Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 20 May, 2013 16 commits
  3. 17 May, 2013 5 commits
  5. 13 May, 2013 8 commits
  7. 10 May, 2013 7 commits
  9. 07 May, 2013 2 commits
    • Jani Nikula's avatar
      drm/i915: clear the stolen fb before resuming · 1ffc5289
      Jani Nikula authored 
      Similar to
commit 88afe715
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Sun Dec 16 12:15:41 2012 +0000

    drm/i915: Clear the stolen fb before enabling

but on the resume path.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57191Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarNikolay Amiantov <nikoamia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (3.9 only)
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1ffc5289
    • Ben Widawsky's avatar
      Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+" · c4ae25ec
      Ben Widawsky authored 
      This reverts commit 03752f5b.

This revert requires a bit of explanation on how I understand things
work. Internally the architects/designers decide how the stolen encoding
works. We put it in a doc. BIOS writers take these docs and implement
it. Driver writers read the doc too, and read the value left by the BIOS
writers, and then we make magic.

The failing here is that in the docs we had[1] contained two different
definitions for this register for Gen7. (We have both a PCI register,
and an MMIO, and each of these were different). At the time [2] of
03752f5b, we asked the architects what the correct value should be; but
that doesn't match the reality (BIOS) unfortunately.

So on all machines I can get my hands on, this revert is the right thing
to do. I've also worked with the product group to confirm that they
agree this revert is what we should do. People using HW made my "people"
who both write their own BIOS, and have access to our docs (Apple?).
Investigations are still ongoing about whether we need to add a list
of machines needing special handling, but this patch should be the
right thing for pretty much everyone.

[1] The docs are still wrong on this one. Now instead of two registers with
two definitions, we have one register with BOTH definitions, progress?
[2] The open source PRMs have the "wrong" definitions in chapter Volume
1 part6, section 1.1.12.

This digging was inspired by Paulo.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Acked-by: default avatarJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: Augment the patch saying that it's still a bit unclear
whether there are any machines out there with "wrong" firmware and
whether we need to add a list to handle them specially.]
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c4ae25ec
  11. 04 May, 2013 2 commits
    • Imre Deak's avatar
      drm/i915: hsw: fix link training for eDP on port-A · 3ab9c637
      Imre Deak authored 
      According to BSpec the link training sequence for eDP on HSW port-A
should be as follows:

1. link training: clock recovery
2. link training: equalization
3. link training: set idle transmission mode
4. display pipe enable
5. link training: disable (set normal mode)

Contrary to this at the moment we don't do step 3. and we do step 5.
before step 4. Fix this by setting idle transmission mode for eDP at
the end of intel_dp_complete_link_train and adding a new
intel_dp_stop_link_training function to disable link training. With
these changes we'll end up with the following functions corresponding
to the above steps:

intel_dp_start_link_train    -> step 1.
intel_dp_complete_link_train -> step 2., step 3.
intel_dp_stop_link_train     -> step 5.

For port-A we'll call intel_dp_stop_link_train only after enabling the
pipe, for everything else we'll call it right after
intel_dp_complete_link_train to preserve the current behavior.

Tested on HSW/HSW-ULT.

In v2:
- Due to a HW issue we must set idle transmission mode for port-A too
  before enabling the pipe. Thanks for Arthur Runyan for explaining
  this.
- Update the patch subject to make it clear that it's an eDP fix, DP is
  not affected.

v3:
- rename intel_dp_link_train() to intel_dp_set_link_train(), use 'val'
  instead 'l' as var name. (Paulo)
Signed-off-by: default avatarImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      3ab9c637
    • Daniel Vetter's avatar
      Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes" · 657445fe
      Daniel Vetter authored 
      This reverts commit 57c21963.

It's an ugly hack for a Haswell SDV platform where the vbt doesn't
seem to fully agree with the panel. Since it seems to cause issues on
real eDP platform let's just kill this hack again.
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarJosh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/3/467
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      657445fe
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7