1. 29 Jan, 2018 1 commit
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next · 457740a9
      David S. Miller authored
      Alexei Starovoitov says:
      
      ====================
      pull-request: bpf-next 2018-01-26
      
      The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
      
      The main changes are:
      
      1) A number of extensions to tcp-bpf, from Lawrence.
          - direct R or R/W access to many tcp_sock fields via bpf_sock_ops
          - passing up to 3 arguments to bpf_sock_ops functions
          - tcp_sock field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags for controlling callbacks
          - optionally calling bpf_sock_ops program when RTO fires
          - optionally calling bpf_sock_ops program when packet is retransmitted
          - optionally calling bpf_sock_ops program when TCP state changes
          - access to tclass and sk_txhash
          - new selftest
      
      2) div/mod exception handling, from Daniel.
          One of the ugly leftovers from the early eBPF days is that div/mod
          operations based on registers have a hard-coded src_reg == 0 test
          in the interpreter as well as in JIT code generators that would
          return from the BPF program with exit code 0. This was basically
          adopted from cBPF interpreter for historical reasons.
          There are multiple reasons why this is very suboptimal and prone
          to bugs. To name one: the return code mapping for such abnormal
          program exit of 0 does not always match with a suitable program
          type's exit code mapping. For example, '0' in tc means action 'ok'
          where the packet gets passed further up the stack, which is just
          undesirable for such cases (e.g. when implementing policy) and
          also does not match with other program types.
          After considering _four_ different ways to address the problem,
          we adapt the same behavior as on some major archs like ARMv8:
          X div 0 results in 0, and X mod 0 results in X. aarch64 and
          aarch32 ISA do not generate any traps or otherwise aborts
          of program execution for unsigned divides.
          Given the options, it seems the most suitable from
          all of them, also since major archs have similar schemes in
          place. Given this is all in the realm of undefined behavior,
          we still have the option to adapt if deemed necessary.
      
      3) sockmap sample refactoring, from John.
      
      4) lpm map get_next_key fixes, from Yonghong.
      
      5) test cleanups, from Alexei and Prashant.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      457740a9
  2. 28 Jan, 2018 2 commits
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch '10GbE' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue · 6b2e2829
      David S. Miller authored
      Jeff Kirsher says:
      
      ====================
      10GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2018-01-26
      
      This series contains updates to ixgbe and ixgbevf.
      
      Emil updates ixgbevf to match ixgbe functionality, starting with the
      consolidating of functions that represent logical steps in the receive
      process so we can later update them more easily.  Updated ixgbevf to
      only synchronize the length of the frame, which will typically be the
      MTU or smaller.  Updated the VF driver to use the length of the packet
      instead of the DD status bit to determine if a new descriptor is ready
      to be processed, which saves on reads and we can save time on
      initialization.  Added support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC/WEAK_ORDERING
      to help improve performance on some platforms.  Updated the VF driver to
      do bulk updates of the page reference count instead of just incrementing
      it by one reference at a time.  Updated the VF driver to only go through
      the region of the receive ring that was designated to be cleaned up,
      rather than process the entire ring.
      
      Colin Ian King adds the use of ARRAY_SIZE() on various arrays.
      
      Miroslav Lichvar fixes an issue where ethtool was reporting timestamping
      filters unsupported for X550, which is incorrect.
      
      Paul adds support for reporting 5G link speed for some devices.
      
      Dan Carpenter fixes a typo where && was used when it should have been
      ||.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6b2e2829
    • Leon Romanovsky's avatar
      net/rocker: Remove unreachable return instruction · 751c45bd
      Leon Romanovsky authored
      The "return 0" instruction follows other return instruction
      and it makes it impossible to execute, hence remove it.
      
      Fixes: 00fc0c51 ("rocker: Change world_ops API and implementation to be switchdev independant")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      751c45bd
  3. 27 Jan, 2018 17 commits
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'fix-lpm-map' · 8223967f
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Yonghong Song says:
      
      ====================
      A kernel page fault which happens in lpm map trie_get_next_key is reported
      by syzbot and Eric. The issue was introduced by commit b471f2f1
      ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map").
      Patch #1 fixed the issue in the kernel and patch #2 adds a multithreaded
      test case in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      8223967f
    • Yonghong Song's avatar
      tools/bpf: add a multithreaded stress test in bpf selftests test_lpm_map · af32efee
      Yonghong Song authored
      The new test will spawn four threads, doing map update, delete, lookup
      and get_next_key in parallel. It is able to reproduce the issue in the
      previous commit found by syzbot and Eric Dumazet.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      af32efee
    • Yonghong Song's avatar
      bpf: fix kernel page fault in lpm map trie_get_next_key · 6dd1ec6c
      Yonghong Song authored
      Commit b471f2f1 ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command
      for LPM_TRIE map") introduces a bug likes below:
      
          if (!rcu_dereference(trie->root))
              return -ENOENT;
          if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) {
              root = &trie->root;
              goto find_leftmost;
          }
          ......
        find_leftmost:
          for (node = rcu_dereference(*root); node;) {
      
      In the code after label find_leftmost, it is assumed
      that *root should not be NULL, but it is not true as
      it is possbile trie->root is changed to NULL by an
      asynchronous delete operation.
      
      The issue is reported by syzbot and Eric Dumazet with the
      below error log:
        ......
        kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
        kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
        general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
        Dumping ftrace buffer:
           (ftrace buffer empty)
        Modules linked in:
        CPU: 1 PID: 8033 Comm: syz-executor3 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8+ #4
        Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
        RIP: 0010:trie_get_next_key+0x3c2/0xf10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:682
        ......
      
      This patch fixed the issue by use local rcu_dereferenced
      pointer instead of *(&trie->root) later on.
      
      Fixes: b471f2f1 ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command or LPM_TRIE map")
      Reported-by: default avatarsyzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
      Reported-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      6dd1ec6c
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'bpf-improvements-and-fixes' · 1651e39e
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Daniel Borkmann says:
      
      ====================
      This set contains a small cleanup in cBPF prologue generation and
      otherwise fixes an outstanding issue related to BPF to BPF calls
      and exception handling. For details please see related patches.
      Last but not least, BPF selftests is extended with several new
      test cases.
      
      Thanks!
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      1651e39e
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others · 21ccaf21
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new
      test cases.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      21ccaf21
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, arm: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 73ae3c04
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from arm32 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      73ae3c04
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, mips64: remove unneeded zero check from div/mod with k · e472d5d8
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      The verifier in both cBPF and eBPF reject div/mod by 0 imm,
      so this can never load. Remove emitting such test and reject
      it from being JITed instead (the latter is actually also not
      needed, but given practice in sparc64, ppc64 today, so
      doesn't hurt to add it here either).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      e472d5d8
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, mips64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 1fb5c9c6
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from mips64 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      1fb5c9c6
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, sparc64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 740d52c6
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from sparc64 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      740d52c6
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, ppc64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 53fbf571
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from ppc64 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      53fbf571
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, s390x: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · a3212b8f
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from s390x JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      a3212b8f
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, arm64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 96a71005
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from arm64 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      96a71005
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf, x86_64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod · 3e5b1a39
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
      eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from x86_64 JIT.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      3e5b1a39
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: fix subprog verifier bypass by div/mod by 0 exception · f6b1b3bf
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      One of the ugly leftovers from the early eBPF days is that div/mod
      operations based on registers have a hard-coded src_reg == 0 test
      in the interpreter as well as in JIT code generators that would
      return from the BPF program with exit code 0. This was basically
      adopted from cBPF interpreter for historical reasons.
      
      There are multiple reasons why this is very suboptimal and prone
      to bugs. To name one: the return code mapping for such abnormal
      program exit of 0 does not always match with a suitable program
      type's exit code mapping. For example, '0' in tc means action 'ok'
      where the packet gets passed further up the stack, which is just
      undesirable for such cases (e.g. when implementing policy) and
      also does not match with other program types.
      
      While trying to work out an exception handling scheme, I also
      noticed that programs crafted like the following will currently
      pass the verifier:
      
        0: (bf) r6 = r1
        1: (85) call pc+8
        caller:
         R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
        callee:
         frame1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_1
        10: (b4) (u32) r2 = (u32) 0
        11: (b4) (u32) r3 = (u32) 1
        12: (3c) (u32) r3 /= (u32) r2
        13: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76)
        14: (95) exit
        returning from callee:
         frame1: R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
                 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv0
                 R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
                 R10=fp0,call_1
        to caller at 2:
         R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R10=fp0,call_-1
      
        from 14 to 2: R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
                      R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
        2: (bf) r1 = r6
        3: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80)
        4: (bf) r2 = r0
        5: (07) r2 += 8
        6: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+1
         R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0) R1=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R2=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R10=fp0,call_-1
        7: (71) r0 = *(u8 *)(r0 +0)
        8: (b7) r0 = 1
        9: (95) exit
      
        from 6 to 8: safe
        processed 16 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0+0
      
      Basically what happens is that in the subprog we make use of a
      div/mod by 0 exception and in the 'normal' subprog's exit path
      we just return skb->data back to the main prog. This has the
      implication that the verifier thinks we always get a pkt pointer
      in R0 while we still have the implicit 'return 0' from the div
      as an alternative unconditional return path earlier. Thus, R0
      then contains 0, meaning back in the parent prog we get the
      address range of [0x0, skb->data_end] as read and writeable.
      Similar can be crafted with other pointer register types.
      
      Since i) BPF_ABS/IND is not allowed in programs that contain
      BPF to BPF calls (and generally it's also disadvised to use in
      native eBPF context), ii) unknown opcodes don't return zero
      anymore, iii) we don't return an exception code in dead branches,
      the only last missing case affected and to fix is the div/mod
      handling.
      
      What we would really need is some infrastructure to propagate
      exceptions all the way to the original prog unwinding the
      current stack and returning that code to the caller of the
      BPF program. In user space such exception handling for similar
      runtimes is typically implemented with setjmp(3) and longjmp(3)
      as one possibility which is not available in the kernel,
      though (kgdb used to implement it in kernel long time ago). I
      implemented a PoC exception handling mechanism into the BPF
      interpreter with porting setjmp()/longjmp() into x86_64 and
      adding a new internal BPF_ABRT opcode that can use a program
      specific exception code for all exception cases we have (e.g.
      div/mod by 0, unknown opcodes, etc). While this seems to work
      in the constrained BPF environment (meaning, here, we don't
      need to deal with state e.g. from memory allocations that we
      would need to undo before going into exception state), it still
      has various drawbacks: i) we would need to implement the
      setjmp()/longjmp() for every arch supported in the kernel and
      for x86_64, arm64, sparc64 JITs currently supporting calls,
      ii) it has unconditional additional cost on main program
      entry to store CPU register state in initial setjmp() call,
      and we would need some way to pass the jmp_buf down into
      ___bpf_prog_run() for main prog and all subprogs, but also
      storing on stack is not really nice (other option would be
      per-cpu storage for this, but it also has the drawback that
      we need to disable preemption for every BPF program types).
      All in all this approach would add a lot of complexity.
      
      Another poor-man's solution would be to have some sort of
      additional shared register or scratch buffer to hold state
      for exceptions, and test that after every call return to
      chain returns and pass R0 all the way down to BPF prog caller.
      This is also problematic in various ways: i) an additional
      register doesn't map well into JITs, and some other scratch
      space could only be on per-cpu storage, which, again has the
      side-effect that this only works when we disable preemption,
      or somewhere in the input context which is not available
      everywhere either, and ii) this adds significant runtime
      overhead by putting conditionals after each and every call,
      as well as implementation complexity.
      
      Yet another option is to teach verifier that div/mod can
      return an integer, which however is also complex to implement
      as verifier would need to walk such fake 'mov r0,<code>; exit;'
      sequeuence and there would still be no guarantee for having
      propagation of this further down to the BPF caller as proper
      exception code. For parent prog, it is also is not distinguishable
      from a normal return of a constant scalar value.
      
      The approach taken here is a completely different one with
      little complexity and no additional overhead involved in
      that we make use of the fact that a div/mod by 0 is undefined
      behavior. Instead of bailing out, we adapt the same behavior
      as on some major archs like ARMv8 [0] into eBPF as well:
      X div 0 results in 0, and X mod 0 results in X. aarch64 and
      aarch32 ISA do not generate any traps or otherwise aborts
      of program execution for unsigned divides. I verified this
      also with a test program compiled by gcc and clang, and the
      behavior matches with the spec. Going forward we adapt the
      eBPF verifier to emit such rewrites once div/mod by register
      was seen. cBPF is not touched and will keep existing 'return 0'
      semantics. Given the options, it seems the most suitable from
      all of them, also since major archs have similar schemes in
      place. Given this is all in the realm of undefined behavior,
      we still have the option to adapt if deemed necessary and
      this way we would also have the option of more flexibility
      from LLVM code generation side (which is then fully visible
      to verifier). Thus, this patch i) fixes the panic seen in
      above program and ii) doesn't bypass the verifier observations.
      
        [0] ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8 [ARM DDI 0487B.b]
            http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0487b.b/DDI0487B_b_armv8_arm.pdf
            1) aarch64 instruction set: section C3.4.7 and C6.2.279 (UDIV)
               "A division by zero results in a zero being written to
                the destination register, without any indication that
                the division by zero occurred."
            2) aarch32 instruction set: section F1.4.8 and F5.1.263 (UDIV)
               "For the SDIV and UDIV instructions, division by zero
                always returns a zero result."
      
      Fixes: f4d7e40a ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      f6b1b3bf
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: make unknown opcode handling more robust · 5e581dad
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Recent findings by syzcaller fixed in 7891a87e ("bpf: arsh is
      not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it") triggered a warning
      in the interpreter due to unknown opcode not being rejected by
      the verifier. The 'return 0' for an unknown opcode is really not
      optimal, since with BPF to BPF calls, this would go untracked by
      the verifier.
      
      Do two things here to improve the situation: i) perform basic insn
      sanity check early on in the verification phase and reject every
      non-uapi insn right there. The bpf_opcode_in_insntable() table
      reuses the same mapping as the jumptable in ___bpf_prog_run() sans
      the non-public mappings. And ii) in ___bpf_prog_run() we do need
      to BUG in the case where the verifier would ever create an unknown
      opcode due to some rewrites.
      
      Note that JITs do not have such issues since they would punt to
      interpreter in these situations. Moreover, the BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
      would also help to avoid such unknown opcodes in the first place.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      5e581dad
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: improve dead code sanitizing · 2a5418a1
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Given we recently had c131187d ("bpf: fix branch pruning
      logic") and 95a762e2 ("bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in
      check_alu_op()") in particular where before verifier skipped
      verification of the wrongly assumed dead branch, we should not
      just replace the dead code parts with nops (mov r0,r0). If there
      is a bug such as fixed in 95a762e2 in future again, where
      runtime could execute those insns, then one of the potential
      issues with the current setting would be that given the nops
      would be at the end of the program, we could execute out of
      bounds at some point.
      
      The best in such case would be to just exit the BPF program
      altogether and return an exception code. However, given this
      would require two instructions, and such a dead code gap could
      just be a single insn long, we would need to place 'r0 = X; ret'
      snippet at the very end after the user program or at the start
      before the program (where we'd skip that region on prog entry),
      and then place unconditional ja's into the dead code gap.
      
      While more complex but possible, there's still another block
      in the road that currently prevents from this, namely BPF to
      BPF calls. The issue here is that such exception could be
      returned from a callee, but the caller would not know that
      it's an exception that needs to be propagated further down.
      Alternative that has little complexity is to just use a ja-1
      code for now which will trap the execution here instead of
      silently doing bad things if we ever get there due to bugs.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      2a5418a1
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: xor of a/x in cbpf can be done in 32 bit alu · 1d621674
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Very minor optimization; saves 1 byte per program in x86_64
      JIT in cBPF prologue.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      1d621674
  4. 26 Jan, 2018 20 commits