Commit 9e279bde authored by unknown's avatar unknown

small fix for a bug introduced when someone made a new getopt scheme

in clients ...

parent af5f3f5f
...@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static struct my_option my_long_options[] = ...@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static struct my_option my_long_options[] =
(gptr*) &unbuffered, 0, GET_BOOL, NO_ARG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, (gptr*) &unbuffered, 0, GET_BOOL, NO_ARG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
{"column-names", OPT_COLUMN_NAMES, "Write column names in results.", {"column-names", OPT_COLUMN_NAMES, "Write column names in results.",
(gptr*) &column_names, (gptr*) &column_names, 0, GET_BOOL, (gptr*) &column_names, (gptr*) &column_names, 0, GET_BOOL,
NO_ARG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, NO_ARG, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
{"skip-column-names", 'N', {"skip-column-names", 'N',
"Don't write column names in results. WARNING: -N is depricated, use long version of this options instead.", "Don't write column names in results. WARNING: -N is depricated, use long version of this options instead.",
0, 0, 0, GET_NO_ARG, NO_ARG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 0, 0, 0, GET_NO_ARG, NO_ARG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment