- 08 Dec, 2023 5 commits
-
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Andrei Matei says: ==================== bpf: fix accesses to uninit stack slots Fix two related issues issues around verifying stack accesses: 1. accesses to uninitialized stack memory was allowed inconsistently 2. the maximum stack depth needed for a program was not always maintained correctly The two issues are fixed together in one commit because the code for one affects the other. V4 to V5: - target bpf-next (Alexei) V3 to V4: - minor fixup to comment in patch 1 (Eduard) - C89-style in patch 3 (Andrii) V2 to V3: - address review comments from Andrii and Eduard - drop new verifier tests in favor of editing existing tests to check for stack depth - append a patch with a bit of cleanup coming out of the previous review ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208032519.260451-1-andreimatei1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
-
Andrei Matei authored
Push the rounding up of stack offsets into the function responsible for growing the stack, rather than relying on all the callers to do it. Uncertainty about whether the callers did it or not tripped up people in a previous review. Signed-off-by:
Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
-
Andrei Matei authored
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack memory (ever since 6715df8d) but, before this patch, these accesses were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places: - in check_stack_slot_within_bounds() - in check_stack_range_initialized() This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it can't run unprivileged for other reasons. This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime because a too small stack had been allocated for it. Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access() was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used instead. This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size. check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue. A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv. Fixes: 01f810ac ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access") Reported-by:
Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrei Matei authored
Add comments to the datastructure tracking the stack state, as the mapping between each stack slot and where its state is stored is not entirely obvious. Signed-off-by:
-
David Vernet authored
In libbpf, when determining whether we need to load vmlinux btf, we're currently (among other things) checking whether there is any struct_ops program present in the object. This works for most realistic struct_ops maps, as a struct_ops map is of course typically composed of one or more struct_ops programs. However, that technically need not be the case. A struct_ops interface could be defined which allows a map to be specified which one or more non-prog fields, and which provides default behavior if no struct_ops progs is actually provided otherwise. For sched_ext, for example, you technically only need to specify the name of the scheduler in the struct_ops map, with the core scheduler logic providing default behavior if no prog is actually specified. If we were to define and try to load such a struct_ops map, we would crash in libbpf when initializing it as obj->btf_vmlinux will be NULL: Reading symbols from minimal... (gdb) r Starting program: minimal_example [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000055555558308c in btf__type_cnt (btf=0x0) at btf.c:612 612 return btf->start_id + btf->nr_types; (gdb) bt type_name=0x5555555d99e3 "sched_ext_ops", kind=4) at btf.c:914 kind=4) at btf.c:942 type=0x7fffffffe558, type_id=0x7fffffffe548, ... data_member=0x7fffffffe568) at libbpf.c:948 kern_btf=0x0) at libbpf.c:1017 at libbpf.c:8059 So as to account for such bare-bones struct_ops maps, let's update obj_needs_vmlinux_btf() to also iterate over an obj's maps and check whether any of them are struct_ops maps. Signed-off-by:David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by:
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208061704.400463-1-void@manifault.com
-
- 07 Dec, 2023 12 commits
-
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Andrei Matei says: ==================== bpf: fix verification of indirect var-off stack access V4 to V5: - split the test into a separate patch V3 to V4: - include a test per Eduard's request - target bpf-next per Alexei's request (patches didn't change) V2 to V3: - simplify checks for max_off (don't call check_stack_slot_within_bounds for it) - append a commit to protect against overflow in the addition of the register and the offset V1 to V2: - fix max_off calculation for access size = 0 ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207041150.229139-1-andreimatei1@gmail.comSigned-off-by: -
Andrei Matei authored
This patch promotes the arithmetic around checking stack bounds to be done in the 64-bit domain, instead of the current 32bit. The arithmetic implies adding together a 64-bit register with a int offset. The register was checked to be below 1<<29 when it was variable, but not when it was fixed. The offset either comes from an instruction (in which case it is 16 bit), from another register (in which case the caller checked it to be below 1<<29 [1]), or from the size of an argument to a kfunc (in which case it can be a u32 [2]). Between the register being inconsistently checked to be below 1<<29, and the offset being up to an u32, it appears that we were open to overflowing the `int`s which were currently used for arithmetic. [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/815fb87b753055df2d9e50f6cd80eb10235fe3e9/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L7494-L7498 [2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/815fb87b753055df2d9e50f6cd80eb10235fe3e9/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L11904Reported-by:
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrei Matei authored
Add a regression test for var-off zero-sized reads. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrei Matei authored
This patch fixes a bug around the verification of possibly-zero-sized stack accesses. When the access was done through a var-offset stack pointer, check_stack_access_within_bounds was incorrectly computing the maximum-offset of a zero-sized read to be the same as the register's min offset. Instead, we have to take in account the register's maximum possible value. The patch also simplifies how the max offset is checked; the check is now simpler than for min offset. The bug was allowing accesses to erroneously pass the check_stack_access_within_bounds() checks, only to later crash in check_stack_range_initialized() when all the possibly-affected stack slots are iterated (this time with a correct max offset). check_stack_range_initialized() is relying on check_stack_access_within_bounds() for its accesses to the stack-tracking vector to be within bounds; in the case of zero-sized accesses, we were essentially only verifying that the lowest possible slot was within bounds. We would crash when the max-offset of the stack pointer was >= 0 (which shouldn't pass verification, and hopefully is not something anyone's code attempts to do in practice). Thanks Hao for reporting! Fixes: 01f810ac ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access") Reported-by:
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Song Liu says: ==================== Allocate bpf trampoline on bpf_prog_pack This set enables allocating bpf trampoline from bpf_prog_pack on x86. The majority of this work, however, is the refactoring of trampoline code. This is needed because we need to handle 4 archs and 2 users (trampoline and struct_ops). 1/7 through 6/7 refactors trampoline code. A few helpers are added. 7/7 finally let bpf trampoline on x86 use bpf_prog_pack. Changes in v7: 1. Use kvmalloc for rw_image in x86/arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline. (Alexei) 2. Add comment to explain why we cannot use kvmalloc in x86/arch_bpf_trampoline_size. (Alexei) Changes in v6: 1. Rebase. 2. Add Acked-by and Tested-by from Jiri Olsa and Björn Töpel. Changes in v5: 1. Adjust size of trampoline ksym. (Jiri) 2. Use "unsigned int size" arg in image management helpers.(Daniel) Changes in v4: 1. Dropped 1/8 in v3, which is already merged in bpf-next. 2. Add Reviewed-by from Björn Töpel. Changes in v3: 1. Fix bug in s390. (Thanks to Ilya Leoshkevich). 2. Fix build error in riscv. (kernel test robot). Changes in v2: 1. Add missing changes in net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c. 2. Reduce one dry run in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline. (Xu Kuohai) 3. Other small fixes. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-1-song@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
Song Liu authored
There are three major changes here: 1. Add arch_[alloc|free]_bpf_trampoline based on bpf_prog_pack; 2. Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline handle ROX input image, this requires arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline allocating a temporary RW buffer; 3. Update __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() to handle a RW buffer (rw_image) and a ROX buffer (image). This part is similar to the image/rw_image logic in bpf_int_jit_compile(). Signed-off-by:
Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-8-song@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
Instead of blindly allocating PAGE_SIZE for each trampoline, check the size of the trampoline with arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). This size is saved in bpf_tramp_image->size, and used for modmem charge/uncharge. The fallback arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline() still allocates a whole page because we need to use set_memory_* to protect the memory. struct_ops trampoline still uses a whole page for multiple trampolines. With this size check at caller (regular trampoline and struct_ops trampoline), remove arch_bpf_trampoline_size() from arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() in archs. Also, update bpf_image_ksym_add() to handle symbol of different sizes. Signed-off-by:
Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-7-song@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
This helper will be used to calculate the size of the trampoline before allocating the memory. arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for arm64 and riscv64 can use arch_bpf_trampoline_size() to check the trampoline fits in the image. OTOH, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for s390 has to call the JIT process twice, so it cannot use arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). Signed-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
x86's implementation of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() requires BPF_INSN_SAFETY buffer space between end of program and image_end. OTOH, the return value does not include BPF_INSN_SAFETY. This doesn't cause any real issue at the moment. However, "image" of size retval is not enough for arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). This will cause confusion when we introduce a new helper arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). To avoid future confusion, adjust the return value to include BPF_INSN_SAFETY. Signed-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
As BPF trampoline of different archs moves from bpf_jit_[alloc|free]_exec() to bpf_prog_pack_[alloc|free](), we need to use different _alloc, _free for different archs during the transition. Add the following helpers for this transition: void *arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline(unsigned int size); void arch_free_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size); void arch_protect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size); void arch_unprotect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size); The fallback version of these helpers require size <= PAGE_SIZE, but they are only called with size == PAGE_SIZE. They will be called with size < PAGE_SIZE when arch_bpf_trampoline_size() helper is introduced later. Signed-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
We are using "im" for "struct bpf_tramp_image" and "tr" for "struct bpf_trampoline" in most of the code base. The only exception is the prototype and fallback version of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). Update them to match the rest of the code base. We mix "orig_call" and "func_addr" for the argument in different versions of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). s/orig_call/func_addr/g so they match. Signed-off-by:
-
Song Liu authored
Currently, bpf_prog_pack_free only can only free pointer to struct bpf_binary_header, which is not flexible. Add a size argument to bpf_prog_pack_free so that it can handle any pointer. Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Dec, 2023 19 commits
-
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
To stay consistent with the naming pattern used for similar cases in BPF UAPI (__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE, etc), rename MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE into __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE. Also similar to MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE and MAX_BPF_REG, add: #define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE Not all __MAX_xxx enums have such #define, so I'm not sure if we should add it or not, but I figured I'll start with a completely backwards compatible way, and we can drop that, if necessary. Also adjust a selftest that used MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE enum. Suggested-by:
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206190920.1651226-1-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== BPF token and BPF FS-based delegation This patch set introduces an ability to delegate a subset of BPF subsystem functionality from privileged system-wide daemon (e.g., systemd or any other container manager) through special mount options for userns-bound BPF FS to a *trusted* unprivileged application. Trust is the key here. This functionality is not about allowing unconditional unprivileged BPF usage. Establishing trust, though, is completely up to the discretion of respective privileged application that would create and mount a BPF FS instance with delegation enabled, as different production setups can and do achieve it through a combination of different means (signing, LSM, code reviews, etc), and it's undesirable and infeasible for kernel to enforce any particular way of validating trustworthiness of particular process. The main motivation for this work is a desire to enable containerized BPF applications to be used together with user namespaces. This is currently impossible, as CAP_BPF, required for BPF subsystem usage, cannot be namespaced or sandboxed, as a general rule. E.g., tracing BPF programs, thanks to BPF helpers like bpf_probe_read_kernel() and bpf_probe_read_user() can safely read arbitrary memory, and it's impossible to ensure that they only read memory of processes belonging to any given namespace. This means that it's impossible to have a mechanically verifiable namespace-aware CAP_BPF capability, and as such another mechanism to allow safe usage of BPF functionality is necessary.BPF FS delegation mount options and BPF token derived from such BPF FS instance is such a mechanism. Kernel makes no assumption about what "trusted" constitutes in any particular case, and it's up to specific privileged applications and their surrounding infrastructure to decide that. What kernel provides is a set of APIs to setup and mount special BPF FS instanecs and derive BPF tokens from it. BPF FS and BPF token are both bound to its owning userns and in such a way are constrained inside intended container. Users can then pass BPF token FD to privileged bpf() syscall commands, like BPF map creation and BPF program loading, to perform such operations without having init userns privileged. This version incorporates feedback and suggestions ([3]) received on v3 of this patch set, and instead of allowing to create BPF tokens directly assuming capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), we instead enhance BPF FS to accept a few new delegation mount options. If these options are used and BPF FS itself is properly created, set up, and mounted inside the user namespaced container, user application is able to derive a BPF token object from BPF FS instance, and pass that token to bpf() syscall. As explained in patch #3, BPF token itself doesn't grant access to BPF functionality, but instead allows kernel to do namespaced capabilities checks (ns_capable() vs capable()) for CAP_BPF, CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, and CAP_SYS_ADMIN, as applicable. So it forms one half of a puzzle and allows container managers and sys admins to have safe and flexible configuration options: determining which containers get delegation of BPF functionality through BPF FS, and then which applications within such containers are allowed to perform bpf() commands, based on namespaces capabilities. Previous attempt at addressing this very same problem ([0]) attempted to utilize authoritative LSM approach, but was conclusively rejected by upstream LSM maintainers. BPF token concept is not changing anything about LSM approach, but can be combined with LSM hooks for very fine-grained security policy. Some ideas about making BPF token more convenient to use with LSM (in particular custom BPF LSM programs) was briefly described in recent LSF/MM/BPF 2023 presentation ([1]). E.g., an ability to specify user-provided data (context), which in combination with BPF LSM would allow implementing a very dynamic and fine-granular custom security policies on top of BPF token. In the interest of minimizing API surface area and discussions this was relegated to follow up patches, as it's not essential to the fundamental concept of delegatable BPF token. It should be noted that BPF token is conceptually quite similar to the idea of /dev/bpf device file, proposed by Song a while ago ([2]). The biggest difference is the idea of using virtual anon_inode file to hold BPF token and allowing multiple independent instances of them, each (potentially) with its own set of restrictions. And also, crucially, BPF token approach is not using any special stateful task-scoped flags. Instead, bpf() syscall accepts token_fd parameters explicitly for each relevant BPF command. This addresses main concerns brought up during the /dev/bpf discussion, and fits better with overall BPF subsystem design. This patch set adds a basic minimum of functionality to make BPF token idea useful and to discuss API and functionality. Currently only low-level libbpf APIs support creating and passing BPF token around, allowing to test kernel functionality, but for the most part is not sufficient for real-world applications, which typically use high-level libbpf APIs based on `struct bpf_object` type. This was done with the intent to limit the size of patch set and concentrate on mostly kernel-side changes. All the necessary plumbing for libbpf will be sent as a separate follow up patch set kernel support makes it upstream. Another part that should happen once kernel-side BPF token is established, is a set of conventions between applications (e.g., systemd), tools (e.g., bpftool), and libraries (e.g., libbpf) on exposing delegatable BPF FS instance(s) at well-defined locations to allow applications take advantage of this in automatic fashion without explicit code changes on BPF application's side. But I'd like to postpone this discussion to after BPF token concept lands. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412043300.360803-1-andrii@kernel.org/ [1] http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2023_material/Trusted_unprivileged_BPF_LSFMM2023.pdf [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190627201923.2589391-2-songliubraving@fb.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/ v11->v12: - enforce exact userns match in bpf_token_capable() and bpf_token_allow_cmd() checks, for added strictness (Christian); v10->v11: - fix BPF FS root check to disallow using bind-mounted subdirectory of BPF FS instance (Christian); - further restrict BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command to be executed from inside exactly the same user namespace as the one used to create BPF FS instance (Christian); v9->v10: - slight adjustments in LSM parts (Paul); - setting delegate_xxx options require capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (Christian); - simplify BPF_TOKEN_CREATE UAPI by accepting BPF FS FD directly (Christian); v8->v9: - fix issue in selftests due to sys/mount.h header (Jiri); - fix warning in doc comments in LSM hooks (kernel test robot); v7->v8: - add bpf_token_allow_cmd and bpf_token_capable hooks (Paul); - inline bpf_token_alloc() into bpf_token_create() to prevent accidental divergence with security_bpf_token_create() hook (Paul); v6->v7: - separate patches to refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_map_alloc LSM hooks, as discussed with Paul, and now they also accept struct bpf_token; - added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free to allow LSMs (SELinux, specifically) to set up security LSM blob (Paul); - last patch also wires bpf_security_struct setup by SELinux, similar to how it's done for BPF map/prog, though I'm not sure if that's enough, so worst case it's easy to drop this patch if more full fledged SELinux implementation will be done separately; - small fixes for issues caught by code reviews (Jiri, Hou); - fix for test_maps test that doesn't use LIBBPF_OPTS() macro (CI); v5->v6: - fix possible use of uninitialized variable in selftests (CI); - don't use anon_inode, instead create one from BPF FS instance (Christian); - don't store bpf_token inside struct bpf_map, instead pass it explicitly to map_check_btf(). We do store bpf_token inside prog->aux, because it's used during verification and even can be checked during attach time for some program types; - LSM hooks are left intact pending the conclusion of discussion with Paul Moore; I'd prefer to do LSM-related changes as a follow up patch set anyways; v4->v5: - add pre-patch unifying CAP_NET_ADMIN handling inside kernel/bpf/syscall.c (Paul Moore); - fix build warnings and errors in selftests and kernel, detected by CI and kernel test robot; v3->v4: - add delegation mount options to BPF FS; - BPF token is derived from the instance of BPF FS and associates itself with BPF FS' owning userns; - BPF token doesn't grant BPF functionality directly, it just turns capable() checks into ns_capable() checks within BPF FS' owning user; - BPF token cannot be pinned; v2->v3: - make BPF_TOKEN_CREATE pin created BPF token in BPF FS, and disallow BPF_OBJ_PIN for BPF token; v1->v2: - fix build failures on Kconfig with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL unset; - drop BPF_F_TOKEN_UNKNOWN_* flags and simplify UAPI (Stanislav). ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-1-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Utilize newly added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free LSM hooks to allocate struct bpf_security_struct for each BPF token object in SELinux. This just follows similar pattern for BPF prog and map. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add a selftest that attempts to conceptually replicate intended BPF token use cases inside user namespaced container. Child process is forked. It is then put into its own userns and mountns. Child creates BPF FS context object. This ensures child userns is captured as the owning userns for this instance of BPF FS. Given setting delegation mount options is privileged operation, we ensure that child cannot set them. This context is passed back to privileged parent process through Unix socket, where parent sets up delegation options, creates, and mounts it as a detached mount. This mount FD is passed back to the child to be used for BPF token creation, which allows otherwise privileged BPF operations to succeed inside userns. We validate that all of token-enabled privileged commands (BPF_BTF_LOAD, BPF_MAP_CREATE, and BPF_PROG_LOAD) work as intended. They should only succeed inside the userns if a) BPF token is provided with proper allowed sets of commands and types; and b) namespaces CAP_BPF and other privileges are set. Lacking a) or b) should lead to -EPERM failures. Based on suggested workflow by Christian Brauner ([0]). [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Wire through token_fd into bpf_prog_load(). Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Allow user to specify token_fd for bpf_btf_load() API that wraps kernel's BPF_BTF_LOAD command. This allows loading BTF from unprivileged process as long as it has BPF token allowing BPF_BTF_LOAD command, which can be created and delegated by privileged process. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add ability to provide token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command through bpf_map_create() API. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add low-level wrapper API for BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command in bpf() syscall. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Wire up bpf_token_create and bpf_token_free LSM hooks, which allow to allocate LSM security blob (we add `void *security` field to struct bpf_token for that), but also control who can instantiate BPF token. This follows existing pattern for BPF map and BPF prog. Also add security_bpf_token_allow_cmd() and security_bpf_token_capable() LSM hooks that allow LSM implementation to control and negate (if necessary) BPF token's delegation of a specific bpf_cmd and capability, respectively. Acked-by:
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs. Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which seems to be a sweet spot. But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the outcome. Acked-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command. This will give LSMs as much information as we can basically provide. The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF verification step. bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and signatures. Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one *even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their relative ordering. Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it should not be an issue anymore. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/Acked-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Remove remaining direct queries to perfmon_capable() and bpf_capable() in BPF verifier logic and instead use BPF token (if available) to make decisions about privileges. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Instead of performing unconditional system-wide bpf_capable() and perfmon_capable() calls inside bpf_base_func_proto() function (and other similar ones) to determine eligibility of a given BPF helper for a given program, use previously recorded BPF token during BPF_PROG_LOAD command handling to inform the decision. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add basic support of BPF token to BPF_PROG_LOAD. Wire through a set of allowed BPF program types and attach types, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. Then make sure we perform bpf_token_capable() checks everywhere where it's relevant. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Accept BPF token FD in BPF_BTF_LOAD command to allow BTF data loading through delegated BPF token. BTF loading is a pretty straightforward operation, so as long as BPF token is created with allow_cmds granting BPF_BTF_LOAD command, kernel proceeds to parsing BTF data and creating BTF object. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Allow providing token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command to allow controlled BPF map creation from unprivileged process through delegated BPF token. Wire through a set of allowed BPF map types to BPF token, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. This, in combination with allowed_cmds allows to create a narrowly-focused BPF token (controlled by privileged agent) with a restrictive set of BPF maps that application can attempt to create. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add new kind of BPF kernel object, BPF token. BPF token is meant to allow delegating privileged BPF functionality, like loading a BPF program or creating a BPF map, from privileged process to a *trusted* unprivileged process, all while having a good amount of control over which privileged operations could be performed using provided BPF token. This is achieved through mounting BPF FS instance with extra delegation mount options, which determine what operations are delegatable, and also constraining it to the owning user namespace (as mentioned in the previous patch). BPF token itself is just a derivative from BPF FS and can be created through a new bpf() syscall command, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE, which accepts BPF FS FD, which can be attained through open() API by opening BPF FS mount point. Currently, BPF token "inherits" delegated command, map types, prog type, and attach type bit sets from BPF FS as is. In the future, having an BPF token as a separate object with its own FD, we can allow to further restrict BPF token's allowable set of things either at the creation time or after the fact, allowing the process to guard itself further from unintentionally trying to load undesired kind of BPF programs. But for now we keep things simple and just copy bit sets as is. When BPF token is created from BPF FS mount, we take reference to the BPF super block's owning user namespace, and then use that namespace for checking all the {CAP_BPF, CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_ADMIN} capabilities that are normally only checked against init userns (using capable()), but now we check them using ns_capable() instead (if BPF token is provided). See bpf_token_capable() for details. Such setup means that BPF token in itself is not sufficient to grant BPF functionality. User namespaced process has to *also* have necessary combination of capabilities inside that user namespace. So while previously CAP_BPF was useless when granted within user namespace, now it gains a meaning and allows container managers and sys admins to have a flexible control over which processes can and need to use BPF functionality within the user namespace (i.e., container in practice). And BPF FS delegation mount options and derived BPF tokens serve as a per-container "flag" to grant overall ability to use bpf() (plus further restrict on which parts of bpf() syscalls are treated as namespaced). Note also, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command itself requires ns_capable(CAP_BPF) within the BPF FS owning user namespace, rounding up the ns_capable() story of BPF token. Signed-off-by: -
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Add few new mount options to BPF FS that allow to specify that a given BPF FS instance allows creation of BPF token (added in the next patch), and what sort of operations are allowed under BPF token. As such, we get 4 new mount options, each is a bit mask - `delegate_cmds` allow to specify which bpf() syscall commands are allowed with BPF token derived from this BPF FS instance; - if BPF_MAP_CREATE command is allowed, `delegate_maps` specifies a set of allowable BPF map types that could be created with BPF token; - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_progs` specifies a set of allowable BPF program types that could be loaded with BPF token; - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_attachs` specifies a set of allowable BPF program attach types that could be loaded with BPF token; delegate_progs and delegate_attachs are meant to be used together, as full BPF program type is, in general, determined through both program type and program attach type. Currently, these mount options accept the following forms of values: - a special value "any", that enables all possible values of a given bit set; - numeric value (decimal or hexadecimal, determined by kernel automatically) that specifies a bit mask value directly; - all the values for a given mount option are combined, if specified multiple times. E.g., `mount -t bpf nodev /path/to/mount -o delegate_maps=0x1 -o delegate_maps=0x2` will result in a combined 0x3 mask. Ideally, more convenient (for humans) symbolic form derived from corresponding UAPI enums would be accepted (e.g., `-o delegate_progs=kprobe|tracepoint`) and I intend to implement this, but it requires a bunch of UAPI header churn, so I postponed it until this feature lands upstream or at least there is a definite consensus that this feature is acceptable and is going to make it, just to minimize amount of wasted effort and not increase amount of non-essential code to be reviewed. Attentive reader will notice that BPF FS is now marked as FS_USERNS_MOUNT, which theoretically makes it mountable inside non-init user namespace as long as the process has sufficient *namespaced* capabilities within that user namespace. But in reality we still restrict BPF FS to be mountable only by processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN *in init userns* (extra check in bpf_fill_super()). FS_USERNS_MOUNT is added to allow creating BPF FS context object (i.e., fsopen("bpf")) from inside unprivileged process inside non-init userns, to capture that userns as the owning userns. It will still be required to pass this context object back to privileged process to instantiate and mount it. This manipulation is important, because capturing non-init userns as the owning userns of BPF FS instance (super block) allows to use that userns to constraint BPF token to that userns later on (see next patch). So creating BPF FS with delegation inside unprivileged userns will restrict derived BPF token objects to only "work" inside that intended userns, making it scoped to a intended "container". Also, setting these delegation options requires capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so unprivileged process cannot set this up without involvement of a privileged process. There is a set of selftests at the end of the patch set that simulates this sequence of steps and validates that everything works as intended. But careful review is requested to make sure there are no missed gaps in the implementation and testing. This somewhat subtle set of aspects is the result of previous discussions ([0]) about various user namespace implications and interactions with BPF token functionality and is necessary to contain BPF token inside intended user namespace. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/Acked-by:Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Within BPF syscall handling code CAP_NET_ADMIN checks stand out a bit compared to CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON checks. For the latter, CAP_BPF or CAP_PERFMON are checked first, but if they are not set, CAP_SYS_ADMIN takes over and grants whatever part of BPF syscall is required. Similar kind of checks that involve CAP_NET_ADMIN are not so consistent. One out of four uses does follow CAP_BPF/CAP_PERFMON model: during BPF_PROG_LOAD, if the type of BPF program is "network-related" either CAP_NET_ADMIN or CAP_SYS_ADMIN is required to proceed. But in three other cases CAP_NET_ADMIN is required even if CAP_SYS_ADMIN is set: - when creating DEVMAP/XDKMAP/CPU_MAP maps; - when attaching CGROUP_SKB programs; - when handling BPF_PROG_QUERY command. This patch is changing the latter three cases to follow BPF_PROG_LOAD model, that is allowing to proceed under either CAP_NET_ADMIN or CAP_SYS_ADMIN. This also makes it cleaner in subsequent BPF token patches to switch wholesomely to a generic bpf_token_capable(int cap) check, that always falls back to CAP_SYS_ADMIN if requested capability is missing. Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 05 Dec, 2023 4 commits
-
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== Complete BPF verifier precision tracking support for register spills Add support to BPF verifier to track and support register spill/fill to/from stack regardless if it was done through read-only R10 register (which is the only form supported today), or through a general register after copying R10 into it, while also potentially modifying offset. Once we add register this generic spill/fill support to precision backtracking, we can take advantage of it to stop doing eager STACK_ZERO conversion on register spill. Instead we can rely on (im)precision of spilled const zero register to improve verifier state pruning efficiency. This situation of using const zero register to initialize stack slots is very common with __builtin_memset() usage or just zero-initializing variables on the stack, and it causes unnecessary state duplication, as that STACK_ZERO knowledge is often not necessary for correctness, as those zero values are never used in precise context. Thus, relying on register imprecision helps tremendously, especially in real-world BPF programs. To make spilled const zero register behave completely equivalently to STACK_ZERO, we need to improve few other small pieces, which is done in the second part of the patch set. See individual patches for details. There are also two small bug fixes spotted during STACK_ZERO debugging. The patch set consists of logically three changes: - patch #1 (and corresponding tests in patch #2) is fixing/impoving precision propagation for stack spills/fills. This can be landed as a stand-alone improvement; - patches #3 through #9 is improving verification scalability by utilizing register (im)precision instead of eager STACK_ZERO. These changes depend on patch #1. - patch #10 is a memory efficiency improvement to how instruction/jump history is tracked and maintained. It depends on patch #1, but is not strictly speaking required, even though I believe it's a good long-term solution to have a path-dependent per-instruction information. Kind of like a path-dependent counterpart to path-agnostic insn_aux array. v3->v3: - fixed up Fixes tag (Alexei); - fixed few more selftests to not use BPF_ST instruction in inline asm directly, checked with CI, it was happy (CI); v2->v3: - BPF_ST instruction workaround (Eduard); - force dereference in added tests to catch problems (Eduard); - some commit message massaging (Alexei); v1->v2: - clean ups, WARN_ONCE(), insn_flags helpers added (Eduard); - added more selftests for STACK_ZERO/STACK_MISC cases (Eduard); - a bit more detailed explanation of effect of avoiding STACK_ZERO in favor of register spill in patch #8 commit (Alexei); - global shared instruction history refactoring moved to be the last patch in the series to make it easier to revert it, if applied (Alexei). ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-1-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: -
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Enhance partial_stack_load_preserves_zeros subtest with detailed precision propagation log checks. We know expect fp-16 to be spilled, initially imprecise, zero const register, which is later marked as precise even when partial stack slot load is performed, even if it's not a register fill (!). Acked-by:
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Now that precision backtracing is supporting register spill/fill to/from stack, there is another oportunity to be exploited here: minimizing precise STACK_ZERO cases. With a simple code change we can rely on initially imprecise register spill tracking for cases when register spilled to stack was a known zero. This is a very common case for initializing on the stack variables, including rather large structures. Often times zero has no special meaning for the subsequent BPF program logic and is often overwritten with non-zero values soon afterwards. But due to STACK_ZERO vs STACK_MISC tracking, such initial zero initialization actually causes duplication of verifier states as STACK_ZERO is clearly different than STACK_MISC or spilled SCALAR_VALUE register. The effect of this (now) trivial change is huge, as can be seen below. These are differences between BPF selftests, Cilium, and Meta-internal BPF object files relative to previous patch in this series. You can see improvements ranging from single-digit percentage improvement for instructions and states, all the way to 50-60% reduction for some of Meta-internal host agent programs, and even some Cilium programs. For Meta-internal ones I left only the differences for largest BPF object files by states/instructions, as there were too many differences in the overall output. All the differences were improvements, reducting number of states and thus instructions validated. Note, Meta-internal BPF object file names are not printed below. Many copies of balancer_ingress are actually many different configurations of Katran, so they are different BPF programs, which explains state reduction going from -16% all the way to 31%, depending on BPF program logic complexity. I also tooked a closer look at a few small-ish BPF programs to validate the behavior. Let's take bpf_iter_netrlink.bpf.o (first row below). While it's just 8 vs 5 states, verifier log is still pretty long to include it here. But the reduction in states is due to the following piece of C code: unsigned long ino; ... sk = s->sk_socket; if (!sk) { ino = 0; } else { inode = SOCK_INODE(sk); bpf_probe_read_kernel(&ino, sizeof(ino), &inode->i_ino); } BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%-8u %-8lu\n", s->sk_drops.counter, ino); return 0; You can see that in some situations `ino` is zero-initialized, while in others it's unknown value filled out by bpf_probe_read_kernel(). Before this change code after if/else branches have to be validated twice. Once with (precise) ino == 0, due to eager STACK_ZERO logic, and then again for when ino is just STACK_MISC. But BPF_SEQ_PRINTF() doesn't care about precise value of ino, so with the change in this patch verifier is able to prune states from after one of the branches, reducing number of total states (and instructions) required for successful validation. Similar principle applies to bigger real-world applications, just at a much larger scale. SELFTESTS ========= File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) --------------------------------------- ----------------------- --------- --------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- bpf_iter_netlink.bpf.linked3.o dump_netlink 148 104 -44 (-29.73%) 8 5 -3 (-37.50%) bpf_iter_unix.bpf.linked3.o dump_unix 8474 8404 -70 (-0.83%) 151 147 -4 (-2.65%) bpf_loop.bpf.linked3.o stack_check 560 324 -236 (-42.14%) 42 24 -18 (-42.86%) local_storage_bench.bpf.linked3.o get_local 120 77 -43 (-35.83%) 9 6 -3 (-33.33%) loop6.bpf.linked3.o trace_virtqueue_add_sgs 10167 9868 -299 (-2.94%) 226 206 -20 (-8.85%) pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.linked3.o on_event 4872 3423 -1449 (-29.74%) 322 229 -93 (-28.88%) strobemeta.bpf.linked3.o on_event 180697 176036 -4661 (-2.58%) 4780 4734 -46 (-0.96%) test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 65594 65401 -193 (-0.29%) 4230 4212 -18 (-0.43%) test_global_func_args.bpf.linked3.o test_cls 145 136 -9 (-6.21%) 10 9 -1 (-10.00%) test_l4lb.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress 4760 2612 -2148 (-45.13%) 113 102 -11 (-9.73%) test_l4lb_noinline.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress 4845 4877 +32 (+0.66%) 219 221 +2 (+0.91%) test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress 2072 2087 +15 (+0.72%) 97 98 +1 (+1.03%) test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o __add_egr_x 12440 9975 -2465 (-19.82%) 364 353 -11 (-3.02%) test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked3.o estab 2558 2572 +14 (+0.55%) 179 180 +1 (+0.56%) test_xdp_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o _xdp_tx_iptunnel 645 596 -49 (-7.60%) 26 24 -2 (-7.69%) test_xdp_noinline.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress_v6 3520 3516 -4 (-0.11%) 216 216 +0 (+0.00%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82661 81241 -1420 (-1.72%) 5073 5155 +82 (+1.62%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 84964 82297 -2667 (-3.14%) 5130 5157 +27 (+0.53%) META-INTERNAL ============= Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) -------------------------------------- --------- --------- ----------------- ---------- ---------- --------------- balancer_ingress 27925 23608 -4317 (-15.46%) 1488 1482 -6 (-0.40%) balancer_ingress 31824 27546 -4278 (-13.44%) 1658 1652 -6 (-0.36%) balancer_ingress 32213 27935 -4278 (-13.28%) 1689 1683 -6 (-0.36%) balancer_ingress 32213 27935 -4278 (-13.28%) 1689 1683 -6 (-0.36%) balancer_ingress 31824 27546 -4278 (-13.44%) 1658 1652 -6 (-0.36%) balancer_ingress 38647 29562 -9085 (-23.51%) 2069 1835 -234 (-11.31%) balancer_ingress 38647 29562 -9085 (-23.51%) 2069 1835 -234 (-11.31%) balancer_ingress 40339 30792 -9547 (-23.67%) 2193 1934 -259 (-11.81%) balancer_ingress 37321 29055 -8266 (-22.15%) 1972 1795 -177 (-8.98%) balancer_ingress 38176 29753 -8423 (-22.06%) 2008 1831 -177 (-8.81%) balancer_ingress 29193 20910 -8283 (-28.37%) 1599 1422 -177 (-11.07%) balancer_ingress 30013 21452 -8561 (-28.52%) 1645 1447 -198 (-12.04%) balancer_ingress 28691 24290 -4401 (-15.34%) 1545 1531 -14 (-0.91%) balancer_ingress 34223 28965 -5258 (-15.36%) 1984 1875 -109 (-5.49%) balancer_ingress 35481 26158 -9323 (-26.28%) 2095 1806 -289 (-13.79%) balancer_ingress 35481 26158 -9323 (-26.28%) 2095 1806 -289 (-13.79%) balancer_ingress 35868 26455 -9413 (-26.24%) 2140 1827 -313 (-14.63%) balancer_ingress 35868 26455 -9413 (-26.24%) 2140 1827 -313 (-14.63%) balancer_ingress 35481 26158 -9323 (-26.28%) 2095 1806 -289 (-13.79%) balancer_ingress 35481 26158 -9323 (-26.28%) 2095 1806 -289 (-13.79%) balancer_ingress 34844 29485 -5359 (-15.38%) 2036 1918 -118 (-5.80%) fbflow_egress 3256 2652 -604 (-18.55%) 218 192 -26 (-11.93%) fbflow_ingress 1026 944 -82 (-7.99%) 70 63 -7 (-10.00%) sslwall_tc_egress 8424 7360 -1064 (-12.63%) 498 458 -40 (-8.03%) syar_accept_protect 15040 9539 -5501 (-36.58%) 364 220 -144 (-39.56%) syar_connect_tcp_v6 15036 9535 -5501 (-36.59%) 360 216 -144 (-40.00%) syar_connect_udp_v4 15039 9538 -5501 (-36.58%) 361 217 -144 (-39.89%) syar_connect_connect4_protect4 24805 15833 -8972 (-36.17%) 756 480 -276 (-36.51%) syar_lsm_file_open 167772 151813 -15959 (-9.51%) 1836 1667 -169 (-9.20%) syar_namespace_create_new 14805 9304 -5501 (-37.16%) 353 209 -144 (-40.79%) syar_python3_detect 17531 12030 -5501 (-31.38%) 391 247 -144 (-36.83%) syar_ssh_post_fork 16412 10911 -5501 (-33.52%) 405 261 -144 (-35.56%) syar_enter_execve 14728 9227 -5501 (-37.35%) 345 201 -144 (-41.74%) syar_enter_execveat 14728 9227 -5501 (-37.35%) 345 201 -144 (-41.74%) syar_exit_execve 16622 11121 -5501 (-33.09%) 376 232 -144 (-38.30%) syar_exit_execveat 16622 11121 -5501 (-33.09%) 376 232 -144 (-38.30%) syar_syscalls_kill 15288 9787 -5501 (-35.98%) 398 254 -144 (-36.18%) syar_task_enter_pivot_root 14898 9397 -5501 (-36.92%) 357 213 -144 (-40.34%) syar_syscalls_setreuid 16678 11177 -5501 (-32.98%) 429 285 -144 (-33.57%) syar_syscalls_setuid 16678 11177 -5501 (-32.98%) 429 285 -144 (-33.57%) syar_syscalls_process_vm_readv 14959 9458 -5501 (-36.77%) 364 220 -144 (-39.56%) syar_syscalls_process_vm_writev 15757 10256 -5501 (-34.91%) 390 246 -144 (-36.92%) do_uprobe 15519 10018 -5501 (-35.45%) 373 229 -144 (-38.61%) edgewall 179715 55783 -123932 (-68.96%) 12607 3999 -8608 (-68.28%) bictcp_state 7570 4131 -3439 (-45.43%) 496 269 -227 (-45.77%) cubictcp_state 7570 4131 -3439 (-45.43%) 496 269 -227 (-45.77%) tcp_rate_skb_delivered 447 272 -175 (-39.15%) 29 18 -11 (-37.93%) kprobe__bbr_set_state 4566 2615 -1951 (-42.73%) 209 124 -85 (-40.67%) kprobe__bictcp_state 4566 2615 -1951 (-42.73%) 209 124 -85 (-40.67%) inet_sock_set_state 1501 1337 -164 (-10.93%) 93 85 -8 (-8.60%) tcp_retransmit_skb 1145 981 -164 (-14.32%) 67 59 -8 (-11.94%) tcp_retransmit_synack 1183 951 -232 (-19.61%) 67 55 -12 (-17.91%) bpf_tcptuner 1459 1187 -272 (-18.64%) 99 80 -19 (-19.19%) tw_egress 801 776 -25 (-3.12%) 69 66 -3 (-4.35%) tw_ingress 795 770 -25 (-3.14%) 69 66 -3 (-4.35%) ttls_tc_ingress 19025 19383 +358 (+1.88%) 470 465 -5 (-1.06%) ttls_nat_egress 490 299 -191 (-38.98%) 33 20 -13 (-39.39%) ttls_nat_ingress 448 285 -163 (-36.38%) 32 21 -11 (-34.38%) tw_twfw_egress 511127 212071 -299056 (-58.51%) 16733 8504 -8229 (-49.18%) tw_twfw_ingress 500095 212069 -288026 (-57.59%) 16223 8504 -7719 (-47.58%) tw_twfw_tc_eg 511113 212064 -299049 (-58.51%) 16732 8504 -8228 (-49.18%) tw_twfw_tc_in 500095 212069 -288026 (-57.59%) 16223 8504 -7719 (-47.58%) tw_twfw_egress 12632 12435 -197 (-1.56%) 276 260 -16 (-5.80%) tw_twfw_ingress 12631 12454 -177 (-1.40%) 278 261 -17 (-6.12%) tw_twfw_tc_eg 12595 12435 -160 (-1.27%) 274 259 -15 (-5.47%) tw_twfw_tc_in 12631 12454 -177 (-1.40%) 278 261 -17 (-6.12%) tw_xdp_dump 266 209 -57 (-21.43%) 9 8 -1 (-11.11%) CILIUM ========= File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) ------------- -------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- -------------- bpf_host.o cil_to_netdev 6047 4578 -1469 (-24.29%) 362 249 -113 (-31.22%) bpf_host.o handle_lxc_traffic 2227 1585 -642 (-28.83%) 156 103 -53 (-33.97%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_ipv4_from_netdev 2244 1458 -786 (-35.03%) 163 106 -57 (-34.97%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 21022 10479 -10543 (-50.15%) 1289 670 -619 (-48.02%) bpf_host.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 15433 11375 -4058 (-26.29%) 905 643 -262 (-28.95%) bpf_host.o tail_ipv4_host_policy_ingress 2219 1367 -852 (-38.40%) 161 96 -65 (-40.37%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 22460 19862 -2598 (-11.57%) 1469 1293 -176 (-11.98%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 5526 3534 -1992 (-36.05%) 366 243 -123 (-33.61%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5132 4256 -876 (-17.07%) 241 219 -22 (-9.13%) bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3702 3542 -160 (-4.32%) 215 205 -10 (-4.65%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 21022 10479 -10543 (-50.15%) 1289 670 -619 (-48.02%) bpf_lxc.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 15433 11375 -4058 (-26.29%) 905 643 -262 (-28.95%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_egress 5073 3374 -1699 (-33.49%) 262 172 -90 (-34.35%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress 5093 3385 -1708 (-33.54%) 262 172 -90 (-34.35%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv4_ct_ingress_policy_only 5093 3385 -1708 (-33.54%) 262 172 -90 (-34.35%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_egress 4593 3878 -715 (-15.57%) 194 151 -43 (-22.16%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress 4606 3891 -715 (-15.52%) 194 151 -43 (-22.16%) bpf_lxc.o tail_ipv6_ct_ingress_policy_only 4606 3891 -715 (-15.52%) 194 151 -43 (-22.16%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 5526 3534 -1992 (-36.05%) 366 243 -123 (-33.61%) bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5132 4256 -876 (-17.07%) 241 219 -22 (-9.13%) bpf_overlay.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 20524 10114 -10410 (-50.72%) 1271 638 -633 (-49.80%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 22718 19490 -3228 (-14.21%) 1475 1275 -200 (-13.56%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 5526 3534 -1992 (-36.05%) 366 243 -123 (-33.61%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 5132 4256 -876 (-17.07%) 241 219 -22 (-9.13%) bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3638 3548 -90 (-2.47%) 209 203 -6 (-2.87%) bpf_overlay.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 4368 3820 -548 (-12.55%) 248 215 -33 (-13.31%) bpf_overlay.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb6 2867 2428 -439 (-15.31%) 167 140 -27 (-16.17%) bpf_sock.o cil_sock6_connect 1718 1703 -15 (-0.87%) 100 99 -1 (-1.00%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4 12917 12443 -474 (-3.67%) 875 849 -26 (-2.97%) bpf_xdp.o tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6 13515 13264 -251 (-1.86%) 715 702 -13 (-1.82%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 39492 36367 -3125 (-7.91%) 2430 2251 -179 (-7.37%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv6 80441 78058 -2383 (-2.96%) 3647 3523 -124 (-3.40%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_ipv6_dsr 1038 901 -137 (-13.20%) 61 55 -6 (-9.84%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4 13027 12096 -931 (-7.15%) 868 809 -59 (-6.80%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4 7617 5900 -1717 (-22.54%) 522 413 -109 (-20.88%) bpf_xdp.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 7575 7395 -180 (-2.38%) 383 374 -9 (-2.35%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 6808 6739 -69 (-1.01%) 403 396 -7 (-1.74%) bpf_xdp.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb6 16173 15847 -326 (-2.02%) 1010 990 -20 (-1.98%) Acked-by: -
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Validate that 1-, 2-, and 4-byte loads from stack slots not aligned on 8-byte boundary still preserve zero, when loading from all-STACK_ZERO sub-slots, or when stack sub-slots are covered by spilled register with known constant zero value. Signed-off-by:
-
