- 05 May, 2021 40 commits
-
-
Oscar Salvador authored
alloc_contig_range() will fail if it finds a HugeTLB page within the range, without a chance to handle them. Since HugeTLB pages can be migrated as any LRU or Movable page, it does not make sense to bail out without trying. Enable the interface to recognize in-use HugeTLB pages so we can migrate them, and have much better chances to succeed the call. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-7-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Oscar Salvador authored
alloc_contig_range will fail if it ever sees a HugeTLB page within the range we are trying to allocate, even when that page is free and can be easily reallocated. This has proved to be problematic for some users of alloc_contic_range, e.g: CMA and virtio-mem, where those would fail the call even when those pages lay in ZONE_MOVABLE and are free. We can do better by trying to replace such page. Free hugepages are tricky to handle so as to no userspace application notices disruption, we need to replace the current free hugepage with a new one. In order to do that, a new function called alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page is introduced. This function will first try to get a new fresh hugepage, and if it succeeds, it will replace the old one in the free hugepage pool. The free page replacement is done under hugetlb_lock, so no external users of hugetlb will notice the change. To allocate the new huge page, we use alloc_buddy_huge_page(), so we do not have to deal with any counters, and prep_new_huge_page() is not called. This is valulable because in case we need to free the new page, we only need to call __free_pages(). Once we know that the page to be replaced is a genuine 0-refcounted huge page, we remove the old page from the freelist by remove_hugetlb_page(). Then, we can call __prep_new_huge_page() and __prep_account_new_huge_page() for the new huge page to properly initialize it and increment the hstate->nr_huge_pages counter (previously decremented by remove_hugetlb_page()). Once done, the page is enqueued by enqueue_huge_page() and it is ready to be used. There is one tricky case when page's refcount is 0 because it is in the process of being released. A missing PageHugeFreed bit will tell us that freeing is in flight so we retry after dropping the hugetlb_lock. The race window should be small and the next retry should make a forward progress. E.g: CPU0 CPU1 free_huge_page() isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page PageHuge() == T alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page alloc_buddy_huge_page() spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock) // PageHuge() && !PageHugeFreed && // !PageCount() spin_unlock_irq(hugetlb_lock) spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock) 1) update_and_free_page PageHuge() == F __free_pages() 2) enqueue_huge_page SetPageHugeFreed() spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock) spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock) 1) PageHuge() == F (freed by case#1 from CPU0) 2) PageHuge() == T PageHugeFreed() == T - proceed with replacing the page In the case above we retry as the window race is quite small and we have high chances to succeed next time. With regard to the allocation, we restrict it to the node the page belongs to with __GFP_THISNODE, meaning we do not fallback on other node's zones. Note that gigantic hugetlb pages are fenced off since there is a cyclic dependency between them and alloc_contig_range. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-6-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: -
Oscar Salvador authored
Currently, prep_new_huge_page() performs two functions. It sets the right state for a new hugetlb, and increases the hstate's counters to account for the new page. Let us split its functionality into two separate functions, decoupling the handling of the counters from initializing a hugepage. The outcome is having __prep_new_huge_page(), which only initializes the page , and __prep_account_new_huge_page(), which adds the new page to the hstate's counters. This allows us to be able to set a hugetlb without having to worry about the counter/locking. It will prove useful in the next patch. prep_new_huge_page() still calls both functions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-5-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Pages allocated via the page allocator or CMA get its private field cleared by means of post_alloc_hook(). Pages allocated during boot, that is directly from the memblock allocator, get cleared by paging_init()-> .. ->memmap_init_zone-> .. ->__init_single_page() before any memblock allocation. Based on this ground, let us remove the clearing of the flag from prep_new_huge_page() as it is not needed. This was a leftover from commit 6c037149 ("hugetlb: convert PageHugeFreed to HPageFreed flag"). Previously the explicit clearing was necessary because compound allocations do not get this initialization (see prep_compound_page). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-4-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Currently, isolate_migratepages_{range,block} and their callers use a pfn == 0 vs pfn != 0 scheme to let the caller know whether there was any error during isolation. This does not work as soon as we need to start reporting different error codes and make sure we pass them down the chain, so they are properly interpreted by functions like e.g: alloc_contig_range. Let us rework isolate_migratepages_{range,block} so we can report error codes. Since isolate_migratepages_block will stop returning the next pfn to be scanned, we reuse the cc->migrate_pfn field to keep track of that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-3-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Patch series "Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages", v10. alloc_contig_range lacks the ability to handle HugeTLB pages. This can be problematic for some users, e.g: CMA and virtio-mem, where those users will fail the call if alloc_contig_range ever sees a HugeTLB page, even when those pages lay in ZONE_MOVABLE and are free. That problem can be easily solved by replacing the page in the free hugepage pool. In-use HugeTLB are no exception though, as those can be isolated and migrated as any other LRU or Movable page. This aims to improve alloc_contig_range->isolate_migratepages_block, so that HugeTLB pages can be recognized and handled. Since we also need to start reporting errors down the chain (e.g: -ENOMEM due to not be able to allocate a new hugetlb page), isolate_migratepages_{range,block} interfaces need to change to start reporting error codes instead of the pfn == 0 vs pfn != 0 scheme it is using right now. From now on, isolate_migratepages_block will not return the next pfn to be scanned anymore, but -EINTR, -ENOMEM or 0, so we the next pfn to be scanned will be recorded in cc->migrate_pfn field (as it is already done in isolate_migratepages_range()). Below is an insight from David (thanks), where the problem can clearly be seen: "Start a VM with 4G. Hotplug 1G via virtio-mem and online it to ZONE_MOVABLE. Allocate 512 huge pages. [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 5061512 kB MemFree: 3319396 kB MemAvailable: 3457144 kB ... HugePages_Total: 512 HugePages_Free: 512 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB The huge pages get partially allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. Try unplugging 1G via virtio-mem (remember, all ZONE_MOVABLE). Inside the guest: [ 180.058992] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.060531] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.061972] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.063413] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.064838] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.065848] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.066794] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.067738] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.068669] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy [ 180.069598] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy" And then with this patchset running: "Same experiment with ZONE_MOVABLE: a) Free huge pages: all memory can get unplugged again. b) Allocated/populated but idle huge pages: all memory can get unplugged again. c) Allocated/populated but all 512 huge pages are read/written in a loop: all memory can get unplugged again, but I get a single [ 121.192345] alloc_contig_range: [180000, 188000) PFNs busy Most probably because it happened to try migrating a huge page while it was busy. As virtio-mem retries on ZONE_MOVABLE a couple of times, it can deal with this temporary failure. Last but not least, I did something extreme: # cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 5061568 kB MemFree: 186560 kB MemAvailable: 354524 kB ... HugePages_Total: 2048 HugePages_Free: 2048 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Triggering unplug would require to dissolve+alloc - which now fails when trying to allocate an additional ~512 huge pages (1G). As expected, I can properly see memory unplug not fully succeeding. + I get a fairly continuous stream of [ 226.611584] alloc_contig_range: [19f400, 19f800) PFNs busy ... But more importantly, the hugepage count remains stable, as configured by the admin (me): HugePages_Total: 2048 HugePages_Free: 2048 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0" This patch (of 7): Currently, __alloc_contig_migrate_range can generate -EINTR, -ENOMEM or -EBUSY, and report them down the chain. The problem is that when migrate_pages() reports -ENOMEM, we keep going till we exhaust all the try-attempts (5 at the moment) instead of bailing out. migrate_pages() bails out right away on -ENOMEM because it is considered a fatal error. Do the same here instead of keep going and retrying. Note that this is not fixing a real issue, just a cosmetic change. Although we can save some cycles by backing off ealier Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-1-osalvador@suse.de Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-2-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: -
Mike Kravetz authored
After making hugetlb lock irq safe and separating some functionality done under the lock, add some lockdep_assert_held to help verify locking. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-9-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Commit c77c0a8a ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
free_pool_huge_page was called with hugetlb_lock held. It would remove a hugetlb page, and then free the corresponding pages to the lower level allocators such as buddy. free_pool_huge_page was called in a loop to remove hugetlb pages and these loops could hold the hugetlb_lock for a considerable time. Create new routine remove_pool_huge_page to replace free_pool_huge_page. remove_pool_huge_page will remove the hugetlb page, and it must be called with the hugetlb_lock held. It will return the removed page and it is the responsibility of the caller to free the page to the lower level allocators. The hugetlb_lock is dropped before freeing to these allocators which results in shorter lock hold times. Add new helper routine to call update_and_free_page for a list of pages. Note: Some changes to the routine return_unused_surplus_pages are in need of explanation. Commit e5bbc8a6 ("mm/hugetlb.c: fix reservation race when freeing surplus pages") modified this routine to address a race which could occur when dropping the hugetlb_lock in the loop that removes pool pages. Accounting changes introduced in that commit were subtle and took some thought to understand. This commit removes the cond_resched_lock() and the potential race. Therefore, remove the subtle code and restore the more straight forward accounting effectively reverting the commit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
With the introduction of remove_hugetlb_page(), there is no need for update_and_free_page to hold the hugetlb lock. Change all callers to drop the lock before calling. With additional code modifications, this will allow loops which decrease the huge page pool to drop the hugetlb_lock with each page to reduce long hold times. The ugly unlock/lock cycle in free_pool_huge_page will be removed in a subsequent patch which restructures free_pool_huge_page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-6-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
The new remove_hugetlb_page() routine is designed to remove a hugetlb page from hugetlbfs processing. It will remove the page from the active or free list, update global counters and set the compound page destructor to NULL so that PageHuge() will return false for the 'page'. After this call, the 'page' can be treated as a normal compound page or a collection of base size pages. update_and_free_page no longer decrements h->nr_huge_pages{_node} as this is performed in remove_hugetlb_page. The only functionality performed by update_and_free_page is to free the base pages to the lower level allocators. update_and_free_page is typically called after remove_hugetlb_page. remove_hugetlb_page is to be called with the hugetlb_lock held. Creating this routine and separating functionality is in preparation for restructuring code to reduce lock hold times. This commit should not introduce any changes to functionality. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-5-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: -
Mike Kravetz authored
The helper routine hstate_next_node_to_alloc accesses and modifies the hstate variable next_nid_to_alloc. The helper is used by the routines alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus. adjust_pool_surplus is called with hugetlb_lock held. However, alloc_pool_huge_page can not be called with the hugetlb lock held as it will call the page allocator. Two instances of alloc_pool_huge_page could be run in parallel or alloc_pool_huge_page could run in parallel with adjust_pool_surplus which may result in the variable next_nid_to_alloc becoming invalid for the caller and pages being allocated on the wrong node. Both alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus are only called from the routine set_max_huge_pages after boot. set_max_huge_pages is only called as the reusult of a user writing to the proc/sysfs nr_hugepages, or nr_hugepages_mempolicy file to adjust the number of hugetlb pages. It makes little sense to allow multiple adjustment to the number of hugetlb pages in parallel. Add a mutex to the hstate and use it to only allow one hugetlb page adjustment at a time. This will synchronize modifications to the next_nid_to_alloc variable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Now that cma_release is non-blocking and irq safe, there is no need to drop hugetlb_lock before calling. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Patch series "make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts", v5. This effort is the result a recent bug report [1]. Syzbot found a potential deadlock in the hugetlb put_page/free_huge_page_path. WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected Since the free_huge_page_path already has code to 'hand off' page free requests to a workqueue, a suggestion was proposed to make the in_irq() detection accurate by always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT [2]. The outcome of that discussion was that the hugetlb put_page path (free_huge_page) path should be properly fixed and safe for all calling contexts. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311021321.127500-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com This patch (of 8): cma_release is currently a sleepable operatation because the bitmap manipulation is protected by cma->lock mutex. Hugetlb code which relies on cma_release for CMA backed (giga) hugetlb pages, however, needs to be irq safe. The lock doesn't protect any sleepable operation so it can be changed to a (irq aware) spin lock. The bitmap processing should be quite fast in typical case but if cma sizes grow to TB then we will likely need to replace the lock by a more optimized bitmap implementation. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The local variable pseudo_vma is not used anymore. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
A rare out of memory error would prevent removal of the reserve map region for a page. hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() handles this rare case to avoid dangling with incorrect counts. Unfortunately, hugepage_subpool_get_pages and hugetlb_acct_memory could possibly fail too. We should correctly handle these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: b5cec28d ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages") Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The resv_map could be NULL since this routine can be called in the evict inode path for all hugetlbfs inodes and we will have chg = 0 in this case. But (chg - freed) won't go negative as Mike pointed out: "If resv_map is NULL, then no hugetlb pages can be allocated/associated with the file. As a result, remove_inode_hugepages will never find any huge pages associated with the inode and the passed value 'freed' will always be zero." Add a comment clarifying this to make it clear and also avoid confusion. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
It's guaranteed that the vma is associated with a resv_map, i.e. either VM_MAYSHARE or HPAGE_RESV_OWNER, when the code reaches here or we would have returned via !resv check above. So it's unneeded to check whether HPAGE_RESV_OWNER is set here. Simplify the return code to make it more clear. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Patch series "Cleanup and fixup for hugetlb", v2. This series contains cleanups to remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() and simplify the return code. Also this handles the error case in hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() correctly. More details can be found in the respective changelogs. This patch (of 5): The same VM_BUG_ON() check is already done in the callee. Remove this extra one to simplify the code slightly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Zi Yan authored
Further extend <debugfs>/split_huge_pages to accept "<path>,<pgoff_start>,<pgoff_end>" for file-backed THP split tests since tmpfs may have file backed by THP that mapped nowhere. Update selftest program to test file-backed THP split too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331235309.332292-2-zi.yan@sent.comSigned-off-by:
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Suggested-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Mika Penttila <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Zi Yan authored
We did not have a direct user interface of splitting the compound page backing a THP and there is no need unless we want to expose the THP implementation details to users. Make <debugfs>/split_huge_pages accept a new command to do that. By writing "<pid>,<vaddr_start>,<vaddr_end>" to <debugfs>/split_huge_pages, THPs within the given virtual address range from the process with the given pid are split. It is used to test split_huge_page function. In addition, a selftest program is added to tools/testing/selftests/vm to utilize the interface by splitting PMD THPs and PTE-mapped THPs. This does not change the old behavior, i.e., writing 1 to the interface to split all THPs in the system. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331235309.332292-1-zi.yan@sent.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
We know it must meet the !is_swap_pte() and !pte_none() condition if we reach here. Since !is_swap_pte() indicates pte_none() or pte_present() is met, it's guaranteed that pte must be present here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The out label here is unneeded because it just goes to out_up_write label. Remove it to make code more concise. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Patch series "Cleanup for khugepaged". This series contains cleanups to remove unnecessary out label and meaningless !pte_present() check. Also use helper function to simplify the code. More details can be found in the respective changelogs. This patch (of 3): We could use helper function range_in_vma() to check whether the desired range is inside the vma to simplify the code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yanfei Xu authored
READ_ONCE() is more selective and lightweight. It is more appropriate that using a READ_ONCE() for the certain variable to prevent the compiler from reordering. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210323092730.247583-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.comSigned-off-by:
Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Acked-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
It's more recommended to use helper function migration_entry_to_page() to get the page via migration entry. We can also enjoy the PageLocked() check there. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-7-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Commit 4958e4d8 ("mm: thp: remove debug_cow switch") forgot to remove TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEBUG_COW_FLAG macro. Remove it here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The !PageCompound() check limits the page must be head or tail while !PageHead() further limits it to page head only. So !PageHead() check is equivalent here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-5-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The current code that checks if migrating misplaced transhuge page is needed is pretty hard to follow. Rework it and add a comment to make its logic more clear and improve readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
It's guaranteed that huge_zero_page will not be NULL if huge_zero_refcount is increased successfully. When READ_ONCE(huge_zero_page) is returned, there must be a huge_zero_page and it can be replaced with returning 'true' when we do not care about the value of huge_zero_page. We can thus make it return bool to save READ_ONCE cpu cycles as the return value is just used to check if huge_zero_page exists. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Patch series "Some cleanups for huge_memory", v3. This series contains cleanups to rework some function logics to make it more readable, use helper function and so on. More details can be found in the respective changelogs. This patch (of 6): The current implementation of vma_adjust_trans_huge() contains some duplicated codes. Add helper function to get rid of these codes to make it more succinct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
There is no need to use a new local variable ret2 to get the return value of handle_userfault(). Use ret directly to make code more succinct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210210072409.60587-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
In writable and !referenced case, the result value should be SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE for trace_mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate() instead of default 0 (SCAN_FAIL) here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 7d2eba05 ("mm: add tracepoint for scanning pages") Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Commit 4d45e75a ("mm: remove the now-unnecessary mmget_still_valid() hack") have made khugepaged_test_exit() suitable for check mm->mm_users against 0. Use this helper here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
smp_wmb() is needed to avoid the copy_huge_page writes to become visible after the set_pmd_at() write here. But we can reuse the smp_wmb() inside __SetPageUptodate() to remove this redundant one. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Patch series "Cleanup and fixup for khugepaged", v2. This series contains cleanups to remove unneeded return value, use helper function and so on. And there is one fix to correct the wrong result value for trace_mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate(). This patch (of 4): The return value of khugepaged_collapse_pte_mapped_thps() is never checked since it's introduced. We should remove such unneeded return value. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
The fault_mutex hashing overhead can be avoided in truncate_op case because page faults can not race with truncation in this routine. So calculate hash for fault_mutex only in !truncate_op case to save some cpu cycles. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Rework the error handling code when alloc_huge_page() failed to remove some duplicated code and simplify the code slightly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-5-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
!PageHuge(oldhpage) is implicitly checked in page_hstate() above, so we remove this explicit one. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
We should not transfer the per-node surplus state when we do not cross the node in order to save some cpu cycles Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
