- 15 Mar, 2023 6 commits
-
-
Naohiro Aota authored
The naming of space_info->active_total_bytes is misleading. It counts not only active block groups but also full ones which are previously active but now inactive. That confusion results in a bug not counting the full BGs into active_total_bytes on mount time. For a background, there are three kinds of block groups in terms of activation. 1. Block groups never activated 2. Block groups currently active 3. Block groups previously active and currently inactive (due to fully written or zone finish) What we really wanted to exclude from "total_bytes" is the total size of BGs #1. They seem empty and allocatable but since they are not activated, we cannot rely on them to do the space reservation. And, since BGs #1 never get activated, they should have no "used", "reserved" and "pinned" bytes. OTOH, BGs #3 can be counted in the "total", since they are already full we cannot allocate from them anyway. For them, "total_bytes == used + reserved + pinned + zone_unusable" should hold. Tracking #2 and #3 as "active_total_bytes" (current implementation) is confusing. And, tracking #1 and subtract that properly from "total_bytes" every time you need space reservation is cumbersome. Instead, we can count the whole region of a newly allocated block group as zone_unusable. Then, once that block group is activated, release [0 .. zone_capacity] from the zone_unusable counters. With this, we can eliminate the confusing ->active_total_bytes and the code will be common among regular and the zoned mode. Also, no additional counter is needed with this approach. Fixes: 6a921de5 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by:Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We do cache->space_info->counter += num_bytes; everywhere in here. This is makes the lines longer than they need to be, and will be especially noticeable when we add the active tracking in, so add a temp variable for the space_info so this is cleaner. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This flag only gets set when we're doing active zone tracking, and we're going to need to use this flag for things related to this behavior. Rename the flag to represent what it actually means for the file system so it can be used in other ways and still make sense. Reviewed-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
btrfs_can_activate_zone() returns true if at least one device has one zone available for activation. This is OK for the single profile, but not OK for DUP profile. We need two zones to create a DUP block group. Fix it by properly handling the case with the profile flags. Fixes: 265f7237 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by:
-
Sweet Tea Dorminy authored
Commit 1ec49744 ("btrfs: turn on -Wmaybe-uninitialized") exposed that on SPARC and PA-RISC, gcc is unaware that fscrypt_setup_filename() only returns negative error values or 0. This ultimately results in a maybe-uninitialized warning in btrfs_lookup_dentry(). Change to only return negative error values or 0 from fscrypt_setup_filename() at the relevant call site, and assert that no positive error codes are returned (which would have wider implications involving other users). Reported-by:
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/481b19b5-83a0-4793-b4fd-194ad7b978c3@roeck-us.net/Signed-off-by:
Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] During my scrub rework, I did a stupid thing like this: bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical; btrfs_submit_bio(fs_info, bio, stripe->mirror_num); Above bi_sector assignment is using logical address directly, which lacks ">> SECTOR_SHIFT". This results a read on a range which has no chunk mapping. This results the following crash: BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to find logical 11274289152 length 65536 assertion failed: !IS_ERR(em), in fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6387 Sure this is all my fault, but this shows a possible problem in real world, that some bit flip in file extents/tree block can point to unmapped ranges, and trigger above ASSERT(), or if CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is not configured, cause invalid pointer access. [PROBLEMS] In the above call chain, we just don't handle the possible error from btrfs_get_chunk_map() inside __btrfs_map_block(). [FIX] The fix is straightforward, replace the ASSERT() with proper error handling (callers handle errors already). Reviewed-by:Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 08 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
We can often end up inserting a block group item, for a new block group, with a wrong value for the used bytes field. This happens if for the new allocated block group, in the same transaction that created the block group, we have tasks allocating extents from it as well as tasks removing extents from it. For example: 1) Task A creates a metadata block group X; 2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0; 3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with a value of 32K. But that fails since the block group item was not yet inserted, and so on failure update_block_group_item() sets the "commit_used" field of the block group back to 0; 4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a "used" field having a value of 32K, but without updating the "commit_used" field in the block group, which remains with value of 0; 5) The two extents are freed from block X, so its "used" field changes from 32K to 0; 6) The transaction commit by task B continues, it enters btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups() which calls update_block_group_item() for block group X, and there it decides to skip the block group item update, because "used" has a value of 0 and "commit_used" has a value of 0 too. As a result, we end up with a block item having a 32K "used" field but no extents allocated from it. When this issue happens, a btrfs check reports an error like this: [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0 ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation (...) Fix this by making insert_block_group_item() update the block group's "commit_used" field. Fixes: 7248e0ce ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+ Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Mar, 2023 6 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
At btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() we are clearing the EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING bit on a 'flags' variable that was not initialized. This makes static checkers complain about it, so initialize the 'flags' variable before clearing the bit. In practice this has no consequences, because EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING should not be set when btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() is called, as an fsync locks the inode in exclusive mode, locks the inode's mmap semaphore in exclusive mode too and it always flushes all delalloc. Also add a comment about why we clear EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING on a copy of the flags of the split extent map. Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/Y%2FyipSVozUDEZKow@kili/ Fixes: db21370b ("btrfs: drop extent map range more efficiently") Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
We have a report, that the info message for block-group reclaim is crossing the 100% used mark. This is happening as we were truncating the divisor for the division (the block_group->length) to a 32bit value. Fix this by using div64_u64() to not truncate the divisor. In the worst case, it can lead to a div by zero error and should be possible to trigger on 4 disks RAID0, and each device is large enough: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/test/scratch[1234] -m raid1 -d raid0 btrfs-progs v6.1 [...] Filesystem size: 40.00GiB Block group profiles: Data: RAID0 4.00GiB <<< Metadata: RAID1 256.00MiB System: RAID1 8.00MiB Reported-by:Forza <forza@tnonline.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e99483.c11a58d.1863591ca52@tnonline.net/ Fixes: 5f93e776 ("btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Current btrfs_log_dev_io_error() increases the read error count even if the erroneous IO is a WRITE request. This is because it forget to use "else if", and all the error WRITE requests counts as READ error as there is (of course) no REQ_RAHEAD bit set. Fixes: c3a62baf ("btrfs: use chained bios when cloning") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
-
void0red authored
Even if the slot is already read out, we may still need to re-balance the tree, thus it can cause error in that btrfs_del_item() call and we need to handle it properly. Reviewed-by:
void0red <void0red@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently user space utilizes dev info ioctl to grab the info of a certain devid, this includes its device uuid. But the returned info is not enough to determine if a device is a seed. Commit a26d60de ("btrfs: sysfs: add devinfo/fsid to retrieve actual fsid from the device") exports the same value in sysfs so this is for parity with ioctl. Add a new member, fsid, into btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args, and populate the member with fsid value. This should not cause any compatibility problem, following the combinations: - Old user space, old kernel - Old user space, new kernel User space tool won't even check the new member. - New user space, old kernel The kernel won't touch the new member, and user space tool should zero out its argument, thus the new member is all zero. User space tool can then know the kernel doesn't support this fsid reporting, and falls back to whatever they can. - New user space, new kernel Go as planned. Would find the fsid member is no longer zero, and trust its value. Reviewed-by:
-
Boris Burkov authored
As reported by Filipe, there's a potential deadlock caused by using btrfs_search_forward on commit_root. The locking there is unconditional, even if ->skip_locking and ->search_commit_root is set. It's not meant to be used for commit roots, so it always needs to do locking. So if another task is COWing a child node of the same root node and then needs to wait for block group caching to complete when trying to allocate a metadata extent, it deadlocks. For example: [539604.239315] sysrq: Show Blocked State [539604.240133] task:kworker/u16:6 state:D stack:0 pid:2119594 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 [539604.241613] Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [539604.242673] Call Trace: [539604.243129] <TASK> [539604.243925] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.244797] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.245399] ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490 [539604.246111] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.246593] rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490 [539604.247290] ? rcu_barrier_tasks_trace+0x10/0x20 [539604.248090] __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150 [539604.248702] down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140 [539604.249280] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs] [539604.250097] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs] [539604.250915] btrfs_search_forward+0x59/0x460 [btrfs] [539604.251781] ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [539604.252476] caching_thread+0x1be/0x920 [btrfs] [539604.253167] btrfs_work_helper+0xf6/0x400 [btrfs] [539604.253848] process_one_work+0x24f/0x5a0 [539604.254476] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0 [539604.255166] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [539604.256047] kthread+0xf0/0x120 [539604.256591] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [539604.257212] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [539604.257822] </TASK> [539604.258233] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack:0 pid:2236474 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 [539604.259802] Call Trace: [539604.260243] <TASK> [539604.260615] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.261205] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.262000] ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490 [539604.262822] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.263374] rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490 [539604.266228] ? lock_acquire+0x160/0x310 [539604.266917] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.267996] ? lock_contended+0x19e/0x500 [539604.268720] __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150 [539604.269400] down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140 [539604.270057] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs] [539604.271129] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs] [539604.272372] btrfs_search_slot+0x143/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.273295] update_block_group_item+0x9e/0x190 [btrfs] [539604.274282] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1c4/0x4f0 [btrfs] [539604.275381] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x280 [539604.276390] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xee/0xed0 [btrfs] [539604.277391] ? lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x310 [539604.278080] ? start_transaction+0xcb/0x6c0 [btrfs] [539604.279099] transaction_kthread+0x142/0x1c0 [btrfs] [539604.279996] ? __pfx_transaction_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [539604.280673] kthread+0xf0/0x120 [539604.281050] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [539604.281496] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [539604.281966] </TASK> [539604.282255] task:fsstress state:D stack:0 pid:2236483 ppid:1 flags:0x00004006 [539604.283897] Call Trace: [539604.284700] <TASK> [539604.285088] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.285660] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.286175] btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress+0xf2/0x170 [btrfs] [539604.287342] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [539604.288450] find_free_extent+0xd93/0x1750 [btrfs] [539604.289256] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.289911] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs] [539604.290843] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs] [539604.291943] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs] [539604.292903] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs] [539604.293773] btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs] [539604.294595] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.295585] btrfs_update_device+0x71/0x1b0 [btrfs] [539604.296459] btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0xe0/0x340 [btrfs] [539604.297489] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x1bf/0x490 [btrfs] [539604.298335] find_free_extent+0x6fa/0x1750 [btrfs] [539604.299174] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.299950] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs] [539604.300918] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs] [539604.301797] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs] [539604.303017] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.303855] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs] [539604.304789] btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs] [539604.305611] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.306682] ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [539604.308198] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x17b/0x7a0 [btrfs] [539604.309254] lookup_extent_backref+0x43/0xd0 [btrfs] [539604.310122] __btrfs_free_extent+0xf8/0x810 [btrfs] [539604.310874] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.311724] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x17b/0x1d0 [btrfs] [539604.313023] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2ba/0x1260 [btrfs] [539604.314271] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x8f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [539604.315445] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.316706] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa2/0xed0 [btrfs] [539604.317855] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [539604.318544] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.319240] create_subvol+0x53d/0x6e0 [btrfs] [539604.320283] btrfs_mksubvol+0x4f5/0x590 [btrfs] [539604.321220] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x11b/0x180 [btrfs] [539604.322307] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc6/0x150 [btrfs] [539604.323295] btrfs_ioctl+0x9f7/0x33e0 [btrfs] [539604.324331] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.325137] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.325808] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [539604.326467] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [539604.327109] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [539604.327875] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [539604.328792] RIP: 0033:0x7f05a7babaeb This needs to use regular btrfs_search_slot() with some skip and stop logic. Since we only consider five samples (five search slots), don't bother with the complexity of looking for commit_root_sem contention. If necessary, it can be added to the load function in between samples. Reported-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7eKMD44Z1+=Kb-1RFMMeZpAm2fwyO59yeBwCcSOU80Pg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: c7eec3d9 ("btrfs: load block group size class when caching") Signed-off-by:
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by:
-
- 01 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Boris Burkov authored
Make it possible to see the distribution of size classes for block groups. Helpful for testing and debugging the allocator w.r.t. to size classes. The new stats can be found at the path: /sys/fs/btrfs/<FSID>/allocation/<bg-type>/size_class but they will only be non-zero for bg-type = data. Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Feb, 2023 26 commits
-
-
Thomas Weißschuh authored
Since commit ee6d3dd4 ("driver core: make kobj_type constant.") the driver core allows the usage of const struct kobj_type. Take advantage of this to constify the structure definitions to prevent modification at runtime. Reviewed-by:
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
The only user in the zoned remap code is gone now, so remove the argument. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
btrfs_record_physical_zoned relies on a bio->bi_bdev samples in the bio_end_io handler to find the reverse map for remapping the zone append write, but stacked block device drivers can and usually do change bi_bdev when sending on the bio to a lower device. This can happen e.g. with the nvme-multipath driver when a NVMe SSD sets the shared namespace bit. But there is no real need for the bdev in btrfs_record_physical_zoned, as it is only passed to btrfs_rmap_block, which uses it to pick the mapping to report if there are multiple reverse mappings. As zone writes can only do simple non-mirror writes right now, and anything more complex will use the stripe tree there is no chance of the multiple mappings case actually happening. Instead open code the subset of btrfs_rmap_block in btrfs_record_physical_zoned, which also removes a memory allocation and remove the bdev field in the ordered extent. Fixes: d8e3fb10 ("btrfs: zoned: use ZONE_APPEND write for zoned mode") Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Using Zone Append only makes sense for writes to the device, so check that in btrfs_use_zone_append. This avoids the possibility of artificially limited read size on zoned file systems. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
struct btrfs_bio has all the information needed for btrfs_use_append, so pass that instead of a btrfs_inode and file_offset. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Instead of digging into the bio_vec in submit_one_bio, set file_offset at bio allocation time from the provided parameter. This also ensures that the file_offset is available all the time when building up the bio payload. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
btrfs_ordered_extent->disk_bytenr can be rewritten by the zoned I/O completion handler, and thus in general is not a good idea to limit I/O size. But the maximum bio size calculation can easily be done using the file_offset fields in the btrfs_ordered_extent and btrfs_bio structures, so switch to that instead. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
In the search loop of the binary search function, we are doing a division by 2 of the sum of the high and low slots. Because the slots are integers, the generated assembly code for it is the following on x86_64: 0x00000000000141f1 <+145>: mov %eax,%ebx 0x00000000000141f3 <+147>: shr $0x1f,%ebx 0x00000000000141f6 <+150>: add %eax,%ebx 0x00000000000141f8 <+152>: sar %ebx It's a few more instructions than a simple right shift, because signed integer division needs to round towards zero. However we know that slots can never be negative (btrfs_header_nritems() returns an u32), so we can instead use unsigned types for the low and high slots and therefore use unsigned integer division, which results in a single instruction on x86_64: 0x00000000000141f0 <+144>: shr %ebx So use unsigned types for the slots and therefore unsigned division. This is part of a small patchset comprised of the following two patches: btrfs: eliminate extra call when doing binary search on extent buffer btrfs: do unsigned integer division in the extent buffer binary search loop The following fs_mark test was run on a non-debug kernel (Debian's default kernel config) before and after applying the patchset: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-O no-holes -R free-space-tree" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) FILE_SIZE=0 umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 6 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Results before applying patchset: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 174472.0 11549868 4 2400000 0 253503.0 11694618 4 3600000 0 257833.1 11611508 6 4800000 0 247089.5 11665983 6 6000000 0 211296.1 12121244 10 7200000 0 187330.6 12548565 Results after applying patchset: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 207556.0 11393252 4 2400000 0 266751.1 11347909 4 3600000 0 274397.5 11270058 6 4800000 0 259608.4 11442250 6 6000000 0 238895.8 11635921 8 7200000 0 211942.2 11873825 Reviewed-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
The function btrfs_bin_search() is just a wrapper around the function generic_bin_search(), which passes the same arguments plus a default low slot with a value of 0. This adds an unnecessary extra function call, since btrfs_bin_search() is not static. So improve on this by making btrfs_bin_search() an inline function that calls generic_bin_search(), renaming the later to btrfs_generic_bin_search() and exporting it. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
The only caller of scrub_rbio calls rbio_orig_end_io right after it, move it into scrub_rbio to match the other work item helpers. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Both callers of recover_rbio call rbio_orig_end_io right after it, so move the call into the shared function. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Both callers of rmv_rbio call rbio_orig_end_io right after it, so move the call into the shared function. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Instead of filling in a bio_list and submitting the bios in the only caller, do that in scrub_assemble_read_bios. This removes the need to pass the bio_list, and also makes it clear that the extra bio_list cleanup in the caller is entirely pointless. Rename the function to scrub_read_bios to make it clear that the bios are not only assembled. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
There is very little extra code in rmw_read_bios, and a large part of it is the superfluous extra cleanup of the bio list. Merge the two functions, and only clean up the bio list after it has been added to but before it has been emptied again by submit_read_wait_bio_list. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
There is very little extra code in recover_rbio, and a large part of it is the superfluous extra cleanup of the bio list. Merge the two functions, and only clean up the bio list after it has been added to but before it has been emptied again by submit_read_wait_bio_list. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Add a helper to put all bios in a list. This does not need to be added to block layer as there are no other users of such code. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
In addition to setting up the end_io handler and submitting the bios in submit_read_bios, also wait for them to be completed instead of waiting for the completion manually in all three callers. Rename submit_read_bios to submit_read_wait_bio_list to make it clear it waits for the bios as well. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Remove the write goto label by moving the data page allocation and data read into the branch. Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Handle the error return on alloc_rbio failure directly instead of using a goto and remove the queue_rbio goto label by moving the plugged check into the if branch. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is used in the tree-log code and is a holdover from previous iterations of extent buffer writeback. We can simply use wait_on_extent_buffer_writeback here, and remove btrfs_wait_tree_block_writeback completely as it's equivalent (waiting on page write writeback). Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty just does the test_clear_bit() and then calls clear_extent_buffer_dirty and does the dirty metadata accounting. Combine this into clear_extent_buffer_dirty and make the result btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
btrfs_clean_tree_block is a misnomer, it's just clear_extent_buffer_dirty with some extra accounting around it. Rename this to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty to make it more clear it belongs with it's setter, btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We only add if we set the extent buffer dirty, and we subtract when we clear the extent buffer dirty. If we end up in set_btree_ioerr we have already cleared the buffer dirty, and we aren't resetting dirty on the extent buffer, so this is simply wrong. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Now that we're passing in the trans into btrfs_clean_tree_block, we can easily roll in the handling of the !trans case and replace all occurrences of if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags)) clear_extent_buffer_dirty(eb); with btrfs_tree_lock(eb); btrfs_clean_tree_block(eb); btrfs_tree_unlock(eb); We need the lock because if we are actually dirty we need to make sure we aren't racing with anything that's starting writeout currently. This also makes sure that we're accounting fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes appropriately. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We check the header generation in the extent buffer against the current running transaction id to see if it's safe to clear DIRTY on this buffer. Generally speaking if we're clearing the buffer dirty we're holding the transaction open, but in the case of cleaning up an aborted transaction we don't, so we have extra checks in that path to check the transid. To allow for a future cleanup go ahead and pass in the trans handle so we don't have to rely on ->running_transaction being set. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We want to clean up the dirty handling for extent buffers so it's a little more consistent, so skip the check for generation == transid and simply always lock the extent buffer before calling btrfs_clean_tree_block. Signed-off-by:
-
