- 27 Jan, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/yinghai-root-bus-hotplug: PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible PCI: Skip attaching driver in device_add() PCI: acpiphp: Keep driver loaded even if no slots found PCI/ACPI: Print info if host bridge notify handler installation fails PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c PCI/ACPI: acpiphp: Rename alloc_acpiphp_hp_work() to alloc_acpi_hp_work() PCI: Make device create/destroy logic symmetric PCI: Fix reference count leak in pci_dev_present() PCI: Set pci_dev dev_node early so IOAPIC irq_descs are allocated locally PCI: Add root bus children dev's res to fail list PCI: acpiphp: Add is_hotplug_bridge detection Conflicts: drivers/pci/pci.h
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/acpi-scan2: ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister() ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/yijing-ari: PCI: shpchp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7 PCI: sgihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7 PCI: cpcihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7 PCI: pciehp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7 PCI: Consolidate "next-function" functions PCI: Rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari() PCI: Enable ARI if dev and upstream bridge support it; disable otherwise
-
- 25 Jan, 2013 18 commits
-
-
Yinghai Lu authored
We want to put pci_dev structs in the device tree as soon as possible so for_each_pci_dev() iteration will not miss them, but driver attachment needs to be delayed until after pci_assign_unassigned_resources() to make sure all devices have resources assigned first. This patch moves device registering from pci_bus_add_devices() to pci_device_add(), which happens earlier, leaving driver attachment in pci_bus_add_devices(). It also removes unattached child bus handling in pci_bus_add_devices(). That's not needed because child bus via pci_add_new_bus() is already in parent bus children list. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
We want to add PCI devices to the device tree as early as possible but delay attaching drivers. device_add() adds a device to the device hierarchy and (via device_attach()) attaches a matching driver and calls its .probe() method. We want to separate adding the device to the hierarchy from attaching the driver. This patch does that by adding "match_driver" in struct pci_dev. When false, we return failure from pci_bus_match(), which makes device_attach() believe there's no matching driver. Later, we set "match_driver = true" and call device_attach() again, which now attaches the driver and calls its .probe() method. [bhelgaas: changelog, explicitly init dev->match_driver, fold device_attach() call into pci_bus_add_device()] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Could have root bus hot-added later and there may be slots that need acpiphp. The result returned by acpiphp_get_num_slots() is meaningless, because the bridge the slots are under may be added after this function has been called, so drop acpiphp_get_num_slots() and the code using it. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Tang Chen authored
acpi_install_notify_handler() could fail. So check the exit status and give a better debug info. Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
The acpiphp driver is confusing because it contains partial support for PCI host bridge hotplug as well as support for hotplug of PCI devices. This patch moves the host bridge hot-add support to pci_root.c and adds hot-remove support in pci_root.c. How to test it: if sci_emu patch is applied, find out root bus number to ACPI root name mapping from dmesg or /sys. To remove root bus: echo "\_SB.PCIB 3" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify To add back root bus: echo "\_SB.PCIB 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Will need to use it for PCI root bridge hotplug support, so rename *acpiphp* to *acpi* and move to osc.c. Also make kacpi_hotplug_wq static after that. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
-
Jiang Liu authored
According to device model documentation, the way to create/destroy PCI devices should be symmetric. The rule is to either use 1) device_register()/device_unregister() or 2) device_initialize()/device_add()/device_del()/put_device(). So change PCI core logic to follow the rule and get rid of the redundant pci_dev_get()/pci_dev_put() pair. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Jiang Liu authored
Function pci_get_dev_by_id() takes a reference on the pci_dev returned, so pci_dev_present() should release the corresponding reference. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Otherwise irq_desc for PCI bridge with hot-added IOAPIC may not be allocated on the local node. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
We can stop trying according to try_number now and do not need to use root_bus checking as stop sign. In extreme case we could need to reallocate resource for device just under root bus. For PCI root bus hot-add, we need to retry to assign resources to PCI devices just under pci root bus. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
When system support hotplug bridge with children hotplug slots, we need to make sure that parent bridge get preallocated resource so later when device is plugged into children slot, those children devices will get resource allocated. We do not meet this problem, because for PCIe hotplug card, when acpiphp is used, pci_scan_bridge will set that for us when detect hotplug bit in slot cap. Reported-and-tested-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
Merge branch 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm into pci/acpi-scan2 * 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister() ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
-
Yijing Wang authored
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to only devices matching this slot's device number. ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions 0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers. [bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix shpchp_unconfigure_device()] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yijing Wang authored
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to only devices matching this slot's device number. ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions 0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers. [bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix disable_slot()] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yijing Wang authored
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to only devices matching this slot's device number. ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions 0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers. [bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix cpci_unconfigure_slot()] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yijing Wang authored
Currently, we enumerate devices in a slot with pci_scan_slot(), then iterate through all the devices we found by looking for functions 0-7. But that's wrong for ARI devices, which may have function numbers up to 255. This means that when we hot-add an ARI device, pciehp only initializes functions 0-7, and other functions don't work correctly. Additionally, if we hot-remove the device, pciehp only removes functions 0-7, leaving stale pci_dev structures for any other functions. This patch fixes the problem by iterating over devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yijing Wang authored
There are several next_fn functions (no_next_fn, next_trad_fn, next_ari_fn); consolidate them in next_fn() to simplify the code. [bhelgaas: make next_fn() static, rework control flow] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yijing Wang authored
pci_enable_ari() now supports enabling or disabling ARI forwarding. So rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari() for easy understanding. No functional change. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 24 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Yijing Wang authored
Currently, we enable ARI in a device's upstream bridge if the bridge and the device support it. But we never disable ARI, even if the device is removed and replaced with a device that doesn't support ARI. This means that if we hot-remove an ARI device and replace it with a non-ARI multi-function device, we find only function 0 of the new device because the upstream bridge still has ARI enabled, and next_ari_fn() only returns function 0 for the new non-ARI device. This patch disables ARI in the upstream bridge if the device doesn't support ARI. See the PCIe spec, r3.0, sec 6.13. [bhelgaas: changelog, function comment] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 19 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
- 17 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/rafael-set-root-bridge-handle: ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance
-
- 15 Jan, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and get the device pointer again later. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves will be removed in the second pass. For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as a post-order callback. This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be used for power management or similar things at that time). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order callback. Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(), so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove() and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under start->handle as a post-order callback. The, run it directly for start->handle itself. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim() to always behave as though it were 1. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is not used by that function. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The ops field in struct acpi_device is not used anywhere, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
- 14 Jan, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Jiang Liu authored
With commit f2a33cde55a03 "ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks", acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind are not used any more. So remove them. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward (to put it lightly). This is how it works, roughly: 1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge, creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that object to acpi_pci_root_add(). 2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object, populates its "device" field with its argument's address (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1). 3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are passed to pci_create_root_bus(). 4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object and passes its "dev" member to device_register(). 5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to acpi_platform_notify(), is called. So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting". 6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the given device object. 7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(). 8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we started with in step 1. Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided thanks to commit f3fd0c8a (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register(). Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(), defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that aren't necessary any more. Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host bridges from Bjorn Helgaas. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 11 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Mika Westerberg authored
Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound to the device), the check against its return value in acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout. Make it so. [rjw: Subject and changelog.] Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 Jan, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan: ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add() ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
Merge branch 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm into pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan * 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add() ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers Conflicts: drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
-
- 09 Jan, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/yinghai-survey-resources: x86/PCI: Implement pcibios_resource_survey_bus() PCI/ACPI: Reserve firmware-allocated resources for hot-added root buses x86/PCI: Keep resource allocation functions after boot x86/PCI: Don't track firmware-assigned BAR values for hot-added devices x86/PCI: Factor out pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource() x86/PCI: Allocate resources on a per-bus basis for hot-adding root buses x86/PCI: Factor out pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() x86/PCI: Factor out pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources()
-
Bjorn Helgaas authored
* pci/misc: PCI: cpqphp: Cleanup and remove unreachable paths PCI: Drop "__" prefix on __pci_enable_device_flags() PCI: Use "unsigned long" for __pci_enable_device_flags to match ioport.h mn10300/PCI: Remove unused pci_root_bus frv/PCI: Remove unused pci_root_bus x86/PCI: Remove unused pci_root_bus
-
- 07 Jan, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Yinghai Lu authored
During testing remove/rescan root bus 00, found [ 338.142574] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver ata_piix with device 0000:00:01.1 [ 338.146788] ata_piix 0000:00:01.1: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x01f0-0x01f7]) [ 338.150565] ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22 because that fixed resource is not claimed. For bootint path it is claimed in from arch/x86/pci/i386.c::pcibios_allocate_resources() Claim those resources, so on the remove/rescan will still use old resources. It is some kind honoring FW setting in the registers during hot add. esp root-bus hot add is through acpi, BIOS has chance to set some registers before handing over. [bhelgaas: move weak definition to patch that uses it] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Firmware may have assigned PCI BARs for hot-added devices, so reserve those resources before trying to allocate more. [bhelgaas: move empty weak definition here] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
The PCI resource allocation functions will be used for hot-added devices, so keep them around. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-