- 22 Oct, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
External (to the btree iterator code) users of bch2_btree_iter_traverse expect that on success the iterator will be pointed at iter->pos and have that position locked - but since we split iter->pos and iter->real_pos, that means it has to update iter->real_pos if necessary. Internal users don't expect it to modify iter->real_pos, so we need two separate functions. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
It had some silly redundancies. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
It was using the method for btree_ptr_v1, but that wasn't checking all the fields. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
More prep work for snapshots. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
peek() has to update iter->real_pos - there's no need for bch2_btree_iter_set_pos() to update it as well. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Ideally we'll be getting rid of peek_with_updates(), but the callers will need to be checked. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This just gives some internal helpers some better names. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Since we're no longer doing next() immediately followed by peek(), this optimization isn't doing anything anymore. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This means bch2_btree_iter_traverse_one() can be made more efficient. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
btree node iterators need to obey the regular btree node invarionts w.r.t. iter->real_pos; once they do, bch2_btree_iter_traverse will have less that it needs to check. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The way btree iterators work internally has been changing, particularly with the iter->real_pos changes, and bch2_btree_iter_next() is no longer hyper optimized - it's just advance followed by peek, so it's more efficient to just call advance where we're not using the return value of bch2_btree_iter_next(). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Prep work for snapshots Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
comparison was wrong Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is mkfs's job. Also, clean up the handling of feature bits some. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The superblock version fields need to be accurate to know whether a filesystem is supported, thus we should be verifying them. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This code used to be used for running some assertions on alloc info at runtime, but it long predates fsck and hasn't been good for much in ages - we can delete it now. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
We keep running into occasional bugs with btree transaction iterators overflowing - this will make those bugs more visible. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is a bit clearer than using bch2_btree_iter_free(). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Change fsck code to always put btree iterators - also, make some flow control improvements to deal with lock restarts better, and refactor check_extents() to not walk extents twice for counting/checking i_sectors. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
this is used in only one place now, so just inline it into the caller. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
An option was added to control whether reflink support was on or off because for a long time, reflink + inline data extent support was missing - but that's since been fixed, so we can drop the option now. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
In the read path, for retry of indirect extents to work we need to differentiate between the location in the btree the read was for, vs. the location where we found the data. This patch adds that plumbing to bch_read_bio. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Minor cleanup, it was being open coded. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
bch2_btree_iter_traverse() is supposed to ensure we have the correct type of lock - it was downgrading if necessary, but if we entered with a read lock it wasn't upgrading to an intent lock, oops. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Since we added iter->real_pos, btree_iter_set_pos_to_(next|prev)_leaf no longer modify iter->pos, so we don't have to save it at the start anymore. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-