This patch fixes the checkpatch issue by removing the Free Software
Foundation's mailing address from the sample GPL notice. Because the FSF
has changed address in the past, and may change again. Linux already
includes a copy of the GPL.
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

bcm2835-vchiq.c:
fixing WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Naik <abhijitnaik27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

bcm2835-vchiq.c:
fixing WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Naik <abhijitnaik27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "CHECK: Macro argument 'vol' may be
better as '(vol)' to avoid precedence issues."
Signed-off-by: Nathan Howard <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "WARNING: Prefer
subsystem eg: netdev]_info([subsystem]dev, ...
then dev_info(dev, ... then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ..."
Signed-off-by: Nathan Howard <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpatch.pl warning: "Block comments use * on subsequent lines."
Signed-off-by: Nathan Howard <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

A single line statement under an if clause doesn't require braces {}
Signed-off-by: Daniel Perez de Andres <danielperezdeandres@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The unwinding here isn't right.  We don't free gdev[0] and instead
free 1 step past what was allocated.  Also we can't allocate "dev" then
we should unwind instead of returning directly.

Fixes: 7b3ad5ab ("staging: Import the BCM2835 MMAL-based V4L2 camera driver.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Relational and logical operators evaluate to either true or false.
Explicit conversion is not needed so remove the ternary operator.
Done using coccinelle:

@r@
expression A,B;
symbol true,false;
binary operator b = {==,!=,&&,||,>=,<=,>,<};
@@
- (A b B) ? true : false
+ A b B
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to
simplify code.

Found with Coccinelle script:
@@
expression ptr;
position p;
statement s0, s1;
@@

ptr@p =
\(kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_ioremap\|usb_alloc_urb\|
alloc_netdev\|dev_alloc_skb\)(...)
... when != ptr

if (
(
+ !
ptr
- == NULL
)
) s0 else s1
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixed checkpath.pl erros "space prohibited after that open/close parenthesis" in vchiq_version.c file.
Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil <goudapatilk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The macro DIV_ROUND_UP performs the computation (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)).
It clarifies the divisor calculations. This occurence was detected using
the coccinelle script:

@@
expression e1;
expression e2;
@@
(
- ((e1) + e2 - 1) / (e2)
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(e1,e2)
|
- ((e1) + (e2 - 1)) / (e2)
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(e1,e2)
)
Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixed checkpatch.pl "missing a blank line after declarations" warning
messages in vc04_services module.
Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil <goudapatilk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Simplify function returns by merging assignment and return into
one command line.
Found with Coccinelle
@@
local idexpression ret;
expression e;
@@

-ret =
+return
     e;
-return ret;
Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Removes unnecessary blank lines after opening and before closing braces.
These instances were found by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Katie Dunne <kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The macro DIV_ROUND_UP performs the computation (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)).
It clarifies the divisor calculations. This occurence was detected using
the coccinelle script:

@@
expression e1;
expression e2;
@@
(
- ((e1) + e2 - 1) / (e2)
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(e1,e2)
|
- ((e1) + (e2 - 1)) / (e2)
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(e1,e2)
)
Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add spaces around operators -, *, ?:, >>, << to conform to kernel style.
These instances were found with checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Katie Dunne <kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add curly braces to if-statements for style compliance.
These cases are found by checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Katie Dunne <kdunne@mail.ccsf.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Put logical continuations on the next line;
remove useless parentheses;
and line up the tests.
Signed-off-by: Sreya Mittal <sreyamittal5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The patch adds spaces around binary operators as suggested by
checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The patch removes the explicit NULL comparison by replacing 'x!=NULL'
with 'x'. This issue was found by checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Added spaces around arithmetic operators (+, -, /), to fix the checkpatch
issue.
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Remove blank line after open braces, to fix the following checkpatch issue:

CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpatch warning about line being over 80 characters.
Signed-off-by: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpatch check notices by simplifying comparisons to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Change array index from the loop bound variable to loop index.
If a poll file fails to open for any intermediate device, all poll files with
fds of devices from 0 upto that device must be closed in the open_poll_files()
function. The current code only closes the poll file with the most recent fd
allocated, and at times tries to close the same file multiple times.

Detected by coccinelle:

@@
expression arr,ex1,ex2;
@@

for(ex1 = 0; ex1 < ex2; ex1++) { <...
  arr[
- ex2
+ ex1
  ]
  ...> }
Signed-off-by: sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

All the device names were being always leaked. Also,
illegal free was being called upon namelist[n] which
was coincidentally NULL. The pointer to dirent structures
must be individually freed before freeing the pointer array.

Coccinelle Script:
@@
expression arr,ex1,ex2;
@@

for(ex1 = 0; ex1 < ex2; ex1++) { <...
  arr[
- ex2
+ ex1
  ]
  ...> }
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Moved logical OR operator to previous line to fix the following
checkpatch issue:

CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line.
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Removed unnecessary parentheses around pointers to fix the following
checkpatch issues:

CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around padapter->xmitpriv
CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around padapter->recvpriv
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Matched function arguments alignment with its open parenthesis. This patch
fixes the following checkpatch issue:

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
Signed-off-by: Varsha Rao <rvarsha016@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to
simplify code.

Found with Coccinelle script:
@@
expression ptr;
position p;
statement s0, s1;
@@

ptr@p =
\(kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_ioremap\|usb_alloc_urb\|
alloc_netdev\|dev_alloc_skb\)(...)
... when != ptr

if (
(
+ !
ptr
- == NULL
)
) s0 else s1
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to
simplify code.

Found with Coccinelle script:
@@
expression ptr;
position p;
statement s0, s1;
@@

ptr@p =
\(kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_ioremap\|usb_alloc_urb\|
alloc_netdev\|dev_alloc_skb\)(...)
... when != ptr

if (
(
+ !
ptr
- == NULL
)
) s0 else s1
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to
simplify code.

Found with Coccinelle script:
@@
expression ptr;
position p;
statement s0;
@@

ptr@p =
\(kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_ioremap\|usb_alloc_urb\|
alloc_netdev\|dev_alloc_skb\)(...)
... when != ptr

if (
(
+ !
ptr
- == NULL
)
) s0
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Parentheses are not needed on the right side of assignment.

Additionally added space around '+'and '*' to remove
checkpatch issue, space required around '+' and '*'.

Parentheses Removed using the coccinelle script:
@@
binary operator bop = {+,-,>>,<<};
expression e, e1, e2;
@@

e =
-(
        e1 bop e2
-)
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixed checkpatch.pl "missing a blank line after declarations" waring
messages from rtl8188eu module.
Signed-off-by: Yamanappagouda Patil <goudapatilk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixes the endianness warning "restricted __le16 degrades to integer" by
converting __le16 to short before using it in bitmasks or in the
macro WLAN_FC_GET_STYPE.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Haas <sehaas@deebas.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c:564:37: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c:564:37:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] len
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_rx.c:564:37:    got restricted __be16 [usertype] <noident>
Signed-off-by: maomao xu <albert008.xu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Using typedef for a structure type is not suggested in Linux kernel coding
style guidelines. So remove typedef from structure tx_pending_t.
The typedef name is not used anywhere. All variables of this type are declared
using "struct tx_pending_t".
Also change the structure name to tx_pending since it is normally only
typedefs that have names that end in _t.
Signed-off-by: sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add a blank line after function declaration to fix the
checkpatch issue Please use a blank line after
function/struct/union/enum declarations.
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Remove blank lines to fix the checkpatch issue,
don't use multiple blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>