- 01 Dec, 2020 10 commits
-
-
Ahmed S. Darwish authored
qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() spins on a certain hardware state until it's updated. At the end of each spin, if in_interrupt() is true, it does 20 loops of cpu_relax(). Otherwise, it yields the CPU. The in_interrupt() macro is ill-defined as it does not provide what the name suggests, and it does not catch the intended use-case here. qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() is always invoked with scsi_qla_host::hw_lock acquired, with disabled interrupts. If the caller is in process context, as in qla4_82xx_need_reset_handler(), then in_interrupt() will return false even though it is not allowed to call schedule(). Remove the in_interrupt() check. Change qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() specification to a purely atomic function. Mark it as static, remove its forward declaration, and move it above its callers. To avoid hammering the PCI bus while spinning, use a 10 micro-second delay instead of cpu_relax(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126132952.2287996-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de Fixes: f4f5df23 ("[SCSI] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX") Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com> Cc: Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@marvell.com> Cc: <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com> Reviewed-by:
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
-
Ahmed S. Darwish authored
hisi_sas_task_exec() uses preemptible() to see if it's safe to block. This does not work for CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n kernels in which preemptible() always returns 0. The problem is masked when enabling some of the common Kconfig.debug options (like CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP), as they implicitly enable the preemption counter. In general, driver leaf functions should not make logic decisions based on the context they're called from. The caller should be the entity responsible for explicitly indicating context. Since hisi_sas_task_exec() already has a gfp_t flags parameter, use it as the explicit context marker. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126132952.2287996-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de Fixes: 214e702d ("scsi: hisi_sas: Adjust task reject period during host reset") Fixes: 550c0d89 ("scsi: hisi_sas: Replace in_softirq() check in hisi_sas_task_exec()") Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Cc: Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Acked-by:
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ahmed S. Darwish authored
hw_event_sas_phy_up() is used in hardirq/softirq context: pm8001_interrupt_handler_msix() || pm8001_interrupt_handler_intx() || pm8001_tasklet => PM8001_CHIP_DISP->isr() = pm80xx_chip_isr() => process_oq() [spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->lock,)] => process_one_iomb() => mpi_hw_event() => hw_event_sas_phy_up() => msleep(200) Revert the msleep() back to an mdelay() to avoid sleeping in atomic context. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126132952.2287996-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de Fixes: 4daf1ef3 ("scsi: pm80xx: Convert 'long' mdelay to msleep") Cc: Vikram Auradkar <auradkar@google.com> Cc: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Acked-by:Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Bean Huo authored
In the case that auto_bkops_enable is false, which means auto bkops has been disabled, there is no need to call ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201125185300.3394-1-huobean@gmail.comReviewed-by:
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by:
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by:
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Luo Jiaxing authored
Relocate all the debugfs code for DFX to v3 hw since no other versions support it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606207594-196362-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Xiang Chen authored
Fix some rollbacks in function hisi_sas_v3_probe() and interrupt_init_v3_hw(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606207594-196362-3-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com Fixes: 8d98416a ("scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ") Signed-off-by:
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by:
-
John Garry authored
Sometimes local functions are called indirectly from the hw driver, which only makes the code harder to follow. Remove these. Method .hw_init is only called from platform driver probe, which is not relevant, so don't set this either. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606207594-196362-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Colin Ian King authored
There are two words that need separating with a space in a pm8001_dbg() message. Fix it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201124093828.307709-1-colin.king@canonical.comReviewed-by:
Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
kernel robot reported a misindentation of a goto. Fix it. At the same time, use a temporary for a repeated entry in the same block to reduce visual noise. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9542a8be9954c1dca744f93f53bb1af6dd1436e8.1606192458.git.joe@perches.comReported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by:
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
Use the more common logging style. [mkp: fixed a few conflicts] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/69dc34ff63adfa60b3f203ed2d58143b5692af57.1606192458.git.joe@perches.comAcked-by:
-
- 26 Nov, 2020 29 commits
-
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-30-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in pmcraid_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in pmcraid_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from pmcraid_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-29-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
There is no "device" parameter in mvumi_shutdown(). Instead there is "pdev" which is not described. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-28-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-27-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in mvumi_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in mvumi_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from mvumi_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-26-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-25-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in twl_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in twl_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from twl_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-24-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-23-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in twa_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in twa_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from twa_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-22-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-21-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-20-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in pm8001_pci_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in pm8001_pci_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from pm8001_pci__resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-19-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-18-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-17-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in scsih_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in scsih_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from scsih_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-16-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Both runtime_suspend_v3_hw() and runtime_resume_v3_hw() do nothing else but invoke suspend_v3_hw() and resume_v3_hw() respectively. This is the case of unnecessary function calls. To use those functions for runtime pm as well, simply use UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS. make -j$(nproc) W=1, with CONFIG_PM disabled, throws '-Wunused-function' warning for runtime_suspend_v3_hw() and runtime_resume_v3_hw(). After dropping those function definitions, the warning was thrown for suspend_v3_hw() and resume_v3_hw(). Hence, mark them as '__maybe_unused'. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-15-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers using new-framework/generic-framework should not handle standard power management operations. These operations were performed by legacy framework through PCI helper functions like pci_save/restore_state(), pci_set_power_state(), etc. Drivers should not use them now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-14-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in hisi_sas_v3_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in hisi_sas_v3_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from hisi_sas_v3_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-13-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-12-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in esas2r_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in esas2r_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from esas2r_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-11-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-10-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in arcmsr_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in arcmsr_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from arcmsr_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-9-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-8-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-7-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-6-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
Balsundar P <balsundar.p@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in aac_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in aac_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this is a bug and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from aac_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-5-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Function parameter 'pdev 'is described as Generic Device Structure. It is a PCI device structure. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-4-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-3-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in megasas_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in megasas_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from megasas_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-2-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 24 Nov, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
We need to check for a valid io_req before we check other data. Also, remove redundant checks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121023337.19295-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@cisco.com> Co-developed-by:
Satish Kharat <satishkh@cisco.com> Signed-off-by:
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com> Signed-off-by:
-
