The test here can underflow so we pass bogus lengths to the hardware.
It's a static checker fix and I don't know the impact.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The driver core clears the driver data to NULL after device_release or on
probe failure.  Thus, it is not needed to manually clear the device driver
data to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Use module_pci_driver() macro which makes the code smaller and simpler.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

We need to return -EINTR after a split because we invalidated iterators
(and freed the btree node) - but if we were finished inserting, we don't
want to redo the traversal.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

When deciding what order to reuse buckets we take into account both the bucket's
priority (which indicates lru order) and also the amount of live data in that
bucket. The way they were scaled together wasn't as correct as it could be...
this patch improves and documents it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Checks if two keys have equivalent header fields.
(good enough for replacement or merging)

Used in bch_bkey_try_merge, and replacing a key
in the btree.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Swenson <nks@daterainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Added generic header checks to bch_bkey_try_merge,
which then calls the bkey specific function

Removed extraneous checks from bch_extent_merge
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Swenson <nks@daterainc.com>

Now handling overlapping extents/keys is a method that's specific to what the
btree node contains.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More work to disentangle various code from struct btree
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More work to disentangle various code from struct btree
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More work to disentangle bset.c from struct btree
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

We're in the process of turning bset.c into library code, so none of the code in
that file should know about struct cache_set or struct btree - so, move the
btree traversal part of the stats code to sysfs.c.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Helper function to explicitly check how much space is free in a btree node
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Soon, bset.c won't need to depend on struct btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More work to disentangle bset.c from the rest of the code:
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More disentangling bset.c from the rest of the bcache code - soon, the
sorting routines won't have any dependencies on any outside structs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Only use extent comparison for comparing extents, so we're not using
START_KEY() on other key types (i.e. btree pointers)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

More refactoring:

node() -> bset_bkey_idx()
end() -> bset_bkey_last()
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Getting away from KEY_PTRS and moving toward KEY_U64s - and getting rid of magic
2s

Also - split out the part that checks against journal entry size so as to avoid
a dependancy on struct cache_set in bset.c
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

In the process of disentagling/libraryizing bset.c from the rest of the
bcache code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

It was a single element mempool before, it's slightly cleaner to just use a real
mempool.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Used this fixed code to find and fix the bug fixed by
a4d885097b0ac0cd1337f171f2d4b83e946094d4.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

That was a terrible name for a macro, add some better helpers to replace it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Now that we've got code for raid5/6 stripe awareness, bcache just needs
to know about the stripes and when writing partial stripes is expensive
- we probably don't want to enable this optimization for raid1 or 10,
even though they have stripes. So add a flag to queue_limits.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

This error path shouldn't have been hit in practice.. and we've got reworked
reserve code coming soon so that it shouldn't _ever_ be bit... but if we've got
code for this error path it should be correct.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

We need a reserve for allocating buckets for new btree nodes - and now that
we've got multiple btrees, it really needs to be per btree.

This reworks the reserves so we've got separate freelists for each reserve
instead of watermarks, which seems to make things a bit cleaner, and it adds
some code so that btree_split() can make sure the reserve is available before it
starts.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Also flesh out the documentation a bit
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Another minor performance optimization
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Unnecessary since a bucket that has dirty pointers pointing to it can
never be invalidated - and skipping it is a measurable performance
boost, since the bucket gen will usually be a cache miss.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

We were unnecessarily waiting on a journal write to complete when we just needed
to start a journal write and start setting up the next one.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

The real fix is where we check the bytes we need against how much is
remaining - we also need to check for a journal entry bigger than our
buffer, we'll never write those and it would be bad if we tried to read
one.

Also improve the diagnostic messages.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

The code that handles overlapping extents that we've just read back in from disk
was depending on the behaviour of the code that handles overlapping extents as
we're inserting into a btree node in the case of an insert that forced an
existing extent to be split: on insert, if we had to split we'd also insert a
new extent to represent the top part of the old extent - and then that new
extent would get written out.

The code that read the extents back in thus not bother with splitting extents -
if it saw an extent that ovelapped in the middle of an older extent, it would
trim the old extent to only represent the bottom part, assuming that the
original insert would've inserted a new extent to represent the top part.

I still haven't figured out _how_ it can happen, but I'm now pretty convinced
(and testing has confirmed) that there's some kind of an obscure corner case
(probably involving extent merging, and multiple overwrites in different sets)
that breaks this. The fix is to change the mergesort fixup code to split extents
itself when required.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10

We need the updated code to make bcache easier to merge.

blk_rq_init() is called in req's complete handler to initialize
the request, so the members of start_time and start_time_ns might
become inaccurate when it is allocated in future.

The patch initializes the two members in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() to
fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Set the return variable to an error code as done elsewhere in the function.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
(
if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\))
 { ... return ret; }
|
ret@p1 = 0
)
... when != ret = e1
    when != &ret
*if(...)
{
  ... when != ret = e2
      when forall
 return ret;
}

// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>