- 07 Jan, 2021 7 commits
-
-
Uros Bizjak authored
Commit 16809ecd moved __svm_vcpu_run the prototype to svm.h, but forgot to remove the original from svm.c. Fixes: 16809ecd ("KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests") Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20201220200339.65115-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Nathan Chancellor authored
When using LLVM's integrated assembler (LLVM_IAS=1) while building x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_KVM=y + CONFIG_KVM_AMD=y, the following build error occurs: $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.o arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:2004:15: error: too few operands for instruction asm volatile(__ex("vmsave") : : "a" (__sme_page_pa(sd->save_area)) : "memory"); ^ arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:28:17: note: expanded from macro '__ex' #define __ex(x) __kvm_handle_fault_on_reboot(x) ^ ./arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:1646:10: note: expanded from macro '__kvm_handle_fault_on_reboot' "666: \n\t" \ ^ <inline asm>:2:2: note: instantiated into assembly here vmsave ^ 1 error generated. This happens because LLVM currently does not support calling vmsave without the fixed register operand (%rax for 64-bit and %eax for 32-bit). This will be fixed in LLVM 12 but the kernel currently supports LLVM 10.0.1 and newer so this needs to be handled. Add the proper register using the _ASM_AX macro, which matches the vmsave call in vmenter.S. Fixes: 86137773 ("KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loading") Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93524 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1216Signed-off-by:Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20201219063711.3526947-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Fixes to get_mmio_spte, destined to 5.10 stable branch.
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Check only the terminal leaf for a "!PRESENT || MMIO" SPTE when looking for reserved bits on valid, non-MMIO SPTEs. The get_walk() helpers terminate their walks if a not-present or MMIO SPTE is encountered, i.e. the non-terminal SPTEs have already been verified to be regular SPTEs. This eliminates an extra check-and-branch in a relatively hot loop. Signed-off-by:
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20201218003139.2167891-5-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Bump the size of the sptes array by one and use the raw level of the SPTE to index into the sptes array. Using the SPTE level directly improves readability by eliminating the need to reason out why the level is being adjusted when indexing the array. The array is on the stack and is not explicitly initialized; bumping its size is nothing more than a superficial adjustment to the stack frame. Signed-off-by:
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Get the so called "root" level from the low level shadow page table walkers instead of manually attempting to calculate it higher up the stack, e.g. in get_mmio_spte(). When KVM is using PAE shadow paging, the starting level of the walk, from the callers perspective, is not the CR3 root but rather the PDPTR "root". Checking for reserved bits from the CR3 root causes get_mmio_spte() to consume uninitialized stack data due to indexing into sptes[] for a level that was not filled by get_walk(). This can result in false positives and/or negatives depending on what garbage happens to be on the stack. Opportunistically nuke a few extra newlines. Fixes: 95fb5b02 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU") Reported-by:
Richard Herbert <rherbert@sympatico.ca> Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Return -1 from the get_walk() helpers if the shadow walk doesn't fill at least one spte, which can theoretically happen if the walk hits a not-present PDPTR. Returning the root level in such a case will cause get_mmio_spte() to return garbage (uninitialized stack data). In practice, such a scenario should be impossible as KVM shouldn't get a reserved-bit page fault with a not-present PDPTR. Note, using mmu->root_level in get_walk() is wrong for other reasons, too, but that's now a moot point. Fixes: 95fb5b02 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU") Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 16 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
VCPU_REGS_R8...VCPU_REGS_R15 are not defined on 32-bit x86, so cull them from the synchronization of the VMSA. Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Dec, 2020 32 commits
-
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarmPaolo Bonzini authored
KVM/arm64 updates for Linux 5.11 - PSCI relay at EL2 when "protected KVM" is enabled - New exception injection code - Simplification of AArch32 system register handling - Fix PMU accesses when no PMU is enabled - Expose CSV3 on non-Meltdown hosts - Cache hierarchy discovery fixes - PV steal-time cleanups - Allow function pointers at EL2 - Various host EL2 entry cleanups - Simplification of the EL2 vector allocation
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The GHCB specification requires the hypervisor to save the address of an AP Jump Table so that, for example, vCPUs that have been parked by UEFI can be started by the OS. Provide support for the AP Jump Table set/get exit code. Signed-off-by:
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
An SEV-ES guest is started by invoking a new SEV initialization ioctl, KVM_SEV_ES_INIT. This identifies the guest as an SEV-ES guest, which is used to drive the appropriate ASID allocation, VMSA encryption, etc. Before being able to run an SEV-ES vCPU, the vCPU VMSA must be encrypted and measured. This is done using the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA command after all calls to LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA have been performed, but before LAUNCH_MEASURE has been performed. In order to establish the encrypted VMSA, the current (traditional) VMSA and the GPRs are synced to the page that will hold the encrypted VMSA and then LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA is invoked. The vCPU is then marked as having protected guest state. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The run sequence is different for an SEV-ES guest compared to a legacy or even an SEV guest. The guest vCPU register state of an SEV-ES guest will be restored on VMRUN and saved on VMEXIT. There is no need to restore the guest registers directly and through VMLOAD before VMRUN and no need to save the guest registers directly and through VMSAVE on VMEXIT. Update the svm_vcpu_run() function to skip register state saving and restoring and provide an alternative function for running an SEV-ES guest in vmenter.S Additionally, certain host state is restored across an SEV-ES VMRUN. As a result certain register states are not required to be restored upon VMEXIT (e.g. FS, GS, etc.), so only do that if the guest is not an SEV-ES guest. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
An SEV-ES vCPU requires additional VMCB vCPU load/put requirements. SEV-ES hardware will restore certain registers on VMEXIT, but not save them on VMRUN (see Table B-3 and Table B-4 of the AMD64 APM Volume 2), so make the following changes: General vCPU load changes: - During vCPU loading, perform a VMSAVE to the per-CPU SVM save area and save the current values of XCR0, XSS and PKRU to the per-CPU SVM save area as these registers will be restored on VMEXIT. General vCPU put changes: - Do not attempt to restore registers that SEV-ES hardware has already restored on VMEXIT. Signed-off-by: -
Tom Lendacky authored
An SEV-ES vCPU requires additional VMCB initialization requirements for vCPU creation and vCPU load/put requirements. This includes: General VMCB initialization changes: - Set a VMCB control bit to enable SEV-ES support on the vCPU. - Set the VMCB encrypted VM save area address. - CRx registers are part of the encrypted register state and cannot be updated. Remove the CRx register read and write intercepts and replace them with CRx register write traps to track the CRx register values. - Certain MSR values are part of the encrypted register state and cannot be updated. Remove certain MSR intercepts (EFER, CR_PAT, etc.). - Remove the #GP intercept (no support for "enable_vmware_backdoor"). - Remove the XSETBV intercept since the hypervisor cannot modify XCR0. General vCPU creation changes: - Set the initial GHCB gpa value as per the GHCB specification. Signed-off-by: -
Tom Lendacky authored
SEV and SEV-ES guests each have dedicated ASID ranges. Update the ASID allocation routine to return an ASID in the respective range. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The SVM host save area is used to restore some host state on VMEXIT of an SEV-ES guest. After allocating the save area, clear it and add the encryption mask to the SVM host save area physical address that is programmed into the VM_HSAVE_PA MSR. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The GHCB specification defines how NMIs are to be handled for an SEV-ES guest. To detect the completion of an NMI the hypervisor must not intercept the IRET instruction (because a #VC while running the NMI will issue an IRET) and, instead, must receive an NMI Complete exit event from the guest. Update the KVM support for detecting the completion of NMIs in the guest to follow the GHCB specification. When an SEV-ES guest is active, the IRET instruction will no longer be intercepted. Now, when the NMI Complete exit event is received, the iret_interception() function will be called to simulate the completion of the NMI. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The guest FPU state is automatically restored on VMRUN and saved on VMEXIT by the hardware, so there is no reason to do this in KVM. Eliminate the allocation of the guest_fpu save area and key off that to skip operations related to the guest FPU state. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
SEV-ES guests do not currently support SMM. Update the has_emulated_msr() kvm_x86_ops function to take a struct kvm parameter so that the capability can be reported at a VM level. Since this op is also called during KVM initialization and before a struct kvm instance is available, comments will be added to each implementation of has_emulated_msr() to indicate the kvm parameter can be null. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
Since many of the registers used by the SEV-ES are encrypted and cannot be read or written, adjust the __get_sregs() / __set_sregs() to take into account whether the VMSA/guest state is encrypted. For __get_sregs(), return the actual value that is in use by the guest for all registers being tracked using the write trap support. For __set_sregs(), skip setting of all guest registers values. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES guests introduce new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR8 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES guests introduce new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR4 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES support introduces new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR0 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of EFER write access is not recommended. EFER interception occurs prior to EFER being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify EFER itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES support introduces a new EFER write trap. This trap provides intercept support of an EFER write after it has been modified. The new EFER value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest EFER. Add support to track the value of the guest EFER value using the EFER write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For an SEV-ES guest, string-based port IO is performed to a shared (un-encrypted) page so that both the hypervisor and guest can read or write to it and each see the contents. For string-based port IO operations, invoke SEV-ES specific routines that can complete the operation using common KVM port IO support. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
For an SEV-ES guest, MMIO is performed to a shared (un-encrypted) page so that both the hypervisor and guest can read or write to it and each see the contents. The GHCB specification provides software-defined VMGEXIT exit codes to indicate a request for an MMIO read or an MMIO write. Add support to recognize the MMIO requests and invoke SEV-ES specific routines that can complete the MMIO operation. These routines use common KVM support to complete the MMIO operation. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
Add trace events for entry to and exit from VMGEXIT MSR protocol processing. The vCPU will be common for the trace events. The MSR protocol processing is guided by the GHCB GPA in the VMCB, so the GHCB GPA will represent the input and output values for the entry and exit events, respectively. Additionally, the exit event will contain the return code for the event. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
Add trace events for entry to and exit from VMGEXIT processing. The vCPU id and the exit reason will be common for the trace events. The exit info fields will represent the input and output values for the entry and exit events, respectively. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x100 is a request for termination of the guest. The guest has encountered some situation for which it has requested to be terminated. The GHCB MSR value contains the reason for the request. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x004 is a request for CPUID information. Only a single CPUID result register can be sent per invocation, so the protocol defines the register that is requested. The GHCB MSR value is set to the CPUID register value as per the specification via the VMCB GHCB GPA field. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x002 is a request to set the GHCB MSR value to the SEV INFO as per the specification via the VMCB GHCB GPA field. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
SEV-ES adds a new VMEXIT reason code, VMGEXIT. Initial support for a VMGEXIT includes mapping the GHCB based on the guest GPA, which is obtained from a new VMCB field, and then validating the required inputs for the VMGEXIT exit reason. Since many of the VMGEXIT exit reasons correspond to existing VMEXIT reasons, the information from the GHCB is copied into the VMCB control exit code areas and KVM register areas. The standard exit handlers are invoked, similar to standard VMEXIT processing. Before restarting the vCPU, the GHCB is updated with any registers that have been updated by the hypervisor. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
This is a pre-patch to consolidate some exit handling code into callable functions. Follow-on patches for SEV-ES exit handling will then be able to use them from the sev.c file. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
When a SHUTDOWN VMEXIT is encountered, normally the VMCB is re-initialized so that the guest can be re-launched. But when a guest is running as an SEV-ES guest, the VMSA cannot be re-initialized because it has been encrypted. For now, just return -EINVAL to prevent a possible attempt at a guest reset. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
When a guest is running as an SEV-ES guest, it is not possible to emulate instructions. Add support to prevent instruction emulation. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
Since the guest register state of an SEV-ES guest is encrypted, debugging is not supported. Update the code to prevent guest debugging when the guest has protected state. Additionally, an SEV-ES guest must only and always intercept DR7 reads and writes. Update set_dr_intercepts() and clr_dr_intercepts() to account for this. Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Lendacky authored
When a guest is running under SEV-ES, the hypervisor cannot access the guest register state. There are numerous places in the KVM code where certain registers are accessed that are not allowed to be accessed (e.g. RIP, CR0, etc). Add checks to prevent register accesses and add intercept update support at various points within the KVM code. Also, when handling a VMGEXIT, exceptions are passed back through the GHCB. Since the RDMSR/WRMSR intercepts (may) inject a #GP on error, update the SVM intercepts to handle this for SEV-ES guests. Signed-off-by:
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
This will be used by SEV-ES to inject MSR failure via the GHCB. Reviewed-by:
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Simplify the four functions that handle {kernel,user} {rd,wr}msr, there is still some repetition between the two instances of rdmsr but the whole business of calling kvm_inject_gp and kvm_skip_emulated_instruction can be unified nicely. Because complete_emulated_wrmsr now becomes essentially a call to kvm_complete_insn_gp, remove complete_emulated_msr. Reviewed-by: -
Paolo Bonzini authored
There is no need to inject a #GP from kvm_mtrr_set_msr, kvm_emulate_wrmsr will handle it. Reviewed-by:
-
