- 12 Oct, 2003 2 commits
-
-
bk://bk.arm.linux.org.uk/linux-2.6-rmkLinus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Russell King authored
-
- 11 Oct, 2003 11 commits
-
-
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-release-2.6.0Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/net-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/sparc-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Venkatesh Pallipadi authored
There is a bug in cpufreq call back funtion in timer_tsc routines, that can result in system deadlock. The issue is: grabbing the write_lock on xtime_lock without disabling the interrupts. So,=20 if we happen to get a timer interrupt while we are in this code, system will go into a deadlock. This bug only effects the kernels that have CONFIG_CPU_FREQ enabled.
-
Ingo Molnar authored
This fixes two del_timer_sync() races that are still in the timer code. The first race was actually triggered in a 2.4 backport of the 2.6 timer code. The second race was never triggered - it is mostly theoretical on a standalone kernel. (It's more likely in any virtualized or otherwise preemptable environment.) Both races happen when self-rearming timers are used. One mainstream example is kernel/itimer.c. The effect of the races is that del_timer_sync() lets a timer running instead of synchronizing with it, causing logic bugs (and crashes) in the affected kernel code. One typical incarnation of the race is a double add_timer(). race #1: this code in __run_timers() is running on CPU0: list_del(&timer->entry); timer->base = NULL; [*] set_running_timer(base, timer); spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); [**] fn(data); spin_lock_irq(&base->lock); CPU0 gets stuck at the [*] code-point briefly - after the timer->base has been set to NULL, but before the base->running_timer pointer has been set up. This is a fundamentally volatile scenario, as there's _zero_ knowledge in the data structures that this timer is about to be executed! Now CPU1 comes along and calls del_timer_sync(). It will find nothing - neither timer->base nor base->running_timer will cause it to synchronize. It will return and report that the timer has been deleted - shortly afterwards CPU1 continues to execute the timer fn, which will cause crashes. This particular race is easy to fix by reordering the timer->base clearing with set_running_timer(), and putting a wmb() between them, but there's more races: race #2 The checking of del_timer_sync() for 'pending or running timer' is fundamentally unrobust. Eg. if CPU0 gets stuck at the [***] point below: base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, i); if (base->running_timer == timer) { while (base->running_timer == timer) { cpu_relax(); preempt_check_resched(); } [***] break; } } smp_rmb(); if (timer_pending(timer)) goto del_again; then del_timer_sync() has already decided that this timer is not running (we just finished loop-waiting for it), but we have not done the timer_pending() check yet. If the timer has re-armed itself, and if the timer expires on CPU1 (this needs a long delay on CPU0 but that's not hard to achieve eg. in UML or with kernel preemption enabled), then CPU1 could start to expire the timer and gets to the [**] point in __run_timers (see above), then CPU1 gets stalled and CPU0 is unstalled, then the timer_pending() check in del_timer_sync() will not notice the running timer, and del_timer_sync() returns - while CPU1 is just about to run the timer! Fixing this second race is hard - it involves a heavy race-check operation that has to lock all bases, and has to re-check the base->running_timer value, and timer_pending condition atomically. This fix also fixes the first race, due to forcing del_timer_sync() to always observe the timer state atomically, so the [*] code point will always synchronize with del_timer_sync(). The patch is ugly but safe, and it has fixed the crashes in the 2.4 backport. I tested the patch on 2.6.0-test7 with some heavy itimer use and it works fine. Removing self-arming timers safely is the sole purpose of del_timer_sync(), so there's no way around this overhead i think. I believe we should ultimately fix all major del_timer_sync() users to not use self-arming timers - having del_timer_sync() in the thread-exit path is now a considerable source of SMP overhead. But this is out of the scope of current 2.6 fixes of course, and we have to support self-arming timers as well.
-
David S. Miller authored
-
Noah J. Misch authored
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
Julian Anastasov authored
-
David S. Miller authored
into nuts.ninka.net:/disk1/davem/BK/sparc-2.5
-
- 10 Oct, 2003 5 commits
-
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/linux/usb-2.6Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/linux/i2c-2.6Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Len Brown authored
into intel.com:/home/lenb/bk/linux-acpi-test-2.6.0
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
into kroah.com:/home/greg/linux/BK/usb-2.6
-
bk://bk.arm.linux.org.uk/linux-2.6-rmkLinus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
- 11 Oct, 2003 1 commit
-
-
Russell King authored
This adds a couple of missing symbol exports for lm_driver_register and lm_driver_unregister.
-
- 10 Oct, 2003 11 commits
-
-
Russell King authored
no_action is implemented by generic code; no need for machine class code to implement it as well.
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
into kroah.com:/home/greg/linux/BK/i2c-2.6
-
bk://linux-dj.bkbits.net/cpufreqLinus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Dave Jones authored
into wopr.codemonkey.org.uk:/mnt/nfs/sepia/bar/src/kernel/2.6/trees/cpufreq
-
Dave Jones authored
(Blah about unused variables). This code still won't be used, as its still not tested/debugged properly on a Nehemiah.
-
Dave Jones authored
We got half multipliers horribly wrong, which made us think we could clock the CPU much higher than we actually could.
-
Dave Jones authored
Now that longhaul=1 matches more than 1 CPU, this broke.
-
Dave Jones authored
These CPUs are actually only longhaul v1 compliant. This was catastrophic, as the MSRs moved between v1 and v2. There was also massive confusion in the documentation regarding Ezra. It's not another variant, so 'v2' never existed. Renamed v3 (Powersaver) to v2 as a result of this.
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
There was no release function, that was the bug :) It caused bad messages to show up in the syslog whenever a i2c driver was removed, and could easily oops.
-
Alexander Malysh authored
attached you can find a patch that should fix i2c-sis630 driver for 2.6.0-X kernel. With i2c-sis630 from stock 2.6.0-X we have oops and driver was not correct registered against i2c-core. Changes: 1) fixed a oops while modprobing 2) added check for buffer overflow for i2c block data read transaction 3) added 'force' modprobe parameter. It's allow more easily testing for not yet supported SiS chips.
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/sparc-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
- 09 Oct, 2003 10 commits
-
-
David S. Miller authored
-
David S. Miller authored
-
David S. Miller authored
-
David S. Miller authored
This code is from ancient history when TCP did not used SKB cloning.
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
Stephen Hemminger authored
-
David Gibson authored
-
Andi Kleen authored
-
Krzysztof Halasa authored
-
David S. Miller authored
-