- 30 Sep, 2018 40 commits
-
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Speed up lookups of an existing lock context by avoiding the inode->i_lock, and using RCU instead. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
For the 'files' and 'flexfiles' layout types, we do not expect the reply to be any larger than 4k. The block and scsi layout types are a little more greedy, so we keep allocating the maximum response size for now. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
We don't need a zeroed out array, since it is immediately being filled. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
It is no longer used outside of net/sunrpc/socklib.c Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Simplify the retry logic. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
In preparation for sharing with AF_LOCAL. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Most of this code should also be reusable with other socket types. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Add a bvec array to struct xdr_buf, and have the client allocate it when we need to receive data into pages. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
If the RPC call relies on the receive call allocating pages as buffers, then let's label it so that we a) Don't leak memory by allocating pages for requests that do not expect this behaviour b) Can optimise for the common case where calls do not require allocation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
We no longer need priority semantics on the xprt->sending queue, because the order in which tasks are sent is now dictated by their position in the send queue. Note that the backlog queue remains a priority queue, meaning that slot resources are still managed in order of task priority. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Fix up the priority queue to not batch by owner, but by queue, so that we allow '1 << priority' elements to be dequeued before switching to the next priority queue. The owner field is still used to wake up requests in round robin order by owner to avoid single processes hogging the RPC layer by loading the queues. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
If the server is slow, we can find ourselves with quite a lot of entries on the receive queue. Converting the search from an O(n) to O(log(n)) can make a significant difference, particularly since we have to hold a number of locks while searching. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Treat socket write space handling in the same way we now treat transport congestion: by denying the XPRT_LOCK until the transport signals that it has free buffer space. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
The theory was that we would need to grab the socket lock anyway, so we might as well use it to gate the allocation of RPC slots for a TCP socket. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
This no longer causes them to lose their place in the transmission queue. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Rather than forcing each and every RPC task to grab the socket write lock in order to send itself, we allow whichever task is holding the write lock to attempt to drain the entire transmit queue. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Avoid memory starvation by giving RPCs that are tagged with the RPC_TASK_SWAPPER flag the highest priority. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Both RDMA and UDP transports require the request to get a "congestion control" credit before they can be transmitted. Right now, this is done when the request locks the socket. We'd like it to happen when a request attempts to be transmitted for the first time. In order to support retransmission of requests that already hold such credits, we also want to ensure that they get queued first, so that we don't deadlock with requests that have yet to obtain a credit. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
One of the intentions with the priority queues was to ensure that no single process can hog the transport. The field task->tk_owner therefore identifies the RPC call's origin, and is intended to allow the RPC layer to organise queues for fairness. This commit therefore modifies the transmit queue to group requests by task->tk_owner, and ensures that we round robin among those groups. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Remove the checks for whether or not we need to transmit, and whether or not a reply has been received. Those are already handled in call_transmit() itself. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
If the request is still on the queue, this will be incorrect behaviour. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
When we shift to using the transmit queue, then the task that holds the write lock will not necessarily be the same as the one being transmitted. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Fix up the back channel code to recognise that it has already been transmitted, so does not need to be called again. Also ensure that we set req->rq_task. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Move the call encoding so that it occurs before the transport connection etc. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Add the queue that will enforce the ordering of RPC task transmission. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
When storing a struct rpc_rqst on the slot allocation list, we currently use the same field 'rq_list' as we use to store the request on the receive queue. Since the structure is never on both lists at the same time, this is OK. However, for clarity, let's make that a union with different names for the different lists so that we can more easily distinguish between the two states. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Allow the caller in clnt.c to call into the code to wait for a reply after calling xprt_transmit(). Again, the reason is that the backchannel code does not need this functionality. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Separate out the action of adding a request to the reply queue so that the backchannel code can simply skip calling it altogether. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
We will use the same lock to protect both the transmit and receive queues. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Rather than waking up the entire queue of RPC messages a second time, just wake up the task that was put to sleep. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
When asked to wake up an RPC task, it makes sense to test whether or not the task is still queued. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Add a helper that will wake up a task that is sleeping on a specific queue, and will set the value of task->tk_status. This is mainly intended for use by the transport layer to notify the task of an error condition. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
We are going to need to pin for both send and receive. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
If the previous message was only partially transmitted, we need to close the socket in order to avoid corruption of the message stream. To do so, we currently hijack the unlocking of the socket in order to schedule the close. Now that we track the message offset in the socket state, we can move that kind of checking out of the socket lock code, which is needed to allow messages to remain queued after dropping the socket lock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-