Although we have qgroup level check in btrfs-progs, it's not enough
since other programe may still call ioctl directly not using
btrfs-progs. For example, systemd.

But it's btrfs-progs to be blame since we don't provide a
full-function(like subvolume create things) btrfs library with enough
check, and only rely on kernel ioctl.

So Add level checks in kernel too.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When a qgroup has parents but no child, it should be removable in
Theory I think. But currently, we can not remove it when it has
either parent or child.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup create 1/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup create 2/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup assign 1/0 2/0 /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer  excl  max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----  ----  -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      16384 16384 0        0        ---     ---
1/0      0     0     0        0        2/0     ---
2/0      0     0     0        0        ---     1/0

At this time, there is no subvol or qgroup depending on it.
Just a qgroup 2/0 is its parent, but 2/0 can work well without
1/0. So I think 1/0 should be removalbe. But:
	# btrfs qgroup destroy 1/0 /mnt
ERROR: unable to destroy quota group: Device or resource busy

This patch remove the check of qgroup->parent in removing it,
then we can remove a qgroup when it has a parent.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we create a subvol inheriting a qgroup, we need to check the level
of them. Otherwise, there is a chance a qgroup can inherit another qgroup
at the same level.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

There are two problems in qgroup:

a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.

b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.

The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.

In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currenly, in data writing, ->reserved is accounted in
fill_delalloc(), but ->may_use is released in clear_bit_hook()
which is called by btrfs_finish_ordered_io(). That's too late,
that said, between fill_delalloc() and btrfs_finish_ordered_io(),
the data is doublely accounted by qgroup. It will cause some
unexpected -EDQUOT.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /root/btrfs-auto-test/
	# btrfs subvolume create /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
	Create subvolume '/root/btrfs-auto-test/sub'
	# btrfs qgroup limit 1G /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file bs=1024 count=1500000
	dd: error writing '/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file': Disk quota exceeded
	681353+0 records in
	681352+0 records out
	697704448 bytes (698 MB) copied, 8.15563 s, 85.5 MB/s
It's (698 MB) when we got an -EDQUOT, but we limit it by 1G.

This patch move the btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() for data from
btrfs_delalloc_reserve/release_metadata() to btrfs_check_data_free_space()
and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Then the accounter in qgroup
will be updated at the same time with the accounter in space_info updated.
In this way, the unexpected -EDQUOT will be killed.
Reported-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, for pre_alloc or delay_alloc, the bytes will be accounted
in space_info by the three guys.
space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
But on the other hand, in qgroup, there are only two counters to account the
bytes, qgroup->reserved and qgroup->excl. And qg->reserved accounts
bytes in space_info->bytes_may_use and qg->excl accounts bytes in
space_info->used. So the bytes in space_info->reserved is not accounted
in qgroup. If so, there is a window we can exceed the quota limit when
bytes is in space_info->reserved.

Example:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
	# sync
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer     excl     max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----     ----     -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      20987904 20987904 0        10485760 ---     ---

qg->excl is 20987904 larger than max_excl 10485760.

This patch introduce a new counter named may_use to qgroup, then
there are three counters in qgroup to account bytes in space_info
as below.
space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
qgroup->may_use           --- qgroup->reserved     --- qgroup->excl

With this patch applied:
	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
fallocate: /mnt/data9: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data10: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data11: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data12: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data13: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data14: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data15: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data16: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data17: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data18: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
fallocate: /mnt/data19: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
	# sync
	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer    excl    max_rfer max_excl parent  child
-------- ----    ----    -------- -------- ------  -----
0/5      9453568 9453568 0        10485760 ---     ---
Reported-by: Cyril SCETBON <cyril.scetbon@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we exceed quota limit in writing, we will free
some reserved extent when we need to drop but not free
account in qgroup. It means, each time we exceed quota
in writing, there will be some remain space in qg->reserved
we can not use any more. If things go on like this, the
all space will be ate up.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_limit_group use arg limit to override the old qgroup_limit of
corresponding qgroup. However, we should override part of old qgroup_limit
according to the bit which has been set in arg limit.
Signed-off-by: Fan Chengniang <fancn.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we commit_transaction(), qgroups in btree should be updated.
But, limit info is not considered currently. It will cause a problem
when a qgroup of a snapshot inherit the limit info from srcqgroup,
then there is an inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Cleanup: Change the parameter of update_qgroup_limit_item() to the family of
update_qgroup_xxx_item().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we call btrfs_qgroup_inherit() with BTRFS_QGROUP_INHERIT_SET_LIMITS,
btrfs will update the limit info of qgroup in btree but forget to update
the qgroup in rbtree at the same time. It obviousely will cause an inconsistency.

This patch fix it by updating the rbtree at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, when we snapshot a subvol, snapshot will not copy the limits
from srcqgroup.

This patch make the qgroup in snapshot inherit the limit info when create
a snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Reproduce:
 while true; do
   dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file count=[75% fs_size]
   rm /mnt/btrfs/file
 done
 Then we can see above loop failed on NO_SPACE.

It it long-term problem since very beginning, because delayed-iput
after rm are not run.

We already have commit_transaction() in alloc_space code, but it is
not triggered in above case.
This patch trigger commit_transaction() to run delayed-iput and
reflash pinned-space to to make write success.

It is based on previous fix of delayed-iput in commit_transaction(),
need to be applied on top of:
btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Steps to reproduce:
  while true; do
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%]
    rm /btrfs_dir/file
    sync
  done

  And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE.

Reason:
  Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't
  done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs
  from list before, but do iput() after next write.

  This is log:
  [ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin

  [ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  [ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
  [ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end

  [ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin
  [ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28

  [ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888
  [ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512
  ...
  [ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496
  [ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end

Fix:
  Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's
  delayed-iputs() done in end.

Test:
  Use script similar to above(more complex),
  before patch:
    7 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
  after patch:
    0 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

space_info's value calculation is some complex and easy to cause
bug, add WARN_ON() to help debug.

Changelog v1->v2:
 Put WARN_ON()s under the ENOSPC_DEBUG mount option.
 Suggested by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Bug1:
  space_info->bytes_readonly was set to very large(negative) value in
  btrfs_remove_block_group().

Reason:
  Current code set block_group_cache->pinned = 0 in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(),
  but above space was not counted to space_info->bytes_readonly.

  Then in btrfs_remove_block_group():
    block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly -= block_group->key.offset;
  We can see following value in trace:
    btrfs_remove_block_group: pid=2677 comm=btrfs-cleaner WARNING: bytes_readonly=12582912, key.offset=134217728

Bug2:
  space_info->total_bytes_pinned grow to value larger than fs size.
  In a 1.2G fs, we can get following trace log:
  at first:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2710 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 869793792 + 95944704 = 965738496
  after some op:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2770 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 1780178944 + 95944704 = 1876123648
  after some op:
    ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=3193 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 2924568576 + 95551488 = 3020120064
  ...

Reason:
  Similar to bug1, we also need to adjust space_info->total_bytes_pinned
  in above code block.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we have any chance to make a successful write, we should not give up.

This patch adjust commit-transaction condition from:
  pinned >= wanted
to
  left + pinned >= wanted
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It is another reason for NO_SPACE case.

When we found enough free space in loop and saved them to
max_hole_start/size before, and tail space contains pending extent,
origional innocent max_hole_start/size are reset in retry.

As a result, find_free_dev_extent() returns less space than it can,
and cause NO_SPACE in user program.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old code bypass commit transaction when we don't have enough
pinned space, but another case is there exist freed bgs in current
transction, it have possibility to make alloc_chunk success.

This patch modify the condition to:
if (have_free_bg || have_pinned_space) commit_transaction()

Confirmed above action by printk before and after patch.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Commit 0d97a64e0 creates a new variable but doesn't always set it up.
This puts it back to the original method (key.offset + 1) for the cases
not covered by Filipe's new logic.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
following warning:

[ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
[ 3914.638636]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3914.639620]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3914.640789]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.642041]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3914.643236]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.644441]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3914.645711]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3914.646914]  [<ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3914.648058]  [<ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3914.650105]  [<ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
[ 3914.651361]  [<ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 3914.652761]  [<ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
[ 3914.654128]  [<ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[ 3914.655320]  [<ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---

This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
keeps dumping the following warning over and over:

[ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
[ 3915.137913]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3915.139154]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3915.140316]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.141505]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3915.142709]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.143849]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3915.145120]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 3915.146352]  [<ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 3915.147565]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3915.148785]  [<ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3915.149931]  [<ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
[ 3915.151154]  [<ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 3915.152094]  [<ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
[ 3915.153081]  [<ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
[ 3915.154062]  [<ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
[ 3915.155193]  [<ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 3915.156274]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---

So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
(same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).

This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
made for fstests:

  mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
  mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT

  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
  umount $SCRATCH_MNT

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we pass a length of 0 to the extent_same ioctl, we end up locking an
extent range with a start offset greater then its end offset (if the
destination file's offset is greater than zero). This results in a warning
from extent_io.c:insert_state through the following call chain:

  btrfs_extent_same()
    btrfs_double_lock()
      lock_extent_range()
        lock_extent(inode->io_tree, offset, offset + len - 1)
          lock_extent_bits()
            __set_extent_bit()
              insert_state()
                --> WARN_ON(end < start)

This leads to an infinite loop when evicting the inode. This is the same
problem that my previous patch titled
"Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" addressed
but for the extent_same ioctl instead of the clone ioctl.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While searching for extents to clone we might find one where we only use
a part of it coming from its tail. If our destination inode is the same
the source inode, we end up removing the tail part of the extent item and
insert after a new one that point to the same extent with an adjusted
key file offset and data offset. After this we search for the next extent
item in the fs/subvol tree with a key that has an offset incremented by
one. But this second search leaves us at the new extent item we inserted
previously, and since that extent item has a non-zero data offset, it
it can make us call btrfs_drop_extents with an empty range (start == end)
which causes the following warning:

[23978.537119] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 16251 at fs/btrfs/file.c:550 btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]()
(...)
[23978.557266] Call Trace:
[23978.557978]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[23978.559191]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[23978.560699]  [<ffffffffa047f0ea>] ? btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]
[23978.562389]  [<ffffffff8104544d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[23978.563613]  [<ffffffffa047f0ea>] btrfs_drop_extent_cache+0x43/0x385 [btrfs]
[23978.565103]  [<ffffffff810e3a18>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x15/0x28
[23978.566294]  [<ffffffff81079ff8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[23978.567438]  [<ffffffffa047f73d>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x6b/0x9e1 [btrfs]
[23978.568702]  [<ffffffff8107c03f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[23978.569763]  [<ffffffff811441c0>] ? ____cache_alloc+0x69/0x2eb
[23978.570817]  [<ffffffff81142269>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x36
[23978.571872]  [<ffffffff81143c15>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.42+0x16c/0x1cb
[23978.573466]  [<ffffffff811420d5>] ? kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.52+0x16/0x18
[23978.574962]  [<ffffffffa0480d07>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x66/0x7f [btrfs]
[23978.576179]  [<ffffffffa049aa35>] btrfs_clone+0x516/0xaf5 [btrfs]
[23978.577311]  [<ffffffffa04983dc>] ? lock_extent_range+0x7b/0xcd [btrfs]
[23978.578520]  [<ffffffffa049b2a2>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x28e/0x39f [btrfs]
[23978.580282]  [<ffffffffa049d9ae>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x219a [btrfs]
(...)
[23978.591887] ---[ end trace 988ec2a653d03ed3 ]---

Then we attempt to insert a new extent item with a key that already
exists, which makes btrfs_insert_empty_item return -EEXIST resulting in
abortion of the current transaction:

[23978.594355] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 16251 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
(...)
[23978.622589] Call Trace:
[23978.623181]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[23978.624359]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[23978.625573]  [<ffffffffa044ab6c>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[23978.626971]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[23978.628003]  [<ffffffff8108a6c8>] ? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x1f
[23978.629138]  [<ffffffffa044ab6c>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[23978.630528]  [<ffffffffa049ad1b>] btrfs_clone+0x7fc/0xaf5 [btrfs]
[23978.631635]  [<ffffffffa04983dc>] ? lock_extent_range+0x7b/0xcd [btrfs]
[23978.632886]  [<ffffffffa049b2a2>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x28e/0x39f [btrfs]
[23978.634119]  [<ffffffffa049d9ae>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x219a [btrfs]
(...)
[23978.647714] ---[ end trace 988ec2a653d03ed4 ]---

This is wrong because we should not process the extent item that we just
inserted previously, and instead process the extent item that follows it
in the tree

For example for the test case I wrote for fstests:

   bs=$((64 * 1024))
   mkfs.btrfs -f -l $bs -O ^no-holes /dev/sdc
   mount /dev/sdc /mnt

   xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa $(($bs * 2)) $(($bs * 2))" /mnt/foo

   $CLONER_PROG -s $((3 * $bs)) -d $((267 * $bs)) -l 0 /mnt/foo /mnt/foo
   $CLONER_PROG -s $((217 * $bs)) -d $((95 * $bs)) -l 0 /mnt/foo /mnt/foo

The second clone call fails with -EEXIST, because when we process the
first extent item (offset 262144), we drop part of it (counting from the
end) and then insert a new extent item with a key greater then the key we
found. The next time we search the tree we search for a key with offset
262144 + 1, which leaves us at the new extent item we have just inserted
but we think it refers to an extent that we need to clone.

Fix this by ensuring the next search key uses an offset corresponding to
the offset of the key we found previously plus the data length of the
corresponding extent item. This ensures we skip new extent items that we
inserted and works for the case of implicit holes too (NO_HOLES feature).

A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Near the end of close_ctree, we're calling btrfs_free_block_rsv
to free up the orphan rsv.  The problem is this call updates the
space_info, which has already been freed.

This adds a new __ function that directly calls kfree instead of trying
to update the space infos.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache.  In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.

If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.

This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit.  We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In order to create the free space cache concurrently with FS modifications,
we need to take a few block group locks.

The cache code also does kmap, which would schedule with the locks held.
Instead of going through kmap_atomic, lets just use lowmem for the cache
pages.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Block group cache writeout is currently waiting on the pages for each
block group cache before moving on to writing the next one.  This commit
switches things around to send down all the caches and then wait on them
in batches.

The end result is much faster, since we're keeping the disk pipeline
full.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We'll need to put the io_ctl into the block_group cache struct, so
name it struct btrfs_io_ctl and move it into ctree.h
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_evict_inode() needs to be more careful about stealing from the
global_rsv.  We dont' want to end up aborting commit with ENOSPC just
because the evict_inode code was too greedy.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We're triggering a huge number of commits from
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space.  These aren't really requried,
because everyone calling the async reclaim code is going to end up
triggering a commit on their own.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This changes our delayed refs calculations to include the space needed
to write back dirty block groups.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When truncate starts, it allocates some space in the block reserves so
that we'll have enough to update metadata along the way.

For very large files, we can easily go through all of that space as we
loop through the extents.  This changes truncate to refill the space
reservation as it progresses through the file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order
to delete the corresponding crcs.  This adds accounting so that we keep
track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build
up too much delayed crc work.

This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and
tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global
reserves.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we are deleting large files with large extents, we are building up
a huge set of delayed refs for processing.  Truncate isn't checking
often enough to see if we need to back off and process those, or let
a commit proceed.

The end result is long stalls after the rm, and very long commit times.
During the commits, other processes back up waiting to start new
transactions and we get into trouble.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'

due to a missing include file.

Fixes: 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The error handling path for alloc_reserved_tree_block is calling
btrfs_free_and_pin_reserved_extent with a spinning tree lock held.  This
might sleep as we allocate extent_state objects:

 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1268
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 11093, name: kworker/u4:7
 5 locks held by kworker/u4:7/11093:
  #0:  ("%s-%s""btrfs", name){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81091d51>] process_one_work+0x151/0x520
  #1:  ((&work->normal_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81091d51>] process_one_work+0x151/0x520
  #2:  (sb_internal){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffffa003a70e>] start_transaction+0x43e/0x590 [btrfs]
  #3:  (&head_ref->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0089f8c>] btrfs_delayed_ref_lock+0x4c/0x240 [btrfs]
  #4:  (btrfs-extent-00){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa007697b>] btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x9b/0x150 [btrfs]
 CPU: 0 PID: 11093 Comm: kworker/u4:7 Tainted: G        W 4.0.0-rc6-default+ #246
 Hardware name: Intel Corporation Santa Rosa platform/Matanzas, BIOS TSRSCRB1.86C.0047.B00.0610170821 10/17/06
 Workqueue: btrfs-extent-refs btrfs_extent_refs_helper [btrfs]
  00000000000004f4 ffff88006dd17848 ffffffff81ab0e3b ffff88006dd17848
  ffff88007a944760 ffff88006dd17868 ffffffff8109d516 ffff88006dd17898
  0000000000000000 ffff88006dd17898 ffffffff8109d5b2 ffffffff81aba2bb
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81ab0e3b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x6c
  [<ffffffff8109d516>] ___might_sleep+0xf6/0x140
  [<ffffffff8109d5b2>] __might_sleep+0x52/0x90
  [<ffffffff81aba2bb>] ? ftrace_call+0x5/0x34
  [<ffffffff81196363>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x163/0x1b0
  [<ffffffffa0056f31>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x150 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0056f20>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x20/0x150 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0056f31>] alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x150 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa005805b>] __set_extent_bit+0x37b/0x5d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81aba2bb>] ? ftrace_call+0x5/0x34
  [<ffffffffa005888d>] ? set_extent_bit+0xd/0x30 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00588a3>] set_extent_bit+0x23/0x30 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0058e80>] set_extent_dirty+0x20/0x30 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00195ba>] pin_down_extent+0xaa/0x170 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa001d8ef>] __btrfs_free_reserved_extent+0xcf/0x160 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0023856>] btrfs_free_and_pin_reserved_extent+0x16/0x20 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa002482a>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xfca/0x1290 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0026eae>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x6e/0x2e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0027378>] delayed_ref_async_start+0x48/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006c883>] normal_work_helper+0x83/0x350 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006cd79>] ? btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0x9/0x20 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006cd82>] btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81091dcb>] process_one_work+0x1cb/0x520
  [<ffffffff81091d51>] ? process_one_work+0x151/0x520
  [<ffffffff811c7abf>] ? seq_read+0x3f/0x400
  [<ffffffff8109260b>] worker_thread+0x5b/0x4e0
  [<ffffffff81097be2>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x12/0xa0
  [<ffffffff810925b0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x450/0x450
  [<ffffffff81098686>] kthread+0xf6/0x120
  [<ffffffff81098590>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x1b0/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff81ab8088>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
  [<ffffffff81098590>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x1b0/0x1b0
 ------------[ cut here ]------------

This changes things to free the path first, which will also unlock the
extent buffer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reported-by: Dave Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Dave Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

This was used to make sure that a fresh btrfs from an older mkfs.btrfs,
but it also allows us to mount a buggy btrfs if this btrfs has the right
superblock head part but has something wrong with chunk tree part[1], and
after that we can hit BUG_ON()s set in the code to prevent something
impossible.

Since David has released "Btrfs progs v3.19-rc2", just remove the check,
if anyone who wants to make a fresh btrfs, please use the latest one.

[1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg42358.htmlSigned-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Orphans in the fs tree are cleaned up via open_ctree and subvolume
orphans are cleaned via btrfs_lookup_dentry -- except when a default
subvolume is in use.  The name for the default subvolume uses a manual
lookup that doesn't trigger orphan cleanup and needs to trigger it
manually as well. This doesn't apply to the remount case since the
subvolumes are cleaned up by walking the root radix tree.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The private_data member of the Btrfs control device file
(/dev/btrfs-control) is used to hold the current transaction and needs
to be initialized to NULL to signify that no transaction is in progress.

We explicitly set the control file's private_data to NULL to be
independent of whatever value the misc subsystem initializes it to.

Backstory:
----------

The misc subsystem (which is used by /dev/btrfs-control) initializes
a file's private_data to point to the misc device when a driver has
registered a custom open file operation and initializes it to NULL
when a custom open file operation has *not* been provided.

This subtle quirk is confusing, to the point where kernel code registers
*empty* file open operations to have private_data point to the misc
device structure.

And it leads to bugs, where the addition or removal of a custom open
file operation surprisingly changes the initial contents of a file's
private_data structure.

To simplify things in the misc subsystem, a patch [1] has been proposed
to *always* set private_data to point to the misc device instead of
only doing this when a custom open file operation has been registered.

But before we can fix this in the misc subsystem itself, we need to
modify the (few) drivers that rely on this very subtle behavior.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/4/939Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Van Braeckel <tomvanbraeckel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>