- 26 Nov, 2020 29 commits
-
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-30-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in pmcraid_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in pmcraid_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from pmcraid_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-29-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
There is no "device" parameter in mvumi_shutdown(). Instead there is "pdev" which is not described. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-28-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-27-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in mvumi_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in mvumi_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from mvumi_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-26-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-25-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in twl_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in twl_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from twl_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-24-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-23-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in twa_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in twa_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from twa_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-22-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-21-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-20-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in pm8001_pci_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in pm8001_pci_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from pm8001_pci__resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-19-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-18-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-17-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in scsih_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in scsih_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from scsih_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-16-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Both runtime_suspend_v3_hw() and runtime_resume_v3_hw() do nothing else but invoke suspend_v3_hw() and resume_v3_hw() respectively. This is the case of unnecessary function calls. To use those functions for runtime pm as well, simply use UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS. make -j$(nproc) W=1, with CONFIG_PM disabled, throws '-Wunused-function' warning for runtime_suspend_v3_hw() and runtime_resume_v3_hw(). After dropping those function definitions, the warning was thrown for suspend_v3_hw() and resume_v3_hw(). Hence, mark them as '__maybe_unused'. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-15-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers using new-framework/generic-framework should not handle standard power management operations. These operations were performed by legacy framework through PCI helper functions like pci_save/restore_state(), pci_set_power_state(), etc. Drivers should not use them now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-14-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in hisi_sas_v3_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in hisi_sas_v3_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from hisi_sas_v3_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-13-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-12-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in esas2r_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in esas2r_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from esas2r_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-11-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-10-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in arcmsr_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in arcmsr_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from arcmsr_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-9-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-8-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-7-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-6-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comAcked-by:
Balsundar P <balsundar.p@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in aac_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in aac_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this is a bug and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from aac_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-5-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Function parameter 'pdev 'is described as Generic Device Structure. It is a PCI device structure. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-4-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
Drivers should do only device-specific jobs. But in general, drivers using legacy PCI PM framework for .suspend()/.resume() have to manage many PCI PM-related tasks themselves which can be done by PCI Core itself. This brings extra load on the driver and it directly calls PCI helper functions to handle them. Switch to the new generic framework by updating function signatures and define a "struct dev_pm_ops" variable to bind PM callbacks. Also, remove unnecessary calls to the PCI Helper functions along with the legacy .suspend & .resume bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-3-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vaibhav Gupta authored
The driver calls pci_enable_wake(...., false) in megasas_resume(), and there is no corresponding pci_enable_wake(...., true) in megasas_suspend(). Either it should do enable-wake the device in .suspend() or should not invoke pci_enable_wake() at all. Concluding that this driver doesn't support enable-wake and PCI core calls pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false) during resume, drop it from megasas_resume(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102164730.324035-2-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 24 Nov, 2020 11 commits
-
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
We need to check for a valid io_req before we check other data. Also, remove redundant checks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121023337.19295-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@cisco.com> Co-developed-by:
Satish Kharat <satishkh@cisco.com> Signed-off-by:
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
Set scsi_set_resid() only if FCPIO_ICMND_CMPL_RESID_UNDER is set. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121015134.18872-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
Replace shost_printk() with FNIC_MAIN_DBG() so that these log messages are controlled by fnic_log_level flag in fnic_handle_link. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121013739.18701-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
Avoid looping in fnic_scsi_abort_io() before sending fw reset when fnic is in TRANS ETH state and when we have not received any link events. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121012145.18522-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
-
Karan Tilak Kumar authored
Replacing shost_printk with FNIC_FCS_DBG() so that these log messages are controlled by fnic_log_level flag in fnic_fip_handler_timer. Bumping up version number from 47 to 49 to maintain same level as internal version. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201120220712.16708-1-kartilak@cisco.comReviewed-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
Make the pm8001_printk() macro take an explicit HBA instead of assuming the existence of an unspecified pm8001_ha argument. Miscellanea: - Add pm8001_ha to the few uses of pm8001_printk() - Add HBA to the pm8001_dbg macro call to pm8001_printk() Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0e17a4c845f15e18f98b346ffb9b039584d21cdd.1605914030.git.joe@perches.comAcked-by:
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
Every PM8001_<FOO>_DBG macro uses an internal call to pm8001_printk. Convert all uses of: PM8001_<FOO>_DBG(hba, pm8001_printk(fmt, ...)) to pm8001_dbg(hba, <FOO>, fmt, ...) so the visual complexity of each macro is reduced. The repetitive macro definitions are converted to a single pm8001_dbg and the level is concatenated using PM8001_##level##_LOGGING for the specific level test. Done with coccinelle, checkpatch and a little typing of the new macro definition. Miscellanea: - Coalesce formats - Realign arguments - Add missing terminating newlines to formats - Remove trailing spaces from formats - Change defective loop with printk(KERN_INFO... to emit a 16 byte hex block to %p16h Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/49f36a93af7752b613d03c89a87078243567fd9a.1605914030.git.joe@perches.comReported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by:
-
Xu Wang authored
Stop typecasting the value returned by kcalloc(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201120083648.9319-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cnAcked-by:
Xu Wang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> Signed-off-by:
-
Finn Thain authored
Refactor to avoid needless calls to NCR5380_maybe_release_dma_irq(). This makes the machine code smaller and the source more readable. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c1317ae8fdcb498460de5d7ea0bd62a42f5eeca8.1605847196.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.auTested-by:
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> Signed-off-by:
-
Finn Thain authored
It is possible that bus_reset_cleanup() or .eh_abort_handler could be invoked during NCR5380_queuecommand(). If that takes place before the new command is enqueued and after the ST-DMA "lock" has been acquired, the ST-DMA "lock" will be released again. This will result in a lost DMA interrupt and a command timeout. Fix this by excluding EH and interrupt handlers while the new command is enqueued. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/af25163257796b50bb99d4ede4025cea55787b8f.1605847196.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.auTested-by:
-
Bjorn Andersson authored
The introduction of ufshcd_dme_configure_adapt() refactored out duplication from the Mediatek and Qualcomm drivers. Both these implementations had the logic of: gear_tx == UFS_HS_G4 => PA_INITIAL_ADAPT gear_tx != UFS_HS_G4 => PA_NO_ADAPT but now both implementations pass PA_INITIAL_ADAPT as "adapt_val" and if gear_tx is not UFS_HS_G4 that is replaced with PA_INITIAL_ADAPT. In other words, it's PA_INITIAL_ADAPT in both above cases. The result is that e.g. Qualcomm SM8150 has no longer functional UFS, so adjust the logic to match the previous implementation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201121044810.507288-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Fixes: fc85a74e ("scsi: ufs: Refactor ADAPT configuration function") Reviewed-by:Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by:
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by:
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
