Commit 62738bf9 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

BUG#29445 - match ... against () never returns

Part 2:
Searching fulltext index for a word with boolean mode truncation
operator may cause infinite loop.

The problem was that "smarter index merge" was used with "trunc-words",
which must never happen.

Affects 5.1 only.


mysql-test/r/fulltext.result:
  Addition to a test case for BUG#29445.
mysql-test/t/fulltext.test:
  Addition to a test case for BUG#29445.
storage/myisam/ft_boolean_search.c:
  Fulltext "smarter index merge" optimization assumes that rows
  it gets are ordered by doc_id. That is not the case when we
  search for a word with truncation operator. It may return
  rows in random order. Thus we may not use "smarter index merge"
  optimization with "trunc-words".
  
  Also fixed compiler warning introduced by Part 1 patch.
parent 847d6ed7
......@@ -485,7 +485,10 @@ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('Offside'),('City Of God');
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city of*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
a
City Of God
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city (of)*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city (of*)' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
a
City Of God
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city* of*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
a
City Of God
DROP TABLE t1;
......@@ -414,7 +414,8 @@ DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1(a VARCHAR(20), FULLTEXT(a));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('Offside'),('City Of God');
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city of*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city (of)*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city (of*)' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE MATCH a AGAINST ('+city* of*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);
DROP TABLE t1;
# End of 4.1 tests
......@@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
inside plus subtree. max_docid could be used by any word in plus
subtree, but it could be updated by plus-word only.
Fulltext "smarter index merge" optimization assumes that rows
it gets are ordered by doc_id. That is not the case when we
search for a word with truncation operator. It may return
rows in random order. Thus we may not use "smarter index merge"
optimization with "trunc-words".
The idea is: there is no need to search for docid smaller than
biggest docid inside current plus subtree or any upper plus subtree.
......@@ -443,7 +449,7 @@ static int _ft2_search(FTB *ftb, FTB_WORD *ftbw, my_bool init_search)
memcpy(lastkey_buf+off, info->lastkey, info->lastkey_length);
}
ftbw->docid[0]=info->lastpos;
if (ftbw->flags & FTB_FLAG_YES)
if (ftbw->flags & FTB_FLAG_YES && !(ftbw->flags & FTB_FLAG_TRUNC))
ftbw->max_docid_expr->max_docid= info->lastpos;
return 0;
}
......@@ -488,7 +494,7 @@ static void _ftb_init_index_search(FT_INFO *ftb)
{
if (ftbe->flags & FTB_FLAG_NO || /* 2 */
ftbe->up->ythresh - ftbe->up->yweaks >
test(ftbe->flags & FTB_FLAG_YES)) /* 1 */
(uint) test(ftbe->flags & FTB_FLAG_YES)) /* 1 */
{
FTB_EXPR *top_ftbe=ftbe->up;
ftbw->docid[0]=HA_OFFSET_ERROR;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment