- 31 Jan, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Su Yue authored
Check item size before accessing the device item to avoid out of bound access, similar to inode_item check. Signed-off-by:
Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Su Yue authored
while mounting the crafted image, out-of-bounds access happens: [350.429619] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/btrfs/struct-funcs.c:161:1 [350.429636] index 1048096 is out of range for type 'page *[16]' [350.429650] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1 [350.429652] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [350.429653] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [350.429772] Call Trace: [350.429774] <TASK> [350.429776] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c [350.429780] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50 [350.429786] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x66/0x70 [350.429791] btrfs_get_16+0xfd/0x120 [btrfs] [350.429832] check_leaf+0x754/0x1a40 [btrfs] [350.429874] ? filemap_read+0x34a/0x390 [350.429878] ? load_balance+0x175/0xfc0 [350.429881] validate_extent_buffer+0x244/0x310 [btrfs] [350.429911] btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer+0xf8/0x100 [btrfs] [350.429935] end_bio_extent_readpage+0x3af/0x850 [btrfs] [350.429969] ? newidle_balance+0x259/0x480 [350.429972] end_workqueue_fn+0x29/0x40 [btrfs] [350.429995] btrfs_work_helper+0x71/0x330 [btrfs] [350.430030] ? __schedule+0x2fb/0xa40 [350.430033] process_one_work+0x1f6/0x400 [350.430035] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430036] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 [350.430037] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400 [350.430038] kthread+0x165/0x190 [350.430041] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [350.430043] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [350.430047] </TASK> [350.430077] BTRFS warning (device loop0): bad eb member start: ptr 0xffe20f4e start 20975616 member offset 4293005178 size 2 check_leaf() is checking the leaf: corrupt leaf: root=4 block=29396992 slot=1, bad key order, prev (16140901064495857664 1 0) current (1 204 12582912) leaf 29396992 items 6 free space 3565 generation 6 owner DEV_TREE leaf 29396992 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 fs uuid a62e00e8-e94e-4200-8217-12444de93c2e chunk uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 item 0 key (16140901064495857664 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3955 itemsize 40 generation 0 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 17592186044416 block group 0 mode 52667 links 33 uid 0 gid 2104132511 rdev 94223634821136 sequence 100305 flags 0x2409000a(none) atime 0.0 (1970-01-01 08:00:00) ctime 2973280098083405823.4294967295 (-269783007-01-01 21:37:03) mtime 18446744071572723616.4026825121 (1902-04-16 12:40:00) otime 9249929404488876031.4294967295 (622322949-04-16 04:25:58) item 1 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 12582912) itemoff 3907 itemsize 48 dev extent chunk_tree 3 chunk_objectid 256 chunk_offset 12582912 length 8388608 chunk_tree_uuid cecbd0f7-9ca0-441e-ae9f-f782f9732bd8 The corrupted leaf of device tree has an inode item. The leaf passed checksum and others checks in validate_extent_buffer until check_leaf_item(). Because of the key type BTRFS_INODE_ITEM, check_inode_item() is called even we are in the device tree. Since the item offset + sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item) > eb->len, out-of-bounds access is triggered. The item end vs leaf boundary check has been done before check_leaf_item(), so fix it by checking item size in check_inode_item() before access of the inode item in extent buffer. Other check functions except check_dev_item() in check_leaf_item() have their item size checks. The commit for check_dev_item() is followed. No regression observed during running fstests. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ CC: Wenqing Liu <wenqingliu0120@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki authored
Quota disable ioctl starts a transaction before waiting for the qgroup rescan worker completes. However, this wait can be infinite and results in deadlock because of circular dependency among the quota disable ioctl, the qgroup rescan worker and the other task with transaction such as block group relocation task. The deadlock happens with the steps following: 1) Task A calls ioctl to disable quota. It starts a transaction and waits for qgroup rescan worker completes. 2) Task B such as block group relocation task starts a transaction and joins to the transaction that task A started. Then task B commits to the transaction. In this commit, task B waits for a commit by task A. 3) Task C as the qgroup rescan worker starts its job and starts a transaction. In this transaction start, task C waits for completion of the transaction that task A started and task B committed. This deadlock was found with fstests test case btrfs/115 and a zoned null_blk device. The test case enables and disables quota, and the block group reclaim was triggered during the quota disable by chance. The deadlock was also observed by running quota enable and disable in parallel with 'btrfs balance' command on regular null_blk devices. An example report of the deadlock: [372.469894] INFO: task kworker/u16:6:103 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [372.479944] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.485067] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.493898] task:kworker/u16:6 state:D stack: 0 pid: 103 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.503285] Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [372.510782] Call Trace: [372.514092] <TASK> [372.521684] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.530104] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.538842] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.547092] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.555591] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.561894] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x18bb/0x2610 [btrfs] [372.570506] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [372.578875] ? free_unref_page+0x3f2/0x650 [372.585484] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.591594] ? release_extent_buffer+0x224/0x420 [btrfs] [372.599264] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xc13/0x10c0 [btrfs] [372.607157] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [372.613054] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extent+0xda0/0xda0 [btrfs] [372.620960] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [372.627137] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.633215] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [372.639404] btrfs_work_helper+0x1ae/0xa90 [btrfs] [372.646268] process_one_work+0x7e9/0x1320 [372.652321] ? lock_release+0x6d0/0x6d0 [372.658081] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 [372.664513] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [372.670529] worker_thread+0x59e/0xf90 [372.676172] ? process_one_work+0x1320/0x1320 [372.682440] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [372.687550] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [372.693811] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [372.700052] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [372.705517] </TASK> [372.709747] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2347 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [372.729827] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [372.745907] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [372.767106] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid: 2347 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [372.787776] Call Trace: [372.801652] <TASK> [372.812961] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [372.830011] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [372.852547] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [372.871761] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [372.886792] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [372.901685] wait_current_trans+0x22c/0x310 [btrfs] [372.919743] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x3d0/0x3d0 [btrfs] [372.938923] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [372.959085] ? join_transaction+0xc75/0xe30 [btrfs] [372.977706] start_transaction+0x938/0x10a0 [btrfs] [372.997168] transaction_kthread+0x19d/0x3c0 [btrfs] [373.013021] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0xfc0/0xfc0 [btrfs] [373.031678] kthread+0x3b9/0x490 [373.047420] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.064645] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 [373.078571] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [373.091197] </TASK> [373.105611] INFO: task btrfs:3145 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.114147] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.120401] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.130393] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3145 ppid: 3141 flags:0x00004000 [373.140998] Call Trace: [373.145501] <TASK> [373.149654] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.155306] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.161965] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.168469] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [373.175468] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.180814] wait_for_commit+0x104/0x150 [btrfs] [373.187643] ? test_and_set_bit+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.194772] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.201191] ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x69/0x3d0 [btrfs] [373.208738] ? finish_wait+0x270/0x270 [373.214704] ? __btrfs_end_transaction+0x347/0x7b0 [btrfs] [373.222342] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x44d/0x2610 [btrfs] [373.230233] ? join_transaction+0x255/0xe30 [btrfs] [373.237334] ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] [373.245251] ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [373.253296] relocate_block_group+0x105/0xc20 [btrfs] [373.260533] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1270/0x1270 [373.267516] ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x85/0x180 [btrfs] [373.275155] ? merge_reloc_roots+0x710/0x710 [btrfs] [373.283602] ? btrfs_wait_ordered_extents+0xd30/0xd30 [btrfs] [373.291934] ? kmem_cache_free+0x124/0x550 [373.298180] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x35c/0x930 [btrfs] [373.306047] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x85/0x210 [btrfs] [373.313229] btrfs_balance+0x12f4/0x2d20 [btrfs] [373.320227] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.326206] ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x210/0x210 [btrfs] [373.333591] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.340031] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 [373.346910] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x548/0x700 [btrfs] [373.354207] btrfs_ioctl+0x7f2/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.360774] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.367957] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 [373.375327] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.383841] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.389993] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.395828] ? mntput_no_expire+0xf7/0xad0 [373.402083] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.408249] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.414486] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.420938] ? trace_raw_output_lock+0xb4/0xe0 [373.427442] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.434224] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.440660] ? force_qs_rnp+0x2a0/0x6b0 [373.446534] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x140 [373.452763] ? __blkcg_punt_bio_submit+0x1b0/0x1b0 [373.459732] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.466089] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.472022] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.477513] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.484823] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f4af7e2bb [373.490493] RSP: 002b:00007ffcbf936178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.500197] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f8f4af7e2bb [373.509451] RDX: 00007ffcbf936220 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.518659] RBP: 00007ffcbf93774a R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f8f4b02d4e0 [373.527872] R10: 00007f8f4ae87740 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [373.537222] R13: 00007ffcbf936220 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002 [373.546506] </TASK> [373.550878] INFO: task btrfs:3146 blocked for more than 123 seconds. [373.559383] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8 #7 [373.565748] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [373.575748] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid: 3146 ppid: 2168 flags:0x00000000 [373.586314] Call Trace: [373.590846] <TASK> [373.595121] __schedule+0xb56/0x4850 [373.600901] ? __lock_acquire+0x23db/0x5030 [373.607176] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x190/0x190 [373.613954] schedule+0xe0/0x270 [373.619157] schedule_timeout+0x168/0x220 [373.625170] ? usleep_range_state+0x150/0x150 [373.631653] ? mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0 [373.637767] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x250 [373.643993] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x17b/0x410 [373.651267] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [373.657677] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7e/0x100 [373.664103] wait_for_completion+0x163/0x250 [373.670437] ? bit_wait_timeout+0x160/0x160 [373.676585] btrfs_quota_disable+0x176/0x9a0 [btrfs] [373.683979] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0x12f0/0x12f0 [btrfs] [373.691340] ? down_write+0xd0/0x130 [373.696880] ? down_write_killable+0x150/0x150 [373.703352] btrfs_ioctl+0x3945/0x71b0 [btrfs] [373.710061] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [373.716192] ? lock_release+0x3a9/0x6d0 [373.722047] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x23cd/0x3050 [373.728486] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x20/0x20 [btrfs] [373.737032] ? set_pte+0x6a/0x90 [373.742271] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x1f0 [373.748506] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe4/0x140 [373.754792] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9f0/0x9f0 [373.761083] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x349/0x4e0 [373.767521] ? selinux_inode_getsecctx+0x80/0x80 [373.774247] ? __up_read+0x182/0x6e0 [373.780026] ? count_memcg_events.constprop.0+0x46/0x60 [373.787281] ? up_write+0x460/0x460 [373.792932] ? security_file_ioctl+0x50/0x90 [373.799232] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x190 [373.805237] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [373.810947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [373.818102] RIP: 0033:0x7f1383ea02bb [373.823847] RSP: 002b:00007fffeb4d71f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [373.833641] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1383ea02bb [373.842961] RDX: 00007fffeb4d7210 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000003 [373.852179] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000078 [373.861408] R10: 00007f1383daec78 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fffeb4d874a [373.870647] R13: 0000000000493099 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [373.879838] </TASK> [373.884018] Showing all locks held in the system: [373.894250] 3 locks held by kworker/4:1/58: [373.900356] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/63: [373.906333] #0: ffffffff8945ff60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260 [373.917307] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/103: [373.923938] #0: ffff888127b4f138 ((wq_completion)btrfs-qgroup-rescan){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x712/0x1320 [373.936555] #1: ffff88810b817dd8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x73f/0x1320 [373.951109] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x1f6/0x10c0 [btrfs] [373.964027] 2 locks held by less/1803: [373.969982] #0: ffff88813ed56098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x80 [373.981295] #1: ffffc90000b3b2e8 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: n_tty_read+0x9e2/0x1060 [373.992969] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/2347: [373.999893] #0: ffff88813d4887a8 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0xe3/0x3c0 [btrfs] [374.015872] 3 locks held by btrfs/3145: [374.022298] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xc3/0x700 [btrfs] [374.034456] #1: ffff88813d48a0a0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0xfe5/0x2d20 [btrfs] [374.047646] #2: ffff88813d488838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x354/0x930 [btrfs] [374.063295] 4 locks held by btrfs/3146: [374.069647] #0: ffff888102dd4460 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38b1/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.081601] #1: ffff88813d488bb8 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x38fd/0x71b0 [btrfs] [374.094283] #2: ffff888102dd4650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xc8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.106885] #3: ffff88813d489800 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_disable+0xd5/0x9a0 [btrfs] [374.126780] ============================================= To avoid the deadlock, wait for the qgroup rescan worker to complete before starting the transaction for the quota disable ioctl. Clear BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag before the wait and the transaction to request the worker to complete. On transaction start failure, set the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag again. These BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag changes can be done safely since the function btrfs_quota_disable is not called concurrently because of fs_info->subvol_sem. Also check the BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLE flag in qgroup_rescan_init to avoid another qgroup rescan worker to start after the previous qgroup worker completed. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Suggested-by:Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following super simple script would crash btrfs at unmount time, if CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT() is set. mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" $mnt/file umount $mnt mount -r ro $dev $mnt btrfs scrub start -Br $mnt umount $mnt This will trigger the following ASSERT() introduced by commit 0a31daa4 ("btrfs: add assertion for empty list of transactions at late stage of umount"). That patch is definitely not the cause, it just makes enough noise for developers. [CAUSE] We will start transaction for the following call chain during scrub: scrub_enumerate_chunks() |- btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() |- btrfs_join_transaction() However for RO mount, there is no running transaction at all, thus btrfs_join_transaction() will start a new transaction. Furthermore, since it's read-only mount, btrfs_sync_fs() will not call btrfs_commit_super() to commit the new but empty transaction. And leads to the ASSERT(). The bug has been there for a long time. Only the new ASSERT() makes it noisy enough to be noticed. [FIX] For read-only scrub on read-only mount, there is no need to start a transaction nor to allocate new chunks in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(). Just do extra read-only mount check in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), and if it's read-only, skip all chunk allocation and go inc_block_group_ro() directly. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When starting a defrag, we should update the writeback index of the inode's mapping in case it currently has a value beyond the start of the range we are defragging. This can help performance and often result in getting less extents after writeback - for e.g., if the current value of the writeback index sits somewhere in the middle of a range that gets dirty by the defrag, then after writeback we can get two smaller extents instead of a single, larger extent. We used to have this before the refactoring in 5.16, but it was removed without any reason to do so. Originally it was added in kernel 3.1, by commit 2a0f7f57 ("Btrfs: fix recursive auto-defrag"), in order to fix a loop with autodefrag resulting in dirtying and writing pages over and over, but some testing on current code did not show that happening, at least with the test described in that commit. So add back the behaviour, as at the very least it is a nice to have optimization. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
A defrag operation can dirty a lot of pages, specially if operating on the entire file or a large file range. Any task dirtying pages should periodically call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(), as stated in that function's comments, otherwise they can leave too many dirty pages in the system. This is what we did before the refactoring in 5.16, and it should have remained, just like in the buffered write path and relocation. So restore that behaviour. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When defragging we can end up collecting a range for defrag that has already pages under delalloc (dirty), as long as the respective extent map for their range is not mapped to a hole, a prealloc extent or the extent map is from an old generation. Most of the time that is harmless from a functional perspective at least, however it can result in a deadlock: 1) At defrag_collect_targets() we find an extent map that meets all requirements but there's delalloc for the range it covers, and we add its range to list of ranges to defrag; 2) The defrag_collect_targets() function is called at defrag_one_range(), after it locked a range that overlaps the range of the extent map; 3) At defrag_one_range(), while the range is still locked, we call defrag_one_locked_target() for the range associated to the extent map we collected at step 1); 4) Then finally at defrag_one_locked_target() we do a call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(), which will reserve data and metadata space. If the space reservations can not be satisfied right away, the flusher might be kicked in and start flushing delalloc and wait for the respective ordered extents to complete. If this happens we will deadlock, because both flushing delalloc and finishing an ordered extent, requires locking the range in the inode's io tree, which was already locked at defrag_collect_targets(). So fix this by skipping extent maps for which there's already delalloc. Fixes: eb793cf8 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to collect target file extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
- 19 Jan, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] After commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") autodefrag no longer properly re-defrag the file from previously finished location. [CAUSE] The recent refactoring of defrag only focuses on defrag ioctl subpage support, doesn't take autodefrag into consideration. There are two problems involved which prevents autodefrag to restart its scan: - No range.start update Previously when one defrag target is found, range->start will be updated to indicate where next search should start from. But now btrfs_defrag_file() doesn't update it anymore, making all autodefrag to rescan from file offset 0. This would also make autodefrag to mark the same range dirty again and again, causing extra IO. - No proper quick exit for defrag_one_cluster() Currently if we reached or exceed @max_sectors limit, we just exit defrag_one_cluster(), and let next defrag_one_cluster() call to do a quick exit. This makes @cur increase, thus no way to properly know which range is defragged and which range is skipped. [FIX] The fix involves two modifications: - Update range->start to next cluster start This is a little different from the old behavior. Previously range->start is updated to the next defrag target. But in the end, the behavior should still be pretty much the same, as now we skip to next defrag target inside btrfs_defrag_file(). Thus if auto-defrag determines to re-scan, then we still do the skip, just at a different timing. - Make defrag_one_cluster() to return >0 to indicate a quick exit So that btrfs_defrag_file() can also do a quick exit, without increasing @cur to the range end, and re-use @cur to update @range->start. - Add comment for btrfs_defrag_file() to mention the range->start update Currently only autodefrag utilize this behavior, as defrag ioctl won't set @max_to_defrag parameter, thus unless interrupted it will always try to defrag the whole range. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There are users using autodefrag mount option reporting obvious increase in IO: > If I compare the write average (in total, I don't have it per process) > when taking idle periods on the same machine: > Linux 5.16: > without autodefrag: ~ 10KiB/s > with autodefrag: between 1 and 2MiB/s. > > Linux 5.15: > with autodefrag:~ 10KiB/s (around the same as without > autodefrag on 5.16) [CAUSE] When autodefrag mount option is enabled, btrfs_defrag_file() will be called with @max_sectors = BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH (1024) to limit how many sectors we can defrag in one try. And then use the number of sectors defragged to determine if we need to re-defrag. But commit b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") uses wrong unit to increase @sectors_defragged, which should be in unit of sector, not byte. This means, if we have defragged any sector, then @sectors_defragged will be >= sectorsize (normally 4096), which is larger than BTRFS_DEFRAG_BATCH. This makes the @max_sectors check in defrag_one_cluster() to underflow, rendering the whole @max_sectors check useless. Thus causing way more IO for autodefrag mount options, as now there is no limit on how many sectors can really be defragged. [FIX] Fix the problems by: - Use sector as unit when increasing @sectors_defragged - Include @sectors_defragged > @max_sectors case to break the loop - Add extra comment on the return value of btrfs_defrag_file() Reported-by:
Anthony Ruhier <aruhier@mailbox.org> Fixes: b18c3ab2 ("btrfs: defrag: introduce helper to defrag one cluster") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0a269612-e43f-da22-c5bc-b34b1b56ebe8@mailbox.org/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
During defrag, at btrfs_defrag_file(), we have this loop that iterates over a file range in steps no larger than 256K subranges. If the range is too long, there's no way to interrupt it. So make the loop check in each iteration if there's signal pending, and if there is, break and return -AGAIN to userspace. Before kernel 5.16, we used to allow defrag to be cancelled through a signal, but that was lost with commit 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()"). This change adds back the possibility to cancel a defrag with a signal and keeps the same semantics, returning -EAGAIN to user space (and not the usually more expected -EINTR). This is also motivated by a recent bug on 5.16 where defragging a 1 byte file resulted in iterating from file range 0 to (u64)-1, as hitting the bug triggered a too long loop, basically requiring one to reboot the machine, as it was not possible to cancel defrag. Fixes: 7b508037 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When attempting to defrag a file with a single byte, we can end up in a too long loop, which is nearly infinite because at btrfs_defrag_file() we end up with the variable last_byte assigned with a value of 18446744073709551615 (which is (u64)-1). The problem comes from the fact we end up doing: last_byte = round_up(last_byte, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1; So if last_byte was assigned 0, which is i_size - 1, we underflow and end up with the value 18446744073709551615. This is trivial to reproduce and the following script triggers it: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT echo -n "X" > $MNT/foobar btrfs filesystem defragment $MNT/foobar umount $MNT So fix this by not decrementing last_byte by 1 before doing the sector size round up. Also, to make it easier to follow, make the round up right after computing last_byte. Reported-by:
-
- 07 Jan, 2022 29 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Print extra information about how many dirty bytes an uncommitted has at the end of mount. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we extended the size of a swapfile after its header was created (by the mkswap utility) and then try to activate it, we will map the entire file when activating the swap file, instead of limiting to the max size defined in the swap file's header. Currently test case generic/643 from fstests fails because we do not respect that size limit defined in the swap file's header. So fix this by not mapping file ranges beyond the max size defined in the swap header. This is the same type of bug that iomap used to have, and was fixed in commit 36ca7943 ("mm/swap: consider max pages in iomap_swapfile_add_extent"). Fixes: ed46ff3d ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com Signed-off-by:
-
Yang Li authored
The warnings were found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is caused by using 'make W=1'. fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Function parameter or member 'bio_ctrl' not described in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'bio' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3210: warning: Excess function parameter 'prev_bio_flags' description in 'btrfs_bio_add_page' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Excess function parameter 'root' description in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1602: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes' Note: this is fixing only the warnings regarding parameter list, the first line is not strictly conforming to the kdoc format as the btrfs codebase does not stick to that and keeps the first line more free form (because it's only for internal use). Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Su Yue authored
btrfs_decompress_bio, the only caller of compression_decompress_bio gets type from @cb and passes it to compression_decompress_bio. However, compression_decompress_bio can get compression type directly from @cb. So remove the parameter and access it through @cb. No functional change. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When code modifying extent-io-tree get modified and got that selftest failed, it can take some time to pin down the cause. To make it easier to expose the problem, dump the extent io tree if the selftest failed. This can save developers debug time, especially since the selftest we can not use the trace events, thus have to manually add debug trace points. Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of btrfs_stripe() has similar problems of scrub_chunk(): - Duplicated and ambiguous @base argument Can be fetched from btrfs_block_group::bg. - Ambiguous argument @length It's again device extent length - Ambiguous argument @num The instinctive guess would be mirror number, but in fact it's stripe index. Fix it by: - Remove @base parameter - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len - Rename @num to @stripe_index Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The argument list of scrub_chunk() has the following problems: - Duplicated @chunk_offset It is the same as btrfs_block_group::start. - Confusing @length The most instinctive guess is chunk length, and one may want to delete it, but the truth is, it's the device extent length. Fix this by: - Remove @chunk_offset Use btrfs_block_group::start instead. - Rename @length to @dev_extent_len Also rename the caller to remove the ambiguous naming. - Rename @cache to @bg The "_cache" suffix for btrfs_block_group has been removed for a while. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently there is only one user for btrfs metadata readahead, and that's scrub. But even for the single user, it's not providing the correct functionality it needs, as scrub needs reada for commit root, which current readahead can't provide. (Although it's pretty easy to add such feature). Despite this, there are some extra problems related to metadata readahead: - Duplicated feature with btrfs_path::reada - Partly duplicated feature of btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix Btrfs already caches its metadata in buffer_radix, while readahead tries to read the tree block no matter if it's already cached. - Poor layer separation Metadata readahead works kinda at device level. This is definitely not the correct layer it should be, since metadata is at btrfs logical address space, it should not bother device at all. This brings extra chance for bugs to sneak in, while brings unnecessary complexity. - Dead code In the very beginning of scrub.c we have #undef DEBUG, rendering all the debug related code useless and unable to test. Thus here I purpose to remove the metadata readahead mechanism completely. [BENCHMARK] There is a full benchmark for the scrub performance difference using the old btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_path::reada. For the worst case (no dirty metadata, slow HDD), there could be a 5% performance drop for scrub. For other cases (even SATA SSD), there is no distinguishable performance difference. The number is reported scrub speed, in MiB/s. The resolution is limited by the reported duration, which only has a resolution of 1 second. Old New Diff SSD 455.3 466.332 +2.42% HDD 103.927 98.012 -5.69% Comprehensive test methodology is in the cover letter of the patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For scrub, we trigger two readaheads for two trees, extent tree to get where to scrub, and csum tree to get the data checksum. For csum tree we already trigger readahead in btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), by setting path->reada. But for extent tree we don't have any path based readahead. Add the readahead for extent tree as well, so we can later remove the btrfs_reada_add() based readahead. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In function scrub_stripe() we allocated two btrfs_path's, one @path for extent tree search and another @ppath for full stripe extent tree search for RAID56. This is totally umncessary, as the @ppath usage is completely inside scrub_raid56_parity(), thus we can move the path allocation into scrub_raid56_parity() completely. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The purpose of this function is to unlock all nodes in a btrfs path which are above 'lowest_unlock' and whose slot used is different than 0. As such it used slightly awkward structure of 'if' as well as somewhat cryptic "no_skip" control variable which denotes whether we should check the current level of skipability or no. This patch does the following (cosmetic) refactorings: * Renames 'no_skip' to 'check_skip' and makes it a boolean. This variable controls whether we are below the lowest_unlock/skip_level levels. * Consolidates the 2 conditions which warrant checking whether the current level should be skipped under 1 common if (check_skip) branch, this increase indentation level but is not critical. * Consolidates the 'skip_level < i && i >= lowest_unlock' and 'i >= lowest_unlock && i > skip_level' condition into a common branch since those are identical. * Eliminates the local extent_buffer variable as in this case it doesn't bring anything to function readability. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At ioctl.c:create_subvol(), when we fail to create a subvolume we always commit the transaction. In most cases this is a no-op, since all the error paths, except for one, abort the transaction - the only exception is when we fail to insert the new root item into the root tree, in that case we don't abort the transaction because we didn't do anything that is irreversible - however we end up committing the transaction which although is not a functional problem, it adds unnecessary rotation of the backup roots in the superblock and unnecessary work. So change that to commit a transaction only when no error happened, otherwise just call btrfs_end_transaction() to release our reference on the transaction. Reviewed-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
The ZNS specification defines a limit on the number of "active" zones. That limit impose us to limit the number of block groups which can be used for an allocation at the same time. Not to exceed the limit, we reuse the existing active block groups as much as possible when we can't activate any other zones without sacrificing an already activated block group in commit a85f05e5 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space"). However, the check is wrong in two ways. First, it checks the condition for every raid index (ffe_ctl->index). Even if it reaches the condition and "ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >= ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size" is met, there can be other block groups having enough space to hold ffe_ctl->num_bytes. (Actually, this won't happen in the current zoned code as it only supports SINGLE profile. But, it can happen once it enables other RAID types.) Second, it checks the active zone availability depending on the raid index. The raid index is just an index for space_info->block_groups, so it has nothing to do with chunk allocation. These mistakes are causing a faulty allocation in a certain situation. Consider we are running zoned btrfs on a device whose max_active_zone == 0 (no limit). And, suppose no block group have a room to fit ffe_ctl->num_bytes but some room to meet ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size (i.e. max_extent_size > num_bytes >= min_alloc_size). In this situation, the following occur: - With SINGLE raid_index, it reaches the chunk allocation checking code - The check returns true because we can activate a new zone (no limit) - But, before allocating the chunk, it iterates to the next raid index (RAID5) - Since there are no RAID5 block groups on zoned mode, it again reaches the check code - The check returns false because of btrfs_can_activate_zone()'s "if (raid_index != BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)" part - That results in returning -ENOSPC without allocating a new chunk As a result, we end up hitting -ENOSPC too early. Move the check to the right place in the can_allocate_chunk() hook, and do the active zone check depending on the allocation flag, not on the raid index. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Introduce a new hook for an extent allocator policy. With the new hook, a policy can decide to allocate a new block group or not. If not, it will return -ENOSPC, so btrfs_reserve_extent() will cut the allocation size in half and retry the allocation if min_alloc_size is large enough. The hook has a place holder and will be replaced with the real implementation in the next patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Allocating an extent from a block group can fail for various reasons. When an allocation from a dedicated block group (for tree-log or relocation data) fails, we need to unregister it as a dedicated one so that we can allocate a new block group for the dedicated one. However, we are returning early when the block group in case it is read-only, fully used, or not be able to activate the zone. As a result, we keep the non-usable block group as a dedicated one, leading to further allocation failure. With many block groups, the allocator will iterate hopeless loop to find a free extent, results in a hung task. Fix the issue by delaying the return and doing the proper cleanups. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND can only work on zoned devices, so it is redundant to check if the filesystem is zoned when REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND is set as the bio's bio_op. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Sink zone check into btrfs_repair_one_zone() so we don't need to do it in all callers. Also as btrfs_repair_one_zone() doesn't return a sensible error, make it a boolean function and return false in case it got called on a non-zoned filesystem and true on a zoned filesystem. Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer() will always be called with a NULL 'cache_ret' argument. As there's no need to check if we have a valid block_group passed in remove these checks. Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Encapsulate the inode lock needed for serializing the data relocation writes on a zoned filesystem into a helper. This streamlines the code reading flow and hides special casing for zoned filesystems. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
In the case of the seed device, the fsid can be different from the mounted sprout fsid. The userland has to read the device superblock to know the fsid but, that idea fails if the device is missing. So add a sysfs interface devinfo/<devid>/fsid to show the fsid of the device. For example: $ cd /sys/fs/btrfs/b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8 $ cat devinfo/1/fsid c44d771f-639d-4df3-99ec-5bc7ad2af93b $ cat devinfo/3/fsid b10b02a5-f9de-4276-b9e8-2bfd09a578a8 Though it's related to seeding, the name of the sysfs file is plain fsid as it matches what blkid says. A path to the device's fsid will aid scripting. Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Filipe reported a problem where sometimes he'd get an ENOSPC abort when running delayed refs with generic/619 and the free space tree enabled. This is partly because we do not reserve space for modifying the free space tree, nor do we have a block rsv associated with that tree. The delayed_refs_rsv tracks the amount of space required to run delayed refs. This means 1 modification means 1 change to the extent root. With the free space tree this turns into 2 changes, because modifying 1 extent means updating the extent tree and potentially updating the free space tree to either remove that entry or add the free space. Thus if we have the FST enabled, simply double the reservation size for our modification. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Filipe reported a problem where generic/619 was failing with an ENOSPC abort while running delayed refs, like the following BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 522920 at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1049 add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs] CPU: 3 PID: 522920 Comm: kworker/u16:19 Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc2-btrfs-next-106 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] RIP: 0010:add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs] RSP: 0000:ffffa65087fb7b20 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9131eeaa RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff8d62e26481b8 R08: ffffffff9ad97ce0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffe4 R13: ffff8d61c25fe688 R14: ffff8d61ebd88800 R15: ffff8d61ebd88a90 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d64ed400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa46a8b1000 CR3: 0000000148d18003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __btrfs_free_extent+0x516/0x950 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] flush_space+0x403/0x630 [btrfs] ? call_rcu_tasks_generic+0x50/0x80 ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0xb5/0x290 [btrfs] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x320 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5b0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 kthread+0x17c/0x1a0 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 There's a couple of reasons for this, but in generic/619's case the largest reason is because it is a very small file system, ad we do not reserve enough space for the global reserve. With the free space tree we now have the free space tree that we need to modify when running delayed refs. This means we need the global reserve to take this into account when it calculates the minimum size it needs to be. This is especially important for very small file systems. Fix this by adjusting the minimum global block rsv size math to include the size of the free space tree when calculating the size. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These two values were introduced in commit ff023aac ("Btrfs: add code to scrub to copy read data to another disk") as an optimization. But the truth is, block layer scheduler can do whatever it wants to merge/split bios to improve performance. Doing such "optimization" is not really going to affect much, especially considering how good current block layer optimizations are doing. Remove such old and immature optimization from our code. Since we're here, also change BUG_ON()s using these two macros to use ASSERT()s. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Use BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE and SZ_4K (minimal sectorsize) to calculate this value. And remove one stale comment on the value, in fact with recent subpage support, BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE * PAGE_SIZE is already beyond BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, just we don't use the full page. Also since we're here, update the BUG_ON() related to SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK to ASSERT(). As those ASSERT() are really only for developers to catch early obvious bugs, not to let end users suffer. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We only throttle the btrfs_truncate_inode_items if the root is SHAREABLE, which isn't set on the log root, which means this loop is unnecessary. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We reset this bool on every loop through the truncate loop, make this variable local to the loop. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have if (del_item) // do something else // something else if (del_item) // do yet another thing else // something else entirely back to back in btrfs_truncate_inode_items, collapse these two sets of if statements into one. Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
This is a logic correctness check, convert it into an ASSERT() instead of a BUG(). Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have a correctness BUG_ON() in btrfs_truncate_inode_items to make sure that we're always using min_type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY if new_size is > 0. Convert this to an ASSERT. Reviewed-by:
-
