1. 18 Jul, 2018 1 commit
    • Tejun Heo's avatar
      block: make bdev_ops->rw_page() take a REQ_OP instead of bool · 3f289dcb
      Tejun Heo authored
      c11f0c0b ("block/mm: make bdev_ops->rw_page() take a bool for
      read/write") replaced @op with boolean @is_write, which limited the
      amount of information going into ->rw_page() and more importantly
      page_endio(), which removed the need to expose block internals to mm.
      
      Unfortunately, we want to track discards separately and @is_write
      isn't enough information.  This patch updates bdev_ops->rw_page() to
      take REQ_OP instead but leaves page_endio() to take bool @is_write.
      This allows the block part of operations to have enough information
      while not leaking it to mm.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      3f289dcb
  2. 17 Jul, 2018 2 commits
  3. 16 Jul, 2018 2 commits
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      blk-iolatency: truncate our current time · 71e9690b
      Josef Bacik authored
      In our longer tests we noticed that some boxes would degrade to the
      point of uselessness.  This is because we truncate the current time when
      saving it in our bio, but I was using the raw current time to subtract
      from.  So once the box had been up a certain amount of time it would
      appear as if our IO's were taking several years to complete.  Fix this
      by truncating the current time so it matches the issue time.  Verified
      this worked by running with this patch for a week on our test tier.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      71e9690b
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      blk-iolatency: don't change the latency window · d607eefa
      Josef Bacik authored
      Early versions of these patches had us waiting for seconds at a time
      during submission, so we had to adjust the timing window we monitored
      for latency.  Now we don't do things like that so this is unnecessary
      code.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      d607eefa
  4. 13 Jul, 2018 11 commits
  5. 12 Jul, 2018 2 commits
    • Helge Deller's avatar
      block: skd: Use %pad printk format for dma_addr_t values · ea870bb2
      Helge Deller authored
      Use the existing %pad printk format to print dma_addr_t values.
      This avoids the following warnings when compiling on the parisc64 platform:
      
      drivers/block/skd_main.c: In function 'skd_preop_sg_list':
      drivers/block/skd_main.c:660:4: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      ea870bb2
    • Christoph Hellwig's avatar
      bsg: remove read/write support · 28519c89
      Christoph Hellwig authored
      The code poses a security risk due to user memory access in ->release
      and had an API that can't be used reliably.  As far as we know it was
      never used for real, but if that turns out wrong we'll have to revert
      this commit and come up with a band aid.
      
      Jann Horn did look software archives for users of this interface,
      and the only users found were example code in sg3_utils, and optional
      support in an optional module of the tgt user space iscsi target,
      which looks like a proof of concept extension of the /dev/sg
      read/write support.
      
      Tony Battersby chimes in that the code is basically unsafe to use in
      general:
      
        The read/write interface on /dev/bsg is impossible to use safely
        because the list of completed commands is per-device (bd->done_list)
        rather than per-fd like it is with /dev/sg.  So if program A and
        program B are both using the write/read interface on the same bsg
        device, then their command responses will get mixed up, and program
        A will read() some command results from program B and vice versa.
        So no, I don't use read/write on /dev/bsg.  From a security standpoint,
        it should definitely be fixed or removed.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      28519c89
  6. 11 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  7. 10 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  8. 09 Jul, 2018 20 commits