Commits · 51d470aeaa3a4ac5bdf98743ac1d32008e8dafa4 · Kirill Smelkov / linux

29 Apr, 2019 40 commits

btrfs: Document btrfs_csum_one_bio · 51d470ae

Nikolay Borisov authored Apr 22, 2019

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

51d470ae

Btrfs: improve performance on fsync of files with multiple hardlinks · b8aa330d

Filipe Manana authored Apr 17, 2019

Commit 41bd6067 ("Btrfs: fix fsync of files with multiple hard links
in new directories") introduced a path that makes fsync fallback to a full
transaction commit in order to avoid losing hard links and new ancestors
of the fsynced inode. That path is triggered only when the inode has more
than one hard link and either has a new hard link created in the current
transaction or the inode was evicted and reloaded in the current
transaction.

That path ends up getting triggered very often (hundreds of times) during
the course of pgbench benchmarks, resulting in performance drops of about
20%.

This change restores the performance by not triggering the full transaction
commit in those cases, and instead iterate the fs/subvolume tree in search
of all possible new ancestors, for all hard links, to log them.
Reported-by: Zhao Yuhu <zyuhu@suse.com>
Tested-by: James Wang <jnwang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

b8aa330d

Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes · 62d54f3a

Filipe Manana authored Apr 22, 2019

Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it
is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is
due to two different reasons:

1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only
   subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example).

2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations.
   Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on
   to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being
   a consequence of the former reason.

However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013,
while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication
with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and
snapshots).

That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running
in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of
the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves
getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar
to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a
snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send
operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail
how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf
that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed
and explained recently in a thread [3].

The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees
(snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target
files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for
fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is
the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog:

 [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400
 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27

The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less
frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots
with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees).
Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit:

 [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
 [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806!
 [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
 [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G    B D W         5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1
 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs]
 (...)
 [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246
 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002
 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000
 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d
 [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708
 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
 [1631742.138455] FS:  00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 [1631742.139010] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 [1631742.141272] Call Trace:
 [1631742.141826]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
 [1631742.142390]  tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs]
 [1631742.142948]  btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs]
 [1631742.143533]  ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs]
 [1631742.144088]  btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs]
 [1631742.144645]  _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs]
 [1631742.145161]  ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0
 [1631742.145685]  btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs]
 [1631742.146179]  ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100
 [1631742.146662]  ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0
 [1631742.147135]  ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0
 [1631742.147593]  ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250
 [1631742.148053]  ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
 [1631742.148510]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
 [1631742.148942]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0
 [1631742.149361]  ? __fget+0x113/0x200
 [1631742.149767]  ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
 [1631742.150159]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
 [1631742.150543]  do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0
 [1631742.150931]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
 [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7
 (...)
 [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7
 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007
 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700
 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
 (...)
 [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]---

That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed
by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because
a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a
slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer
contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to
some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0).

Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run
in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN
to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

62d54f3a

Btrfs: send, flush dellaloc in order to avoid data loss · 9f89d5de

Filipe Manana authored Apr 15, 2019

When we set a subvolume to read-only mode we do not flush dellaloc for any
of its inodes (except if the filesystem is mounted with -o flushoncommit),
since it does not affect correctness for any subsequent operations - except
for a future send operation. The send operation will not be able to see the
delalloc data since the respective file extent items, inode item updates,
backreferences, etc, have not hit yet the subvolume and extent trees.

Effectively this means data loss, since the send stream will not contain
any data from existing delalloc. Another problem from this is that if the
writeback starts and finishes while the send operation is in progress, we
have the subvolume tree being being modified concurrently which can result
in send failing unexpectedly with EIO or hitting runtime errors, assertion
failures or hitting BUG_ONs, etc.

Simple reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 108K" /mnt/sv/foo

  $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv ro true
  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt/sv

  $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo
  0000000 ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea
  *
  0110592

  $ umount /mnt
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt
  $ echo $?
  0
  $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo
  0000000
  # ---> empty file

Since this a problem that affects send only, fix it in send by flushing
dellaloc for all the roots used by the send operation before send starts
to process the commit roots.

This is a problem that affects send since it was introduced (commit
31db9f7c ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive"))
but backporting it to older kernels has some dependencies:

- For kernels between 3.19 and 4.20, it depends on commit 3cd24c69
  ("btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot") because
  the function btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() does not exist before that
  commit. So one has to either pick that commit or replace the calls to
  btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() in this patch with calls to
  btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes().

- For kernels older than 3.19 it also requires commit e5fa8f86
  ("Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans") because
  it depends on the function ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() which that
  commits introduced.

- No dependencies for 5.0+ kernels.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

9f89d5de

Btrfs: do not start a transaction during fiemap · 03628cdb

Filipe Manana authored Apr 15, 2019

During fiemap, for regular extents (non inline) we need to check if they
are shared and if they are, set the shared bit. Checking if an extent is
shared requires checking the delayed references of the currently running
transaction, since some reference might have not yet hit the extent tree
and be only in the in-memory delayed references.

However we were using a transaction join for this, which creates a new
transaction when there is no transaction currently running. That means
that two more potential failures can happen: creating the transaction and
committing it. Further, if no write activity is currently happening in the
system, and fiemap calls keep being done, we end up creating and
committing transactions that do nothing.

In some extreme cases this can result in the commit of the transaction
created by fiemap to fail with ENOSPC when updating the root item of a
subvolume tree because a join does not reserve any space, leading to a
trace like the following:

heisenberg kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
heisenberg kernel: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
heisenberg kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7137 at fs/btrfs/root-tree.c:136 btrfs_update_root+0x22b/0x320 [btrfs]
(...)
heisenberg kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 7137 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 4.19.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 4.19.28-2
heisenberg kernel: Hardware name: FUJITSU LIFEBOOK U757/FJNB2A5, BIOS Version 1.21 03/19/2018
heisenberg kernel: RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_root+0x22b/0x320 [btrfs]
(...)
heisenberg kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb5448828bd40 EFLAGS: 00010286
heisenberg kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8ed56bccef50 RCX: 0000000000000006
heisenberg kernel: RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffff8ed6bda166a0
heisenberg kernel: RBP: 00000000ffffffe4 R08: 00000000000003df R09: 0000000000000007
heisenberg kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8ed63396a078
heisenberg kernel: R13: ffff8ed092d7c800 R14: ffff8ed64f5db028 R15: ffff8ed6bd03d068
heisenberg kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8ed6bda00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
heisenberg kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
heisenberg kernel: CR2: 00007f46f75f8000 CR3: 0000000310a0a002 CR4: 00000000003606f0
heisenberg kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
heisenberg kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
heisenberg kernel: Call Trace:
heisenberg kernel: commit_fs_roots+0x166/0x1d0 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
heisenberg kernel: ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xac/0x180 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2bd/0x870 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: ? start_transaction+0x9d/0x3f0 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: transaction_kthread+0x147/0x180 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x530/0x530 [btrfs]
heisenberg kernel: kthread+0x112/0x130
heisenberg kernel: ? kthread_bind+0x30/0x30
heisenberg kernel: ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
heisenberg kernel: ---[ end trace 05de912e30e012d9 ]---

Since fiemap (and btrfs_check_shared()) is a read-only operation, do not do
a transaction join to avoid the overhead of creating a new transaction (if
there is currently no running transaction) and introducing a potential
point of failure when the new transaction gets committed, instead use a
transaction attach to grab a handle for the currently running transaction
if any.
Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/b2a668d7124f1d3e410367f587926f622b3f03a4.camel@scientia.net/
Fixes: afce772e ("btrfs: fix check_shared for fiemap ioctl")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

03628cdb

btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from btrfs_set_disk_extent_flags · f5c8daa5
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
f5c8daa5
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from btrfs_add_delayed_extent_op · c6e340bc
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
c6e340bc
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from emit_last_fiemap_cache · 5c5aff98
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
5c5aff98
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from CHECK_FE_ALIGNED · 033774dc
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
033774dc
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from from tree_advance · 179d1e6a
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
179d1e6a
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from tree_move_down · c7da9597
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
c7da9597
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from btrfs_extend_item · c71dd880
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
c71dd880
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from btrfs_truncate_item · 78ac4f9e
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
78ac4f9e
btrfs: remove unused parameter fs_info from split_item · 25263cd7
David Sterba authored Mar 20, 2019
```
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
```
25263cd7