1. 11 Feb, 2016 1 commit
  2. 05 Feb, 2016 1 commit
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix hang on extent buffer lock caused by the inode_paths ioctl · 0c0fe3b0
      Filipe Manana authored
      While doing some tests I ran into an hang on an extent buffer's rwlock
      that produced the following trace:
      
      [39389.800012] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#15 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32166]
      [39389.800016] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#14 stuck for 22s! [fdm-stress:32165]
      [39389.800016] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
      [39389.800016] irq event stamp: 0
      [39389.800016] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
      [39389.800016] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35
      [39389.800016] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35
      [39389.800016] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
      [39389.800016] CPU: 14 PID: 32165 Comm: fdm-stress Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [39389.800016] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [39389.800016] task: ffff880175b1ca40 ti: ffff8800a185c000 task.ti: ffff8800a185c000
      [39389.800016] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810902af>]  [<ffffffff810902af>] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x57/0x158
      [39389.800016] RSP: 0018:ffff8800a185fb80  EFLAGS: 00000202
      [39389.800016] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e9c RCX: 0000000000000101
      [39389.800016] RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001
      [39389.800016] RBP: ffff8800a185fb98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
      [39389.800016] R10: ffff8800a185fb68 R11: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R12: ffff8801710c4e98
      [39389.800016] R13: ffff880175b1ca40 R14: ffff8800a185fc10 R15: ffff880175b1ca40
      [39389.800016] FS:  00007f6d37fff700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [39389.800016] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [39389.800016] CR2: 00007f6d300019b8 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
      [39389.800016] Stack:
      [39389.800016]  ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880175b1ca40 ffff8800a185fbb0
      [39389.800016]  ffffffff81091e11 ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbc8 ffffffff81091895
      [39389.800016]  ffff8801710c4e98 ffff8800a185fbe8 ffffffff81486c5c ffffffffa067288c
      [39389.800016] Call Trace:
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff81091e11>] queued_read_lock_slowpath+0x46/0x60
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff81091895>] do_raw_read_lock+0x3e/0x41
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff81486c5c>] _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0x44
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa067288c>] ? btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa067288c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x54/0x125 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa0622ced>] ? btrfs_find_item+0xa7/0xd2 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa069363f>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xd6/0x174 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa0693730>] inode_to_path+0x53/0xa2 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa0693e2e>] paths_from_inode+0x117/0x2ec [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffffa0670cff>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd5b/0x2793 [btrfs]
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff81276727>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [39389.800016]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [39389.800016] Code: b9 01 01 00 00 f7 c6 00 ff ff ff 75 32 83 fe 01 89 ca 89 f0 0f 45 d7 f0 0f b1 13 39 f0 74 04 89 c6 eb e2 ff ca 0f 84 fa 00 00 00 <8b> 03 84 c0 74 04 f3 90 eb f6 66 c7 03 01 00 e9 e6 00 00 00 e8
      [39389.800012] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod ppdev xor sha256_generic hmac raid6_pq drbg ansi_cprng aesni_intel i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq aes_x86_64 ablk_helper tpm_tis parport_pc i2c_core sg cryptd evdev psmouse lrw tpm parport gf128mul serio_raw pcspkr glue_helper processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
      [39389.800012] irq event stamp: 0
      [39389.800012] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
      [39389.800012] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35
      [39389.800012] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104e58d>] copy_process+0x638/0x1a35
      [39389.800012] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
      [39389.800012] CPU: 15 PID: 32166 Comm: fdm-stress Tainted: G             L  4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [39389.800012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [39389.800012] task: ffff880179294380 ti: ffff880034a60000 task.ti: ffff880034a60000
      [39389.800012] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81091e8d>]  [<ffffffff81091e8d>] queued_write_lock_slowpath+0x62/0x72
      [39389.800012] RSP: 0018:ffff880034a639f0  EFLAGS: 00000206
      [39389.800012] RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffff8801710c4e98 RCX: 0000000000000000
      [39389.800012] RDX: 00000000000000ff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8801710c4e9c
      [39389.800012] RBP: ffff880034a639f8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
      [39389.800012] R10: ffff880034a639b0 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8801710c4e98
      [39389.800012] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff880172cbc000 R15: ffff8801710c4e00
      [39389.800012] FS:  00007f6d377fe700(0000) GS:ffff8802be9e0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [39389.800012] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [39389.800012] CR2: 00007f6d3d3c1000 CR3: 0000000037c93000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
      [39389.800012] Stack:
      [39389.800012]  ffff8801710c4e98 ffff880034a63a10 ffffffff81091963 ffff8801710c4e98
      [39389.800012]  ffff880034a63a30 ffffffff81486f1b ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00
      [39389.800012]  ffff880034a63a78 ffffffffa0672cb3 ffff8801710c4e00 ffff880034a63a58
      [39389.800012] Call Trace:
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff81091963>] do_raw_write_lock+0x72/0x8c
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff81486f1b>] _raw_write_lock+0x3a/0x41
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0672cb3>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x119/0x251 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa061aeba>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x5d [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa061ce13>] ? btrfs_root_node+0xda/0xe6 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa061ce83>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x22/0x42 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa062046b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1b8/0x758 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff810fc6b0>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa06365db>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x31/0x95 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8108d62f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8148482b>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x397/0x3bc
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa068821b>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x59/0x1c0 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa068858e>] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x194/0x5aa [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff81486ab7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0688a48>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xa4/0x15c [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0688d62>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x11/0x13 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa064048e>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x234/0x96e [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0618d10>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x145/0x1ad [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffffa0671176>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11d2/0x2793 [btrfs]
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff81140261>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [39389.800012]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [39389.800012] Code: f0 0f b1 13 85 c0 75 ef eb 2a f3 90 8a 03 84 c0 75 f8 f0 0f b0 13 84 c0 75 f0 ba ff 00 00 00 eb 0a f0 0f b1 13 ff c8 74 0b f3 90 <8b> 03 83 f8 01 75 f7 eb ed c6 43 04 00 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00
      
      This happens because in the code path executed by the inode_paths ioctl we
      end up nesting two calls to read lock a leaf's rwlock when after the first
      call to read_lock() and before the second call to read_lock(), another
      task (running the delayed items as part of a transaction commit) has
      already called write_lock() against the leaf's rwlock. This situation is
      illustrated by the following diagram:
      
               Task A                       Task B
      
        btrfs_ref_to_path()               btrfs_commit_transaction()
          read_lock(&eb->lock);
      
                                            btrfs_run_delayed_items()
                                              __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items()
                                                __btrfs_update_delayed_inode()
                                                  btrfs_lookup_inode()
      
                                                    write_lock(&eb->lock);
                                                      --> task waits for lock
      
          read_lock(&eb->lock);
          --> makes this task hang
              forever (and task B too
      	of course)
      
      So fix this by avoiding doing the nested read lock, which is easily
      avoidable. This issue does not happen if task B calls write_lock() after
      task A does the second call to read_lock(), however there does not seem
      to exist anything in the documentation that mentions what is the expected
      behaviour for recursive locking of rwlocks (leaving the idea that doing
      so is not a good usage of rwlocks).
      
      Also, as a side effect necessary for this fix, make sure we do not
      needlessly read lock extent buffers when the input path has skip_locking
      set (used when called from send).
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      0c0fe3b0
  3. 03 Feb, 2016 3 commits
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: remove no longer used function extent_read_full_page_nolock() · 7f042a83
      Filipe Manana authored
      Not needed after the previous patch named
      "Btrfs: fix page reading in extent_same ioctl leading to csum errors".
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      7f042a83
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix page reading in extent_same ioctl leading to csum errors · 31314002
      Filipe Manana authored
      In the extent_same ioctl, we were grabbing the pages (locked) and
      attempting to read them without bothering about any concurrent IO
      against them. That is, we were not checking for any ongoing ordered
      extents nor waiting for them to complete, which leads to a race where
      the extent_same() code gets a checksum verification error when it
      reads the pages, producing a message like the following in dmesg
      and making the operation fail to user space with -ENOMEM:
      
      [18990.161265] BTRFS warning (device sdc): csum failed ino 259 off 495616 csum 685204116 expected csum 1515870868
      
      Fix this by using btrfs_readpage() for reading the pages instead of
      extent_read_full_page_nolock(), which waits for any concurrent ordered
      extents to complete and locks the io range. Also do better error handling
      and don't treat all failures as -ENOMEM, as that's clearly misleasing,
      becoming identical to the checks and operation of prepare_uptodate_page().
      
      The use of extent_read_full_page_nolock() was required before
      commit f4414602 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with extent-same and readpage"),
      as we had the range locked in an inode's io tree before attempting to
      read the pages.
      
      Fixes: f4414602 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with extent-same and readpage")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.2+
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      31314002
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix invalid page accesses in extent_same (dedup) ioctl · e0bd70c6
      Filipe Manana authored
      In the extent_same ioctl we are getting the pages for the source and
      target ranges and unlocking them immediately after, which is incorrect
      because later we attempt to map them (with kmap_atomic) and access their
      contents at btrfs_cmp_data(). When we do such access the pages might have
      been relocated or removed from memory, which leads to an invalid memory
      access. This issue is detected on a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
      which produces a trace like the following:
      
      186736.677437] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      [186736.680382] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev xor raid6_pq sha256_generic hmac drbg ansi_cprng acpi_cpufreq evdev sg aesni_intel aes_x86_64
      parport_pc ablk_helper tpm_tis psmouse parport i2c_piix4 tpm cryptd i2c_core lrw processor button serio_raw pcspkr gf128mul glue_helper loop autofs4 ext4
      crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last
      unloaded: btrfs]
      [186736.681319] CPU: 13 PID: 10222 Comm: duperemove Tainted: G        W       4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [186736.681319] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [186736.681319] task: ffff880132600400 ti: ffff880362284000 task.ti: ffff880362284000
      [186736.681319] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81264d00>]  [<ffffffff81264d00>] memcmp+0xb/0x22
      [186736.681319] RSP: 0018:ffff880362287d70  EFLAGS: 00010287
      [186736.681319] RAX: 000002c002468acf RBX: 0000000012345678 RCX: 0000000000000000
      [186736.681319] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0005d129c5cf9000 RDI: 0005d129c5cf9000
      [186736.681319] RBP: ffff880362287d70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000001000
      [186736.681319] R10: ffff880000000000 R11: 0000000000000476 R12: 0000000000001000
      [186736.681319] R13: ffff8802f91d4c88 R14: ffff8801f2a77830 R15: ffff880352e83e40
      [186736.681319] FS:  00007f27b37fe700(0000) GS:ffff88043dda0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [186736.681319] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [186736.681319] CR2: 00007f27a406a000 CR3: 0000000217421000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
      [186736.681319] Stack:
      [186736.681319]  ffff880362287ea0 ffffffffa048d0bd 000000000009f000 0000000000001000
      [186736.681319]  0100000000000000 ffff8801f2a77850 ffff8802f91d49b0 ffff880132600400
      [186736.681319]  00000000000004f8 ffff8801c1efbe41 0000000000000000 0000000000000038
      [186736.681319] Call Trace:
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffffa048d0bd>] btrfs_ioctl+0x24cb/0x2731 [btrfs]
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [186736.681319]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [186736.681319] Code: 0a 3c 6e 74 0d 3c 79 74 04 3c 59 75 0c c6 06 01 eb 03 c6 06 00 31 c0 eb 05 b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 55 31 c9 48 89 e5 48 39 d1 74 13 <0f> b6
      04 0f 44 0f b6 04 0e 48 ff c1 44 29 c0 74 ea eb 02 31 c0
      
      (gdb) list *(btrfs_ioctl+0x24cb)
      0x5e0e1 is in btrfs_ioctl (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2972).
      2967                    dst_addr = kmap_atomic(dst_page);
      2968
      2969                    flush_dcache_page(src_page);
      2970                    flush_dcache_page(dst_page);
      2971
      2972                    if (memcmp(addr, dst_addr, cmp_len))
      2973                            ret = BTRFS_SAME_DATA_DIFFERS;
      2974
      2975                    kunmap_atomic(addr);
      2976                    kunmap_atomic(dst_addr);
      
      So fix this by making sure we keep the pages locked and respect the same
      locking order as everywhere else: get and lock the pages first and then
      lock the range in the inode's io tree (like for example at
      __btrfs_buffered_write() and extent_readpages()). If an ordered extent
      is found after locking the range in the io tree, unlock the range,
      unlock the pages, wait for the ordered extent to complete and repeat the
      entire locking process until no overlapping ordered extents are found.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.2+
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      e0bd70c6
  4. 29 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  5. 27 Jan, 2016 3 commits
  6. 26 Jan, 2016 4 commits
    • David Sterba's avatar
      Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()" · 80ad623e
      David Sterba authored
      This reverts commit 69624913. The
      cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in
      progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs
      provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages:
      
      kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
      kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done.
      kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
      kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
      kernel: btrfs-cleaner   D ffff88033dd13bc0     0   152      2 0x00000000
      kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff
      kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451
      kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020
      kernel: Call Trace:
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8
      kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e
      kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73
      kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72
      kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a
      kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45
      kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b
      kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a
      kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736
      kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7
      kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae
      kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167
      kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
      
      As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for
      stable kernels.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: default avatarMartin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de>
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4
      CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      80ad623e
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: async-thread: Fix a use-after-free error for trace · 0a95b851
      Qu Wenruo authored
      Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
      So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().
      
      Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().
      Reported-by: default avatarDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0a95b851
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix race between fsync and lockless direct IO writes · de0ee0ed
      Filipe Manana authored
      An fsync, using the fast path, can race with a concurrent lockless direct
      IO write and end up logging a file extent item that points to an extent
      that wasn't written to yet. This is because the fast fsync path collects
      ordered extents into a local list and then collects all the new extent
      maps to log file extent items based on them, while the direct IO write
      path creates the new extent map before it creates the corresponding
      ordered extent (and submitting the respective bio(s)).
      
      So fix this by making the direct IO write path create ordered extents
      before the extent maps and make the fast fsync path collect any new
      ordered extents after it collects the extent maps.
      Note that making the fsync handler call inode_dio_wait() (after acquiring
      the inode's i_mutex) would not work and lead to a deadlock when doing
      AIO, as through AIO we end up in a path where the fsync handler is called
      (through dio_aio_complete_work() -> dio_complete() -> vfs_fsync_range())
      before the inode's dio counter is decremented (inode_dio_wait() waits
      for this counter to have a value of zero).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      de0ee0ed
    • Chris Mason's avatar
      Merge branch 'fix/fst-sysfs' of... · 6b5aa88c
      Chris Mason authored
      Merge branch 'fix/fst-sysfs' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6b5aa88c
  7. 25 Jan, 2016 2 commits
  8. 22 Jan, 2016 2 commits
  9. 21 Jan, 2016 3 commits
  10. 20 Jan, 2016 17 commits
    • David Sterba's avatar
      ba2d0840
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: raid56: Use raid_write_end_io for scrub · a6111d11
      Zhao Lei authored
      No need to create additional end_io function for scrub, it increased
      code size and introduced some un-unified lines, as:
      raid_write_parity_end_io():
              int err = bio->bi_error;
              if (bio->bi_error)
      raid_write_end_io():
              int err = bio->bi_error;
              if (err)
      
      This patch combines them.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a6111d11
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Remove unnecessary ClearPageUptodate for raid56 · 748f4ef4
      Zhao Lei authored
      PageUptodate flag already initialized to 0 for new page,
      no need to set it again.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      748f4ef4
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: use rbio->nr_pages to reduce calculation · 915e2290
      Zhao Lei authored
      We can use rbio->stripe_npages to reduce unnecessary calculation in
      many code place.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      915e2290
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Use unified stripe_page's index calculation · b7178a5f
      Zhao Lei authored
      We are using different index calculation method for stripe_page in
      current code:
      1: (rbio->stripe_len / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
      2: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
      3: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len * stripe_index, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) + page_index
      ...
      
      They can get same result when stripe_len align to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
      this is why current code can work, intruduce and use a common function
      for calculation is a better choose.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b7178a5f
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Fix calculation of rbio->dbitmap's size calculation · bfca9a6d
      Zhao Lei authored
      Current code is trying to calculate rbio->dbitmap's size to make it
      align to sizeof(long), but implement haven't achived this object,
      it is align to sizeof(char) instead.
      This patch fixed above calculation, and use sizeof(long) instead of
      fixed "8" to increate compatibility.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      bfca9a6d
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Fix no_space in write and rm loop · e1746e83
      Zhao Lei authored
      I see no_space in v4.4-rc1 again in xfstests generic/102.
      It happened randomly in some node only.
      (one of 4 phy-node, and a kvm with non-virtio block driver)
      
      By bisect, we can found the first-bad is:
       commit bdced438 ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting")'
      But above patch only triggered the bug by making bio operation
      faster(or slower).
      
      Main reason is in our space_allocating code, we need to commit
      page writeback before wait it complish, this patch fixed above
      bug.
      
      BTW, there is another reason for generic/102 fail, caused by
      disable default mixed-blockgroup, I'll fix it in xfstests.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e1746e83
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: merge functions for wait snapshot creation · 0bc19f90
      Zhao Lei authored
      wait_for_snapshot_creation() is in same group with oher two:
       btrfs_start_write_no_snapshoting()
       btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting()
      
      Rename wait_for_snapshot_creation() and move it into same place
      with other two.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0bc19f90
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: delete unused argument in btrfs_copy_from_user · ee22f0c4
      Zhao Lei authored
      size_t write_bytes is not necessary for btrfs_copy_from_user(),
      delete it.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ee22f0c4
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Use direct way to determine raid56 write/recover mode · ad1ba2a0
      Zhao Lei authored
      Old code used bbio->raid_map to determine whether in raid56
      write/recover operation, because we didn't't have bbio->map_type.
      
      Now we have direct way for this condition, rid of using
      the function-relative data, and make the code more readable.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ad1ba2a0
    • Zhao Lei's avatar
      btrfs: Small cleanup for get index_srcdev loop · 94a97dfe
      Zhao Lei authored
      1: Adjust condition in loop to make less TAB
      2: Move btrfs_put_bbio()'s line for combine, and makes logic clean.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      94a97dfe
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: Enhance chunk validation check · f04b772b
      Qu Wenruo authored
      Enhance chunk validation:
      1) Num_stripes
         We already have such check but it's only in super block sys chunk
         array.
         Now check all on-disk chunks.
      
      2) Chunk logical
         It should be aligned to sector size.
         This behavior should be *DOUBLE CHECKED* for 64K sector size like
         PPC64 or AArch64.
         Maybe we can found some hidden bugs.
      
      3) Chunk length
         Same as chunk logical, should be aligned to sector size.
      
      4) Stripe length
         It should be power of 2.
      
      5) Chunk type
         Any bit out of TYPE_MAS | PROFILE_MASK is invalid.
      
      With all these much restrict rules, several fuzzed image reported in
      mail list should no longer cause kernel panic.
      Reported-by: default avatarVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f04b772b
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: Enhance super validation check · 319e4d06
      Qu Wenruo authored
      Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points:
      1) Restrict sector/node size check
         Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2.
         So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now.
      
      2) Super flag check
         For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and
         btrfs-progs super flags.
         And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this
         check will only output warning.
      
      3) Better root alignment check
         Now root bytenr is checked against sector size.
      
      4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid().
         Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check.
         And magic number check.
      Reported-by: default avatarVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      319e4d06
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix deadlock running delayed iputs at transaction commit time · c2d6cb16
      Filipe Manana authored
      While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
      iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:
      
      [  886.399989] =============================================
      [  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
      [  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
      [  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
      [  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]        CPU0
      [  886.403568]        ----
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
      [  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] stack backtrace:
      [  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
      [  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
      [  886.403568] Call Trace:
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
      [ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
      [ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
      [ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
      [ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
      [ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
      [ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
      [ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
      [ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
      [ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
      [ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
      [ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
      [ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
      [ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
      [ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      
      This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
      fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
      a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
      a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
      delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
      an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
      and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
      delayed iput operations.
      This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
      semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
      class for each level of recursion.
      
      Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
      is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
      instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
      run from anywhere.
      
      Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c2d6cb16
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix typo in log message when starting a balance · fedc0045
      Filipe Manana authored
      The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance"
      (already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users:
      metatdata -> metadata.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      fedc0045
    • Chris Mason's avatar
      Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of... · 326f7842
      Chris Mason authored
      Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
      326f7842
    • Chris Mason's avatar
      Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of... · acc30855
      Chris Mason authored
      Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
      acc30855
  11. 19 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  12. 15 Jan, 2016 2 commits