, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
Raid56 merge (merge commit e942f883) had mistakenly removed a call to __cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself after a successful finish. (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.) Bring it back. Reported-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9
-
- 05 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Commit 24542bf7 changed preallocation of extents to cap the max size we try to allocate. It's a valid change, but the extent reservation code is also used by balance, and that can't tolerate a smaller extent being allocated. __btrfs_prealloc_file_range already has a min_size parameter, which is used by relocation to request a specific extent size. This commit adds an extra check to enforce that minimum extent size. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
- 04 Mar, 2013 10 commits
-
-
Stefan Behrens authored
Commit 5ac00add added a testnset mutex and code that disallows running administrative tasks in parallel. It is prevented that the device add/delete/balance/replace/resize operations are started in parallel. By mistake, the defragmentation operation was included in the check for mutually exclusiveness as well. This is fixed with this commit. Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Only let one trans handle to wait for other handles, otherwise we will get ABBA issues. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Btrfs balance can easily hit BUG_ON in these places, but we want to it bail out gracefully after we force the whole filesystem to readonly. So we use btrfs_std_error hook in place of BUG_ON. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We can bail out from here gracefully instead of a cold BUG_ON. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We've missed the 'free blocks' part on ENOMEM error. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree and reloc roots list. Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and since this function can also be used in the balance recover path, we also make the change as well to keep code simple. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Add a check for NULL pointer to avoid invalid reference. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be blocked to commit because of this orphan handler. We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the transaction commitment failed. - access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment. - pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment, the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they would access the freed pending snapshots. This patch fixes the above problems by: - remove the dangerous code that accessed the freed handler - assign ->error if the error happens during the snapshot creation - the transaction committer doesn't free the pending snapshots, just assigns the error number and evicts them before we unblock the transaction. Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan cleanup do the right thing. The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even thought it still does the right thing. So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0 to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 03 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
tilegx_defconfig: fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table': fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Signed-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- 01 Mar, 2013 8 commits
-
-
Paul Gortmaker authored
We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends. Signed-off-by:
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item. This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents since we expect for it to be the right size. To fix this just delete the item and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized btrfs_file_extent_item. This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding happens. Observed mount failure: mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050 Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G W 3.8.0-default+ #267 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140 [<ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250 [<ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0 [<ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840 [<ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840 [<ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0 [<ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0 [<ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200 [<ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0 [<ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120 [<ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980 [<ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80 [<ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0 [<ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right way to deal with the kernel code like this: [...] if (ret) goto out; [...] So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with out_fail, this will be easier to maintain. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
commit eb6b88d9 leads into another bug. If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it. Signed-off-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Steps to reproduce: i=0 ncases=100 mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt> while [ $i -le $ncases ] do btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt> btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt> i=$(($i+1)) done btrfs quota disable <mnt> umount <mnt> btrfsck <mnt> You can also use the commands: btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns. We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one. Signed-off-by:
-
- 28 Feb, 2013 8 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
The nodesize is capped at 64k and there are enough pages preallocated in extent_buffer::inline_pages. The fallback to kmalloc never happened because even on the smallest page size considered (4k) inline_pages covered the needs. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When deleting a snapshot/subvolume, we need remove root ref/backref, dir entries and update the dir inode, so we must reserve free space for those operations. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
There are two problems in the space reservation of the snapshot/ subvolume creation. - don't reserve the space for the root item insertion - the space which is reserved in the qgroup is different with the free space reservation. we need reserve free space for 7 items, but in qgroup reservation, we need reserve space only for 3 items. So we implement new metadata reservation functions for the snapshot/subvolume creation. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Since we have grabbed the parent inode at the beginning of the snapshot creation, and both sync and async snapshot creation release it after the pending snapshots are actually created, it is safe to access the parent inode directly during the snapshot creation, we needn't use dget_parent/dput to fix the parent dentry and get the dir inode. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The printk introduced in 6f60cbd3 was a remainder from copying portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under different conditions and the warning makes sense there. Reported-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
While doing cleanup work on an aborted transaction, we've set the global running transaction pointer to NULL _before_ waiting all other transaction handles to finish, so others'd hit NULL pointer crash when referencing the global running transaction pointer. This first sets a hint to avoid new transaction handle joining, then waits other existing handles to abort or finish so that we can safely set the above global pointer to NULL. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
When we abort a transaction while fsyncing, we'll skip freeing log roots part of committing a transaction, which leads to memory leak. This adds a 'free log roots' in putting super when no more users hold references on log roots, so it's safe and clean. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed while looking into a tree logging bug that we aren't logging inline extents properly. Since this requires copying and it shouldn't happen too often just force us to copy everything for the inode into the tree log when we have an inline extent. With this patch we have valid data after a crash when we write an inline extent. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 26 Feb, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Though most of the btrfs codes are using ALIGN macro for page alignment, there are still some codes using open-coded alignment like the following: ------ u64 mask = ((u64)root->stripesize - 1); u64 ret = (val + mask) & ~mask; ------ Or even hidden one: ------ num_bytes = (end - start + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1); ------ Sometimes these open-coded alignment is not so easy to understand for newbie like me. This commit changes the open-coded alignment to the ALIGN macro for a better readability. Also there is a previous patch from David Sterba with similar changes, but the patch is for 3.2 kernel and seems not merged. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12747.html Cc: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by:Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Before we forced to change a file's NOCOW and COMPRESS flag due to the parent directory's, but this ends up a bad idea, because it confuses end users a lot about file's NOCOW status, eg. if someone change a file to NOCOW via 'chattr' and then rename it in the current directory which is without NOCOW attribute, the file will lose the NOCOW flag silently. This diables 'change flags in rename', so from now on we'll only inherit flags from the parent directory on creation stage while in other places we can use 'chattr' to set NOCOW or COMPRESS flags. Reported-by:
Marios Titas <redneb8888@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
While inserting dir index and updating inode for a snapshot, we'd add delayed items which consume trans->block_rsv, if we don't have any space reserved in this trans handle, we either just return or reserve space again. But before creating pending snapshots during committing transaction, we've done a release on this trans handle, so we don't have space reserved in it at this stage. What we're using is block_rsv of pending snapshots which has already reserved well enough space for both inserting dir index and updating inode, so we need to set trans handle to indicate that we have space now. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexandre Oliva authored
I've experienced filesystem freezes with permanent spikes in the active process count for quite a while, particularly on filesystems whose available raw space has already been fully allocated to chunks. While looking into this, I found a pretty obvious error in do_chunk_alloc: it sets space_info->chunk_alloc, but if btrfs_alloc_chunk returns an error other than ENOSPC, it returns leaving that flag set, which causes any other threads waiting for space_info->chunk_alloc to become zero to spin indefinitely. I haven't double-checked that this patch fixes the failure I've observed fully (it's not exactly trivial to trigger), but it surely is a bug and the fix is trivial, so... Please put it in :-) What I saw in that function also happens to explain why in some cases I see filesystems allocate a huge number of chunks that remain unused (leading to the scenario above, of not having more chunks to allocate). It happens for data and metadata, but not necessarily both. I'm guessing some thread sets the force_alloc flag on the corresponding space_info, and then several threads trying to get disk space end up attempting to allocate a new chunk concurrently. All of them will see the force_alloc flag and bump their local copy of force up to the level they see first, and they won't clear it even if another thread succeeds in allocating a chunk, thus clearing the force flag. Then each thread that observed the force flag will, on its turn, force the allocation of a new chunk. And any threads that come in while it does that will see the force flag still set and pick it up, and so on. This sounds like a problem to me, but... what should the correct behavior be? Clear force_flag once we copy it to a local force? Reset force to the incoming value on every loop? Set the flag to our incoming force if we have it at first, clear our local flag, and move it from the space_info when we determined that we are the thread that's going to perform the allocation? btrfs: clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> If btrfs_alloc_chunk fails with e.g. ENOMEM, we exit do_chunk_alloc without clearing chunk_alloc in space_info. As a result, any further calls to do_chunk_alloc on that filesystem will start busy-waiting for chunk_alloc to be cleared, but it never will be. This patch adjusts do_chunk_alloc so that it clears this flag in case of an error. Signed-off-by:
Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Schmidt authored
When a subvolume is removed, we remove the root item from the root tree, while the tree blocks and backrefs remain for a while. When backref walking comes across one of those orphan tree blocks, it can find a backref for a no longer existing root. This is all good, we only must tolerate __resolve_indirect_ref returning an error and continue with the good refs found. Reported-by:
Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by:
Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported hitting the BUG_ON() in btrfs_finished_ordered_io() where we had csums on a NOCOW extent. This can happen if we have NODATACOW set but not NODATASUM set, which can happen in two cases, either we mount with -o nodatacow and then write into preallocated space, or chattr +C a directory and move a file into that directory. Liu has fixed the move case in a different place, but this fixes the mount -o nodatacow case. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Feb, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
If we remount the fs to close the auto defragment or make the fs R/O, we should stop the auto defragment. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When running the 083th case of xfstests on the filesystem with "compress-force=lzo", the following WARNINGs were triggered. WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7908 WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7909 WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7911 WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4510 WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4511 This problem was introduced by the patch "Btrfs: fix deadlock due to unsubmitted". In this patch, there are two bugs which caused the above problem. The 1st one is a off-by-one bug, if the DIO write return 0, it is also a short write, we need release the reserved space for it. But we didn't do it in that patch. Fix it by change "ret > 0" to "ret >= 0". The 2nd one is ->outstanding_extents was increased twice when a short write happened. As we know, ->outstanding_extents is a counter to keep track of the number of extent items we may use duo to delalloc, when we reserve the free space for a delalloc write, we assume that the write will introduce just one extent item, so we increase ->outstanding_extents by 1 at that time. And then we will increase it every time we split the write, it is done at the beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct(). So when a short write happens, we needn't increase ->outstanding_extents again. But this patch done. In order to fix the 2nd problem, I re-write the logic for ->outstanding_extents operation. We don't increase it at the beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct(), instead, we just increase it when the split actually happens. Reported-by:
Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- 20 Feb, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas, As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots. The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this as well. Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of backref walking stuff. Here is the basic idea, o set the writeback ranges started by defragment with flag EXTENT_DEFRAG o at endio, after we finish updating fs tree, we use backref walking to find all parents of the ranges and re-link them with the new COWed file layout by adding corresponding backrefs. Signed-off-by:
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
We try to limit the size of a chunk to 10GB, which keeps the unit of work reasonable during balance and resize operations. The limit checks were taking into account the number of copies of the data we had but what they really should be doing is comparing against the logical size of the chunk we're creating. This moves the code around a little to use the count of data stripes from raid5/6. Signed-off-by:
-
