- 23 Mar, 2021 13 commits
-
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
Similar to the DSA situation, ocelot supports LAG offload but treats this scenario improperly: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set bond0 master br0 ip link set swp0 master bond0 We do the same thing as we do there, which is to simulate a 'bridge join' on 'lag join', if we detect that the bonding upper has a bridge upper. Again, same as DSA, ocelot supports software fallback for LAG, and in that case, we should avoid calling ocelot_netdevice_changeupper. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
If we join an already-created bridge port, such as a bond master interface, then we can miss the initial switchdev notifications emitted by the bridge for this port, while it wasn't offloaded by anybody. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
DSA currently assumes that the bridge port starts off with this constellation of bridge port flags: - learning on - unicast flooding on - multicast flooding on - broadcast flooding on just by virtue of code copy-pasta from the bridge layer (new_nbp). This was a simple enough strategy thus far, because the 'bridge join' moment always coincided with the 'bridge port creation' moment. But with sandwiched interfaces, such as: br0 | bond0 | swp0 it may happen that the user has had time to change the bridge port flags of bond0 before enslaving swp0 to it. In that case, swp0 will falsely assume that the bridge port flags are those determined by new_nbp, when in fact this can happen: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set bond0 master br0 ip link set bond0 type bridge_slave learning off ip link set swp0 master br0 Now swp0 has learning enabled, bond0 has learning disabled. Not nice. Fix this by "dumpster diving" through the actual bridge port flags with br_port_flag_is_set, at bridge join time. We use this opportunity to split dsa_port_change_brport_flags into two distinct functions called dsa_port_inherit_brport_flags and dsa_port_clear_brport_flags, now that the implementation for the two cases is no longer similar. This patch also creates two functions called dsa_port_switchdev_sync and dsa_port_switchdev_unsync which collect what we have so far, even if that's asymmetrical. More is going to be added in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
This is a pretty noisy change that was broken out of the larger change for replaying switchdev attributes and objects at bridge join time, which is when these extack objects are actually used. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
DSA can properly detect and offload this sequence of operations: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set swp0 master bond0 ip link set bond0 master br0 But not this one: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set bond0 master br0 ip link set swp0 master bond0 Actually the second one is more complicated, due to the elapsed time between the enslavement of bond0 and the offloading of it via swp0, a lot of things could have happened to the bond0 bridge port in terms of switchdev objects (host MDBs, VLANs, altered STP state etc). So this is a bit of a can of worms, and making sure that the DSA port's state is in sync with this already existing bridge port is handled in the next patches. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
Currently this simple setup with DSA: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set bond0 master br0 ip link set swp0 master bond0 will not work because the bridge has created the PVID in br_add_if -> nbp_vlan_init, and it has notified switchdev of the existence of VLAN 1, but that was too early, since swp0 was not yet a lower of bond0, so it had no reason to act upon that notification. We need a helper in the bridge to replay the switchdev VLAN objects that were notified since the bridge port creation, because some of them may have been missed. As opposed to the br_mdb_replay function, the vg->vlan_list write side protection is offered by the rtnl_mutex which is sleepable, so we don't need to queue up the objects in atomic context, we can replay them right away. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
When a switchdev port starts offloading a LAG that is already in a bridge and has an FDB entry pointing to it: ip link set bond0 master br0 bridge fdb add dev bond0 00:01:02:03:04:05 master static ip link set swp0 master bond0 the switchdev driver will have no idea that this FDB entry is there, because it missed the switchdev event emitted at its creation. Ido Schimmel pointed this out during a discussion about challenges with switchdev offloading of stacked interfaces between the physical port and the bridge, and recommended to just catch that condition and deny the CHANGEUPPER event: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210210105949.GB287766@shredder.lan/ But in fact, we might need to deal with the hard thing anyway, which is to replay all FDB addresses relevant to this port, because it isn't just static FDB entries, but also local addresses (ones that are not forwarded but terminated by the bridge). There, we can't just say 'oh yeah, there was an upper already so I'm not joining that'. So, similar to the logic for replaying MDB entries, add a function that must be called by individual switchdev drivers and replays local FDB entries as well as ones pointing towards a bridge port. This time, we use the atomic switchdev notifier block, since that's what FDB entries expect for some reason. Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
I have a system with DSA ports, and udhcpcd is configured to bring interfaces up as soon as they are created. I create a bridge as follows: ip link add br0 type bridge As soon as I create the bridge and udhcpcd brings it up, I also have avahi which automatically starts sending IPv6 packets to advertise some local services, and because of that, the br0 bridge joins the following IPv6 groups due to the code path detailed below: 33:33:ff:6d:c1:9c vid 0 33:33:00:00:00:6a vid 0 33:33:00:00:00:fb vid 0 br_dev_xmit -> br_multicast_rcv -> br_ip6_multicast_add_group -> __br_multicast_add_group -> br_multicast_host_join -> br_mdb_notify This is all fine, but inside br_mdb_notify we have br_mdb_switchdev_host hooked up, and switchdev will attempt to offload the host joined groups to an empty list of ports. Of course nobody offloads them. Then when we add a port to br0: ip link set swp0 master br0 the bridge doesn't replay the host-joined MDB entries from br_add_if, and eventually the host joined addresses expire, and a switchdev notification for deleting it is emitted, but surprise, the original addition was already completely missed. The strategy to address this problem is to replay the MDB entries (both the port ones and the host joined ones) when the new port joins the bridge, similar to what vxlan_fdb_replay does (in that case, its FDB can be populated and only then attached to a bridge that you offload). However there are 2 possibilities: the addresses can be 'pushed' by the bridge into the port, or the port can 'pull' them from the bridge. Considering that in the general case, the new port can be really late to the party, and there may have been many other switchdev ports that already received the initial notification, we would like to avoid delivering duplicate events to them, since they might misbehave. And currently, the bridge calls the entire switchdev notifier chain, whereas for replaying it should just call the notifier block of the new guy. But the bridge doesn't know what is the new guy's notifier block, it just knows where the switchdev notifier chain is. So for simplification, we make this a driver-initiated pull for now, and the notifier block is passed as an argument. To emulate the calling context for mdb objects (deferred and put on the blocking notifier chain), we must iterate under RCU protection through the bridge's mdb entries, queue them, and only call them once we're out of the RCU read-side critical section. There was some opportunity for reuse between br_mdb_switchdev_host_port, br_mdb_notify and the newly added br_mdb_queue_one in how the switchdev mdb object is created, so a helper was created. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
The SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME attribute is only emitted from: sysfs/ioctl/netlink -> br_set_ageing_time -> __set_ageing_time therefore not at bridge port creation time, so: (a) switchdev drivers have to hardcode the initial value for the address ageing time, because they didn't get any notification (b) that hardcoded value can be out of sync, if the user changes the ageing time before enslaving the port to the bridge We need a helper in the bridge, such that switchdev drivers can query the current value of the bridge ageing time when they start offloading it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Vladimir Oltean authored
It may happen that we have the following topology with DSA or any other switchdev driver with LAG offload: ip link add br0 type bridge stp_state 1 ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set bond0 master br0 ip link set swp0 master bond0 ip link set swp1 master bond0 STP decides that it should put bond0 into the BLOCKING state, and that's that. The ports that are actively listening for the switchdev port attributes emitted for the bond0 bridge port (because they are offloading it) and have the honor of seeing that switchdev port attribute can react to it, so we can program swp0 and swp1 into the BLOCKING state. But if then we do: ip link set swp2 master bond0 then as far as the bridge is concerned, nothing has changed: it still has one bridge port. But this new bridge port will not see any STP state change notification and will remain FORWARDING, which is how the standalone code leaves it in. We need a function in the bridge driver which retrieves the current STP state, such that drivers can synchronize to it when they may have missed switchdev events. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Xie He authored
Problem: The "lapb_t1timer_running" function in "lapb_timer.c" is used in only one place: in the "lapb_kick" function in "lapb_out.c". "lapb_kick" calls "lapb_t1timer_running" to check if the timer is already pending, and if it is not, schedule it to run. However, if the timer has already fired and is running, and is waiting to get the "lapb->lock" lock, "lapb_t1timer_running" will not detect this, and "lapb_kick" will then schedule a new timer. The old timer will then abort when it sees a new timer pending. I think this is not right. The purpose of "lapb_kick" should be ensuring that the actual work of the timer function is scheduled to be done. If the timer function is already running but waiting for the lock, "lapb_kick" should not abort and reschedule it. Changes made: I added a new field "t1timer_running" in "struct lapb_cb" for "lapb_t1timer_running" to use. "t1timer_running" will accurately reflect whether the actual work of the timer is pending. If the timer has fired but is still waiting for the lock, "t1timer_running" will still correctly reflect whether the actual work is waiting to be done. The old "t1timer_stop" field, whose only responsibility is to ask a timer (that is already running but waiting for the lock) to abort, is no longer needed, because the new "t1timer_running" field can fully take over its responsibility. Therefore "t1timer_stop" is deleted. "t1timer_running" is not simply a negation of the old "t1timer_stop". At the end of the timer function, if it does not reschedule itself, "t1timer_running" is set to false to indicate that the timer is stopped. For consistency of the code, I also added "t2timer_running" and deleted "t2timer_stop". Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Kurt Kanzenbach authored
Report the driver name, ASIC ID and the switch name via devlink. This is a useful information for user space tooling. Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@kmk-computers.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-nextDavid S. Miller authored
Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter updates for net-next The following batch contains Netfilter updates for net-next: 1) Split flowtable workqueues per events, from Oz Shlomo. 2) fall-through warnings for clang, from Gustavo A. R. Silva 3) Remove unused declaration in conntrack, from YueHaibing. 4) Consolidate skb_try_make_writable() in flowtable datapath, simplify some of the existing codebase. 5) Call dst_check() to fall back to static classic forwarding path. 6) Update table flags from commit phase. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 Mar, 2021 27 commits
-
-
Eric Dumazet authored
When adding CONFIG_PCPU_DEV_REFCNT, I forgot that the initial net device refcount was 0. When CONFIG_PCPU_DEV_REFCNT is not set, this means the first dev_hold() triggers an illegal refcount operation (addition on 0) refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x128/0x1a4 Fix is to change initial (and final) refcount to be 1. Also add a missing kerneldoc piece, as reported by Stephen Rothwell. Fixes: 919067cc ("net: add CONFIG_PCPU_DEV_REFCNT") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
David S. Miller authored
Ioana Ciornei says: ==================== dpaa2-switch: offload bridge port flags to device Add support for offloading bridge port flags to the switch. With this patch set, the learning, broadcast flooding and unknown ucast/mcast flooding states will be user configurable. Apart from that, the last patch is a small fix that configures the offload_fwd_mark if the switch port is under a bridge or not. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
If a switch port is under a bridge, the offload_fwd_mark should be setup before sending the skb towards the stack so that the bridge does not try to flood the packet on the other switch ports. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
Add support for configuring per port unknown flooding by accepting both BR_FLOOD and BR_MCAST_FLOOD as offloadable bridge port flags. The DPAA2 switch does not support at the moment configuration of unknown multicast flooding independently of unknown unicast flooding, therefore check that both BR_FLOOD and BR_MCAST_FLOOD have the same state. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
The BR_BCAST_FLOOD bridge port flag is now accepted by the driver and a change in its state will determine a reconfiguration of the broadcast egress flooding list on the FDB associated with the port. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
Add support for configuring the learning state of a switch port. When the user requests the HW learning to be disabled, a fast-age procedure on that specific port is run so that previously learnt addresses do not linger. At device probe as well as on a bridge leave action, the ports are configured with HW learning disabled since they are basically a standalone port. At the same time, at bridge join we inherit the bridge port BR_LEARNING flag state and configure it on the switch port. There were already some MC firmware ABI functions for changing the learning state, but those were per FDB (bridging domain) and not per port so we need to adjust those to use the new MC fw command which is per port. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
Extract the code that determines the list of egress flood interfaces for a specific flood type into a new function - dpaa2_switch_fdb_get_flood_cfg(). This will help us to not duplicate code when the broadcast and unknown ucast/mcast flooding domains will be individually configurable. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ioana Ciornei authored
In order to avoid a forward declaration in the next patches, move the dpaa2_switch_fdb_set_egress_flood() function to the top of the file. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
David S. Miller authored
Aleksander Jan Bajkowski says: ==================== net: dsa: lantiq: add support for xRX300 and xRX330 Changed since v3: * fixed last compilation warning Changed since v2: * fixed compilation warnings * removed example bindings for xrx330 * patches has been refactored due to upstream changes Changed since v1: * gswip_mii_mask_cfg() can now change port 3 on xRX330 * changed alowed modes on port 0 and 5 for xRX300 and xRX330 * moved common part of phylink validation into gswip_phylink_set_capab() * verify the compatible string against the hardware ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Aleksander Jan Bajkowski authored
Add compatible string for xRX300 and xRX330 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@wp.pl> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Aleksander Jan Bajkowski authored
Verify compatible string against hardware. Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@wp.pl> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Aleksander Jan Bajkowski authored
This patch allows to use all PHYs on GRX300 and GRX330. The ARX300 has 3 and the GRX330 has 4 integrated PHYs connected to different ports compared to VRX200. Each integrated PHY can work as single Gigabit Ethernet PHY (GMII) or as double Fast Ethernet PHY (MII). Allowed port configurations: xRX200: GMAC0: RGMII, MII, REVMII or RMII port GMAC1: RGMII, MII, REVMII or RMII port GMAC2: GPHY0 (GMII) GMAC3: GPHY0 (MII) GMAC4: GPHY1 (GMII) GMAC5: GPHY1 (MII) or RGMII port xRX300: GMAC0: RGMII port GMAC1: GPHY2 (GMII) GMAC2: GPHY0 (GMII) GMAC3: GPHY0 (MII) GMAC4: GPHY1 (GMII) GMAC5: GPHY1 (MII) or RGMII port xRX330: GMAC0: RGMII, GMII or RMII port GMAC1: GPHY2 (GMII) GMAC2: GPHY0 (GMII) GMAC3: GPHY0 (MII) or GPHY3 (GMII) GMAC4: GPHY1 (GMII) GMAC5: GPHY1 (MII), RGMII or RMII port Tested on D-Link DWR966 (xRX330) with OpenWRT. Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@wp.pl> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/next-queueDavid S. Miller authored
Tony Nguyen says: ==================== 100GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2021-03-22 This series contains updates to ice and iavf drivers. Haiyue Wang says: The Intel E810 Series supports a programmable pipeline for a domain specific protocols classification, for example GTP by Dynamic Device Personalization (DDP) profile. The E810 PF has introduced flex-bytes support by ethtool user-def option allowing for packet deeper matching based on an offset and value for DDP usage. For making VF also benefit from this flexible protocol classification, some new virtchnl messages are defined and handled by PF, so VF can query this new flow director capability, and use ethtool with extending the user-def option to configure Rx flow classification. The new user-def 0xAAAABBBBCCCCDDDD: BBBB is the 2 byte pattern while AAAA corresponds to its offset in the packet. Similarly DDDD is the 2 byte pattern with CCCC being the corresponding offset. The offset ranges from 0x0 to 0x1F7 (up to 504 bytes into the packet). The offset starts from the beginning of the packet. This feature can be used to allow customers to set flow director rules for protocols headers that are beyond standard ones supported by ethtool (e.g. PFCP or GTP-U). Like for matching GTP-U's TEID value 0x10203040: ethtool -N ens787f0v0 flow-type udp4 dst-port 2152 \ user-def 0x002e102000303040 action 13 ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
David S. Miller authored
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Preparations for resilient nexthop groups This patchset contains preparations for resilient nexthop groups support in mlxsw. A follow-up patchset will add support and selftests. Most of the patches are trivial and small to make review easier. Patchset overview: Patch #1 removes RTNL assertion in nexthop notifier block since it is not needed. The assertion will trigger when mlxsw starts processing notifications related to resilient groups as not all are emitted with RTNL held. Patches #2-#9 gradually add support for nexthops with trap action. Up until now mlxsw did not program nexthops whose neighbour entry was not resolved. This will not work with resilient groups as their size is fixed and the nexthop mapped to each bucket is determined by the nexthop code. Therefore, nexthops whose neighbour entry is not resolved will be programmed to trap packets to the CPU in order to trigger neighbour resolution. Patch #10 is a non-functional change to allow for code reuse between regular nexthop groups and resilient ones. Patch #11 avoids unnecessary neighbour updates in hardware. See the commit message for a detailed explanation. Patches #12-#14 add support for additional nexthop group sizes that are supported by Spectrum-{2,3} ASICs. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Spectrum-{2,3} support different adjacency group size ranges compared to Spectrum-1. Add an array describing these ranges and change the common code to use the array which was set during the per-ASIC initialization. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
The device supports a fixed set of adjacency group sizes. Encode these sizes in an array, so that the next patch will be able to split it between Spectrum-1 and Spectrum-{2,3}, which support different size ranges. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
There are several differences in the router module between Spectrum-1 and Spectrum-{2,3}. Currently, this is only apparent in the router interface (RIF) operations that are split between these ASICs. A subsequent patch is going to introduce another difference between these ASICs. Create per-ASIC router operations that will encapsulate all these differences. For now, these operations are only used to set the per-ASIC RIF operations in 'mlxsw_sp->router->rif_ops_arr'. Note that this fields was unused since commit 1f5b2303 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Set RIF ops per ASIC type"). Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Avoid updating neighbour and adjacency entries in hardware when the neighbour is already connected and its MAC address did not change. This can happen, for example, when neighbour transitions between valid states such as 'NUD_REACHABLE' and 'NUD_DELAY'. This is especially important for resilient hashing as these updates will result in adjacency entries being marked as active. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
The validation of a nexthop group entry is also necessary for resilient nexthop groups, so break the validation to a separate function to allow for code reuse in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Encapsulate this functionality in a separate function, so that it could be invoked by follow-up patches, when replacing a nexthop bucket that is part of a resilient nexthop group. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
mlxsw_sp_nexthop_update() is used to update the configuration of Ethernet-type nexthops, as opposed to mlxsw_sp_nexthop_ipip_update(), which is used to update IPinIP-type nexthops. Rename the function to mlxsw_sp_nexthop_eth_update(), so that it is consistent with mlxsw_sp_nexthop_ipip_update(). It will allow us to introduce mlxsw_sp_nexthop_update() in a follow-up patch, which calls either of above mentioned function based on the nexthop's type. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Currently, nexthops are programmed with either forward or discard action (for blackhole nexthops). Nexthops that do not have a valid MAC address (neighbour) or router interface (RIF) are simply not written to the adjacency table. In resilient nexthop groups, the size of the group must remain fixed and the kernel is in complete control of the layout of the adjacency table. A nexthop without a valid MAC or RIF will therefore be written with a trap action, to trigger neighbour resolution. Allow such nexthops to be programmed to the adjacency table to enable above mentioned use case. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Nexthops that need to be programmed with a trap action might not have a valid router interface (RIF) associated with them. Therefore, use the loopback RIF created during initialization to program them to the device. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
Currently, the action associated with the nexthop is assumed to be 'forward' unless the 'discard' bit is set. Instead, simplify this by introducing a dedicated field to represent the action of the nexthop. This will allow us to more easily introduce more actions, such as trap. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
The comments assume that nexthops are simple Ethernet nexthops that are programmed to forward packets to the associated neighbour. This is no longer the case, as both IPinIP and blackhole nexthops are now supported. Adjust the comments to reflect these changes. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
The helper returns the MAC address associated with the nexthop. It is only valid when the nexthop forwards packets and when it is an Ethernet nexthop. Reflect this in the checks the helper is performing. This is not an issue because the sole caller of the function only invokes it for such nexthops. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Ido Schimmel authored
The helper mlxsw_sp_nexthop_offload() is actually interested in finding out if the nexthop is both written to the adjacency table and forwarding packets (as opposed to discarding them). Rename it to mlxsw_sp_nexthop_is_forward() and remove mlxsw_sp_nexthop_is_discard(). Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-