1. 01 Sep, 2020 3 commits
    • Julia Lawall's avatar
      tm6000: drop unnecessary list_empty · 3c9c3902
      Julia Lawall authored
      list_for_each_entry is able to handle an empty list.
      The only effect of avoiding the loop is not initializing the
      index variable.
      Drop list_empty tests in cases where these variables are not
      used.
      
      Note that list_for_each_entry is defined in terms of list_first_entry,
      which indicates that it should not be used on an empty list.  But in
      list_for_each_entry, the element obtained by list_first_entry is not
      really accessed, only the address of its list_head field is compared
      to the address of the list head, so the list_first_entry is safe.
      
      The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
      (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
      
      <smpl>
      @@
      expression x,e;
      iterator name list_for_each_entry;
      statement S;
      identifier i;
      @@
      
      -if (!(list_empty(x))) {
         list_for_each_entry(i,x,...) S
      - }
       ... when != i
      ? i = e
      </smpl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
      3c9c3902
    • Julia Lawall's avatar
      saa7134: drop unnecessary list_empty · a357a784
      Julia Lawall authored
      list_for_each_safe is able to handle an empty list.
      The only effect of avoiding the loop is not initializing the
      index variable.
      Drop list_empty tests in cases where these variables are not
      used.
      
      The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
      (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
      
      <smpl>
      @@
      expression x,e;
      iterator name list_for_each_safe;
      statement S;
      identifier i,j;
      @@
      
      -if (!(list_empty(x))) {
         list_for_each_safe(i,j,x) S
      - }
       ... when != i
           when != j
      (
        i = e;
      |
      ? j = e;
      )
      </smpl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
      a357a784
    • Julia Lawall's avatar
      media: cx231xx: drop unnecessary list_empty · a5073212
      Julia Lawall authored
      list_for_each_entry is able to handle an empty list.
      The only effect of avoiding the loop is not initializing the
      index variable.
      Drop list_empty tests in cases where these variables are not
      used.
      
      Note that list_for_each_entry is defined in terms of list_first_entry,
      which indicates that it should not be used on an empty list.  But in
      list_for_each_entry, the element obtained by list_first_entry is not
      really accessed, only the address of its list_head field is compared
      to the address of the list head, so the list_first_entry is safe.
      
      The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
      (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
      
      <smpl>
      @@
      expression x,e;
      iterator name list_for_each_entry;
      statement S;
      identifier i;
      @@
      
      -if (!(list_empty(x))) {
         list_for_each_entry(i,x,...) S
      - }
       ... when != i
      ? i = e
      </smpl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
      a5073212
  2. 29 Aug, 2020 37 commits