- 21 Nov, 2013 8 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
Lockdep complains about btrfs's async commit: [ 2372.462171] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 2372.462191] 3.12.0+ #32 Tainted: G W [ 2372.462209] ------------------------------------- [ 2372.462228] ceph-osd/14048 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at: [ 2372.462275] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462305] but there are no more locks to release! [ 2372.462324] [ 2372.462324] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2372.462349] no locks held by ceph-osd/14048. [ 2372.462367] [ 2372.462367] stack backtrace: [ 2372.462386] CPU: 2 PID: 14048 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.12.0+ #32 [ 2372.462414] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015 11/09/2011 [ 2372.462455] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd28 ffffffff816f094a ffff8800378aa320 [ 2372.462491] ffff88007490fd50 ffffffff810adf4c ffff8800378aa320 ffff88009af97650 [ 2372.462526] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd88 ffffffff810b01ee ffff8800898c0000 [ 2372.462562] Call Trace: [ 2372.462584] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462619] [<ffffffff816f094a>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 2372.462642] [<ffffffff810adf4c>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xec/0x100 [ 2372.462677] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462710] [<ffffffff810b01ee>] lock_release+0x18e/0x210 [ 2372.462742] [<ffffffffa022cb36>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1d6/0x2a0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462783] [<ffffffffa025a7ce>] btrfs_ioctl_start_sync+0x3e/0xc0 [btrfs] [ 2372.462822] [<ffffffffa025f1d3>] btrfs_ioctl+0x4c3/0x1f70 [btrfs] [ 2372.462849] [<ffffffff812c0321>] ? avc_has_perm+0x121/0x1b0 [ 2372.462873] [<ffffffff812c0224>] ? avc_has_perm+0x24/0x1b0 [ 2372.462897] [<ffffffff8107ecc8>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x100 [ 2372.462922] [<ffffffff8117b145>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e5/0x4e0 [ 2372.462946] [<ffffffff812c19e6>] ? file_has_perm+0x86/0xa0 [ 2372.462969] [<ffffffff8117b3c1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 [ 2372.462991] [<ffffffff817045a4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 ==================================================== It's because that we don't do the right thing when checking if it's ok to tell lockdep that we're trying to release the rwsem. If the trans handle's type is TRANS_ATTACH, we won't acquire the freeze rwsem, but as TRANS_ATTACH fits the check (trans < TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK), we'll release the freeze rwsem, which makes lockdep complains a lot. Reported-by:
Ma Jianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
The 'git blame' history shows that, the old transaction commit code has to do twice to ensure roots are updated and we have to flush metadata and super block manually, however, right now all of these can be handled well inside the transaction commit code without extra efforts. And the error handling part remains same with the current code, -- 'return to caller once we get error'. This saves us a transaction commit and a flush of super block, which are both heavy operations according to ftrace output analysis. Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race. This is wrong because worker in this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed. Return -EINVAL instead. Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
This disables the "if needed, write the good copy back before the read is completed" part of the read sequence for read-only mounts. Cc: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
Currently if we discover an error when scrubbing in ro mode we a) blindly increment the uncorrectable_errors counter, and b) spam the dmesg with the 'unable to fixup (regular) error at ...' message, even though a) we haven't tried to determine if the error is correctable or not, and b) we haven't tried to fixup anything. Fix this. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we fsync, seek and write, rename and then fsync again we will lose the modified hole extent because the rename will drop all of the modified extents since we didn't do the fast search. We need to only drop the modified extents if we didn't do the fast search and we were logging the entire inode as we don't need them anymore, otherwise this is being premature. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we rename a file that is already in the log and we fsync again we will lose the new name. This is because we just log the inode update and not the new ref. To fix this we just need to check if we are logging the new name of the inode and copy all the metadata instead of just updating the inode itself. With this patch my testcase now passes. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We can just return false for this so we stop doing the snapshot aware defrag stuff. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Nov, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
3 of 4 callers actually want file_inode()... Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Heiko Carstens noticed that btrfs was using empty_zero_page incorrectly. He explained: The definition of empty_zero_page is architecture specific. It is (currently) either a character array, an unsigned long containing the address of the empty_zero_page, or even worse only the address of the struct page belonging to the empty_zero_page. This commit changes btrfs to use a for-loop instead. On x86 the resulting .ko is smaller, and we're no longer worrying about how each arch builds its zeros. Reported-by:
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 12 Nov, 2013 30 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for several times. It wasted time. We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages by a reasonable number. (Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe we can find a good way to improve it in the future.) Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We only allocate scrub workers if we pass all the necessary checks, for example, there are no operation in progress. Besides, move mutex lock protection outside of scrub_workers_get() /scrub_workers_put(). Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the problem was for bz 60834. If the first item in the leaf is an inline extent and we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off the end of the leaf. So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's not REG we can just break out. This should fix this problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Rashika authored
The function write_ctree_super() in disk-io.c uses variable ret to return the result of function write_all_supers(). Since, this variable serves no purpose, hence the patch removes it and returns the call of the called function. Reviewed-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the kernel style guidelines. Signed-off-by:
Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Replace kmalloc(size * nr, ) with kmalloc_array(nr, size), thus making it easier to check is that the calculation doesn't wrap or return a smaller allocation Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Enclose macros with complex values within parenthesis in accordance to checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Remove redundant local zero structure, replacing it by the kernel's global ZERO_PAGE. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Pack the structure btrfs_device in volumes.h to eliminate holes detected by pahole, thus reducing binary memory footprint. Signed-off-by:
-
Rashika authored
This patch replaces multiple atomic_inc() with atomic_add() in delayed-inode.c to reduce source code and have few instructions for compilation. Reviewed-by:
-
Rashika authored
The function free_root_pointers() in disk-io.h contains redundant code. Therefore, this patch adds a helper function free_root_extent_buffers() to free_root_pointers() to eliminate redundancy. Reviewed-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4528! RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01ac33b>] [<ffffffffa01ac33b>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+ 0x1eb/0x230 [btrfs] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01398c1>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x241/0x380 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0180bad>] ? copy_extent_buffer+0xad/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0139da1>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x3a1/0x520 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013a0b6>] btrfs_cow_block+0x116/0x1b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013ddad>] btrfs_search_slot+0x43d/0x970 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0153c57>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0172a5e>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x11e/0xae0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013b3fd>] ? generic_bin_search.constprop.39+0x8d/0x1a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8117d14a>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1da/0x200 [<ffffffffa0138e7a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0173ef0>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x60/0x90 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b24d>] relink_extent_backref+0x2ed/0x780 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0162fe0>] ? btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa01b8ed7>] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b909>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x229/0xac0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016c3b5>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cbe5>] worker_loop+0x125/0x4e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cac0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81075ea0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 [<ffffffff8164796c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It turns out to be that balance operation will bump root's @last_snapshot, which enables snapshot-aware defrag path, and backref walking stuff will find data reloc tree as refs' parent, and hit the BUG_ON() during COW. As data reloc tree's data is just for relocation purpose, and will be deleted right after relocation is done, it's unnecessary to walk those refs belonged to data reloc tree, it'd be better to skip them. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
If something wrong happens in write endio, running snapshot-aware defragment can end up with undefined results, maybe a crash, so we should avoid it. In order to share similar code, this also adds a helper to free the struct for snapshot-aware defrag. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
If we get any error while doing a dir index/item lookup in the log tree, we were always unlinking the corresponding inode in the subvolume. It makes sense to unlink only if the lookup failed to find the dir index/item, which corresponds to NULL or -ENOENT, and not when other errors happen (like a transient -ENOMEM or -EIO). Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
We were setting the csums search offset and length to the right values if the extent is compressed, but later on right before doing the csums lookup we were overriding these two parameters regardless of compression being set or not for the extent. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
We were ignoring the name component of the dir_item. Both the name and data must fit within BTRFS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE(root). Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Originally, we introduced scrub_super_lock to synchronize tree log code with scrubbing super. However we can replace scrub_super_lock with device_list_mutex, because writing super will hold this mutex, this will reduce an extra lock holding when writing supers in sync log code. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
After running space balance on a new fs, the fs check program outputed the following warning message: free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache generation (20) Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> # mount <dev> <mnt> # btrfs balance start <mnt> # umount <mnt> # btrfs check <dev> It was because there was no data space after the space balance, and the free space write out task didn't try to allocate a new data chunk for the free space inode when doing the reservation. So the data space reservation failed, and in order to tell the free space loader that this free space inode could not be trusted, the generation of the free space inode wasn't updated. Then the check program found this problem and outputed the above message. But in fact, it is safe that we try to allocate a new data chunk when we find the data space is not enough. The patch fixes the above problem by this way. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to relocate the larger the file system got. This appeared to be because we were committing the transaction _constantly_. There were a few places where we do braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction. We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false so we always committed the transaction in this case. I tested this to make sure it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
When using delalloc workers in a non-waiting way (like for enospc handling) we can end up not actually waiting for the dirty pages to be started if we have compression. We need to add an extra filemap flush to make sure any async extents that have started are actually moved along before returning. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported a list corruption warning from btrfs_remove_ordered_extent, it is because we aren't taking the ordered_root_lock when we remove the inode from the ordered operations list. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is just the write path, the only reason we start a transaction is so we can check cross references, we don't make any actual changes, so there is no reason to abort the transaction if we fail. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
