- 22 Feb, 2024 40 commits
-
-
Breno Leitao authored
hugetlb_madv_vs_map selftest was not part of the mm test-suite since we didn't have a fix for the problem it found. Now that the problem is already fixed (see previous commit), let's enable this selftest in the default test-suite. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240205191843.4009640-3-leitao@debian.orgSigned-off-by:
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Breno Leitao authored
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Restore the reservation", v2. This is a fix for a case where a backing huge page could stolen after madvise(MADV_DONTNEED). A full reproducer is in selftest. See https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240105155419.1939484-1-leitao@debian.org/ In order to test this patch, I instrumented the kernel with LOCKDEP and KASAN, and run the following tests, without any regression: * The self test that reproduces the problem * All mm hugetlb selftests SUMMARY: PASS=9 SKIP=0 FAIL=0 * All libhugetlbfs tests PASS: 0 86 FAIL: 0 0 This patch (of 2): Currently there is a bug that a huge page could be stolen, and when the original owner tries to fault in it, it causes a page fault. You can achieve that by: 1) Creating a single page echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages 2) mmap() the page above with MAP_HUGETLB into (void *ptr1). * This will mark the page as reserved 3) touch the page, which causes a page fault and allocates the page * This will move the page out of the free list. * It will also unreserved the page, since there is no more free page 4) madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) the page * This will free the page, but not mark it as reserved. 5) Allocate a secondary page with mmap(MAP_HUGETLB) into (void *ptr2). * it should fail, but, since there is no more available page. * But, since the page above is not reserved, this mmap() succeed. 6) Faulting at ptr1 will cause a SIGBUS * it will try to allocate a huge page, but there is none available A full reproducer is in selftest. See https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240105155419.1939484-1-leitao@debian.org/ Fix this by restoring the reserved page if necessary. These are the condition for the page restore: * The system is not using surplus pages. The goal is to reduce the surplus usage for this case. * If the VMA has the HPAGE_RESV_OWNER flag set, and is PRIVATE. This is safely checked using __vma_private_lock() * The page is anonymous Once this is scenario is found, set the `hugetlb_restore_reserve` bit in the folio. Then check if the resv reservations need to be adjusted later, done later, after the spinlock, since the vma_xxxx_reservation() might touch the file system lock. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240205191843.4009640-1-leitao@debian.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240205191843.4009640-2-leitao@debian.orgSigned-off-by:
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul Heidekrüger authored
Test that KASan can detect some unsafe atomic accesses. As discussed in the linked thread below, these tests attempt to cover the most common uses of atomics and, therefore, aren't exhaustive. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113259.3045705-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131210041.686657-1-paul.heidekrueger@tum.de/T/#uSigned-off-by:
Paul Heidekrüger <paul.heidekrueger@tum.de> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214055Acked-by:
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
"page_counter.h" does not need <linux/kernel.h>. <linux/limits.h> is enough to get LONG_MAX. Files that include page_counter.h are limited. They have been compile tested or checked. $ git grep page_counter\.h include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h: struct page_counter hugepage[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE]; --> all files that include it have been compile tested include/linux/memcontrol.h:#include <linux/page_counter.h> --> <linux/kernel.h> has been added, to be safe include/net/sock.h:#include <linux/page_counter.h> --> already include <linux/kernel.h> mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c:#include <linux/page_counter.h> mm/memcontrol.c:#include <linux/page_counter.h> mm/page_counter.c:#include <linux/page_counter.h> --> compile tested Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/adfdbe21c4d06400d7bd802868762deb85cae8b6.1706908921.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by:
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
T.J. Mercier authored
Before 388536ac291 ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive reclaim") we passed the number of pages for the reclaim request directly to try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages, which could lead to significant overreclaim. After 0388536a the number of pages was limited to a maximum 32 (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) to reduce the amount of overreclaim. However such a small batch size caused a regression in reclaim performance due to many more reclaim start/stop cycles inside memory_reclaim. The restart cost is amortized over more pages with larger batch sizes, and becomes a significant component of the runtime if the batch size is too small. Reclaim tries to balance nr_to_reclaim fidelity with fairness across nodes and cgroups over which the pages are spread. As such, the bigger the request, the bigger the absolute overreclaim error. Historic in-kernel users of reclaim have used fixed, small sized requests to approach an appropriate reclaim rate over time. When we reclaim a user request of arbitrary size, use decaying batch sizes to manage error while maintaining reasonable throughput. MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU used root - full reclaim pages/sec time (sec) pre-0388536a : 68047 10.46 post-0388536a : 13742 inf (reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 67352 10.51 MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU not used /uid_0 - 1G reclaim pages/sec time (sec) overreclaim (MiB) pre-0388536a : 258822 1.12 107.8 post-0388536a : 105174 2.49 3.5 (reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 233396 1.12 -7.4 MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU not used /uid_0 - full reclaim pages/sec time (sec) pre-0388536a : 72334 7.09 post-0388536a : 38105 14.45 (reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 72914 6.96 [tjmercier@google.com: v4] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240206175251.3364296-1-tjmercier@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202233855.1236422-1-tjmercier@google.com Fixes: 0388536a ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive reclaim") Signed-off-by:T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Acked-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by:
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com> Acked-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Efly Young <yangyifei03@kuaishou.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yajun Deng authored
These vma_merge() callers will pass mm, anon_vma and file, they all from the same vma. There is no need to pass three parameters at the same time. Pass vma instead of mm, anon_vma and file to vma_merge(), so that it can save two parameters. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203014632.2726545-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240125034922.1004671-2-yajun.deng@linux.dev/Signed-off-by:
Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev> Reviewed-by:
Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev> Signed-off-by:
-
Breno Leitao authored
The usage of run_vmtests.sh does not include hugetlb, which is a valid test category. Add the 'hugetlb' to the usage of run_vmtests.sh. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129115246.1234253-1-leitao@debian.orgSigned-off-by:
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> Reviewed-by:
Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
... and conditionally return to the caller if any PTE except the first one is writable. fork() has to make sure to properly write-protect in case any PTE is writable. Other users (e.g., page unmaping) are expected to not care. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-16-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's always ignore the accessed/young bit: we'll always mark the PTE as old in our child process during fork, and upcoming users will similarly not care. Ignore the dirty bit only if we don't want to duplicate the dirty bit into the child process during fork. Maybe, we could just set all PTEs in the child dirty if any PTE is dirty. For now, let's keep the behavior unchanged, this can be optimized later if required. Ignore the soft-dirty bit only if the bit doesn't have any meaning in the src vma, and similarly won't have any in the copied dst vma. For now, we won't bother with the uffd-wp bit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-15-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's implement PTE batching when consecutive (present) PTEs map consecutive pages of the same large folio, and all other PTE bits besides the PFNs are equal. We will optimize folio_pte_batch() separately, to ignore selected PTE bits. This patch is based on work by Ryan Roberts. Use __always_inline for __copy_present_ptes() and keep the handling for single PTEs completely separate from the multi-PTE case: we really want the compiler to optimize for the single-PTE case with small folios, to not degrade performance. Note that PTE batching will never exceed a single page table and will always stay within VMA boundaries. Further, processing PTE-mapped THP that maybe pinned and have PageAnonExclusive set on at least one subpage should work as expected, but there is room for improvement: We will repeatedly (1) detect a PTE batch (2) detect that we have to copy a page (3) fall back and allocate a single page to copy a single page. For now we won't care as pinned pages are a corner case, and we should rather look into maintaining only a single PageAnonExclusive bit for large folios. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-14-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We already read it, let's just forward it. This patch is based on work by Ryan Roberts. [david@redhat.com: fix the hmm "exclusive_cow" selftest] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13f296b8-e882-47fd-b939-c2141dc28717@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-13-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's prepare for further changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-12-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's use our handy new helper. Note that the implementation is slightly different, but shouldn't really make a difference in practice. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-11-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Tested-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's use our handy helper now that it's available on all archs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-10-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's provide pte_next_pfn(), independently of set_ptes(). This allows for using the generic pte_next_pfn() version in some arch-specific set_ptes() implementations, and prepares for reusing pte_next_pfn() in other context. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-9-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-8-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-7-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-6-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Tested-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-5-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Ryan Roberts authored
Patch series "mm/memory: optimize fork() with PTE-mapped THP", v3. Now that the rmap overhaul[1] is upstream that provides a clean interface for rmap batching, let's implement PTE batching during fork when processing PTE-mapped THPs. This series is partially based on Ryan's previous work[2] to implement cont-pte support on arm64, but its a complete rewrite based on [1] to optimize all architectures independent of any such PTE bits, and to use the new rmap batching functions that simplify the code and prepare for further rmap accounting changes. We collect consecutive PTEs that map consecutive pages of the same large folio, making sure that the other PTE bits are compatible, and (a) adjust the refcount only once per batch, (b) call rmap handling functions only once per batch and (c) perform batch PTE setting/updates. While this series should be beneficial for adding cont-pte support on ARM64[2], it's one of the requirements for maintaining a total mapcount[3] for large folios with minimal added overhead and further changes[4] that build up on top of the total mapcount. Independent of all that, this series results in a speedup during fork with PTE-mapped THP, which is the default with THPs that are smaller than a PMD (for example, 16KiB to 1024KiB mTHPs for anonymous memory[5]). On an Intel Xeon Silver 4210R CPU, fork'ing with 1GiB of PTE-mapped folios of the same size (stddev < 1%) results in the following runtimes for fork() (shorter is better): Folio Size | v6.8-rc1 | New | Change ------------------------------------------ 4KiB | 0.014328 | 0.014035 | - 2% 16KiB | 0.014263 | 0.01196 | -16% 32KiB | 0.014334 | 0.01094 | -24% 64KiB | 0.014046 | 0.010444 | -26% 128KiB | 0.014011 | 0.010063 | -28% 256KiB | 0.013993 | 0.009938 | -29% 512KiB | 0.013983 | 0.00985 | -30% 1024KiB | 0.013986 | 0.00982 | -30% 2048KiB | 0.014305 | 0.010076 | -30% Note that these numbers are even better than the ones from v1 (verified over multiple reboots), even though there were only minimal code changes. Well, I removed a pte_mkclean() call for anon folios, maybe that also plays a role. But my experience is that fork() is extremely sensitive to code size, inlining, ... so I suspect we'll see on other architectures rather a change of -20% instead of -30%, and it will be easy to "lose" some of that speedup in the future by subtle code changes. Next up is PTE batching when unmapping. Only tested on x86-64. Compile-tested on most other architectures. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231220224504.646757-1-david@redhat.com [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231218105100.172635-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com [3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230809083256.699513-1-david@redhat.com [4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231124132626.235350-1-david@redhat.com [5] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231207161211.2374093-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com This patch (of 15): Since the high bits [51:48] of an OA are not stored contiguously in the PTE, there is a theoretical bug in set_ptes(), which just adds PAGE_SIZE to the pte to get the pte with the next pfn. This works until the pfn crosses the 48-bit boundary, at which point we overflow into the upper attributes. Of course one could argue (and Matthew Wilcox has :) that we will never see a folio cross this boundary because we only allow naturally aligned power-of-2 allocation, so this would require a half-petabyte folio. So its only a theoretical bug. But its better that the code is robust regardless. I've implemented pte_next_pfn() as part of the fix, which is an opt-in core-mm interface. So that is now available to the core-mm, which will be needed shortly to support forthcoming fork()-batching optimizations. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240125173534.1659317-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-2-david@redhat.com Fixes: 4a169d61 ("arm64: implement the new page table range API") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fdaeb9a5-d890-499a-92c8-d171df43ad01@arm.com/Signed-off-by:Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Hao Ge authored
Change the type of file from int to bool because is_file_lru return bool Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131103802.122920-1-gehao@kylinos.cnSigned-off-by:
Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by:
-
Baolin Wang authored
Currently we will use 'cc->nr_freepages >= cc->nr_migratepages' comparison to ensure that enough freepages are isolated in isolate_freepages(), however it just decreases the cc->nr_freepages without updating cc->nr_migratepages in compaction_alloc(), which will waste more CPU cycles and cause too many freepages to be isolated. So we should also update the cc->nr_migratepages when allocating or freeing the freepages to avoid isolating excess freepages. And I can see fewer free pages are scanned and isolated when running thpcompact on my Arm64 server: k6.7 k6.7_patched Ops Compaction pages isolated 120692036.00 118160797.00 Ops Compaction migrate scanned 131210329.00 154093268.00 Ops Compaction free scanned 1090587971.00 1080632536.00 Ops Compact scan efficiency 12.03 14.26 Moreover, I did not see an obvious latency improvements, this is likely because isolating freepages is not the bottleneck in the thpcompact test case. k6.7 k6.7_patched Amean fault-both-1 1089.76 ( 0.00%) 1080.16 * 0.88%* Amean fault-both-3 1616.48 ( 0.00%) 1636.65 * -1.25%* Amean fault-both-5 2266.66 ( 0.00%) 2219.20 * 2.09%* Amean fault-both-7 2909.84 ( 0.00%) 2801.90 * 3.71%* Amean fault-both-12 4861.26 ( 0.00%) 4733.25 * 2.63%* Amean fault-both-18 7351.11 ( 0.00%) 6950.51 * 5.45%* Amean fault-both-24 9059.30 ( 0.00%) 9159.99 * -1.11%* Amean fault-both-30 10685.68 ( 0.00%) 11399.02 * -6.68%* Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6440493f18da82298152b6305d6b41c2962a3ce6.1708409245.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by:
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reviewed-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-13-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-12-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Also remove unneeded logging which isn't enabled. Skip a hugepage size if it has less free pages to avoid unnecessary failures. For examples, some systems may not have 1GB hugepage free. So skip 1GB for testing in this test instead of failing the entire test. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-11-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-9-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-8-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-7-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. I've done some cleanups as well. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-6-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-5-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Minor cleanups have also been included. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-4-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-3-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muhammad Usama Anjum authored
Patch series "conform tests to TAP format output", v2. This patch (of 12): Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. While at it, convert commenting style from // to /**/. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-2-usama.anjum@collabora.comSigned-off-by:
-
Suren Baghdasaryan authored
Current implementation of UFFDIO_MOVE fails to move zeropages and returns EBUSY when it encounters one. We can handle them by mapping a zeropage at the destination and clearing the mapping at the source. This is done both for ordinary and for huge zeropages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131175618.2417291-1-surenb@google.comSigned-off-by:
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Reported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202401300107.U8iMAkTl-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Nicolas Geoffray <ngeoffray@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Gomez authored
XArray multi-index entries do not keep track of the order stored once the entry is being marked as used with cmpxchg (conditionally replaced with NULL). Add a test to check the order is actually lost. The test also verifies the order and entries for all the tied indexes before and after the NULL replacement with xa_cmpxchg. Add another entry at 1 << order that keeps the node around and the order information for the NULL-entry after xa_cmpxchg. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-3-mcgrof@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Luis Chamberlain authored
Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Invalid cma_alloc() input scenarios - including excess allocation request should neither be counted as CMA_ALLOC_FAIL nor 'cma->nr_pages_failed' be updated when applicable with CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS. This also drops 'out' jump label which has become redundant. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240201023714.3871061-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by:
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christophe Leroy authored
Add a readable attribute in debugfs to trigger a W^X pages check at any time. To trigger the test, just read /sys/kernel/debug/check_wx_pages It will report FAILED if the test failed, SUCCESS otherwise. Detailed result is provided into dmesg. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e947fb1a9f3f5466344823e532d343ff194ae03d.1706610398.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.euSigned-off-by:
-
