Commit 5da8fa1b authored by Igor Babaev's avatar Igor Babaev

Merge.

parents ad8ccccc c92d8cba
......@@ -571,6 +571,17 @@ f1
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
End of 5.1 tests
#
# LP bug:938518 HAVING does not reject the result of aggregation
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (pk INT PRIMARY KEY, a INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2,7), (4,7), (6,2), (17,0);
SELECT MIN(t.pk) FROM t1, t1 as t WHERE t1.pk = 1;
MIN(t.pk)
NULL
SELECT MIN(t.pk) FROM t1, t1 as t WHERE t1.pk = 1 HAVING MIN(t.pk) < 10;
MIN(t.pk)
drop table t1;
#
# LP bug #791761: MAX over an empty join + HAVING
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int , KEY (b)) ;
......@@ -594,3 +605,33 @@ SELECT MAX(t1.b) AS f FROM t1 JOIN t2 ON t2.a != 0
WHERE (SELECT f3 FROM t3) <> 0 HAVING f <> 6 ;
f
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3;
#
# LP bug:806955 HAVING not observed with aggregate +subquery
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (f3 int, f10 varchar(1), f11 int, KEY (f10) );
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL,'a',0),(8,'b',0);
CREATE TABLE t2 (f2 int);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (7);
CREATE TABLE t3 (f3 int);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (0),(8);
set @save_optimizer_switch=@@optimizer_switch;
set optimizer_switch='semijoin=off,materialization=off';
SELECT MIN( t1.f10 ) AS field1
FROM t1 , t2
WHERE t2.f2 IN ( SELECT f3 FROM t3 )
HAVING field1 < 's';
field1
explain extended
SELECT MIN( t1.f10 ) AS field1
FROM t1 , t2
WHERE t2.f2 IN ( SELECT f3 FROM t3 )
HAVING field1 < 's';
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows filtered Extra
1 PRIMARY t2 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 100.00
1 PRIMARY t1 index NULL f10 4 NULL 2 100.00 Using index
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t3 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 2 100.00 Using where
Warnings:
Note 1003 select min(`test`.`t1`.`f10`) AS `field1` from `test`.`t1` join `test`.`t2` where <expr_cache><7>(<in_optimizer>(7,<exists>(select `test`.`t3`.`f3` from `test`.`t3` where (<cache>(7) = `test`.`t3`.`f3`)))) having (`field1` < 's')
set optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
drop table t1,t2,t3;
End of 5.2 tests
......@@ -589,9 +589,17 @@ ORDER BY t1.f1;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
--echo End of 5.1 tests
--echo #
--echo # LP bug:938518 HAVING does not reject the result of aggregation
--echo #
CREATE TABLE t1 (pk INT PRIMARY KEY, a INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2,7), (4,7), (6,2), (17,0);
SELECT MIN(t.pk) FROM t1, t1 as t WHERE t1.pk = 1;
SELECT MIN(t.pk) FROM t1, t1 as t WHERE t1.pk = 1 HAVING MIN(t.pk) < 10;
drop table t1;
--echo #
--echo # LP bug #791761: MAX over an empty join + HAVING
--echo #
......@@ -616,3 +624,36 @@ SELECT MAX(t1.b) AS f FROM t1 JOIN t2 ON t2.a != 0
WHERE (SELECT f3 FROM t3) <> 0 HAVING f <> 6 ;
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3;
--echo #
--echo # LP bug:806955 HAVING not observed with aggregate +subquery
--echo #
CREATE TABLE t1 (f3 int, f10 varchar(1), f11 int, KEY (f10) );
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL,'a',0),(8,'b',0);
CREATE TABLE t2 (f2 int);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (7);
CREATE TABLE t3 (f3 int);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (0),(8);
set @save_optimizer_switch=@@optimizer_switch;
set optimizer_switch='semijoin=off,materialization=off';
SELECT MIN( t1.f10 ) AS field1
FROM t1 , t2
WHERE t2.f2 IN ( SELECT f3 FROM t3 )
HAVING field1 < 's';
explain extended
SELECT MIN( t1.f10 ) AS field1
FROM t1 , t2
WHERE t2.f2 IN ( SELECT f3 FROM t3 )
HAVING field1 < 's';
set optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
drop table t1,t2,t3;
--echo End of 5.2 tests
......@@ -5945,6 +5945,10 @@ int init_key_cache(KEY_CACHE *keycache, uint key_cache_block_size,
((PARTITIONED_KEY_CACHE_CB *) keycache_cb)->partitions :
0;
DBUG_ASSERT(partitions <= MAX_KEY_CACHE_PARTITIONS);
keycache->key_cache_mem_size=
keycache->partitions ?
((PARTITIONED_KEY_CACHE_CB *) keycache_cb)->key_cache_mem_size :
((SIMPLE_KEY_CACHE_CB *) keycache_cb)->key_cache_mem_size;
if (blocks > 0)
keycache->can_be_used= 1;
return blocks;
......@@ -6008,6 +6012,11 @@ int resize_key_cache(KEY_CACHE *keycache, uint key_cache_block_size,
((PARTITIONED_KEY_CACHE_CB *)(keycache->keycache_cb))->partitions;
}
keycache->key_cache_mem_size=
keycache->partitions ?
((PARTITIONED_KEY_CACHE_CB *)(keycache->keycache_cb))->key_cache_mem_size :
((SIMPLE_KEY_CACHE_CB *)(keycache->keycache_cb))->key_cache_mem_size;
keycache->can_be_used= (blocks >= 0);
}
return blocks;
......
......@@ -1032,7 +1032,6 @@ public:
virtual bool update_table_bitmaps_processor(uchar *arg) { return 0; }
virtual bool view_used_tables_processor(uchar *arg) { return 0; }
virtual bool eval_not_null_tables(uchar *opt_arg) { return 0; }
virtual bool clear_sum_processor(uchar *opt_arg) { return 0; }
virtual bool is_subquery_processor (uchar *opt_arg) { return 0; }
virtual bool limit_index_condition_pushdown_processor(uchar *opt_arg)
{
......
......@@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ public:
{
return trace_unsupported_by_check_vcol_func_processor(func_name());
}
bool clear_sum_processor(uchar *arg) { clear(); return 0; }
};
......
......@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int return_zero_rows(JOIN *join, select_result *res,
List<TABLE_LIST> &tables,
List<Item> &fields, bool send_row,
ulonglong select_options, const char *info,
Item *having);
Item *having, List<Item> &all_fields);
static COND *build_equal_items(THD *thd, COND *cond,
COND_EQUAL *inherited,
List<TABLE_LIST> *join_list,
......@@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ JOIN::exec()
send_row_on_empty_set(),
select_options,
zero_result_cause,
having ? having : tmp_having);
having ? having : tmp_having, all_fields);
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
......@@ -10440,7 +10440,7 @@ remove_const(JOIN *join,ORDER *first_order, COND *cond,
static int
return_zero_rows(JOIN *join, select_result *result, List<TABLE_LIST> &tables,
List<Item> &fields, bool send_row, ulonglong select_options,
const char *info, Item *having)
const char *info, Item *having, List<Item> &all_fields)
{
DBUG_ENTER("return_zero_rows");
......@@ -10470,9 +10470,15 @@ return_zero_rows(JOIN *join, select_result *result, List<TABLE_LIST> &tables,
if (!table->is_jtbm())
mark_as_null_row(table->table); // All fields are NULL
}
if (having &&
!having->walk(&Item::clear_sum_processor, FALSE, NULL) &&
having->val_int() == 0)
List_iterator_fast<Item> it(all_fields);
Item *item;
/*
Inform all items (especially aggregating) to calculate HAVING correctly,
also we will need it for sending results.
*/
while ((item= it++))
item->no_rows_in_result();
if (having && having->val_int() == 0)
send_row=0;
}
if (!(result->send_fields(fields,
......@@ -10480,13 +10486,7 @@ return_zero_rows(JOIN *join, select_result *result, List<TABLE_LIST> &tables,
{
bool send_error= FALSE;
if (send_row)
{
List_iterator_fast<Item> it(fields);
Item *item;
while ((item= it++))
item->no_rows_in_result();
send_error= result->send_data(fields) > 0;
}
if (!send_error)
result->send_eof(); // Should be safe
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment