Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 05 Nov, 2012 3 commits
    • Colin Cross's avatar
      ARM: OMAP4: retrigger localtimers after re-enabling gic · cd8ce159
      Colin Cross authored 
      'Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX gic control'
register change disables the gic distributor while the secondary
cpu is being booted.  If a localtimer interrupt on the primary cpu
occurs when the distributor is turned off, the interrupt is lost,
and the localtimer never fires again.

Make the primary cpu wait for the secondary cpu to reenable the
gic distributor (with interrupts off for safety), and then
check if the pending bit is set in the localtimer but not the
gic.  If so, ack it in the localtimer, and reset the timer with
the minimum timeout to trigger a new timer interrupt.
Signed-off-by: default avatarColin Cross <ccross@android.com>
[s-jan@ti.com: adapted to k3.4 + validated functionality]
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastien Jan <s-jan@ti.com>
[t-kristo@ti.com: dropped generic ARM kernel exports from the code, rebased
 to mainline]
Signed-off-by: default avatarTero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      cd8ce159
    • Santosh Shilimkar's avatar
      ARM: OMAP4460: Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX GIC control register change. · ff999b8a
      Santosh Shilimkar authored 
      On OMAP4+ devices, GIC register context is lost when MPUSS hits
the OSWR(Open Switch Retention). On the CPU wakeup path, ROM code
gets executed and one of the steps in it is to restore the
saved context of the GIC. The ROM Code GIC distributor restoration
is split in two parts: CPU specific register done by each CPU and
common register done by only one CPU.

Below is the abstract flow.

...............................................................
- MPUSS in OSWR state.
- CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code.

[..]

- CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:"

[...]

- CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code.

[...]

- CPU0 is online in OS
- CPU0 enables the GIC distributor. GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1
- CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock-domain force wakeup method.
- CPU0 continues it's execution.
[..]

- CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code.

[..]

- CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:"

[..]

- CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code.

[...]

- CPU1 is online in OS and start executing.
[...]   -

GIC Restoration: /* Common routine for HS and GP devices */
{
       if (GICD != 1)  { /* This will be true in OSWR state */
               if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED)
                       - CPU restores GIC distributor
               else
                       - reconfigure GIC distributor to boot values.

               GICD.Enable secure = 1
       }

       if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED)
               - CPU restore its GIC CPU interface registers if saved.
       else
               - reconfigure its GIC CPU interface registers to boot
                       values.
}
...............................................................

So as mentioned in the flow, GICD != 1 condition decides how
the GIC registers are handled in ROM code wakeup path from
OSWR. As evident from the flow, ROM code relies on the entire
GICD register value and not specific register bits.

The assumption was valid till CortexA9 r1pX version since there
was only one banked bit to control secure and non-secure GICD.
Secure view which ROM code sees:
       bit 0 == Enable Non-secure
Non-secure view which HLOS sees:
       bit 0 == Enable secure

But GICD register has changed between CortexA9 r1pX and r2pX.
On r2pX GICD register is composed of 2 bits.
Secure view which ROM code sees:
       bit 1 == Enable Non-secure
       bit 0 == Enable secure
Non-secure view which HLOS sees:
       bit 0 == Enable Non-secure

Hence on OMAP4460(r2pX) devices, if you go through the
above flow again during CPU1 wakeup, GICD == 3 and hence
ROM code fails to understand the real wakeup power state
and reconfigures GIC distributor to boot values. This is
nasty since you loose the entire interrupt controller
context in a live system.

The ROM code fix done on next OMAP4 device (OMAP4470 - r2px) is to
check "GICD.Enable secure != 1" for GIC restoration in OSWR wakeup path.

Since ROM code can't be fixed on OMAP4460 devices, a work around
needs to be implemented. As evident from the flow, as long as
CPU1 sees GICD == 1 in it's wakeup path from OSWR, the issue
won't happen. Below is the flow with the work-around.

...............................................................
- MPUSS in OSWR state.
- CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code.

[..]

- CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:"

[..]

- CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code.

[..]

- CPU0 is online in OS.
- CPU0 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 0
- CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock domain force wakeup method.
- CPU0 waits for GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1
- CPU0 coninues it's execution.
[..]

- CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code.

[..]

- CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:"

[..]

- CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code.

[..]

- CPU1 is online in OS
- CPU1 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1
- CPU1 start executing
[...]
...............................................................

With this procedure, the GIC configuration done between the
CPU0 wakeup and CPU1 wakeup will not be lost but during this
short windows, the CPU0 will not receive interrupts.

The BUG is applicable to only OMAP4460(r2pX) devices.
OMAP4470 (also r2pX) is not affected by this bug because
ROM code has been fixed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      ff999b8a
    • Tero Kristo's avatar
      ARM: OMAP4: PM: add errata support · c9621844
      Tero Kristo authored 
      Added similar PM errata flag support as omap3 has. This should be used
in similar manner, set the flags during init time, and check the flag
values during runtime.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      c9621844
  3. 04 Nov, 2012 1 commit
  5. 03 Nov, 2012 15 commits
  7. 02 Nov, 2012 21 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7